Palestine: A Policy

Last updated

Palestine A Policy.jpg
Title page of 1942 edition of the book
AuthorAlbert Montefiore Hyamson
Original titlePalestine: A Policy
LanguageEnglish
SubjectZionism - History, Mandates - Palestine, Jews - Palestine
GenreHistory
Published1942 Methuen & co., ltd.
Publication placeUK
Media typePrint
Pages214
ISBN 0883553252
OCLC 3068318
296.09569
LC Class DS149 .H83

Palestine: A Policy is a history book by British civil servant and historian, Albert Montefiore Hyamson, which provides a history of the idea and practise of Zionism from the Eighteenth Century and the British Mandate for Palestine until 1942.

Contents

Background

In 1937, against the background of the deliberations and findings of the Peel Commission, Hyamson wrote a number of letters to the editor of The Times newspaper. The first, in May, said that partition of Palestine was a bad idea and would mark a surrender to extremists on both sides. He wrote that partition would destroy the ideal of a Palestinian state with Jewish and Arab citizens living together, and lead to the creation of two mutually hostile countries that would require the British army to keep the peace between them. Hyamson's alternative was of 'the ideal of a united Palestine, with Jewish and Arab citizens all civilly and politically equal and free', organised under a system similar to the Ottoman millet approach where all communities would be given the widest possible autonomy in all matters. [1] His second letter, written in July, entreated the British government to postpone partition while the moderate Jews and Arabs came to a measure of cooperation. [2]

In August he wrote to point out that it was the Jewish Agency and rather than the World Zionist Organization that could properly claim to represent the Jews of Palestine. Further, he believed that proposals for a hundred thousand Jewish immigrants per year would make the country impossibly crowded. [3] Finally, in October he wrote to say partition was unpopular and should be avoided. [4] He wrote another letter in April 1938 reflecting on the vote in the House of Commons to extend Palestinian citizenship to Jewish sufferers of Nazi oppression in Europe could only remain a gesture of sympathy, but remained impossible in practise and that it might be seen as a threat by Palestinian Arabs. [5]

In the early and mid 1940s Hyamson promoted the bi-nationalism of Judah L Magnes whenever he could. He collaborated with Norman Bentwich and others in 1943 to distribute a pamphlet on the policy by Magnes. In an article published in The Contemporary Review in 1945 he set forth his reasons for supporting bi-nationalism (as the best compromise between either Zionist or Arab dominance of Palestine), which he reiterated in a letter to The Jewish Chronicle in 1946. Hyamson also wrote a number of articles supporting Magnes in The Jewish Outlook, the journal of the Jewish Fellowship. [6]

Prior to the publication of Palestine: A Policy, Hyamson was apparently worried by the Zionist reaction within the Jewish community and wrote to his friend Sir Ronald Storrs that he believed he would be 'in for a bout of persecution' on account of the book. He also asked Storrs, who wrote the foreword to the book, if he wouldn't mind toning down his comments as he was facing enough pressure without Storrs’ contribution adding to this. [7] Storrs’s introduction likened Hyamson’s book to Norman Bentwich’s Wanderer Between Two Worlds for its ability to explain Jews and Zionism to Gentiles and its ability to see both sides of the argument. He also mentions that Hyamson’s dispassionate analysis might be taken as betrayal by more extreme Zionists. However, Storrs believes it would be a strange paradox if territorial Zionism overcame spiritual Zionism. After recapping a few of Hyamson’s main points (including that Hyamson would consider himself a Zionist), he concludes that few people would disagree that Arabs would benefit from Jewish cooperation and prosperity, and the book may be a step towards that understanding. [8]

"One can be a Zionist without being a nationalist, even an unaggressive one. The earlier Zionism, that which has had a far longer career than the Neo-Zionism of to-day, was none the less Zionist, even though it had no tinge of nationalism in the modern semi-aggressive sense. That Zionism was not based on a Jewish nation, whose existence in the modern sense it did not admit, but on the Jewish people."(from Hyamson's preface to Palestine: A Policy (pps. xi and xii)) Menorah, a dos passado e presente.jpg
"One can be a Zionist without being a nationalist, even an unaggressive one. The earlier Zionism, that which has had a far longer career than the Neo-Zionism of to-day, was none the less Zionist, even though it had no tinge of nationalism in the modern semi-aggressive sense. That Zionism was not based on a Jewish nation, whose existence in the modern sense it did not admit, but on the Jewish people."(from Hyamson's preface to Palestine: A Policy (pps. xi and xii))

