Abbreviation | NCRC |
---|---|
Founded | 2007 |
Founder | Karen Delise |
Type | LLC |
Focus | Producing studies and funding for pit bull advocacy, opposing breed-specific legislation, and casting doubt on opposing studies |
Origins | Acquired by Jane Berkey from Karen Delise in 2007 |
Method | Publications, speakers, and conferences; also, funding for allied causes, groups, and websites through a separate action fund |
Owner | Jane Berkey, Animal Farm Foundation |
Key people | Karen Delise, Research Consultant |
Parent organization | Animal Farm Foundation |
Employees | ≈13 |
Website | nationalcanineresearchcouncil |
The National Canine Research Council (NCRC) is an animal advocacy group, originally started by Karen Delise, a veterinary technician. [1] It was later acquired by Jane Berkey, the owner of Animal Farm Foundation and registered as National Canine Research Council, LLC in 2007. Its current website describes itself as "A Research & Policy Think Tank". [2] The National Canine Research Council is a subsidiary of Animal Farm Foundation (AFF). [3] The AVMA has published National Canine Research Council articles and also receives funding from Animal Farm Foundation. The National Canine Research Council has an associated 501(c)(4) fund called the National Canine Research Council Action Fund, which can directly support lobbying and political activities. [4] [5]
The National Canine Research Council is controversial as its publications are intended to bolster the pro-pit bull and anti-BSL (anti-breed-specific-legislation) policies of its parent company, Animal Farm Foundation. AFF says it is the other way around and its policies are informed by NCRC findings. [3]
Any discussion of pit bulls is controversial: Marie-Claude Malboeuf describes the pit bull lobby and the pit bull victims groups as fighting like cats and dogs in her La Presse article on the pit bull debate:
The two camps—pro and anti-pit bulls—don’t join battle merely in a war of studies. In 2010, pit bull promoters turned to hijacking website names resembling the [dogbite] victims site Dogsbite.org, buying similar domains (Dogsbite.com and Dogsbite.net). Brutal denunciations and innuendoes rain down in social media and blogs, each side displaying its contempt for the other camp. Jeff Borchardt, who saw his baby killed by pit bulls, saves Twitter screen shots about him saying [things like]: "He is like a fart in a storm. Nobody hears him or cares about him". Like other victims, he receives death threats. For her part, the founder of Dogsbite saves emails of a former leader of the lobby with a criminal past. He threatens [Dogsbite] with lawsuits, writing that he has sent her personal information to the FBI because she could be "a terrorist", and that her movement "fabricates attacks and deliberately sets pit bulls loose at large". On their side, pit bull owners report being brutally denounced and sometimes insulted when they are peacefully walking their dogs. [6]
Marie-Claude Malboeuf, reporter for Montreal's La Presse, described the pit bull lobby led by Animal Farm Foundation as comprising five different levels, [7] [lower-alpha 1] with the National Canine Research Council playing a pivotal role in producing studies that lobbyists can use as ammunition in arguing for laws repealing breed-specific legislation and pit bull supporters can use to argue that pit bull type dogs are not inherently dangerous or vicious.
NCRC is owned by the Animal Farm Foundation, an organization whose purpose is "securing equal treatment and opportunity for 'pit bull' dogs." [8]
The relationship between Animal Farm Foundation and National Canine Research Council was not known from the time of its acquisition in 2007 until 2010 when DogsBite.org filed a WIPO arbitration in a domain name dispute. The process uncovered the connection between AFF and NCRC, when AFF was found to be the domain name owner of DogsBite.com and DogsBite.net which both redirected users to NCRC's website, nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com. This led to the discovery that NCRC was funded by AFF. [9] As of 2024, the AFF website discloses the relationship, but the NCRC website does not. [3] [10]
When Montreal was debating a pit bull ban in 2016, the Order of Veterinary Physicians of Quebec (French : L'Ordre des médecins vétérinaires du Québec) developed a report opposing a pit bull ban by, in part, relying on NCRC publications funded by Animal Farm Foundation. [7]
Marie-Claude Malboeuf writes in her La Presse five-part article, [7] in the section "De quel Côté Penche la Science?" [11] ("Which Side is Science Leaning Towards?") that the president of L'Ordre des médecins vétérinaires du Québec, Dr. Joël Bergeron, dismissed arguments made in medical studies. [12] She wrote:
This last conclusion is drawn from a study by the National Canine Research Council (NCRC), which belongs to a pressure group, Animal Farm Foundation, entirely dedicated to the defense of pit bulls ...
