Animal Farm Foundation

Last updated

Animal Farm Foundation, Inc.
Founded1985
FounderJane Berkey
Type501(c)3 non-profit
FocusAdvocacy for pit bull type dogs and opposing breed specific legislation
Location
  • United States
MethodPublic relations including branding, marketing, legal action, and lobbying
OwnerJane Berkey
Key people
Jane Berkey, president
Subsidiaries National Canine Research Council
Endowment ≈$6M+
Employees
≈10
Website animalfarmfoundation.org

Animal Farm Foundation (AFF) is a pit bull and anti-BSL (anti-breed-specific legislation) animal advocacy group set up by heiress Jane Berkey as a 501(c)(3) charity. It started as a horse rescue in 1985, then shifted focus to pit bull dogs when the founder adopted a pit bull and "discovered that 'pit bull' dog owners were not welcome in a lot of communities and spaces." [1]

Contents

AFF maintains a farm of 400 acres in Dutchess County for "rescued and retired horses, cows and other farm life." It notes that dogs are their "main mission". [1] The 2021 Guidestar report for Animal Farm Foundation describes their mission as "Securing equal treatment and opportunity for 'pit bull' dogs." [2]

Animal Farm Foundation is controversial and highly influential: It has been described by Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's journalist Mark Kelley, as having a key role in a "pit bull lobby" in the investigative news series The Fifth Estate :

There’s actually something that we’re learning ... [that there is] a pro-pit bull lobby. When I started investigating this, I thought this couldn’t be. You got animal rights groups in United States. The Animal Farm Foundation is one, Best Friends Animal Society is another. These are multi-million dollar animal rights groups. They’ve got lawyers. They’ve got lobbyists, got market celebrities on their side: The dog whisperer, Jennifer Aniston, to Betty White posing with her dog saying that this is a perfect family-friendly dog, but it’s more than a marketing effort. It’s also a political effort right now in the United States. This lobby has convinced 21 states to ban bans, so if you were in your community in one of those 21 states it’s illegal to bring in a pit bull ban breed specific legislation, so it’s a political force. [3]

The key role in the pit bull lobby

Marie-Claude Malboeuf, reporter for Montreal's La Presse, described the pit bull lobby as an extensive and well-funded network, [4] comprising five different levels: [5]

  1. Financing—provided by Animal Farm Foundation.
  2. Policy studies—produced by the National Canine Research Council (NCRC), a research organization acquired by Animal Farm Foundation. They also fund projects consistent with pit bull and anti-BSL advocacy.
  3. Publication—of the NCRC studies by the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, which also links to Animal Farm Foundation and promotes its views.
  4. Political Lobbying—by members of Best Friends Animal Society and by their lobbyists to exert pressure on elected officials to advocate legislation favoring pit bull owners and opposing breed-specific legislation.
  5. Social Media Broadcasting—by shelters, breeders, trainers, and pit bull-related websites that promote AFF positions while attacking opponents in social media, often citing NCRC studies as justification.

Animal Farm Foundation has worked with three public relations firms:

  1. The Wakeman Agency [6]
  2. Coyne PR [7]
  3. Gatesman Agency [8]

and one major law firm, Husch Blackwell. [9]

The first PR firm, the Wakeman Agency, worked "to increase AFF’s media presence, to target specific cities with media campaigns to overturn legislation, and to strengthen their public voice through op-eds" so AFF would be perceived as an "expert and burgeoning thought leader on the issue of breed-specific legislation." [6]

A second PR firm, Coyne PR, helped Animal Farm Foundation set up The Majority Project, [10] a web site for pit bull owners to band together and share common experiences. Coyne PR described their work as helping "correct the misperception of 'pit bull' dogs", using a "PSA campaign ... to put brand spokespeople in the spotlight both nationally and locally." [7] The National Canine Research Council, a subsidiary of AFF, also worked with Coyne PR, in this case to "train police officers on the proper way to approach and deal with dogs." [11]

The third PR firm, Gatesman Agency, described their work with AFF as an "award-winning campaign [that] spanned eight months and involved local, trade and national media relations, a community event and a special newsjacking stunt that hijacked the social media conversation surrounding Pit Bull Awareness Month." [8] Gatesman said they had used their "Hacking Human Behavior™ approach" and performed "a deep dive into audience research that revealed the emotional motivations behind misperceptions about pit bulls" and then created "messages, visuals and storylines to generate a very different emotional response. [8] According to Animal Farm Foundation's 2017 990 PF records, AFF paid $262,938 to the Gatesman Agency.

