Multifocal plane microscopy

Last updated

The schematic of a multifocal plane microscope Schematic diagram of a multifocal plane microscope.PNG
The schematic of a multifocal plane microscope

Multifocal plane microscopy (MUM), also known as multiplane microscopy or multifocus microscopy, is a form of light microscopy that allows the tracking of the 3D dynamics in live cells at high temporal and spatial resolution by simultaneously imaging different focal planes within the specimen. [1] [2] [3] [4] In this methodology, the light collected from the sample by an infinity-corrected objective lens is split into two paths. [5] In each path the split light is focused onto a detector which is placed at a specific calibrated distance from the tube lens. In this way, each detector images a distinct plane within the sample. The first developed MUM setup was capable of imaging two distinct planes within the sample. However, the setup can be modified to image more than two planes by further splitting the light in each light path and focusing it onto detectors placed at specific calibrated distances. It has later been improved for imaging up to four distinct planes. [6] [7] To image a greater number of focal planes, simpler techniques based on image splitting optics have been developed. One example is by using a customized image splitting prism, which is capable of capturing up to 8 focal planes using only two cameras. [8] Better yet, standard off-the-shelf partial beamsplitters can be used to construct a so-called z-splitter prism that allows simultaneous imaging of 9 individual focal planes using a single camera. [9] [10] Another technique called multifocus microscopy (MFM) uses diffractive Fourier optics to image up to 25 focal planes. [11] [12]

Contents

Introduction

Fluorescence microscopy of live cells represents a major tool in the study of trafficking events. The conventional microscope design is well adapted to image fast cellular dynamics in two dimensions, i.e., in the plane of focus. However, cells are three-dimensional objects and intracellular trafficking pathways are typically not constrained to one focal plane. If the dynamics are not constrained to one focal plane, the conventional single plane microscopy technology is inadequate for detailed studies of fast intracellular dynamics in three dimensions. Classical approaches based on changing the focal plane are often not effective in such situations since the focusing devices are relatively slow in comparison to many of the intracellular dynamics. In addition, the focal plane may frequently be at the wrong place at the wrong time, thereby missing important aspects of the dynamic events.

Implementation

MUM can be implemented in any standard light microscope. An example implementation in a Zeiss microscope is as follows. [13] A Zeiss dual-video adaptor is first attached to the side port of a Zeiss Axiovert 200 microscope. Two Zeiss dual-video adaptors are then concatenated by attaching each of them to the output ports of the first Zeiss video adaptor. To each of the concatenated video adaptor, a high resolution CCD camera is attached by using C-mount/spacer rings and a custom-machined camera coupling adaptor. The spacing between the output port of the video adaptor and the camera is different for each camera, which results in the cameras imaging distinct focal planes.

It is worth mentioning that there are many ways to implement MUM. The mentioned implementation offers several advantages such as flexibility, ease of installation and maintenance, and adjustability for different configurations. Additionally, for a number of applications it is important to be able to acquire images in different colors at different exposure times. For example, to visualize exocytosis in TIRFM, very fast acquisition is necessary. However, to image a fluorescently labeled stationary organelle in the cell, low excitation is necessary to avoid photobleaching and as a result the acquisition has to be relatively slow. [14] In this regard, the above implementation offers great flexibility, since different cameras can be used to acquire images in different channels.

3D super-resolution imaging and single molecule tracking using MUM

A comparison of the depth discrimination of MUM with conventional single plane microscopy Depth discrimination of MUM vs single plane.png
A comparison of the depth discrimination of MUM with conventional single plane microscopy

Modern microscopy techniques have generated significant interest in studying cellular processes at the single molecule level. Single molecule experiments overcome averaging effects and therefore provide information that is not accessible using conventional bulk studies. However, the 3D localization and tracking of single molecules poses several challenges. In addition to whether or not images of the single molecule can be captured while it undergoes potentially highly complex 3D dynamics, the question arises whether or not the 3D location of the single molecule can be determined and how accurately this can be done.

