Navicert

Last updated

The navicert, short for navigation certificate, [1] also known as a "Letter of Assurance" was a form of commercial passport issued to allow ships to pass through blockades without inspection. This was of particular relevance during the British naval blockades of Germany in WWI and WWII.

Contents

Background

Navicerts were introduced at the suggestion of US Consul General in London Robert Peet Skinner and first issued in March 1916, as a method of reducing the inconvenience of the blockade to neutral trade. The system was reintroduced for WWII starting 1 December 1939. [2]

A notice on 17 November 1939 explained the system:

For the benefit of exporters and others who are not familiar with the operation of the system, a navicert may be explained as a form of commercial passport. Intending exporters desiring to take advantage of the system may apply to the nearest British Consulate on special forms obtainable from any British Consulate in the U. S. and, if the intended consignment is regarded as unobjectionable, they will be granted a navicert for it. A charge of two dollars will be made for navicerts granted, to cover the cost of the necessary telegraphic enquiries. The navicert must be carried in the same ship as the goods to which it relates, and it will then ensure favourable treatment at the hands of the British contraband patrols. Vessels whose entire cargo is covered by navicerts will be subjected to the minimum of delay.

— British Embassy [2]

Navicerts were approached legally as the British authorities voluntarily refraining from their rights of Visit and Search. This meant that these ships whose entire cargoes were navicerted could avoid delays and uncertainty from being stopped and searched, or diverted to a British port for inspection. The system also provided numerous benefits to the British. It reduced the burden on the British navy and prize courts to police the blockade, conduct inspections and make judgements. Further, the system encouraged neutrals to cooperate with the blockade, as exporters of acceptable goods would insist that their cargo be not co-mingled with unacceptable goods that would cause the whole shipment to be delayed. Quotas could also be imposed on navicerts to stop neutrals from accruing surpluses that could be exported to enemies. However, by cooperating with the British in this way, it has been argued that neutrals were breaching their neutrality by conducting activity (including allowing inspection by British officials) in favour of a belligerent on their territory. [3] The US did not officially endorse the system while neutral in WWII. [2]

The system was highly successful in WWI, with 30,000 granted out of 40,000 applications by the US entry into WWI in April 1917. The system continued to be used with American trade until all exports came under the control of the War Trade Board. In WWII the system was quickly begun in December 1939 under the Ministry of Economic Warfare, and became compulsory by July 1940, with 5000-7000 applications made per month in 1941. [4] A similar system called mailcert was implemented for mail. [2] A so-called "reverse-navicert" was also used, the "certificate of origin and interest" system, which certified that ships did not transport German products. [4] The system ended at the end of September 1946. [5]

A blank example of a WWII navicert can be found in Matson's book on the topic. [6]

Though in a modern war the implementation of the navicert system would likely be quite different, as of 2014 US and German military manuals include the navicert system as a legitimate mechanism for conducting a blockade (mostly replacing prize courts) and do not consider it a violation of neutrality. [1]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Embargo Act of 1807</span> 1807 U.S. law forbidding trade with all other countries

The Embargo Act of 1807 was a general trade embargo on all foreign nations that was enacted by the United States Congress. As a successor or replacement law for the 1806 Non-importation Act and passed as the Napoleonic Wars continued, it represented an escalation of attempts to persuade Britain to stop any impressment of American sailors and to respect American sovereignty and neutrality but also attempted to pressure France and other nations in the pursuit of general diplomatic and economic leverage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Continental System</span> 1806–1814 embargo of Europe against Britain

The Continental Blockade, or Continental System, was a large-scale embargo by French emperor Napoleon I against the British Empire from 21 November 1806 until 11 April 1814, during the Napoleonic Wars. Napoleon issued the Berlin Decree on 21 November 1806 in response to the naval blockade of the French coasts enacted by the British government on 16 May 1806. The embargo was applied intermittently, ending on 11 April 1814 after Napoleon's first abdication.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blockade</span> Prevention of trade or movement by force