Turning to the legal side, Animal Farm Foundation used the legal firm of Husch Blackwell LLP to challenge existing pit bull bans in Sioux City, Iowa; [12] Council Bluffs, Iowa; [13] and Williston, North Dakota. [14] Just to consider two years, AFF paid Husch Blackwell $102,298 in 2020 and $961,764 in 2021. [15] [16]

Husch Blackwell also represented AFF in the WIPO arbitration in a domain name dispute, during which NCRC was discovered to be funded by AFF after AFF was found to be the domain name owner of DogsBite.com and DogsBite.net. [17] [lower-alpha 1] [lower-alpha 2] Both sites redirect users to the NCRC website, nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com.

Overview of the controversy

Mark Kelley, reporter for CBC's The Fifth Estate, presented both sides of the pit bull controversy succinctly in a preview to the video investigative report "Pit Bulls Unleashed: Should They be Banned?": [18]

Mark Kelley: Pit bull-type dogs are considered so vicious by many that they are banned or restricted in more than 30 countries. But these powerful dogs are getting a multi-million dollar makeover by some powerful friends in the pro-pit bull lobby.
...

Mark Kelley: Why do pit bulls need lobbying?
Ledy VanKavage: Well, I think they are the most misunderstood dog there is and … they’re just dogs, they’re not werewolves.
...
Mark Kelley: Their message: the pit bull is the underdog. User-friendly, family-friendly, and the lobby is trying to silence its critics in Canada and the US.

Jeff Borchardt: It’s like David and Goliath: Every time we think we are getting our message out there, someone else is killed. [19]

In the quote above, Ledy VanKavage is a "lawyer, lobbyist, and a lifelong pit bull lover" [18] for Best Friends Animal Society, which advocates for pit bull owners and against breed-specific legislation. In contrast, Jeff Borchardt's son Daxton was killed by pit bulls when his baby sitter's two pit bull dogs attacked 11-month-old Daxton. [18] Subsequently, he started the website "Daxton's Friends", and advocates for pit bull victims and in favor of breed-specific legislation.

Contrasting positions between the pit bull lobby and pit bull victim advocates

Animal Farm Foundation and its subsidiary National Canine Research Council argue that BSL (breed-specific legislation) does not reduce dog bites. Further, they say that no particular breed is more likely to bite than another and "absurdly large numbers of targeted breeds would have to be completely removed from a community in order to prevent even one serious dog-bite related injury." [20]

In contrast, Mark Kelley, in a Q&A session on the Fifth Estate's video, "Pit Bulls Unleashed: Should They Be Banned?", found that most medical studies, especially in pediatric trauma, came to a different conclusion. He responded to viewer questions about Director of Plastic Surgery at the Children's Hospital in Little Rock, Arkansas, Dr. Golinko, and his findings [21] that pit bulls caused the majority of the most severe injuries and deaths:

I think it’s an important point to make about these studies from Dr. Golinko. They only confirm previous studies that have been done. In 2009, a study out of Philadelphia; [22] 2011, a study that came out of the University of Texas Health Science Center; [23] 2015, a study that came out of the University of California, [24] all about dog bites. Now what they conclude, in general, is that pit bull attacks have more severe injuries than dog bites from other breeds and a higher risk of death. There is worldwide consensus among the literature that individuals under 18 are the most susceptible to these bite injuries and the largest emergency department study to date found boys from five to nine years old the most susceptible to these bite injuries. [25]

Consequently, pit bull victim advocates argue that BSL is intended to reduce serious dog attacks, attacks where victims are mauled, maimed, disfigured, or killed, and that viewing the aim as simply reducing bites misrepresents their position. [26] Further, most independent studies conclude that pit bull type dogs are indeed responsible for the vast majority of severe injuries or fatalities. [21]

Accusations of deception and harassment

The techniques of Animal Farm Foundation, in particular the use of the National Canine Research Council to produce studies that contrast with independent studies showing that pit bull-type dogs are a serious and growing worldwide problem, has been likened to tobacco industry tactics, [27] in particular the use of ostensibly independent front organizations to produce scientific studies rebutting existing studies.

