Nashville Charter Amendment 1

Last updated

Nashville Charter Amendment 1 of 2009 (also known as the Nashville English Only Amendment or Nashville English First Amendment) was a proposed amendment to the charter of Nashville, Tennessee [1] which, if passed, would have restricted the use of foreign languages in relation to the functions of the city government.

Contents

Nashville Charter Amendment 1
January 22, 2009 (2009-01-22)

English is the official language of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee. Official actions that bind or commit the government shall be taken only in the English language, and all official government communications and publications shall be in English. No person shall have a right to government services in any other language. All meetings of the Metro Council, boards, and commissions of the Metropolitan Government shall be conducted in English. The Metro Council may make specific exceptions to protect public health and safety. Nothing in this measure shall be interpreted to conflict with federal or state law. [2]
Results
Choice
Votes %
Check-71-128-204-brightblue.svg Yes32,14443.50%
Light brown x.svg No41,75256.50%
Valid votes73,896100.00%
Invalid or blank votes00.00%
Total votes73,896100.00%
Source: ABC News [3]

Early voting was held from January 2, 2009 to January 17, 2009. [4] Regular voting was held on January 22, 2009. [5] The amendment failed to pass, with only 43.5% of voters supporting it.

The referendum took place amidst a broader English-only movement in the United States. Most of the funding for the initiative came from the Virginia-based lobbying organization ProEnglish. [6]

Components

Accordingly, there were five components to Proposal 1:

Previous efforts to pass this type of legislation had been met with vigorous opposition from then-Nashville Mayor Bill Purcell, who argued that the passage of an ordinance making English the official language of Nashville would create legal confusion, resulting in countless lawsuits. In his statement vetoing the ordinance in February 2007, Purcell said:

If this law takes effect, this city will be engaged in years of lawsuits testing the effect and constitutionality of the ordinance. That means hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees whether we win or lose, for no good reason. [7]

Proponents of the proposal referred to it as "English First" while opponents called it "English Only" - each side claimed that the other side's terminology was misleading. [8] [9] The Associated Press called the measure a "foreign language ban." [10]

Supporters of Proposal 1 argued that government communication in only one language is simple and cost-effective and provides an incentive to non-English speakers to learn the language. [2] The proponents of Proposal 1 were represented by Nashville English First, the brainchild of Nashvillians Jon Crisp and Eric Crafton, [11] with the legal, financial, and moral support of ProEnglish out of Arlington, Virginia. [12]

Opponents argued that the measure is antagonistic toward immigrants in transition, redundant in that English was already the "official and legal language" of Tennessee, and that passage of the measure could damage Nashville's reputation as a welcoming city, its international economy, its budget, and its safety. [13] The most formal opposition came from Nashville for All of Us, a coalition of Nashville groups. [13]

Results

The amendment failed to pass, with 41,752 votes opposed (56.5%) and 32,144 votes in support 43.5%.

Nashville Charter Amendment 1
ChoiceVotes %
Light brown x.svg No41,75256.50
Yes32,14443.50
Total votes73,896100.00
Source: ABC News, NewsChannel 5 [14] [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Popular initiative</span> Popular voter petition systems

A popular initiative is a form of direct democracy by which a petition meeting certain hurdles can force a legal procedure on a proposition. The hurdles the petition has to meet vary between countries, typically signatures by a certain number of registered voters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English-only movement</span> Political movement in the U.S.

The English-only movement, also known as the Official English movement, is a political movement that advocates for the exclusive use of the English language in official United States government communication through the establishment of English as the only official language in the United States. The United States has never had an official national language. However, at some times and places, there have been various moves to promote or require the use of English, such as in Native American boarding schools.

A constitutional amendment is a modification of the constitution of a polity, organization or other type of entity. Amendments are often interwoven into the relevant sections of an existing constitution, directly altering the text. Conversely, they can be appended to the constitution as supplemental additions, thus changing the frame of government without altering the existing text of the document.

A double majority is a voting system which requires a majority of votes according to two separate criteria. The mechanism is usually used to require strong support for any measure considered to be of great importance. Typically in legislative bodies, a double majority requirement exists in the form of a quorum being necessary for legislation to be passed.

In the politics of the United States, the process of initiatives and referendums allow citizens of many U.S. states to place legislation on the ballot for a referendum or popular vote, either enacting new legislation, or voting down existing legislation. Citizens, or an organization, might start an initiative to gather a predetermined number of signatures to qualify the measure for the ballot. The measure is placed on the ballot for the referendum, or actual vote.

In Australia, referendums are public votes held on important issues where the electorate may approve or reject a certain proposal. In contemporary usage, polls conducted on non-constitutional issues are known as plebiscites, with the term referendum being reserved solely for votes on constitutional changes, which is legally required to make a change to the Constitution of Australia.

The Constitution of the State of Ohio is the basic governing document of the State of Ohio, which in 1803 became the 17th state to join the United States of America. Ohio has had three constitutions since statehood was granted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metropolitan Council of Nashville and Davidson County</span> Legislative body of Nashville, Tennessee

The Metropolitan Council is the legislative body of the consolidated city-county government of Nashville, Tennessee and Davidson County.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ProEnglish</span> American nonprofit lobbying organization

ProEnglish is an American nonprofit lobbying organization that is part of the English-only movement. The group supports making English the only official language of the United States. The group has also campaigned against immigration reform and bilingual education.