Synopsis

In his preface, Hyamson states that he is a spiritual Zionist, rather than a nationalist, or political Zionist. In his first chapter, The Jew and the Mission of Israel, he makes a distinction between Jews who are of the Jewish religion, Hebrews who are of the Jewish race, and Israelites who are a member of the Jewish community or nationality. The Mission of the Jews is the main justification of the survival of the Jews (i.e. the religion), to be "priests and a holy nation", which is a purely religious vocation. To avoid assimilation all Jews who want Jewry to survive must be Zionists. The following four chapters give a history of different forms of Zionism, usually as to how it relates to England. Starting with messianic Zionism which is often millenarian and played a role in Oliver Cromwell’s resettlement of the Jews in England. He then looks at British advocates for Zionism, largely Christian, who he points out didn’t usually envision a Jewish state. In a chapter titled Practical Zionism he gives a history of the previous 200 years of Jewish settlement in Palestine. Political Zionism looks at Theodor Hertzl and the Zionist organisation, and makes the point that Political Zionism which needs a Jewish state is ultimately assimilationist. [9] The following five chapters look at recent British involvement in Palestine, starting with the Balfour Declaration and finishing shortly after the White Paper of 1939. It is clear that his sympathies lie with practical Zionists (those who would settle in Palestine), but not political Zionists (who wanted a Jewish state). Whenever he talks of Jewish immigration to Palestine, he links it to the ‘economic absorbtive capacity’ of the country.

In the final chapter, The Next Step, Hyamson lays out a solution to the issues faced by Palestine in 1942. After pointing out that the situation seems to be insoluble, he writes that it must be possible for both Jews and Arabs to live together with their ambitions for "individual freedom and communal or national liberty" [10] (and more specifically, providing a National Home for Jews and freedom from domination by others for Arabs) being met. To achieve this, the idea of specifically Arab and Jewish states must be abandoned. A system like the Swiss cantons, or the United Kingdom with specific community laws and protections for minorities should be adopted. Weizmann wanted this in 1919, and similar schemes were also proposed by General Nuri el Said and George Antonius. Such an arrangement would be the true successor the Council of the Four Lands and the Lithuanian Council. Further, Palestine, even if the majority of the population were Jewish, would have to be part of a Greater Syria. In this manner conflict between Jews and Arabs could be overcome and we could see mutual cooperation like in the Arab Golden Age.

Reception and later writing

Foreign Affairs magazine gave the book a short review, calling it "one of the more sensible and objective books on the "too much promised land," by a non-Zionist Jew". [11]

In June 1946 Hyamson added his name to a letter to The Times with a number of Indian Civil Servants to say that the situation in Palestine and the possibility of reconciliation between Jew and Arab had been made more difficult by the conclusions of the Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry. They proposed self-government for all Palestinians, Jew and Arab, within a single state before goodwill is established between the parties. Once the status of each community was assured, cooperation would follow. Practical efforts should be made along the lines of the Cabinet Mission to India, which they say worked in a vastly more complicated situation. [12] In April 1948 he wrote his final letter to The Times which called for a bi-national or federal solution to the situation in Palestine. [13]

In 1950 Hyamson published his final book on the issue of Palestine in Palestine under the Mandate, 1920-1948. The book included a chapter on the eviction of Arab tenant farmers from lands sold by absentee Arab landlords to Jewish agencies from the 1920s. [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Balfour Declaration</span> British government statement of 1917

The Balfour Declaration was a public statement issued by the British Government in 1917 during the First World War announcing its support for the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine, then an Ottoman region with a small minority Jewish population. The declaration was contained in a letter dated 2 November 1917 from the United Kingdom's Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the British Jewish community, for transmission to the Zionist Federation of Great Britain and Ireland. The text of the declaration was published in the press on 9 November 1917.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zionism</span> Movement supporting a Jewish state in Palestine