A blockade is the act of actively preventing a country or region from receiving or sending out food, supplies, weapons, or communications, and sometimes people, by military force. A blockade differs from an embargo or sanction, which are legal barriers to trade rather than physical barriers. It is also distinct from a siege in that a blockade is usually directed at an entire country or region, rather than a fortress or city and the objective may not always be to conquer the area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blockade runner</span> Merchant ship used to evade a naval blockade

A blockade runner is a merchant vessel used for evading a naval blockade of a port or strait. It is usually light and fast, using stealth and speed rather than confronting the blockaders in order to break the blockade. Blockade runners usually transport cargo, for example bringing food or arms to a blockaded city. They have also carried mail in an attempt to communicate with the outside world.

Swedish iron ore was an important economic and military factor in the European theatre of World War II, as Sweden was the main contributor of iron ore to Nazi Germany. The average percentages by source of Nazi Germany’s iron ore procurement through 1933–43 by source were: Sweden: 43.0 Domestic production (Germany): 28.2 France: 12.9. Within the German military the Navy was most dependent on Swedish steel as an absolute necessity to the German war effort, according to their grand admiral. It has also been argued that the Swedish export helped prolong the war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Unrestricted submarine warfare</span> Military Doctrine

Unrestricted submarine warfare is a type of naval warfare in which submarines sink merchant ships such as freighters and tankers without warning. The use of unrestricted submarine warfare has had significant impacts on international relations in regards to both the First World War and the Second World War. Its history has been dominated by German decision making.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prize court</span>

A prize court is a court authorized to consider whether prizes have been lawfully captured, typically whether a ship has been lawfully captured or seized in time of war or under the terms of the seizing ship's letters of marque and reprisal. A prize court may order the sale or destruction of the seized ship, and the distribution of any proceeds to the captain and crew of the seizing ship. A prize court may also order the return of a seized ship to its owners if the seizure was unlawful, such as if seized from a country which had proclaimed its neutrality.

German tanker <i>Altmark</i>

Altmark was a German oil tanker and supply vessel, one of five of a class built between 1937 and 1939. She is best known for her support of the German commerce raider, the "pocket battleship" Admiral Graf Spee and her subsequent involvement in the "Altmark Incident". In 1940 she was renamed Uckermark and used as supply tanker for the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau during Operation Berlin before sailing to Japan in September 1942 as a blockade breaker.

The Milan Decree was issued on 17 December 1807 by Napoleon I of France to enforce the 1806 Berlin Decree, which had initiated the Continental System, the basis for his plan to defeat the British by waging economic warfare.

The 1807 Orders in Council were a series of decrees, in the form of Orders in Council, made by the Privy Council of the United Kingdom in the course of the wars with Napoleonic France which instituted its policy of commercial warfare. The Orders are important for the role they played in shaping the British war effort against France, but they are also significant for the strained relations—and sometimes military conflict—they caused between Great Britain and neutral countries, whose trade was affected by them.

Economic warfare or economic war is an economic strategy used by belligerent states with the goal of weakening the economy of other states. This is primarily achieved by the use of economic blockades. Ravaging the crops of the enemy is a classic method, used for thousands of years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prize (law)</span> Vessel, cargo, or equipment captured during armed conflict on the seas

In admiralty law prizes are equipment, vehicles, vessels, and cargo captured during armed conflict. The most common use of prize in this sense is the capture of an enemy ship and its cargo as a prize of war. In the past, the capturing force would commonly be allotted a share of the worth of the captured prize. Nations often granted letters of marque that would entitle private parties to capture enemy property, usually ships. Once the ship was secured on friendly territory, it would be made the subject of a prize case: an in rem proceeding in which the court determined the status of the condemned property and the manner in which the property was to be disposed of.