The link between Animal Farm Foundation and the National Canine Research Council was unknown from when Jane Berkey acquired the National Canine Research Council in 2007 up until 2010, when Dogsbite.org unsuccessfully filed a WIPO arbitration in a domain name dispute. The domain names in question, Dogsbite.net and Dogsbite.com, still redirect browsers to the National Canine Research Council website.

During the debate over a pit bull ban in Montreal in 2016, Emeritus McGill University professor Dr. Barry Pless, an expert [lower-alpha 3] in Pediatric Trauma and Epidemiology, as well as founder of the medical journal Injury Prevention, [lower-alpha 4] acted as an independent consultant for the Canadian newspaper La Presse . Dr. Pless was "scandalized at the abuse of epidemiological norms he found being used to launder pit bulls". [28] He said: “To conduct studies, which aim first of all to prevent laws from being adopted and not declare their conflict of interest, is the strategy employed by the weapons lobby and the tobacco lobby.” [27] Rampton and Stauber, in their book Trust Us, We're Experts , explained the public relations use of the third party technique referred to here, and used by the tobacco industry, saying that “The tobacco industry…helped invent the strategy of using scientists as third-party advocates…”. [29]

Arguments over identifying pit bull type dogs

Animal Farm Foundation has funded studies by the National Canine Research Council that have concluded that pit bull-type dogs cannot be reliably identified based solely on visual identification.

In contrast, victim advocate sites point out multiple court cases that ruled that ordinary dog owners can identify pit bull-type dogs. Specifically, the courts determined "a dog owner of ordinary intelligence can determine if he does in fact own a dog commonly known as a pit bull." [30] Furthermore, the courts have ruled "there is no constitutional requirement that legislation be written with scientific precision to be enforceable." [31] So, DNA sampling need not be done for every media-reported case to be valid, and as Dr. Golinko noted in his interview, in most pediatric trauma cases the identification was straightforward:

Mark: How were you able to identify whether these were in fact pit bulls that had attacked these victims?

Dr. Golinko: That’s a great question. It’s because the majority of the biting dogs is either a family dog or a dog known to the family, meaning, you know, mom's boyfriend or ex-husband brings over a dog, or grandma brings over a dog, it's typically a dog that the child is familiar with, in most situations. [32]

Arguments over tracking dog attacks by breed

Karen Delise, former director and founder of the National Canine Research Council, has argued that "media accounts of dog attacks are often seriously flawed". [33] The National Canine Research Council has produced studies to cast doubt on news reports where pit bulls are identified as killing people by variously discrediting the news media for inaccurate or "sensationalist" reporting; discrediting visual identification by saying only expert identification or forensics, such as DNA analysis, is reliable; and further attacking critics by attributing the motives of those in favor of BSL to racism and discrimination, e.g., saying that "All breed-specific policies and laws can be traced to racism, classism, and ableism." [34]

In contrast, victim advocates, such as Dogsbite.org, track all dog fatalities reported in the US, including breed reports and photographs of the dogs. Dogsbite.org has been used as a source in a Forbes article [35] on pit bull danger and recommended as a source for pit bull dog owners by D. Caroline Coile, PhD, [36] who has authored 34 books, including Pit Bulls for Dummies [37] and Barron's Encyclopedia of Dog Breeds. [38]

See also

Notes

  1. Marie-Claude Malboeuf's La Presse article says,"To produce studies, the Animal Farm Foundation purchased a private research organization in 2007. The acquisition was kept secret until the Dogbite Victims Group discovered it, during a legal dispute.”
  2. In AFF's response to the WIPO complaint dated June 21, 2010, page 4: "In July 2007, AFF purchased all right, title and interest in the National Canine Research Council, including its intellectual property and the domain name nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com from Karen Delise. At that time, AFF established the National Canine Research Council, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ("NCRC"). AFF is the sole member of NCRC.
  3. For example, Dr. Barry Pless has over 13000 citations on Google Scholar.
  4. The Injury Prevention journal is published by BMJ Group, which publishes medical journals, including the British Medical Journal.