Zionism is an ethno-cultural nationalist movement that emerged in Europe in the late 19th century and aimed for the establishment of a Jewish state through the colonization of a land outside Europe. With the rejection of alternate proposals for a Jewish state, it eventually focused on the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, a region corresponding to the Land of Israel in Judaism, and of central importance in Jewish history. Zionists wanted to create a Jewish state in Palestine with as much land, as many Jews, and as few Palestinian Arabs as possible. Following the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, Zionism became Israel's national or state ideology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homeland for the Jewish people</span> Idea rooted in Jewish history, religion and culture

A homeland for the Jewish people is an idea rooted in Jewish history, religion, and culture. The Jewish aspiration to return to Zion, generally associated with divine redemption, has suffused Jewish religious thought since the destruction of the First Temple and the Babylonian exile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edmond James de Rothschild</span> French member of the Rothschild banking family

Baron Abraham Edmond Benjamin James de Rothschild was a French member of the Rothschild banking family. A strong supporter of Zionism, his large donations lent significant support to the movement during its early years, which helped lead to the establishment of the State of Israel—where he is simply known as "The Baron Rothschild", "HaBaron", or "Hanadiv Hayeduah".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One-state solution</span> Proposed resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict

The one-state solution is a proposed approach to resolving the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, according to which one state would be established in former Mandatory Palestine. Proponents of this solution advocate a single state encompassing the currently recognized state of Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The term one-state reality describes the belief that the current situation in Israel/Palestine is de facto a single state. The one-state solution is sometimes also called a bi-national state, owing to the hope that the state would be a homeland for both Jews and Palestinians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1920 Nebi Musa riots</span> Anti-Zionist riots in and around Jerusalems Old City in British-controlled Palestine

The 1920 Nebi Musa riots or 1920 Jerusalem riots took place in British-controlled part of Occupied Enemy Territory Administration between Sunday, 4 April, and Wednesday, 7 April 1920 in and around the Old City of Jerusalem. Five Jews were killed and several hundred injured; four Arabs were killed, and eighteen injured; 7 Britons were injured. The riots coincided with and are named after the Nebi Musa festival, which was held every year on Easter Sunday, and followed rising tensions in Arab–Jewish relations. The events came shortly after the Battle of Tel Hai and the increasing pressure on Arab nationalists in Syria in the course of the Franco-Syrian War.

The Biltmore Conference, also known by its resolution as the Biltmore Program, was a fundamental departure from traditional Zionist policy by its demand "that Palestine be established as a Jewish Commonwealth." The meeting was held in New York City, at the prestigious Biltmore Hotel, from May 9 to May 11, 1942, with 600 delegates and Zionist leaders from 18 countries attending.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Arthur Grenfell Wauchope</span> British diplomat (1874–1947)

General Sir Arthur Grenfell Wauchope was a British soldier and colonial administrator.

Brit Shalom was a group of Jewish Zionist intellectuals in Mandatory Palestine, founded in 1925.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judah Leon Magnes</span> Jewish rabbi (1877-1948)

Judah Leon Magnes was a prominent Reform rabbi in both the United States and Mandatory Palestine. He is best remembered as a leader in the pacifist movement of the World War I period, his advocacy of a binational Jewish-Arab state in Palestine, and as one of the most widely recognized voices of 20th century American Reform Judaism. Magnes served as the first chancellor of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (1925), and later as its President (1935–1948).

The Passfield White Paper, issued October 20, 1930, by colonial secretary Lord Passfield, was a formal statement of British policy in Palestine, which previously had been set by the Churchill White Paper of 1922. The new statement resulted from the Hope Simpson Commission's investigation into the deeper causes of the 1929 Palestine riots, that initially started over access to the Western Wall. The white paper limited official Jewish immigration to a much greater degree.

As an organized nationalist movement, Zionism is generally considered to have been founded by Theodor Herzl in 1897. However, the history of Zionism began earlier and is intertwined with Jewish history and Judaism. The organizations of Hovevei Zion, held as the forerunners of modern Zionist ideals, were responsible for the creation of 20 Jewish towns in Palestine between 1870 and 1897.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intercommunal conflict in Mandatory Palestine</span> 1920–1948 conflict between Arabs and Jews in Palestine

During the British rule in Mandatory Palestine, there was civil, political and armed struggle between Palestinian Arabs and the Jewish Yishuv, beginning from the violent spillover of the Franco-Syrian War in 1920 and until the onset of the 1948 Arab–Israeli War. The conflict shifted from sectarian clashes in the 1920s and early 1930s to an armed Arab Revolt against British rule in 1936, armed Jewish Revolt primarily against the British in mid-1940s and finally open war in November 1947 between Arabs and Jews.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shlomo Kaplansky</span> Labour Zionist politician

Shlomo Kaplansky was a Labour Zionist politician, who served as the secretary of the World Union of Poalei Zion. During the 1920s he was a leading advocate of a bi-national state in Palestine. Kaplansky was the President of the Technion – Israel Institute of Technology.