A major obstacle to high accuracy 3D location estimation is the poor depth discrimination of a standard microscope. [15] Even with a high numerical aperture objective, the image of a point source in a conventional microscope does not change appreciably if the point source is moved several hundred nanometers from its focus position. This makes it extraordinarily difficult to determine the axial, i.e., z position, of the point source with a conventional microscope.

More generally, quantitative single molecule microscopy for 3D samples poses the identical problem whether the application is localization/tracking or super-resolution microscopy such as PALM, STORM, FPALM, dSTORM for 3D applications, i.e. the determination of the location of a single molecule in three dimensions. [16] MUM offers several advantages. [17] In MUM, images of the point source are simultaneously acquired at different focus levels. These images give additional information that can be used to constrain the z position of the point source. This constraining information largely overcomes the depth discrimination problem near the focus.

The 3D localization measure provides a quantitative measure of how accurately the location of the point source can be determined. A small numerical value of the 3D localization measure implies very high accuracy in determining the location, while a large numerical value of the 3D localization measure implies very poor accuracy in determining the location. For a conventional microscope when the point source is close to the plane of focus, e.g., z0 <= 250 nm, the 3D localization measure predicts very poor accuracy in estimating the z position. Thus, in a conventional microscope, it is problematic to carry out 3D tracking when the point source is close to the plane of focus.

On the other hand, for a two plane MUM setup the 3D localization measure predicts consistently better accuracy than a conventional microscope for a range of z-values, especially when the point source is close to the plane of focus. An immediate implication of this result is that the z-location of the point source can be determined with relatively the same level of accuracy for a range of z-values, which is favorable for 3D single particle tracking.

Dual objective multifocal plane microscopy (dMUM)

Dual objective multifocal plane microscope (dMUM) Dual objective MUM.png
Dual objective multifocal plane microscope (dMUM)

In single particle imaging applications, the number of photons detected from the fluorescent label plays a crucial role in the quantitative analysis of the acquired data. Currently, particle tracking experiments are typically carried out on either an inverted or an upright microscope, in which a single objective lens illuminates the sample and also collects the fluorescence signal from it. Note that although fluorescence emission from the sample occurs in all directions (i.e., above and below the sample), the use of a single objective lens in these microscope configurations results in collecting light from only one side of the sample. Even if a high numerical aperture objective lens is used, not all photons emitted at one side of the sample can be collected due to the finite collection angle of the objective lens. Thus even under the best imaging conditions conventional microscopes collect only a fraction of the photons emitted from the sample.

To address this problem, a microscope configuration can be used that uses two opposing objective lenses, where one of the objectives is in an inverted position and the other objective is in an upright position. This configuration is called dual objective multifocal plane microscopy (dMUM). [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microscopy</span> Viewing of objects which are too small to be seen with the naked eye

Microscopy is the technical field of using microscopes to view objects and areas of objects that cannot be seen with the naked eye. There are three well-known branches of microscopy: optical, electron, and scanning probe microscopy, along with the emerging field of X-ray microscopy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optical microscope</span> Microscope that uses visible light

The optical microscope, also referred to as a light microscope, is a type of microscope that commonly uses visible light and a system of lenses to generate magnified images of small objects. Optical microscopes are the oldest design of microscope and were possibly invented in their present compound form in the 17th century. Basic optical microscopes can be very simple, although many complex designs aim to improve resolution and sample contrast.

A total internal reflection fluorescence microscope (TIRFM) is a type of microscope with which a thin region of a specimen, usually less than 200 nanometers can be observed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fluorescence microscope</span> Optical microscope that uses fluorescence and phosphorescence

A fluorescence microscope is an optical microscope that uses fluorescence instead of, or in addition to, scattering, reflection, and attenuation or absorption, to study the properties of organic or inorganic substances. "Fluorescence microscope" refers to any microscope that uses fluorescence to generate an image, whether it is a simple set up like an epifluorescence microscope or a more complicated design such as a confocal microscope, which uses optical sectioning to get better resolution of the fluorescence image.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Confocal microscopy</span> Optical imaging technique