At the start of World War II in 1939, the Portuguese Government announced on 1 September that the 550-year-old Anglo-Portuguese Alliance remained intact, but since the British did not seek Portuguese assistance, Portugal was free to remain neutral in the war and would do so. In an aide-mémoire of 5 September 1939, the British government confirmed the understanding. As Adolf Hitler's occupation swept across Europe, neutral Portugal became one of Europe's last escape routes. Portugal was able to maintain its neutrality until 1944, when a military agreement was signed to give the United States permission to establish a military base in Terceira Island in the Azores and thus its status changed to non-belligerent in favour of the Allies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blockade of Germany (1914–1919)</span> WWI naval blockade

The Blockade of Germany, or the Blockade of Europe, occurred from 1914 to 1919. The prolonged naval blockade was conducted by the Allies during and after World War I in an effort to restrict the maritime supply of goods to the Central Powers, which included Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. The blockade is considered one of the key elements in the eventual Allied victory in the war. In December 1918, the German Board of Public Health claimed that 763,000 German civilians had already died from starvation and disease caused by the blockade. An academic study done in 1928 put the death toll at 424,000, with similar or lower numbers given by more recent scholars, noting however complications with the degree of attribution of Spanish flu deaths. Around 100,000 people may have died during the post-armistice continuation of the blockade in 1919. However, it has been pointed out that there was an even slightly larger civilian excess mortality during the war in the United Kingdom, a country that was much less affected by food shortages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Irish Mercantile Marine during World War II</span> Overview of the IMM during World War II

The Irish Mercantile Marine during World War II continued essential overseas trade in the conflict, a period referred to as The Long Watch by Irish mariners.

The Treaty of Amity and Commerce Between the United States and Sweden, officially A treaty of Amity and Commerce concluded between His Majesty the King of Sweden and the United States of North America, was a treaty signed on April 3, 1783 in Paris, France between the United States and the Kingdom of Sweden. The treaty officially established commercial relations between these two nations and was signed during the American Revolutionary War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blockade of Germany (1939–1945)</span> WWII operation to restrict supply lines

The Blockade of Germany (1939–1945), also known as the Economic War, involved operations carried out during World War II by the British Empire and by France in order to restrict the supplies of minerals, fuel, metals, food and textiles needed by Nazi Germany – and later by Fascist Italy – in order to sustain their war efforts. The economic war consisted mainly of a naval blockade, which formed part of the wider Battle of the Atlantic, but also included the bombing of economically important targets and the preclusive buying of war materials from neutral countries in order to prevent their sale to the Axis powers.

The Essex Decision was a ruling made by the English High Court of Admiralty on 22 May 1805 regarding the capture of the American merchant vessel, Essex. The decision called upon the Rule of 1756, which stated that neutral nations in wartime were only permitted to carry goods that they were permitted to carry in peacetime. Essex was ruled to have violated the Rule of 1756. This led to a sharp increase in British seizure of American ships by the same reasoning and was one of the leading causes of the War of 1812.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Peet Skinner</span> American diplomat

Robert Peet Skinner was an American diplomat, editor, and publisher.

The Netherlands remained neutral during World War I, a stance that arose partly from a strict policy of neutrality in international affairs that started in 1830, with the secession of Belgium from the Netherlands. Dutch neutrality was not guaranteed by the major powers in Europe and was not part of the Dutch constitution. The country's neutrality was based on the belief that its strategic position between the German Empire, German-occupied Belgium, and the British guaranteed its safety.

References

  1. 1 2 Farrant, James (2014). "Modern Maritime Neutrality Law". International Law Studies. 90. US Naval War College: 243–245.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Moos, Malcom (1944). "The Navicert in World War II". The American Journal of International Law. 38 (1).
  3. ↑ Neff, Stephen C (2018). "Disrupting a Delicate Balance: The Allied Blockade Policy and the Law of Maritime Neutrality during the Great War". European Journal of International Law. 29. doi:10.1093/ejil/chy026.
  4. 1 2 Cox, Nechama Janet Cohen (2001). The Ministry of Economic Warfare and Britain's conduct of economic warfare, 1939-1945 (PDF) (PhD thesis). pp. 89–90.
  5. ↑ "British Navicert Control System For Commerce Will End Oct. 1". New York Times. 20 September 1946.
  6. ↑ Matson, Robert W. (1994). Neutrality and navicerts : Britain, the United States, and economic warfare, 1939-1940. p. 85.


This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.