Albert Montefiore Hyamson, was a British civil servant and historian who served as chief immigration officer in the British Mandate of Palestine from 1921 to 1934.

Ihud was a small binationalist Zionist political party founded by Judah Leon Magnes, Martin Buber, Ernst Simon and Henrietta Szold, former supporters of Brit Shalom, in 1942 as a binational response to the Biltmore Conference, which made the establishment of a Jewish Commonwealth in Palestine the policy of the Zionist movement. Other prominent members were David Werner Senator, Moshe Smilansky, agronomist Haim Margaliot-Kalvarisky (1868–1947), and Judge Joseph Moshe Valero.

This timeline of anti-Zionism chronicles the history of anti-Zionism, including events in the history of anti-Zionist thought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mandatory Palestine</span> British League of Nations mandate (1920–1948)

Mandatory Palestine was a geopolitical entity that existed between 1920 and 1948 in the region of Palestine under the terms of the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine.

Labor Zionism or socialist Zionism refers to the left-wing, socialist variant of Zionism. For many years, it was the most significant tendency among Zionists and Zionist organizations, and was seen as the Zionist sector of the historic Jewish labour movements of Eastern Europe and Central Europe, eventually developing local units in most countries with sizable Jewish populations. Unlike the "political Zionist" tendency founded by Theodor Herzl and advocated by Chaim Weizmann, Labor Zionists did not believe that a Jewish state would be created by simply appealing to the international community or to powerful nations such as the United Kingdom, Germany, or the former Ottoman Empire. Rather, they believed that a Jewish state could only be created through the efforts of the Jewish working class making aliyah to the Land of Israel and raising a country through the creation of a Labor Jewish society with rural kibbutzim and moshavim, and an urban Jewish Proletariat.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nevill Barbour</span> Journalist and reporter who wrote about the Arab world

Nevill Barbour was a BBC journalist and reporter who wrote about the Arab world.

References

  1. Albert M. Hyamson The Palestine Problem. The Times, London. 5 May 1937: 12. The Times Digital Archive.
  2. Albert M. Hyamson The Palestine Report - Is Reconciliation Possible? The Times, London. 17 July 1937: 12. The Times Digital Archive.
  3. Albert M. Hyamson Powers of the Zionist Organization. The Times, London. 18 August 1937: 12. The Times Digital Archive.
  4. Albert M. Hyamson Partition in Palestine. The Times, London. 29 Oct 1937: 12. The Times Digital Archive.
  5. Albert M. Hyamson Palestine Citizenship for Jews. The Times, London. 19 April 1938: 12. The Times Digital Archive.
  6. Miller, Rory (2006). "J.L. Magnes and the Promotion of Bi-Nationalism in Palestine", Jewish Journal of Sociology. Vol. 48, no1-2 p.63
  7. Miller, Rory, Divided Against Zion: Anti-Zionist Opposition to the Creation of a Jewish State in Palestine, 1945-1948, Routledge, 2013 p.173
  8. Storrs, Sir Anthony in Hyamson, Alfred Montefiore Palestine: A Policy, Methuen, 1942, pps v-ix
  9. Hyamson, Alfred Montefiore. Palestine: A Policy. Methuen, 1942, p. 69.
  10. Hyamson, Alfred Montefiore. Palestine: A Policy. Methuen, 1942, p. 193.
  11. Woolbert, Robert Gale (January 1943) Palestine: A Policy Foreign Affairs
  12. Young, Hubert, Graham, Lancelot, Haig, Harry and Hyamson, Albert (3 June 1946) Palestine - Key to Solution - An Equal Partnership. The Times, London
  13. Hyamson, Albert. Palestine. The Times (London). 3 April 1938.
  14. Machover, Moshé. Israelis and Palestinians: Conflict and Resolution, Haymarket Books, 2012 ISBN   1608461688