Citations

  1. 1 2 About AFF 2023.
  2. Guidestar on AFF 2021.
  3. The Pit Bull Debate 2017.
  4. Pitbulls: Qui Veut Sauver Les Pitbulls? 2016.
  5. Pitbulls: Comme Chiens et Chats 2016.
  6. 1 2 Wakeman PR 2023.
  7. 1 2 Coyne PR for AFF 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 Gatesman Agency 2019.
  9. "Husch Blackwell: Trusted Legal Leaders". Husch Blackwell.
  10. The Majority Project 2023.
  11. Coyne PR for NCRC 2023.
  12. Sioux City Challenge 2022.
  13. Council Bluffs Challenge 2022.
  14. Williston Challenge 2022.
  15. Roberts, Andrea; Schwenke, Ken; Tigas, Mike; Wei, Sisi; Glassford, Alec (November 15, 2021). "Animal Farm Foundation Inc, Form 990PF - Nonprofit Explorer". ProPublica. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  16. Roberts, Andrea; Schwenke, Ken; Tigas, Mike; Wei, Sisi; Glassford, Alec (November 15, 2022). "Animal Farm Foundation Inc, Form 990PF - Nonprofit Explorer". ProPublica. Retrieved August 11, 2023.
  17. Samuel, Rothnie & Badgley 2010.
  18. 1 2 3 Pit Bulls Unleashed: Should They Be Banned? 2017.
  19. Preview Pit Bulls Unleashed 2017.
  20. National Canine Research Council. "Breed Specific Legislation" (PDF). National Canine Research Council. p. 13.
  21. 1 2 Golinko, Arslanian & Williams 2016.
  22. Kaye, Belz & Kirschner 2009.
  23. Bini et al. 2011.
  24. O'Brien et al. 2015.
  25. Pit Bulls Unleashed: Q&A 2017.
  26. Semyonova, Alexandra (2016). "Selling a lobbying pamphlet as science: Analysis of the May 15, 2014 AVMA pamphlet "Literature Review on the Welfare Implications of The Role of Breed in Dog Bite Risk and Prevention"" (Blog). Nonlinear Dogs. Retrieved September 2, 2023.
  27. 1 2 De Quel Côté Penche la Science? 2016.
  28. Kay, Barbara (November 16, 2016). "Pit bull bylaws make sense". Barbara Kay, columnist for National Post . Retrieved July 26, 2023.
  29. Rampton & Stauber 2002.
  30. Ohio v. Anderson 1990.
  31. Colorado Dog Fanciers v. Denver 1991.
  32. "Pit Bulls Unleashed: Should They Be Banned?" (News). Canadian Broadcasting Corporation:The Fifth Estate. September 22, 2017. 19:39 minutes in. Retrieved June 20, 2023.
  33. Pit Bull Placebo 2007.
  34. NCRC BSL Brochure 2023.
  35. McCarthy, Niall. "America's Most Dangerous Dog Breeds [Infographic]" (News). Forbes. Retrieved August 10, 2023.
  36. Coile 2020, pp. 45, 230.
  37. Coile 2020.
  38. Coile 1998.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pit bull</span> Type of dog

Pit bull is an umbrella term for several types of dog believed to have descended from bull and terriers. In the United states, the term is usually considered to include the American Pit Bull Terrier, American Staffordshire Terrier, American Bully, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, and sometimes the American Bulldog, along with any crossbred dog that shares certain physical characteristics with these breeds. In other countries, including the United Kingdom, the term is used as an abbreviation of the American Pit Bull Terrier breed specifically, while the Staffordshire Bull Terrier is not considered a pit bull. Most pit bull-type dogs descend from the British bull and terrier, a 19th-century dog-fighting type developed from crosses between the Old English Bulldog and the Old English Terrier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bulldog</span> British breed of dog

The Bulldog is a British breed of dog of mastiff type. It may also be known as the English Bulldog or British Bulldog. It is a medium-sized, muscular dog of around 40–55 lb (18–25 kg). They have large heads with thick folds of skin around the face and shoulders and a relatively flat face with a protruding lower jaw. The breed has significant health issues as a consequence of breeding for its distinctive appearance, including brachycephaly, hip dysplasia, heat sensitivity, and skin infections. Due to concerns about their quality of life, breeding Bulldogs is illegal in Norway and the Netherlands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Staffordshire Bull Terrier</span> British breed of dog