Referendums in Taiwan at both the national and local level are governed by the Referendum Act of Taiwan, which was enacted by the Legislative Yuan in December 2003. Citizens can propose laws via referendums at the national and local levels. The Referendum Act also allowed people to make changes or abolish laws by referendums.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2008 Latvian constitutional referendum</span>

A constitutional referendum to amend the constitution of Latvia in order to allow one-tenth of the total registered electorate to initiate a popular referendum to dissolve the Latvian parliament was held in Latvia on 2 August 2008.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2009 California Proposition 1F</span>

Proposition 1F of 2009 was a measure approved by California voters relating to the salaries of state officers. It was an amendment of the Constitution of California prohibiting pay raises for members of the State Legislature, the Governor, and other state officials during deficit years. It was proposed by the legislature and approved in a referendum held as part of the May 19, 2009 special election ballot, in which the California electorate also voted on five other propositions.

The Alliance for European Integration was a centre-right anti-communist ruling coalition in Moldova from the July 2009 election until it lost to a no confidence vote in the Parliament on February 13, 2013. It was succeeded by the anti-communist Pro-European Coalition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 Moldovan constitutional referendum</span>

A nationwide referendum was held in Moldova on 5 September 2010 on whether or not the country should amend the Constitution of Moldova to return to direct popular election of the president. Since 2001, the president had been indirectly elected by Parliament, with a supermajority of 61 seats required for election. The voters are asked to answer the following question: "Would you agree with the Constitutional amendment, which would allow the election of the President of the Republic of Moldova by the entire population?" Voters chose one of the proposed options: "Yes (for)" or "No (against)". Of those who had cast their vote, 87.83% chose "Yes". However, the referendum did not pass because only 30.29% of voters turned out, short of the necessary 33% for the referendum to be considered valid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2010 American Samoan constitutional referendum</span>

A constitutional referendum was held in American Samoa on November 2, 2010, on the same day of the United States House of Representatives election and American Samoan general election.

Charter Amendment One was a citizen-led referendum defeated in Gainesville, Florida's city election on March 24, 2009. Titled the "Amendment to the City Charter Prohibiting the City from Providing Certain Civil Rights," the measure would remove the legal protections not explicitly covered under the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, specifically with reference to sexual orientation and gender identity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 Nashville mayoral special election</span>

The 2018 Nashville mayoral special election took place on May 24, 2018, to elect the next mayor of Nashville, Tennessee. David Briley, a Democrat who became interim mayor after the resignation of Megan Barry, won outright without a runoff election.

Referendums in the Philippines are occasionally held at a national, regional or local level. Referendums can either by national or local in scope. In the Philippines, "referendums" and "plebiscites" mean different things.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2022 Kansas abortion referendum</span>

The 2022 Kansas abortion referendum was a rejected legislatively referred constitutional amendment to the Kansas Constitution that appeared on the ballot on August 2, 2022, alongside primary elections for statewide offices, with early voting from July 13. If enacted, the amendment would have declared that the Kansas Constitution does not guarantee a right to abortion, giving the Kansas state government power to prosecute individuals involved in abortions, and further declared that the Kansas government is not required to fund abortions.

References

  1. "Nashville.gov - Election Commission". Davidson County Election Commission. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  2. 1 2 "Nashville English First". Nashville English First. Archived from the original on 2009-01-24. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  3. Cousins, Juanita. "Nashville voters reject 'English-First' proposal". ABC News. Archived from the original on 2009-03-08. Retrieved 2009-05-18.
  4. "Nashville.gov - Election Commission - Early Voting Schedule". Davidson County Election Commission. Archived from the original on December 4, 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  5. "Nashville.gov - Election Commission". Davidson County Election Commission. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  6. Cass, Michael (27 January 2009). "Out-of-state group gave almost all of English-only campaign funds". The Tennessean.
  7. "Mayor's Statement Regarding Veto of English-Only Amendment". Siskind's Immigration Bulletin. 2007-02-10. Retrieved 2008-12-06.
  8. "Official English Is Not English Only". ProEnglish. Archived from the original on October 17, 2008. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  9. "Vote NO to the Nashville English Only Referendum on January 22, 2009". Vote NO to the Nashville English Only Referendum on January 22, 2009. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  10. "Voters to decide on Nashville foreign language ban". International Business Times. Retrieved 2008-12-06.[ dead link ]
  11. "English Only Ringleader Eric Crafton Is Driven More by Ideals than by Politics - Which May Be Worse". Nashville Scene. Archived from the original on 2008-12-12. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  12. "ProEnglish Confident Nashville English Initiative Will Qualify and Pass and Says it Helped Fund the Effort". Reuters. 2008-08-14. Archived from the original on 2013-02-01. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  13. 1 2 "Nashville for All of Us". Nashville for All of Us. Retrieved 2008-12-05.
  14. Cousins, Juanita. "Nashville voters reject 'English-First' proposal". ABC News. Archived from the original on 2009-03-08. Retrieved 2009-05-18.
  15. "Governor Releases Statement On English Only Rejection". NewsChannel 5. 23 January 2009. Archived from the original on 30 January 2013. Retrieved 14 October 2012.