Confocal microscopy, most frequently confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) or laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM), is an optical imaging technique for increasing optical resolution and contrast of a micrograph by means of using a spatial pinhole to block out-of-focus light in image formation. Capturing multiple two-dimensional images at different depths in a sample enables the reconstruction of three-dimensional structures within an object. This technique is used extensively in the scientific and industrial communities and typical applications are in life sciences, semiconductor inspection and materials science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-photon excitation microscopy</span> Fluorescence imaging technique

Two-photon excitation microscopy is a fluorescence imaging technique that is particularly well-suited to image scattering living tissue of up to about one millimeter in thickness. Unlike traditional fluorescence microscopy, where the excitation wavelength is shorter than the emission wavelength, two-photon excitation requires simultaneous excitation by two photons with longer wavelength than the emitted light. The laser is focused onto a specific location in the tissue and scanned across the sample to sequentially produce the image. Due to the non-linearity of two-photon excitation, mainly fluorophores in the micrometer-sized focus of the laser beam are excited, which results in the spatial resolution of the image. This contrasts with confocal microscopy, where the spatial resolution is produced by the interaction of excitation focus and the confined detection with a pinhole.

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) is a statistical analysis, via time correlation, of stationary fluctuations of the fluorescence intensity. Its theoretical underpinning originated from L. Onsager's regression hypothesis. The analysis provides kinetic parameters of the physical processes underlying the fluctuations. One of the interesting applications of this is an analysis of the concentration fluctuations of fluorescent particles (molecules) in solution. In this application, the fluorescence emitted from a very tiny space in solution containing a small number of fluorescent particles (molecules) is observed. The fluorescence intensity is fluctuating due to Brownian motion of the particles. In other words, the number of the particles in the sub-space defined by the optical system is randomly changing around the average number. The analysis gives the average number of fluorescent particles and average diffusion time, when the particle is passing through the space. Eventually, both the concentration and size of the particle (molecule) are determined. Both parameters are important in biochemical research, biophysics, and chemistry.

A 4Pi microscope is a laser scanning fluorescence microscope with an improved axial resolution. With it the typical range of the axial resolution of 500–700 nm can be improved to 100–150 nm, which corresponds to an almost spherical focal spot with 5–7 times less volume than that of standard confocal microscopy.

Christoph Cremer is a German physicist and emeritus at the Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, former honorary professor at the University of Mainz and was a former group leader at Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB) at the Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Germany, who has successfully overcome the conventional limit of resolution that applies to light based investigations by a range of different methods. In the meantime, according to his own statement, Christoph Cremer is a member of the Max Planck Institute for Chemistry and the Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Single-particle tracking</span> AliAlamerr

Single-particle tracking (SPT) is the observation of the motion of individual particles within a medium. The coordinates time series, which can be either in two dimensions (x, y) or in three dimensions (x, y, z), is referred to as a trajectory. The trajectory is typically analyzed using statistical methods to extract information about the underlying dynamics of the particle. These dynamics can reveal information about the type of transport being observed (e.g., thermal or active), the medium where the particle is moving, and interactions with other particles. In the case of random motion, trajectory analysis can be used to measure the diffusion coefficient.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vertico spatially modulated illumination</span>

Vertico spatially modulated illumination (Vertico-SMI) is the fastest light microscope for the 3D analysis of complete cells in the nanometer range. It is based on two technologies developed in 1996, SMI and SPDM. The effective optical resolution of this optical nanoscope has reached the vicinity of 5 nm in 2D and 40 nm in 3D, greatly surpassing the λ/2 resolution limit applying to standard microscopy using transmission or reflection of natural light according to the Abbe resolution limit That limit had been determined by Ernst Abbe in 1873 and governs the achievable resolution limit of microscopes using conventional techniques.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Optical sectioning</span> Imaging of focal planes within a thick sample

Optical sectioning is the process by which a suitably designed microscope can produce clear images of focal planes deep within a thick sample. This is used to reduce the need for thin sectioning using instruments such as the microtome. Many different techniques for optical sectioning are used and several microscopy techniques are specifically designed to improve the quality of optical sectioning.

