Murder in Portuguese law

Last updated

The Portuguese Penal Code was adopted in 1982 by Decree-Law no. 400/82, of September 23, entering into force on January 1, 1983. It has seen multiple amendments, but has been subject of two major reforms in 1995, by Decree-Law no. 48/95, of March 15, and in 2007, by Law no. 59/2007. The Penal Code devotes a chapter on “crimes against human life”, where murder is included; despite that other crimes, in their aggravated form, may be considered, in other countries, to be included in murder. Murder may also be found in special legislation, namely in the Code of Military Justice, adopted in 2003 by Law no. 100/2003, of November 15, and in the Penal and Disciplinary Code of the Merchant Navy, adopted in 1940 by Decree-Law no. 33252/43, of November 20. The Portuguese Constitution expressly forbids the death penalty (article 24, § 2) and life imprisonment (article 30, § 1). Additionally, since 1997, the Constitution does not allow the extradition of anyone who would be subject to any of those two forms of punishment at the requesting country. Unless binding assurances are given that the suspect will not be sentenced to either death penalty or life imprisonment, the extradition must be rejected.

Contents

Homicide

Homicide is defined in article 131 of the Penal Code, being the first crime to appear on the Code, simply stating that “whoever kills another person is punished with imprisonment from 8 to 16 years”. Following the general crime of homicide, setting the elements of the fact for the following crime, Qualified Homicide, in article 132 § 1, aggravating the punishment in cases where “the death is produced in circumstances revealing a special unlawfulness and perversity” from 12 to 25 years. Article 132 § 2 defines which cases are susceptible to reveal such special unlawfulness and perversity, namely:

a) When the murderer is a descendant or an ascendant, either by blood or adoption, of the victim.
b) When the victim is the spouse, former spouse, or person of the same or different sex with whom the felon had a relation analogous to a marital bond, even if not a member of the same household, or the other parent of the son or daughter of the murderer.
c) When the victim is especially defenceless, due to their age, handicap, illness or pregnancy.
d) When the murder employs torture or other act of cruelty to enhance the victim's sufferance.
e) When the murder is determined by greed, by the pleasure of causing death or suffering, for personal enjoyment or sexual gratification or any other futile motive.
f) When the murder is determined by racial, religious or political hatred or motivated by the colour, ethnical or national origin, sex, sexual orientation or gender identity of the victim.
g) When the murder takes place in order to prepare, facilitate, execute or dissimulate another crime, or to facilitate the escape from the authorities.
h) When the act is carried out in conjunction with, at least, other two people or when an especially dangerous mean is used to cause death.
i) When poison or any other insidious mean is used to cause death.
j) When the murderer acts with emotional coldness, or reflecting on the means to commit murder, or the intent has persisted for longer than 24 hours.
l) When the victim is the President, member of Parliament, member of the Government, a judge, member of the Council of State, Representant of the Republic, prosecutor, member of the regional parliament or government, the Ombudsman, member of local government or any other service that exercises public authority, chief of any public force, juror, witness, attorney, solicitor, enforcement agent, judicial administrator, a person holding office in procedures of alternative dispute resolution, agent of security forces or services, civil servant, military, agent of public force or person employed in public service, educator, professor, examiner or member of the schooling community, minister of any religious cult, journalist, judge or referee of any federated sport, when the act is related or caused by the exercise of said functions.
m) When the murderer is a public servant (e.g. a police officer) and the act takes place with serious abuse of authority.

These circumstances are only susceptible to qualify the homicide to a more serious punishment, not functioning automatically (e.g. someone that kills their parent at their request commits homicide on request, and not qualified homicide), [1] as they are simply “pattern-examples” (exemplos-padrão). Other circumstances that are subsumed to those “pattern-examples” may also be susceptible to qualify homicide, [2] however any other circumstances revealing a special unlawfulness and perversity that may not be subsumed to those “pattern-examples” may not be construed to qualify homicide, with such an interpretation being unconstitutional according to the Constitutional Court. [3] Following qualified homicide, the Penal Code defines other cases of intentional homicide with a lesser degree of guiltiness:

According to the Code of Penal Procedure (article 14 § 2 (a)) cases related to intentional homicide are tried by a panel of three judges, or by a jury, when the possible punishment exceeds 8 years of imprisonment and the jury is requested by the arguido , prosecution, or the assisting party (e.g. the family of the victim).

Negligent Homicide

Negligent Homicide (art. 136 of the Penal Code), is punishable with a prison term of no less than 1 month and no longer than 3 years, or a fine. If the death is caused by gross negligence the penalty the prison term is of 1 month to 5 years.

Additionally, unintentionally causing someone's death while committing a crime other than homicide may be an aggravating factor of that crime, called “aggravation by result” (agravação pelo resultado), with examples ranging from abandonment resulting in death (article 138 §§ 1 (a) and 3 (a)), punished with imprisonment from 3 to 10 years of imprisonment (whereas the normal punishment is 1 to 5 years of imprisonment), bodily harm aggravated by death (articles 144 and 147 §1) is punished with imprisonment from 2 years and 8 months to 13 years and 4 months (whereas the usual penalty is imprisonment from 2 to 10 years) and robbery aggravated by death (article 210 §§ 2 and 3) punished with imprisonment from 8 to 16 years (instead of imprisonment raging from 1 to 8 years for simple robbery).