NCRC Director Karen Delise revisited all fatal canine attacks from 2000 to 2009. Based on her overview, the media all identify the same breed of dog (sometimes crossbreed) and identify the same breed as the authorities in 83% to 89% of cases. She still concludes that they are right 18% of the time.
The animal care technician has no proof that the media are wrong. But for her, no matter who informs them – including the masters – no dog can be called a pit bull, a German shepherd, etc. unless purebred and officially registered with a kennel club. [13]
After Marie-Claude Malboeuf's La Presse article on pit bulls was released, Dr. Joël Bergeron wrote an opinion article for La Presse, expressing regret that five National Canine Research Council studies had been included without at least qualifying that they had been funded by Animal Farm Foundation. [14]
The National Canine Research Council provides a downloadable brochure titled "Breed-Specific Legislation", which is intended to help activists opposing BSL. [15] The brochure says:
The trend reflects a growing understanding that regulating dogs on the basis of breed or physical description does not reduce dog bites. An evidence-based analysis published in 2010 offers one explanation for the failure of BSL: absurdly large numbers of targeted breeds would have to be completely removed from a community in order to prevent even one serious dog-bite related injury. Most importantly, studies continue to show that one kind of dog is no more likely to threaten or bite a human being than another. [15]
In contrast, advocacy groups for dog attack victims argue that BSL laws "are designed as a proactive measure to prevent severe disfiguring dog attacks and fatalities", [16] and not just to reduce "dog bites". They point to numerous medical studies showing that pit bulls are disproportionately responsible for these kind of serious attacks, especially to children. [12] [17] [18] [19]
Furthermore, NCRC's brochure attacks opponents by saying (p. 4): "All breed-specific policies and laws can be traced to racism, classism, and ableism." [15] Again, advocacy groups for pit bull victims differ; they believe BSL laws help keep all communities safer, especially for families and children, as "The objective of breed-specific legislation, which primarily targets pit bulls and their derivatives, is to prevent severe and fatal attacks before they occur". [20]
Pit bull advocates claim that media reports are unreliable, especially when pit bulls are identified in attacks. Mark Kelley said that:
They point to analysis by the National Canine Research Council, which is run by a pro-pit bull foundation, that claims there is …no reliable evidence that demonstrates a link between breed and fatal dog bites. They also claim pit bulls are routinely misidentified as the guilty party. [21]
When Dr. Golinko, Director Of Plastic Surgery at the Arkansas Children's Hospital in Little Rock, Arkansas, was asked about a medical study he authored identifying pit bulls as causing the most severe injuries, far more than any other breed, [12] he explained:
Mark: How were you able to identify whether these were in fact pit bulls that had attacked these victims?
Dr. Golinko: That’s a great question. It’s because the majority of the biting dogs is either a family dog or a dog known to the family, meaning, you know, mom's boyfriend or ex-husband brings over a dog, or grandma brings over a dog, it's typically a dog that the child is familiar with, in most situations. [21]
Dr. Barry Pless, Professor Emeritus at McGill University and founder of the journal Injury Prevention , [lower-alpha 2] compared the pit bull lobby to the tobacco lobby; he said, "Conducting studies aimed primarily at preventing the adoption of laws and not declaring one's conflicts of interest is the strategy employed by the gun lobby and the tobacco lobby." [11] Dr. Barry Pless is an authority [lower-alpha 3] in pediatric trauma, epidemiology and biostatistics [11] hired by La Presse as an independent expert. Marie-Claude Malboeuf, a reporter at La Presse, similarly described the pit bull lobby as "a new tobacco lobby". [13]
In general, the tobacco industry playbook to defeat unfavorable regulation has one overarching objective and that is to cast doubt on existing science. Various tactics are used: funding research to produce desired results—frequently using front groups; offering gifts and consulting arrangements; deflecting attention from public health problems by reframing the problem in terms of issues of personal responsibility; and using courts to challenge critics and unfavorable regulations. [22]
In her memoir Acknowledgements, [23] Barbara Kay, a conservative columnist for the Canadian newspaper National Post, also compared the tactics of the pit bull advocacy movement (PBAM) to tobacco industry tactics:
A disinformation campaign about pit bulls has been in progress for thirty years. Humane societies, having succumbed like other official bodies to PBAM pressure, push pit bulls as good companion animals in the same shameful way that cigarette companies once pushed tobacco as a benign, relaxing and even therapeutic product." [24]
Additionally, she provided telling examples of how opponents are aggressively attacked and intimidated, a key aspect of tobacco industry tactics:
As a journalist who attempts to inform the public of the truth about pit bulls, I can certainly attest to the vigour and singlemindedness of PBAM's rank and file in their determination to chill any discourse in the public forum that exposes pit bull myths. I have been called a racist, a bigot and an advocate for doing to pit bulls "what Hitler did to the Jews." PBAM activists have written to my editor accusing me of a lack of journalistic integrity. PBAM activists follow me on Twitter to monitor my tweets and swiftly react to any that "diss" pit bulls.
