Noblesse Oblige (book)

Last updated

Noblesse Oblige
Noblesse-oblige-book-cover-wikipedia.jpg
First edition (UK)
Editor Nancy Mitford (credited) [lower-alpha 1]
CountryUnited Kingdom
LanguageEnglish
Subject Linguistic
Genre Essays
Published1956 Hamish Hamilton (UK)
Media typePrint (Hardback)
Pages114

Noblesse Oblige: An Enquiry Into the Identifiable Characteristics of the English Aristocracy (1956) is a book illustrated by Osbert Lancaster, caricaturist of English manners, and published by Hamish Hamilton. The anthology comprises four brief essays by Nancy Mitford, Alan S. C. Ross, "Strix" and Christopher Sykes, a letter by Evelyn Waugh, and a poem by John Betjeman.

Contents

Until Nancy Mitford wrote "The English Aristocracy" in an article published in 1955, England was blissfully unconscious of 'U' ('Upperclass') usage. Her article sparked off a public debate, whose counterblasts are collected in this book, published one year later. [1] Although the subtitle rather dryly suggests it as an enquiry into the identifying characteristics of members of the English upper-class, it is really more of a debate, with each essayist entertaining and convincing.

Mitford was credited incorrectly as the editor of the book, though she was merely one of its contributors. [lower-alpha 1]

Overview

This collection of essays started with Nancy Mitford's article "The English Aristocracy", published in 1955 in the magazine Encounter in response to a serious academic article by the British linguist Ross (below). The expressions 'U' (upper class) and 'non-U' (non-upper class) came to prominence [2] in this article, which sold out the edition of the magazine immediately after publication. The article caused a great deal of light-hearted controversy. The book was published one year later. There is sharp disagreement among the Us who have contributed to this book.

Considered one of the most gifted comic writers of her time, Mitford, who had had an aristocratic upbringing along with her sisters, said she wrote the article about her peers "In order to demonstrate the upper middle class does not merge imperceptibly into the middle class". [3] She said differences of speech distinguish the members of one social class in England from another. The daughter of a Baron, she was therefore an "Hon" − honourable. Deborah Cavendish, the Duchess of Devonshire, the youngest of the famously (and sometimes infamously) unconventional Mitford sisters, wrote a letter to Encounter [4] about the article saying: "... as the co-founder, with my sister Jessica, [5] of the Hons Club, I would like to point out that ... the word Hon meant Hen in Honnish... We were very fond of chickens and on the whole preferred their company to that of human beings ...". [6]

Reviews

Noblesse Oblige was reviewed favorably by Time magazine in May 1956:

In these days of penurious peers and vanishing stately homes, how can one tell whether an Englishman is a genuine member of the Upper Class? Last week, in a slim anthology of aristocratic manners edited by aristocratic Novelist Nancy Mitford (Noblesse Oblige; Hamish Hamilton), England got an answer that has managed to stir up everyone from Novelist Graham Greene to Actor John Loder. Not since Humorist Stephen Potter launched the cult of gamesmanship had the nation been so obsessed as it was over the difference between U (Upper Class) and non-U.

— Time Magazine [7]

Two decades later, in its obituary upon Mitford's death, the New York Times had this to say about the book:

Unabashedly snobbish and devastatingly witty, Miss Mitford achieved enormous success and popularity as one of Britain's most piercing observers of social manners... Indeed, one of Miss Mitford's pet concerns entered the history of obscure literary debates when, in 1955, she published perhaps her most famous essay on upper-class and non-upper-class forms of speech. The essay sparked such a controversy in Britain, with responses from many major literary figures, that Miss Mitford was compelled a year later to bring out a thin book, Noblesse Oblige, with her disquisition on the subject as its centerpiece. Her argument, a set-piece even today among literary parlor games, was that the more elegant euphemism used for any word is usually the non-upper-class thing to say—or, in Miss Mitford's words, simply non-U. Thus: It is very non-U to say "dentures"; "false teeth" will do. Ill is non-U; sick is U. The non-U person resides at his home. The U person lives in his house. And so forth.