Super-resolution microscopy is a series of techniques in optical microscopy that allow such images to have resolutions higher than those imposed by the diffraction limit, which is due to the diffraction of light. Super-resolution imaging techniques rely on the near-field or on the far-field. Among techniques that rely on the latter are those that improve the resolution only modestly beyond the diffraction-limit, such as confocal microscopy with closed pinhole or aided by computational methods such as deconvolution or detector-based pixel reassignment, the 4Pi microscope, and structured-illumination microscopy technologies such as SIM and SMI.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital holographic microscopy</span>

Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) is digital holography applied to microscopy. Digital holographic microscopy distinguishes itself from other microscopy methods by not recording the projected image of the object. Instead, the light wave front information originating from the object is digitally recorded as a hologram, from which a computer calculates the object image by using a numerical reconstruction algorithm. The image forming lens in traditional microscopy is thus replaced by a computer algorithm. Other closely related microscopy methods to digital holographic microscopy are interferometric microscopy, optical coherence tomography and diffraction phase microscopy. Common to all methods is the use of a reference wave front to obtain amplitude (intensity) and phase information. The information is recorded on a digital image sensor or by a photodetector from which an image of the object is created (reconstructed) by a computer. In traditional microscopy, which do not use a reference wave front, only intensity information is recorded and essential information about the object is lost.

Photo-activated localization microscopy and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) are widefield fluorescence microscopy imaging methods that allow obtaining images with a resolution beyond the diffraction limit. The methods were proposed in 2006 in the wake of a general emergence of optical super-resolution microscopy methods, and were featured as Methods of the Year for 2008 by the Nature Methods journal. The development of PALM as a targeted biophysical imaging method was largely prompted by the discovery of new species and the engineering of mutants of fluorescent proteins displaying a controllable photochromism, such as photo-activatible GFP. However, the concomitant development of STORM, sharing the same fundamental principle, originally made use of paired cyanine dyes. One molecule of the pair, when excited near its absorption maximum, serves to reactivate the other molecule to the fluorescent state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Light sheet fluorescence microscopy</span> Fluorescence microscopy technique

Light sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) is a fluorescence microscopy technique with an intermediate-to-high optical resolution, but good optical sectioning capabilities and high speed. In contrast to epifluorescence microscopy only a thin slice of the sample is illuminated perpendicularly to the direction of observation. For illumination, a laser light-sheet is used, i.e. a laser beam which is focused only in one direction. A second method uses a circular beam scanned in one direction to create the lightsheet. As only the actually observed section is illuminated, this method reduces the photodamage and stress induced on a living sample. Also the good optical sectioning capability reduces the background signal and thus creates images with higher contrast, comparable to confocal microscopy. Because light sheet fluorescence microscopy scans samples by using a plane of light instead of a point, it can acquire images at speeds 100 to 1,000 times faster than those offered by point-scanning methods.

Lattice light-sheet microscopy is a modified version of light sheet fluorescence microscopy that increases image acquisition speed while decreasing damage to cells caused by phototoxicity. This is achieved by using a structured light sheet to excite fluorescence in successive planes of a specimen, generating a time series of 3D images which can provide information about dynamic biological processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fourier ptychography</span> Computational imaging technique in microscopy

Fourier ptychography is a computational imaging technique based on optical microscopy that consists in the synthesis of a wider numerical aperture from a set of full-field images acquired at various coherent illumination angles, resulting in increased resolution compared to a conventional microscope.

Super-resolution dipole orientation mapping (SDOM) is a form of fluorescence polarization microscopy (FPM) that achieved super resolution through polarization demodulation. It was first described by Karl Zhanghao and others in 2016. Fluorescence polarization (FP) is related to the dipole orientation of chromophores, making fluorescence polarization microscopy possible to reveal structures and functions of tagged cellular organelles and biological macromolecules. In addition to fluorescence intensity, wavelength, and lifetime, the fourth dimension of fluorescence—polarization—can also provide intensity modulation without the restriction to specific fluorophores; its investigation in super-resolution microscopy is still in its infancy.