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder</span> Unlawful killing of a human with malice aforethought

Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed with the necessary intention as defined by the law in a specific jurisdiction. This state of mind may, depending upon the jurisdiction, distinguish murder from other forms of unlawful homicide, such as manslaughter. Manslaughter is killing committed in the absence of malice, such as in the case of voluntary manslaughter brought about by reasonable provocation, or diminished capacity. Involuntary manslaughter, where it is recognized, is a killing that lacks all but the most attenuated guilty intent, recklessness.

Life imprisonment is any sentence of imprisonment for a crime under which the convicted criminal is to remain in prison for the rest of their natural life. Crimes that result in life imprisonment are considered extremely serious and usually violent. Examples of these crimes are murder, torture, terrorism, child abuse resulting in death, rape, espionage, treason, illegal drug trade, human trafficking, severe fraud and financial crimes, aggravated property damage, arson, hate crime, kidnapping, burglary, robbery, theft, piracy, aircraft hijacking, and genocide.

Gregg v. Georgia, Proffitt v. Florida, Jurek v. Texas, Woodson v. North Carolina, and Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 153 (1976), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. It reaffirmed the Court's acceptance of the use of the death penalty in the United States, upholding, in particular, the death sentence imposed on Troy Leon Gregg. The set of cases is referred to by a leading scholar as the July 2 Cases, and elsewhere referred to by the lead case Gregg. The court set forth the two main features that capital sentencing procedures must employ in order to comply with the Eighth Amendment ban on "cruel and unusual punishments". The decision essentially ended the de facto moratorium on the death penalty imposed by the Court in its 1972 decision in Furman v. Georgia (1972). Justice Brennan's dissent famously argued that "The calculated killing of a human being by the State involves, by its very nature, a denial of the executed person's humanity ... An executed person has indeed 'lost the right to have rights.'"

Capital murder refers to a category of murder in some parts of the US for which the perpetrator is eligible for the death penalty. In its original sense, capital murder was a statutory offence of aggravated murder in Great Britain, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland, which was later adopted as a legal provision to define certain forms of aggravated murder in the United States. Some jurisdictions that provide for death as a possible punishment for murder, such as California, do not have a specific statute creating or defining a crime known as capital murder; instead, death is one of the possible sentences for certain kinds of murder. In these cases, "capital murder" is not a phrase used in the legal system but may still be used by others such as the media.

Philippine criminal laws is the body of law which defines crimes, and prescribes the penalties thereof in the Philippines.

In Brazil, homicide is punished under article 121 of the Penal Code. It is split into two different categories: homicídio doloso, and homicídio culposo. The penalty for intentional homicide varies from six to twenty years; the penalty for unintentional homicide varies from one to three years.

In Denmark manddrab (manslaughter) is the term used by the Danish penalty law to describe the act of intentionally killing another person. No distinction between manslaughter and murder exists. The penalty goes from a minimum of five years to imprisonment for life. The standard punishment for manslaughter - i.e. where there are neither aggravating nor mitigating circumstances - is 12 years imprisonment. If the perpetrator is sentenced to life in prison, 12 years must pass before they can file for probation.

Under the German penal code, Strafgesetzbuch, there are two sections relating to homicide:

According to the modern Russian Criminal Code, only intentional killing of another human is considered as a murder. The following types of murder are defined:

According to the Romanian penal code, the maximum punishment a person can get for the unlawful killing of another is life imprisonment.

In Sweden, the following homicide offenses exist:

In Switzerland, articles 111 to 117 of the Swiss Criminal Code detail the various scenarios in which the killing of another person is punishable. Articles 112 to 117 are leges speciales to article 111, meaning that when the conditions of one of the latter are met, article 111 will not be invoked.

In the United States, the law for murder varies by jurisdiction. In many US jurisdictions there is a hierarchy of acts, known collectively as homicide, of which first-degree murder and felony murder are the most serious, followed by second-degree murder and, in a few states, third-degree murder, which in other states is divided into voluntary manslaughter, and involuntary manslaughter such as reckless homicide and negligent homicide, which are the least serious, and ending finally in justifiable homicide, which is not a crime. However, because there are at least 52 relevant jurisdictions, each with its own criminal code, this is a considerable simplification.

Articles 108 through 108-C of the Penal Code of Peru define crimes similar to those known as murder in Anglophone countries. The term asesinato ("murder") is no longer used in the Penal Code since 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal law of the United States</span>

The criminal law of the United States is a manifold system of laws and practices that connects crimes and consequences. In comparison, civil law addresses non-criminal disputes. The system varies considerably by jurisdiction, but conforms to the US Constitution. Generally there are two systems of criminal law to which a person maybe subject; the most frequent is state criminal law, and the other is federal law.

Special circumstances in criminal law are actions of the accused, or conditions under which a crime, particularly homicide, was committed. Such factors require or allow for a more severe punishment.

Georgia is an independent European nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder in California law</span>

The law on the crime of murder in the U.S. state of California is defined by sections 187 through 191 of the California Penal Code.

Murderin Japanese law constitutes when someone intentionally kills another person without justification.

References

  1. ↑ Figueiredo Dias 1999, pp.25 to 28; Silva Dias 2007, pp. 24 and 25.
  2. ↑ Figueiredo Dias 1999, pp.25 to 28; Silva Dias 2007, pp. 25 and 26.
  3. ↑ "Acórdão n.º 852/2014". Tribunal Constitucional. Retrieved 24 September 2023.

Figueiredo Dias, Jorge de (1999). “Homicídio qualificado” in Comentário Conimbricense do Código Penal, Tome I, Coimbra Editora. Silva Dias, Augusto (2007). “Crimes contra a vida e a integridade física”, 2nd edition, AAFDL.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.