— The New York Times [8]

Contents

"The English Aristocracy"

Nancy Mitford writes in the first essay that the English aristocracy is the only real aristocracy left in the world today, even if it may seem to be on the verge of decadence: it has political power through the House of Lords and real social position through the Queen. Then she explains the order of precedence of dukes, marquesses, earls, viscounts, barons, members of a noble family, young sons, baronets, knights and knights of the Garter. Accused of being a snob, she quotes from Alan Ross of Birmingham University who points out that "it is solely by their language that the upper classes nowadays are distinguished since they are neither cleaner, richer, nor better-educated than anybody else". Mitford says Ross invented the U and non-U English useful formula. Though she doesn't agree completely with the Professor's list, she adopts his classification system, and adds a few suggestions of her own. [9] She gives many examples of U and non-U usage and thoroughly explains the aristocracy saying, for example, dukes are rather new creations, the purpose of the aristocrat is most emphatically not to work for money, and nobility in England is based on title and not on bloodline. The ancestors of the lords spent months abroad, buying pictures and statues, which they cheerfully sell in order to spend months abroad, she writes.

"U and Non-U — An Essay in Sociological Linguistics" by Alan S. C. Ross

The second article is a condensed and simplified version of Professor Ross’ "Linguistic Class-Indicators in Present-Day English", [10] which appeared in 1954 in the Finnish philological periodical Neuphilologische Mitteilungen. For him the English class-system was essentially tripartite — there exists an upper, a middle, and a lower class. Solely by its language it is possible to identify them. In times past (e.g. in the Victorian and Edwardian periods) this was not the case. In fact the Professor says there are, it is true, a few minor points of life which may serve to demarcate the upper class, but they are minor ones, and he is concerned in this essay only with the linguistic demarcation. [11] This line, for the Professor, is, often, a line between, on one hand, gentlemen and, on the other, persons who, though not gentlemen, must at first sight appear, or would like to appear, as such. Thus, habits of speech peculiar to the lower classes find no place in this article. He also addresses the written language, considering the following points: names on envelopes, etc., beginning of letters, names on cards, postal addresses on envelopes, etc. at the heads of letters, and on cards; finally, letter-endings.

"An open letter" by Evelyn Waugh

Evelyn Waugh wrote the third contribution, An open letter to the Honble Mrs. Peter Rodd (Nancy Mitford) on a very serious subject from Evelyn Waugh, which also first appeared in Encounter . [12] Widely regarded as a master of style of the 20th century, Waugh, who was a great friend of Nancy Mitford, [13] added his own thoughts to the class debate and points out that Nancy is a delightful trouble maker to write such a thing but also someone who only just managed to be upper class and now resides in another country, so — he asks — who is she really to even bring it all up? [14] Although this may seem offensive, Nancy Mitford said that "everything with Evelyn Waugh was jokes. Everything. That's what none of the people who wrote about him seem to have taken into account at all". [15]

"Posh Lingo" by "Strix"

A shorter version of "Strix's" article appeared in The Spectator and this is the fourth essay of the book. "Strix", pseudonym of Peter Fleming, [16] was a British adventurer and travel writer, who was James Bond author Ian Fleming’s elder brother and a friend of Nancy. He begins saying that Nancy Mitford's article has given rise to much pleasurable discussion. Before pushing on to the less etymological aspects of her theme, he addresses how language evolves and changes naturally, [17] and U-slang, attributing to it a sense of parody. He says interest in the study of U-speech has been arbitrarily awakened and considers this interest unhealthy and contrary to the "national interest". He closes his article hoping (ironically) that the U-young will strive for a clear, classless medium of communication in which all say "Pardon?" and none say "What?", and every ball is a dance and every man's wife is "the" wife, but then saying that he will be surprised and disappointed if they do anything of the sort.

"What U-Future?" by Christopher Sykes

All groups talk a particular language. Thus begins the fifth essay of the book. It is the natural way of things that you say something one way which the lawyer says another way. Same with doctors. A doctor who can only talk like a text book may leave you in serious doubt as to your state of health, Sykes says. Same with sailors, same with all other craftsmen. Then he comments from Shakespeare, for whom language was a vast instrument at his command, to what he calls the irrational little vocabulary of the movements of fashion: newspaper fashion, pub fashion, cinema fashion, popular song fashion. But, for this English author, the great, the most desired fashion has always been that of “the best society,” of “the fashionable”, of “the chic”, which is kept by snobbism. After further analyzing the use of U and non-U habits and its progress, reflecting either by stress or reaction the mood of any time. Pursuing his argument he introduces Topivity — T-manners and T-customs [18] etc., meaning the likely social conventions of a remote future in which the peerage has survived by infiltrating the trade union movement on a large scale. Abandoning "U", he ends the article with "T" stating that one big T-point remains constant: nobody wants a really poor peer: it is very un-T not to be rich. However, T and non-T do not seem to have become popular though.

"How to Get on in Society" by John Betjeman

The last essay of Noblesse Oblige is a poem taken from A Few Late Chrystanthemums.