Three-photon microscopy (3PEF) is a high-resolution fluorescence microscopy based on nonlinear excitation effect. Different from two-photon excitation microscopy, it uses three exciting photons. It typically uses 1300 nm or longer wavelength lasers to excite the fluorescent dyes with three simultaneously absorbed photons. The fluorescent dyes then emit one photon whose energy is three times the energy of each incident photon. Compared to two-photon microscopy, three-photon microscopy reduces the fluorescence away from the focal plane by , which is much faster than that of two-photon microscopy by . In addition, three-photon microscopy employs near-infrared light with less tissue scattering effect. This causes three-photon microscopy to have higher resolution than conventional microscopy.

References

  1. ↑ Prabhat, P.; Ram, S.; Ward, E.S.; Ober, R.J. (2004). "Simultaneous imaging of different focal planes in fluorescence microscopy for the study of cellular dynamics in three dimension". IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience . 3 (4): 237–242. doi:10.1109/TNB.2004.837899. PMC   2761735 . PMID   15631134.
  2. ↑ Prabhat, P.; Ram, S.; Ward, E.S.; Ober, R.J. (2006). Conchello, Jose-Angel; Cogswell, Carol J; Wilson, Tony (eds.). "Simultaneous imaging of several focal planes in fluorescence microscopy for the study of cellular dynamics in 3D". Proceedings of SPIE . Three-Dimensional and Multidimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing XIII. 6090: 115–121. Bibcode:2006SPIE.6090..115P. doi:10.1117/12.644343. S2CID   119772837.
  3. ↑ Dehmelt, Leif; Bastiaens, Philippe I. H. (2010). "Spatial organization of intracellular communication: insights from imaging". Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology . 11 (6): 440–452. doi:10.1038/nrm2903. PMID   20485292. S2CID   12262683.
  4. ↑ Tahmasbi, A.; Ram, S.; Chao, J.; Abraham, A.V.; Tang, F.W.; Ward, E.S.; Ober, R.J. (2014). "Designing the focal plane spacing for multifocal plane microscopy". Optics Express . 22 (14): 16706–16721. Bibcode:2014OExpr..2216706T. doi:10.1364/OE.22.016706. PMC   4162350 . PMID   25090489.
  5. ↑ Badieirostami, M.; Lew, M.D.; Thompson, M.A.; Moerner, W.E. (2010). "Three-dimensional localization precision of the double-helix point spread function versus astigmatism and biplane". Applied Physics Letters . 97 (16): 161103. Bibcode:2010ApPhL..97p1103B. doi:10.1063/1.3499652. PMC   2980550 . PMID   21079725.
  6. ↑ Ram, Sripad; Prabhat, Prashant; Chao, Jerry; Sally Ward, E.; Ober, Raimund J. (2008). "High accuracy 3D quantum dot tracking with multifocal plane microscopy for the study of fast intracellular dynamics in live cells". Biophysical Journal . 95 (12): 6025–6043. Bibcode:2008BpJ....95.6025R. doi:10.1529/biophysj.108.140392. PMC   2599831 . PMID   18835896.
  7. ↑ Dalgarno, P. A.; Dalgarno, H. I. C.; Putoud, A.; Lambert, R.; Paterson, L.; Logan, D. C.; Towers, D. P.; Warburton, R. J.; Greenaway, A. H. (2010). "Multiplane imaging and three dimensional nanoscale particle tracking in biological microscopy" (PDF). Optics Express . 18 (2): 877–884. Bibcode:2010OExpr..18..877D. doi: 10.1364/OE.18.000877 . PMID   20173908. S2CID   7701295.
  8. ↑ Geissbuehler, S.; Sharipov, A.; Godinat, A.; Bocchio, N. L.; Sandoz, P. A.; Huss, A.; Jensen, N. A.; Jakobs, S.; Enderlein, J.; Goot, F. G.; Dubikovskaya, E. A.; Lasser, T.; Leutenegger, M. (2014). "Live-cell multiplane three-dimensional super-resolution optical fluctuation imaging". Nature Communications . 5: 5830. Bibcode:2014NatCo...5.5830G. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6830 . PMC   4284648 . PMID   25518894.
