Paiks

Last updated

The Paiks or Paik people worked in various system on which the economy of the Ahom kingdom & Mallabhum kingdom of medieval Assam & Bengal depended. In Paik system, adult and able males, called paiks were obligated to render service to the state and form its militia in return for a piece of land for cultivation owned by the kingdom [1] [2] [3] [4] But it wasn't the Ahom kingdom alone that used a corvee system like this in Northeast IndiaKingdom of Manipur and in a simpler form Jaintia kingdom and the Kachari kingdom too used similar systems that had tribal origins. [5] The mature structure was designed by Momai Tamuli Borbarua in 1608, and extensively and exhaustively implemented by 1658 during the reign of Sutamla Jayadhwaj Singha. [6] The system continued to evolve over time to meet the needs of the Ahom state and in time began to accumulate contradictions. By the end of the Moamoria rebellion (1769–1805) the Paik system had collapsed. [7]

Contents

History

Northeast India

Paik system

Every male in the Ahom kingdom between the ages of fifteen and fifty who was not a noble, a priest, a high caste or a slave was a paik. [8] The paiks were organized into four-member groups called gots. [9]

The Koch kings also followed a similar system in Koch Bihar and Koch Hajo, following the Ahoms. [10]

Land holdings

The duty of a paik was to render service to the Ahom state in exchange for which he was granted 2 puras (2.66 acres) of usufruct cultivable land (gaa mati), which was neither hereditary nor transferable. [11]

Royal service

The royal services that the paiks tended to were defense (the Ahom kingdom did not have a standing army till the beginning of 19th century and its army consisted of the militia formed of paiks), civil construction (embankments, roads, bridges, tanks, etc.), military production (boats, arrows, muskets), etc. There were two major classes of paiks: kanri paik (archer) who rendered his service as a soldier or as a laborer and chamua paik who rendered non-manual service and had a higher social standing. Some other minor classes were: bilatiyas (tenants at the estates of nobles), dewaliyas (attached to temples and sattras) and bahatiyas (attached to hill masters). Kanri paiks could move up to chamua. Most of the lower paik officersBora, Saikia, Hazarika, Tamuli, Pachanibelonged to the chamua class. [12]

Bengal

In the jungle estates, zamindars employed members of the Chuar community as village police, known as paiks. The leaders of the paiks were referred to as sardars. Instead of paying them a regular salary, the zamindars provided these paiks with rent-free chakran lands (also called paikan lands) as compensation. The paiks viewed this land allocation as their "ancient right." Rather than cultivating these lands themselves, the paiks typically hired landless Chuars to work the land. As a result, the hired Chuars became tenants of the paiks. These tenants were distinct from the non-tribal peasants living in the nearby villages. Although the Chuars worked the paikan lands, there was no strong sense of unity between them and the non-Chuar peasants. [13]

Notes

  1. "It follows, then, that paddy lands belonged to the community, i.e. to the king as representative of the community. This medieval Thai practice is a key to the understanding of the Ahom system of land rights in Assam." ( Guha 1966 :222)
  2. Das, Binod Sankar (1984). Changing Profile of the Frontier Bengal, 1751-1833. Mittal Publications. p. 86.
  3. Dasgupta, Samira; Biswas, Rabiranjan; Mallik, Gautam Kumar (2009). Heritage Tourism: An Anthropological Journey to Bishnupur. Mittal Publications. pp. 19–20. ISBN   978-81-8324-294-3.
  4. "Adivasi resistance in the Jungle Mahals 1767-1799" (PDF). Netaji Subhas Open University.
  5. "Despite some later modifications, the military-administrative system of the Ahoms remained essentially the same till 1826 and thus betrayed its tribal origin. It resembled very much that of medieval Thailand and also that of Manipur, Cachar and Jaintia." ( Guha 1966 :225)
  6. ( Sharma 1996 :34)
  7. ( Sharma 1996 :51)
  8. ( Sharma 1996 :34)
  9. ( Sharma 1996 :34)
  10. "Kuch society consisted of a number of clan-based tribes loosely organized around a king to whom local landholders owed fealty, and to whom their subordinate clansmen owed tribute. This tribute was paid not in cash or crops but in corvée labor, a system apparently modeled after the practice of the Ahom kings in neighboring Assam. Peasants known as paiks belonged to units of four cultivators and owed service to the king in turn by rotation within these units." ( Eaton 1993 :188)
  11. ( Sharma 1996 :35)
  12. ( Baruah 1993 , p. 17)
  13. "Adivasi resistance in the Jungle Mahals 1767-1799" (PDF). Netaji Subhas Open University.

References