The Staffordshire Bull Terrier, also called the Staffy or Stafford, is a purebred dog of small to medium size in the terrier group that originated in the northern parts of Birmingham and in the Black Country of Staffordshire, for which it is named. They descended from 19th-century bull terriers that were developed by crossing bulldogs with various terriers to create a generic type of dog generally known as bull and terriers. Staffords share the same ancestry with the modern Bull Terrier, although the two breeds developed along independent lines, and do not resemble each other. Modern Staffords more closely resemble the old type of bull terrier, and were first recognised as a purebred dog breed by The Kennel Club of Great Britain in 1935.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dog fighting</span> Blood sport

Dog fighting is a type of blood sport that turns game and fighting dogs against each other in a physical fight, often to the death, for the purposes of gambling or entertainment to the spectators. In rural areas, fights are often staged in barns or outdoor pits; in urban areas, fights are often staged in garages, basements, warehouses, alleyways, abandoned buildings, neighborhood playgrounds, or in the streets. Dog fights usually last until one dog is declared a winner, which occurs when one dog fails to scratch, dies, or jumps out of the pit. Sometimes dog fights end without declaring a winner; for instance, the dog's owner may call the fight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Bulldog</span> Dog breed

The American bulldog is a large, muscular breed of mastiff-type dog. Their ancestors were brought to the British North American colonies where they worked on small farms and ranches.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Breed-specific legislation</span> Legislation specific for breeds that are used in illegal dog fighting

In law, breed-specific legislation (BSL) is a type of law that prohibits or restricts particular breeds or types of dog. Such laws range from outright bans on the possession of these dogs, to restrictions and conditions on ownership, and often establishes a legal presumption that such dogs are dangerous or vicious to prevent dog attacks. Some jurisdictions have enacted breed-specific legislation in response to a number of fatalities or maulings involving pit bull–type dogs or other dog breeds commonly used in dog fighting, and some government organizations such as the United States Army and Marine Corps have taken administrative action as well. Due to opposition to such laws in the United States, anti-BSL laws have been passed in 21 of the 50 state-level governments, prohibiting or restricting the ability of jurisdictions within those states to enact or enforce breed-specific legislation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dangerous Dogs Act 1991</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom prohibiting or restricting certain types of dogs and codifying the criminal offence of allowing a dog of any breed to be dangerously out of control. After a series of eleven dog attacks in 1991, Home Secretary Kenneth Baker promised "to rid the country of the menace of these fighting dogs". The Act has been controversial for failing to stem the rise of dog attacks and for focusing on a dog's breed or looks instead of an individual dog's behaviour.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Pit Bull Terrier</span> American dog breed

The American Pit Bull Terrier (APBT) is a dog breed recognized by the United Kennel Club (UKC) and the American Dog Breeders Association (ADBA), but not the American Kennel Club (AKC). It is a medium-sized, short-haired dog, of a solid build, whose early ancestors came from England. When compared with the English Staffordshire Bull Terrier, the American Pit Bull Terrier is larger by margins of 6–8 inches (15–20 cm) in height and 25–35 pounds (11–16 kg) in weight. The American Pit Bull Terrier varies in size: males are normally about 18–21 inches (45–53 cm) in height and around 35–60 pounds (15–27 kg) in weight, while females are normally around 17–20 inches (43–50 cm) in height and 30–50 pounds (13–22 kg) in weight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Staffordshire Terrier</span> Dog breed

The American Staffordshire Terrier, also known as the AmStaff, is a medium-sized, short-coated American dog breed recognized by the American Kennel Club, but not the United Kennel Club, which instead allows American Staffordshire Terriers to be registered under the American Pit Bull Terrier breed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tosa (dog breed)</span> Dog breed

The Tosa Inu is a breed of dog of Japanese origin that is considered rare. It was originally bred in Tosa, Shikoku, as a fighting dog and is the only breed still used (legally) in Japanese dog fighting. Ownership is restricted in some countries as a dangerous breed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dog bite</span> Bite by a dog that is upon a person or other animal