  9. ↑ Xiao, S.; Gritton, H.; Tseng, H.-A.; Zemel, D.; Han, X.; Mertz, J. (2020). "High-contrast multifocus microscopy with a single camera and z-splitter prism". Optica . 7 (11): 1477–1486. Bibcode:2020Optic...7.1477X. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.404678 . PMC   8443084 . PMID   34532564.
  10. ↑ Xiao, S.; Zheng, S.; Mertz, J. (2021). "High-speed multifocus phase imaging in thick tissue". Biomedical Optics Express . 12 (9): 5782–5792. doi: 10.1364/BOE.436247 . PMC   8515987 . PMID   34692215.
  11. ↑ Abrahamsson, Sara; Chen, Jiji; Hajj, Bassam; Stallinga, Sjoerd; Katsov, Alexander Y; Wisniewski, Jan; Mizuguchi, Gaku; Soule, Pierre; Mueller, Florian (1 January 2012). "Fast multicolor 3D imaging using aberration-corrected multifocus microscopy". Nature Methods. 10 (1): 60–63. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2277. PMC   4161287 . PMID   23223154.
  12. ↑ Abrahamsson, Sara; McQuilken, Molly; Mehta, Shalin B.; Verma, Amitabh; Larsch, Johannes; Ilic, Rob; Heintzmann, Rainer; Bargmann, Cornelia I.; Gladfelter, Amy S. (1 January 2015). "MultiFocus Polarization Microscope (MF-PolScope) for 3D polarization imaging of up to 25 focal planes simultaneously". Optics Express. 23 (6): 7734–7754. Bibcode:2015OExpr..23.7734A. doi:10.1364/oe.23.007734. PMC   5802244 . PMID   25837112.
  13. ↑ "MUM – Ward Ober Lab". UT Southwestern. Retrieved 19 July 2012.
  14. ↑ Prabhat, P.; Gan, Z.; Chao, J.; Ram, S.; Vaccaro, C.; Gibbons, S.; Ober, R. J.; Ward, E. S. (2007). "Elucidation of intracellular recycling pathways leading to exocytosis of the Fc receptor, FcRn, by using multifocal plane microscopy". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences . 104 (14): 5889–5894. Bibcode:2007PNAS..104.5889P. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700337104 . PMC   1851587 . PMID   17384151.
  15. ↑ Ram, S.; Ward, E.S.; Ober, R.J. (2005). Nicolau, Dan V; Enderlein, Joerg; Leif, Robert C; Farkas, Daniel L; Raghavachari, Ramesh (eds.). "How accurately can a single molecule be localized in three dimensions using a fluorescence microscope?". Proceedings of SPIE . Imaging, Manipulation, and Analysis of Biomolecules and Cells: Fundamentals and Applications III. 5699: 426–435. Bibcode:2005SPIE.5699..426R. doi:10.1117/12.587878. PMC   2864488 . PMID   20448826.
  16. ↑ "Biplane FPALM super resolution microscope".
  17. ↑ Ram, Sripad; Chao, Jerry; Prabhat, Prashant; Ward, E. Sally; Ober, Raimund J. (2007). Conchello, Jose-Angel; Cogswell, Carol J; Wilson, Tony (eds.). "A novel approach to determining the three-dimensional location of microscopic objects with applications to 3D particle tracking". Proceedings of SPIE . Three-Dimensional and Multidimensional Microscopy: Image Acquisition and Processing XIV. 6443: 6443–0C. Bibcode:2007SPIE.6443E..0DR. doi:10.1117/12.698763. S2CID   121283489.
  18. ↑ Ram, Sripad; Prabhat, Prashant; Ward, E. Sally; Ober, Raimund J. (2009). "Improved single particle localization accuracy with dual objective multifocal plane microscopy". Optics Express . 17 (8): 6881–6898. Bibcode:2009OExpr..17.6881R. doi:10.1364/OE.17.006881. PMC   2720637 . PMID   19365515.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.