Other journalists confirm to me that they receive the same treatment when they step with "incorrect" attitudes into this peculiar social quagmire. But the persecution of journalists is merely the tip of an intimidation iceberg. Well under the public radar, PBAM has had great success in cowing an entire dog-related infrastructure. [25]
Victim advocates' groups, such as http://dogsbite.org, http://nationalpitbullvictimawareness.org, and http://daxtonsfriends.com see even more detailed parallels between the pit bull and tobacco lobbies, e.g., pointing out:
A detailed comparison of the Tobacco Lobby and the Pit Bull Lobby from the point of view of the victim's advocate group http://dogsbite.org draws these parallels: [27]
Tactic | Tobacco Lobby | Pit Lobby |
---|---|---|
Trumpeting Experts | Paid medical experts | Paid veterinary experts |
Misdirection to other factors | Other risk factors for heart disease / cancer | Other "contributing factors" in fatal dog attacks |
Arguing terminology | "cancer" isn't a scientific term; there are many kinds | “pit bull” is meaningless slang; there is more than one breed |
The primary risk isn't determinate as the result isn't inevitable | Since not all people who smoke get lung cancer, smoking can’t be the cause | Since not all pit bulls attack, genetics and breed can't be the cause |
Arguing the statistics are inadequate without the highest standard of evidence | “Death certificates are notoriously inaccurate”—According to the Tobacco Institute, only autopsies are accurate enough to determine lung cancer is the cause of death | Dogs are misidentified as pit bulls; only DNA tests can confirm that a dog is a pit bull |
Pit bull is an umbrella term for several types of dog believed to have descended from bull and terriers. In the United States, the term is usually considered to include the American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, American Bully, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and sometimes the American Bulldog, along with any crossbred dog that shares certain physical characteristics with these breeds. In other countries, including the United Kingdom, the term is used as an abbreviation of the American Pit Bull Terrier breed specifically, while the Staffordshire Bull Terrier is not considered a pit bull. Most pit bull–type dogs descend from the British bull and terrier, a 19th-century dog-fighting type developed from crosses between the Old English Bulldog and the Old English Terrier.
The American Kennel Club (AKC) is a registry of purebred dog pedigrees in the United States. In addition to maintaining its pedigree registry, this kennel club also promotes and sanctions events for purebred dogs, including the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show, an annual event which predates the official forming of the AKC, the National Dog Show and the AKC National Championship. The AKC is a non-member partner with the Fédération Cynologique Internationale. The AKC recognizes 200 dog breeds, as of 2022.
The Staffordshire Bull Terrier, also called the Staffy or Stafford, is a purebred dog of small to medium size in the terrier group that originated in the northern parts of Birmingham and in the Black Country of Staffordshire, for which it is named. They descended from 19th-century bull terriers that were developed by crossing bulldogs with various terriers to create a generic type of dog generally known as bull and terriers. Staffords share the same ancestry with the modern Bull Terrier, although the two breeds developed along independent lines, and do not resemble each other. Modern Staffords more closely resemble the old type of bull terrier, and were first recognised as a purebred dog breed by The Kennel Club of Great Britain in 1935.
Dog fighting is a type of blood sport that turns game and fighting dogs against each other in a physical fight, often to the death, for the purposes of gambling or entertainment to the spectators. In rural areas, fights are often staged in barns or outdoor pits; in urban areas, fights are often staged in garages, basements, warehouses, alleyways, abandoned buildings, neighborhood playgrounds, or in the streets. Dog fights usually last until one dog is declared a winner, which occurs when one dog fails to scratch, dies, or jumps out of the pit. Sometimes dog fights end without declaring a winner; for instance, the dog's owner may call the fight.
In law, breed-specific legislation (BSL) is a type of law that prohibits or restricts particular breeds or types of dog. Such laws range from outright bans on the possession of these dogs, to restrictions and conditions on ownership, and often establishes a legal presumption that such dogs are dangerous or vicious to prevent dog attacks. Some jurisdictions have enacted breed-specific legislation in response to a number of fatalities or maulings involving pit bull–type dogs or other dog breeds commonly used in dog fighting, and some government organizations such as the United States Army and Marine Corps have taken administrative action as well. Due to opposition to such laws in the United States, anti-BSL laws have been passed in 21 of the 50 state-level governments, prohibiting or restricting the ability of jurisdictions within those states to enact or enforce breed-specific legislation.