"The non-U-ness of fish-knives in place of fish-forks is delightfully satirised by John Betjeman in How to Get on in Society (1954):

Phone for the fish-knives, Norman
As Cook is a little unnerved;
You kiddies have crumpled the serviettes
And I must have things daintily served.

"Some say that the bluntness of a fish-knife reflects its primary function, which is to remove the skin while minimising the risk of cutting the flesh. Others say that the skin is delicious. David Mellor, an authority on cutlery, has pointedly remarked that you don't need a sharp knife to cut fish. He also considers the shape of fish knives to be purely decorative. A standard-shaped knife would do the job better.”

— The Independent. [19]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 "I didn't know they were going to say edited by, nor did I edit it, nor even see it in proof (except my piece). Rather naughty I think." – Letter from Nancy to Evelyn Waugh ( ISBN   0-395-74015-0, p. 391)

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evelyn Waugh</span> British writer and journalist (1903–1966)

Arthur Evelyn St. John Waugh was an English writer of novels, biographies, and travel books; he was also a prolific journalist and book reviewer. His most famous works include the early satires Decline and Fall (1928) and A Handful of Dust (1934), the novel Brideshead Revisited (1945), and the Second World War trilogy Sword of Honour (1952–1961). He is recognised as one of the great prose stylists of the English language in the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nancy Mitford</span> English novelist, biographer and journalist (1904–1973)

Nancy Freeman-Mitford, known as Nancy Mitford, was an English novelist, biographer, and journalist. The eldest of the Mitford sisters, she was regarded as one of the "bright young things" on the London social scene in the inter-war period. She wrote several novels about upper-class life in England and France, and is considered a sharp and often provocative wit. She also has a reputation as a writer of popular historical biographies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jessica Mitford</span> British writer (1917–1996)

Jessica Lucy "Decca" Treuhaft was an English author, one of the six aristocratic Mitford sisters noted for their sharply conflicting politics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diana Mosley</span> British fascist, writer and editor (1910–2003)

Diana, Lady Mosley, known as Diana Guinness between 1929 and 1936, was a British aristocrat, fascist, writer and editor. She was one of the Mitford sisters and the wife of Oswald Mosley, leader of the British Union of Fascists.

<i>Brideshead Revisited</i> 1945 novel by Evelyn Waugh

Brideshead Revisited: The Sacred & Profane Memories of Captain Charles Ryder is a novel by the English writer Evelyn Waugh, first published in 1945. It follows, from the 1920s to the early 1940s, the life and romances of Charles Ryder, especially his friendship with the Flytes, a family of wealthy English Catholics who live in a palatial mansion, Brideshead Castle. Ryder has relationships with two of the Flytes: Lord Sebastian and Lady Julia. The novel explores themes including Catholicism and nostalgia for the age of English aristocracy. A well-received television adaptation of the novel was produced in an 11-part miniseries by Granada Television in 1981. In 2008, it was adapted as a film.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lady Diana Cooper</span> English aristocrat

Diana Cooper, Viscountess Norwich was an English silent film actress and aristocrat who was a well-known social figure in London and Paris.

<i>The Loved One</i> (book) 1948 novel by Evelyn Waugh

The Loved One: An Anglo-American Tragedy (1948) is a short satirical novel by British novelist Evelyn Waugh about the funeral business in Los Angeles, the British expatriate community in Hollywood, and the film industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Byron</span> British writer

Robert Byron was an English travel writer, best known for his travelogue The Road to Oxiana. He was also an art critic and historian.

U and non-U English usage, where "U" stands for upper class and "non-U" represents the aspiring middle classes, was part of the terminology of popular discourse of social dialects (sociolects) in Britain in the 1950s. The different vocabularies can often appear quite counter-intuitive: the middle classes prefer "fancy" or fashionable words, even neologisms and often euphemisms, in attempts to make themselves sound more refined, while the upper classes in many cases stick to the same plain and traditional words that the working classes also use, as, confident in the security of their social position, they have no need to seek to display refinement.

Noblesse oblige is a French phrase meaning "nobility obliges".

<i>The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold</i> 1957 autobiographical novel by Evelyn Waugh

The Ordeal of Gilbert Pinfold is a novel by the British writer Evelyn Waugh, first published in July 1957. It is Waugh's penultimate full-length work of fiction, which the author called his "mad book"—a largely autobiographical account of a period of hallucinations caused by bromide intoxication that he experienced in the early months of 1954, recounted through his protagonist Gilbert Pinfold.