A dog bite is a bite upon a person or other animal by a dog, including from a rabid dog. More than one successive bite is often called a dog attack, although dog attacks can include knock-downs and scratches. Though some dog bites do not result in injury, they can result in infection, disfigurement, temporary or permanent disability, or death. Another type of dog bite is the "soft bite" displayed by well-trained dogs, by puppies, and in non-aggressive play. Dog bites can occur during dog fighting, as a response to mistreatment, by trained dogs working as guard, police or military animals, or during a random encounter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bull and terrier</span> Mixed breed

Bull and terrier was a common name for crossbreeds between bulldogs and terriers in the early 1800s. Other names included half-and-halfs and half-breds. It was a time in history when, for thousands of years, dogs were classified by use or function, unlike the modern pets of today that were bred to be conformation show dogs and family pets. Bull and terrier crosses were originally bred to function as fighting dogs for bull- and bear-baiting, and other popular blood sports during the Victorian era. The sport of bull baiting required a dog with attributes such as tenacity and courage, a wide frame with heavy bone, and a muscular, protruding jaw. By crossing bulldogs with various terriers from Ireland and Great Britain, breeders introduced "gameness and agility" into the hybrid mix.

Dogs in the United States have significant popularity and status – they are often treated as family members. Currently, the American Kennel Club is the largest registry of pure breed dogs across the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Status dog</span> Dog kept to add to an owners tough image

Status dog is a term used in the United Kingdom to describe a potentially dangerous or aggressive dog that is kept as a symbol of the owner's hard or tough image, to intimidate others, and possibly as a weapon. This idea has persisted through centuries, tracing back to Roman times. More recently, after news of vicious dogs mauling young victims, the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 placed restrictions on the ownership and care of four types of dog ; while two further breeds, the Rottweiler and the Staffordshire Bull Terrier, are also widely perceived as status dogs. The UK has been taking steps to address the problem, starting with the Metropolitan Police establishing a dedicated Status Dog Unit in 2009.

DogsBite.org is a nonprofit organization that publishes accounts of and compiles statistics of dog bite related fatalities throughout the United States, victim testimonies, an overview of breed-specific legislation within the United States, and advocates for victims of dog bites by promoting breed-specific legislation as a means to reduce serious dog attacks. The organization provides statistics and information to news organizations and has filed amicus briefs in court cases related to breed-specific legislation. The organization has been criticized of publishing misleading or inaccurate information.

Fatal dog attacks are human deaths caused by dogs. The study of fatal dog attacks can lead to prevention techniques which can help to reduce all dog bite injuries, not only fatalities. Dog bites and attacks can result in pain, bruising, wounds, bleeding, soft tissue injury, broken bones, loss of limbs, scalping, disfigurement, life-threatening injuries, and death.

The American Dog Breeders Association (ADBA) is an all-breed dog registry founded in 1909 by Guy McCord and Con Feeley. The registry is headquartered in Salt Lake City, UT in the U.S., but has multiple affiliate clubs located around the world. The registry began by promoting the John Colby strain of pit bull types. Over time, the focus changed to the registration and promotion of purebred American Pit Bull Terriers, a breed that few other breed registries have recognized because of its ancestral origins as a fighting dog in England and Ireland. The first official breed registry to recognize American Pit Bull Terriers was the United Kennel Club (UKC) in 1898 when it registered its first dog, "Bennett’s Ring", owned by UKC founder C. Z. Bennett. ADBA sponsors various conformation dog shows, weight pulling competitions, and Top Dog Athletic Events consisting of three canine competitions: treadmill race, wall climb and lure coursing. In 1976, ADBA began publishing a quarterly magazine titled The American Pit Bull Terrier Gazette.

The National Canine Research Council (NCRC) is an animal advocacy group, originally started by Karen Delise, a veterinary technician. It was later acquired by Jane Berkey, the owner of Animal Farm Foundation and registered as National Canine Research Council, LLC in 2007. Its current website describes itself as "A Research & Policy Think Tank". The National Canine Research Council is a subsidiary of Animal Farm Foundation (AFF). The AVMA has published National Canine Research Council articles and also receives funding from Animal Farm Foundation. The National Canine Research Council has an associated 501(c)(4) fund called the National Canine Research Council Action Fund, which can directly support lobbying and political activities.

References

Medical studies

Books

Archived web pages

News media

Video investigative reports

Court cases

Further reading


News media

Court Cases