The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom prohibiting or restricting certain types of dogs and codifying the criminal offence of allowing a dog of any breed to be dangerously out of control. After a series of eleven dog attacks in 1991, Home Secretary Kenneth Baker promised "to rid the country of the menace of these fighting dogs". The Act has been controversial for failing to stem the rise of dog attacks and for focusing on a dog's breed or looks instead of an individual dog's behaviour.
The American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT) is a dog breed recognized by the United Kennel Club (UKC) and the American Dog Breeders Association (ADBA), but not the American Kennel Club (AKC). It is a medium-sized, short-haired dog, of a solid build, whose early ancestors came from England. When compared with the English Staffordshire Bull Terrier, the American Pit Bull Terrier is larger by margins of 6–8 inches (15–20 cm) in height and 25–35 pounds (11–16 kg) in weight. The American Pit Bull Terrier varies in size: males are normally about 18–21 inches (45–53 cm) in height and around 35–60 pounds (15–27 kg) in weight, while females are normally around 17–20 inches (43–50 cm) in height and 30–50 pounds (13–22 kg) in weight.
The American Staffordshire Terrier, also known as the AmStaff, is a medium-sized, short-coated American dog breed recognized by the American Kennel Club, but not the United Kennel Club, which instead allows American Staffordshire Terriers to be registered under the American Pit Bull Terrier breed.
The Olde English Bulldogge is an American dog breed, recognized by the United Kennel Club (UKC) in January 2014. The breed is listed in the UKC Guardian Dog Group. Five years prior to UKC recognition, the breed was registered by the former Canine Developmental, Health and Performance Registry (CDHPR), a privately held business located in Kalamazoo, Michigan. In the early 2000s, CDHPR had been working with the UKC under a unique agreement to develop breeding plans and strategies in an effort to produce improved breeds of dogs that would be accepted as purebred and, therefore, eligible for UKC registration.
The Dobermann is a German breed of medium-large working dog of pinscher type. It was originally bred in Thuringia in about 1890 by Louis Dobermann, a tax collector. It has a long muzzle and – ideally – an even and graceful gait. The ears were traditionally cropped and the tail docked, practices which are now illegal in many countries.
A dog bite is a bite upon a person or other animal by a dog. More than one successive bite is often called a dog attack, although dog attacks can include knock-downs and scratches. Though some dog bites do not result in injury, they can result in infection, disfigurement, temporary or permanent disability, or death. Another type of dog bite is the "soft bite" displayed by well-trained dogs, by puppies, and in non-aggressive play. Dog bites can occur during dog fighting, as a response to mistreatment, by trained dogs working as guard, police or military animals, or during a random encounter.
Bull and terrier was a common name for crossbreeds between bulldogs and terriers in the early 1800s. Other names included half-and-halfs and half-breds. It was a time in history when, for thousands of years, dogs were classified by use or function, unlike the modern pets of today that were bred to be conformation show dogs and family pets. Bull and terrier crosses were originally bred to function as fighting dogs for bull- and bear-baiting, and other popular blood sports during the Victorian era. The sport of bull baiting required a dog with attributes such as tenacity and courage, a wide frame with heavy bone, and a muscular, protruding jaw. By crossing bulldogs with various terriers from Ireland and Great Britain, breeders introduced "gameness and agility" into the hybrid mix.
Badger-baiting is a form of blood sport in which badgers are baited with dogs. A baiting session typically results in the death of the badger, and possibly serious injuries to the dogs.
The Bull Arab is a type of dog developed in Australia for pig hunting. The dog was developed from crossing German Shorthaired Pointer, Greyhound and Bull Terrier. The result was a medium to large size, short-haired, muscular dog.
Fatal dog attacks in the United States cause the deaths of thirty to fifty people each year. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, there were 468 deaths in the United States from being bitten or struck by a dog between 2011 and 2021. This is an average of 43 deaths annually, ranging from a low of 31 deaths in 2016 and a high of 81 deaths in 2021. Dogs killed more males than females during the tracking decade. Children between the ages of one to four are most often the victims, accounting for 29.4% of the fatalities from dog attacks in 2022; those under the age of seventeen accounted for 56.7% of all fatalities that year.
Dogs in the United States have significant popularity and status – they are often treated as family members. Currently, the American Kennel Club is the largest registry of pure breed dogs across the world.