Alan Strode Campbell Ross was a British academic specialising in linguistics. He is best remembered as the ultimate source and inspiration for author Nancy Mitford's "U and non-U" forms of behaviour and language usage as class indicators.

Christopher Hugh Sykes was an English writer. Born into the northern English landowning Sykes family of Sledmere, he was the second son of the diplomat Sir Mark Sykes (1879–1919), and his wife, Edith. His sister was Angela Sykes, the sculptor. His politician uncle, also Christopher Sykes, was, for a time, a close friend of Edward VII.

Combe Florey House in Combe Florey, Somerset, England is a country house dating from the early 18th century. It replaced an Elizabethan manor house which was pulled down after the English Civil War. The gatehouse to the original manor survives. In the mid-20th century, the house was home to the writer Evelyn Waugh who died there in 1966 and is buried next to the churchyard of the adjacent Church of St Peter & St Paul. Combe Florey House is a Grade II listed building.

<i>The Pursuit of Laughter</i> 2008 collection of diaries, articles, reviews and portraits by Diana Mosley

The Pursuit of Laughter is a 2008 collection of diaries, articles, reviews and portraits by Diana Mosley (née Mitford). The book was published by Gibson Square and edited by Martin Rynja. Mosley's sister, Deborah Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire, provides the introduction. The title is a homage to another Mitford sister's book, Nancy Mitford's The Pursuit of Love.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bright young things</span> London-based group of young aristocrats and socialites in the 20th century

The Bright Young Things, or Bright Young People, was a term given by the tabloid press to a group of Bohemian young aristocrats and socialites in 1920s London. They threw flamboyant fancy dress parties, went on elaborate treasure hunts through nighttime London, and some drank heavily or used illicit drugs — all of which was enthusiastically covered by journalists such as Charles Graves and Tom Driberg.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lady Pansy Lamb</span> British writer and translator

Lady Margaret Pansy Felicia Lamb, known as Lady Pansy Lamb was an English writer under her maiden name of Pansy Pakenham. A novelist, biographer, and translator of French poetry, she was the wife of the Australian-born painter Henry Lamb.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Selina Hastings (writer)</span> British journalist, author and biographer

Lady Selina Shirley Hastings is a British journalist, author and biographer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Alexander Wedderburn St. Clair-Erskine</span>

James Alexander Wedderburn "Hamish" St. Clair-Erskine was an English aristocrat aesthete. He was engaged to Nancy Mitford.

Piers Court is a country house in Stinchcombe on the Cotswold Edge in Gloucestershire, England. A Grade II* listed building, in the mid-20th century the court was home to the novelist Evelyn Waugh.

References

  1. ↑ Nancy Mitford — Noblesse Oblige
  2. ↑ Debrett's
  3. ↑ Right, Rosie (1 January 1980). "How U are You?". Style Weekly. Richmond, VA.
  4. ↑ Quoted by Russel Lynes, in his introduction to the first edition of Noblesse Oblige published by Harper & Brothers (1956), in the United States, p. 10
  5. ↑ Decca — The Letters of Jessica Mitford, Alfred A. Knop
  6. ↑ Lacey, Hester (18 March 2011). "Chicken-keeping with the FT: Deborah Devonshire". Financial Times (London).
  7. ↑ "Education: Who's U?" Time (New York). 21 May 1956.
  8. ↑ Weisman, Steven R. (1 July 1973)."Nancy Mitford, Author, Dead; Satiric Novelist and Essayist". The New York Times.
  9. ↑ "A Penguin a Week — A blog about vintage Penguin paperbacks"
  10. ↑ An Essay in Sociological Linguistics by Alan S. C. Ross] — Encounter , November 1955
  11. ↑ "A U and non-U exchange of the upper class". The Independent on Sunday. 5 June 1994.
  12. ↑ Encounter, December 1955
  13. ↑ "The Letters of Nancy Mitford and Evelyn Waugh". The New York Times.
  14. ↑ Brogan, Denis W. The Saturday Review. 28 July 1956. p. 17.
  15. ↑ Nancy Mitford in a television interview. Quoted in Byrne, p. 348.
  16. ↑ Mitford, 1956 —The University of Hull
  17. ↑ Savidge Reads
  18. ↑ Noblesse Oblige, Harper & Brothers (1956), Published in the United States, First Edition — What U-Future? pp. 150-156
  19. ↑ "Good Questions: Nothing fishy in the cutlery drawer at Buckingham Palace" Archived 2014-10-26 at the Wayback Machine . The Independent (London).

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.