DogsBite.org is a nonprofit organization that publishes accounts of and compiles statistics of dog bite related fatalities throughout the United States, victim testimonies, an overview of breed-specific legislation within the United States, and advocates for victims of dog bites by promoting breed-specific legislation as a means to reduce serious dog attacks. The organization provides statistics and information to news organizations and has filed amicus briefs in court cases related to breed-specific legislation. The organization has been criticized for publishing misleading or inaccurate information.
Fatal dog attacks are human victim's deaths caused by dogs. The study of fatal dog attacks can lead to prevention techniques which can help to reduce all dog bite injuries, not only fatalities. Dog bites and attacks can result in pain, bruising, wounds, bleeding, soft tissue injury, broken bones, loss of limbs, scalping, disfigurement, life-threatening injuries, and death.
Animal Farm Foundation (AFF) is a pit bull and anti-BSL animal advocacy group set up by heiress Jane Berkey as a 501(c)(3) charity. It started as a horse rescue in 1985, then shifted focus to pit bull dogs when the founder adopted a pit bull and "discovered that 'pit bull' dog owners were not welcome in a lot of communities and spaces."
Essig 2019 study, "Dog bite injuries to the face: Is there risk with breed ownership? A systematic review with meta-analysis"
Golinko's 2016 study, "Characteristics of 1616 Consecutive Dog Bite Injuries at a Single Institution"
O'Brien et al., 2015 study, "Dog bites of the head and neck: an evaluation of a common pediatric trauma and associated treatment"
Bini's 2011 study, "Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs", Annals of Surgery
Kaye et al.'s 2009 study, "Pediatric Dog Bite Injuries: A 5-Year Review of the Experience at The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia"
Manitoba 2013 BSL study, "Effectiveness of breed-specific legislation in decreasing the incidence of dog-bite injury hospitalisations in people in the Canadian province of Manitoba"
Catalonia 2010 BSL study, "Decline in hospitalisations due to dog bite injuries in Catalonia, 1997-2008. An effect of government regulation?"
Pit Bulls Unleashed: Should They Be Banned?, 42:35 long
CBC Fifth Estate
La Presse article, Part I—Pitbulls: Qui Veut Sauver Les Pitbulls?
La Presse article, Part II—Pitbulls: De Quel Côté Penche la Science?
La Presse article, Part III—Pitbulls: Ce Qui N’a Pas été dit au Gouvernement
La Presse article, Part IV—Pitbulls: Comme Chiens et Chats
La Presse article, Part V—Pitbulls: Niveau Maximal D’Agressivité Atteint par Divers Gros Chiens lors d’un Test de Tempérament
La Presse article, Apologia for l'Ordre des Médecins Vétérinaires
La Presse article, l'Ordre des médecins vétérinaires fait son mea culpa
Forbes article on 501c3 vs 501c4
Lucy Muir's point-by-point comparison of pit bull lobby tactics to tobacco industry lobby tactics
Alexandra Semyonova's analysis of AVMA's “Literature Review on the Welfare Implications of The Role of Breed in Dog Bite Risk and Prevention”
BSL definition on rc4ps web site
BSL definition on DogsBite.org web site
NCRC Brochure on BSL for Activists
Karen Delise PR release for NCRC "Dog Bites on the Decline"
Karen Delise statement "Newspaper and media accounts of dog attacks are often seriously flawed" on 2007 web site for AFF when Karen Delise owned NCRC:
Guidestar Report on Animal Farm Foundation
Recent web page for NCRC:
NCRC Action fund
Recent 2023 version of AFF About Page, mentioning that NCRC is a subsidiary: "our subsidiary organization, National Canine Research Council.
Karen Delise original web page for NCRC in 2007:
Coyne PR's work for NCRC, their description:
Coyne PR's work for AFF, where NCRC is described as AFF's policy arm:
How to Win the War on Truth
Karen Delise self-published book "The Pit Bull Placebo":
Barbara Kay's book, "Acknowledgements: A Cultural Memoir and Other Essays.
Rampton & Stauber, 2002
WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization) Case of DogsBite.org vs Animal Farm Foundation legal case showing: (1) that NCRC is owned by Animal Farm Foundation and (2) illustrating one use of legal team Husch Blackwell Sanders LLP by AFF. (3) lack of transparency regarding AFF's ownership of NCRC.
Ohio v. Anderson: The courts determined "a dog owner of ordinary intelligence can determine if he does in fact own a dog commonly known as a pit bull."
Colorado Dog Fanciers v. Denver: The courts ruled "there is no constitutional requirement that legislation be written with scientific precision to be enforceable."