Parts Manufacturer Approval

Last updated

Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) is an approval granted by the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to a manufacturer of aircraft parts. [1]

Contents

Approval

It is generally illegal in the United States to install replacement or modification parts on a certificated aircraft without an airworthiness release such as a Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) or Parts Manufacturing Approval (PMA). There are a number of other methods of compliance, including parts manufactured to government or industry standards, parts manufactured under technical standard order authorization [TSO], owner-/operator-produced parts, experimental aircraft, field approvals, etc. [2] [3]

PMA-holding manufacturers are permitted to make replacement parts for aircraft, even though they are not the original manufacturer of the aircraft. [4] The process is analogous to 'after-market' parts for automobiles, except that the United States aircraft parts production market remains tightly regulated by the FAA.

An applicant for a PMA applies for approval from the FAA. The FAA prioritizes its review of a new application based on its internal process called Project Prioritization. [5]

The FAA Order covering the application for PMA is Order 8110.42 revision D. This document is worded as instructions to the FAA reviewing personnel. An accompanying Advisory Circular (AC) 21.303-4 is intended to address the applicant. 8110.42C addressed both the applicant and the reviewer. Per the order, application for a PMA can be made per the following ways: Identicality in which the applicant attempts to convince the FAA that the PMA part is identical to the OAH (Original Approval Holder) part. Identicality by Licensure is accomplished by providing evidence to the FAA that the applicant has licensed the part data from the OAH. This evidence is usually in the form of an Assist Letter provided to the applicant by the OAH. PMA may also be granted based upon prior approval of an STC . As an example: If an STC were granted to alter an existing aircraft design then that approval would also apply to the parts needed to make that modification. A PMA would be required, however, to manufacture the parts. The last method to obtain a PMA is Test & Computation. This approach consist of one or a combination of both of the following methods: General Analysis and Comparative Analysis. General analysis compares the proposed part to the functional requirements of that part when installed. Comparative Analysis compares the function of the proposed part to the OAH part. As an example: If a PMA application for flight control cables were to show that the PMA part exceeds the pull strength requirements of the aircraft system it is meant for, that is general analysis. To show that it exceeds that of the OAH part is comparative analysis. The modern trend is to use a variety of techniques in combination in order to obtain approval of complicated parts - relying on the techniques that are most accurate and best able to provide the proof of airworthiness desired. [6] The cognizant regional FAA Aircraft Certification Office (ACO) determines if the applicant has shown compliance with all relevant airworthiness regulations and is thus entitled to design approval.

The second step in the application process is to apply to the FAA Manufacturing Inspection Divisional Office (MIDO) to obtain approval of the manufacturing quality assurance system (known as production approval). Production approval will be granted when the FAA is satisfied that the system will not permit parts to leave the system until the parts have been verified to meet the requirements of the approved design, and the system otherwise meets the requirements of the FAA quality system regulations. [7] A Production Approval Holder (PAH) will typically already have satisfied this requirement before PMA application is made.

PMA applications based upon licensure or STC do not require ACO approval (since the data has already been approved) and can go straight to the MIDO.

History

Under the Civil Air Regulations (CARs), the government had the authority to approve aircraft parts in a predecessor to the PMA rules. This authority was found in each of the sets of airworthiness standards published in the Civil Air Regulations. [8] CAR 3.31, for example, permitted the Administrator to approve aircraft parts as early as 1947. [9]

In 1952, the Civil Aeronautics Board adjusted the location of the parts production authority from the ".31" regulations to the ".18" regulations. [10] For example, the CAR 3 authority for modification and replacement parts could be found in section 3.18 after 1952.

In 1955, the Civil Aeronautics Board separated the parts authority out of the airworthiness standards, and placed it in a more general location so that one standard would apply to replacement and modification parts for all different forms of aircraft. [11]

In 1965 CAR 1.55 became Federal Aviation Regulation section 21.303. [12]

The 1965 regulatory change also imposed specific obligations on the PMA holder related to the Fabrication Inspection System. [13]

Amendment 21-38 of Part 21 was published May 26, 1972. [14] This was the next rule change to affect PMAs. This rule eliminated the incorporation by reference of type certification requirements in favor of PMA-specific data submission requirements. This change established the separate process and separate requirements for data that must be submitted by an applicant for a PMA (prior to this there was no explicit distinction between the application data requirements for type certificated products and the data requirements for PMAed articles). [15]

The aircraft parts aftermarket expanded greatly in the 1980s as airlines sought to reduce the costs of spares by finding alternative sources of parts. During this time period, though, many manufacturers failed to obtain PMA approvals from the FAA.

In the 1990s, the FAA engaged in an "Enhanced Enforcement" program that educated the industry about the importance of approval and as a consequence a huge number of parts were approved through formal FAA mechanisms. [16] Under this program, companies that had previously manufactured aircraft parts without PMAs could apply for PMAs in order to bring their manufacturing operations into full compliance with the regulations. This movement brought an explosion of PMA parts to the marketplace.

2009 rule change

The FAA published a significant revision to the U.S. manufacturing regulations on October 16, 2009. [17] This new rule eliminates some of the legal distinctions between forms of production approval issued by the FAA, which should have the effect of further demonstrating the FAA's support of the quality systems implemented by PMA manufacturers. Specifically, instead of having a separate body of regulations for a PMA Fabrication Inspection System (FIS), [18] as was the case in prior regulations, the PMA regulations now include a cross reference to the 14 C.F.R. § 21.137, [19] which is the regulation defining the elements of a quality system for all production approval holders. [20] In practice, all production approval holders were held to the same production quality standards before the rule change [21] - this will now be more obvious in the FAA's regulations. Accomplishing this harmonization of standards was an important goal of the Modification and Replacement Parts Association (MARPA).

The new rule became effective April 16, 2011. [22] The FAA's FAQ on Part 21 stated that PMA quality systems would be evaluated for compliance by the FAA during certificate management activity after the compliance date of the rule. [23] Today, all FAA production approvals - whether for complete aircraft or for piece parts - rely on a common set of quality assurance system elements. E.g. 14 C.F.R. §§ 21.137 (quality system requirements for production certificates), 21.307 (requiring PMA holders to establish a quality system that meets the requirements of § 21.137), 21.607 (requiring TSOA holders to establish a quality system that meets the requirements of § 21.137).

Relationship to repair

The FAA is also working on new policies concerning parts fabricated in the course of repair. This practice has historically been confused with PMA manufacturing, although the two are actually quite different practices supported by different FAA regulations. [24] Today, FAA Advisory Circular 43.18 provides guidance for the fabrication of parts to be consumed purely during a maintenance operation, [25] and additional guidance is expected to be released in the near future. One of the key features of FAC 43.18 is that it recommends implementation of a quality assurance system quite similar to the fabrication inspection systems that PMA manufacturers are required to have.

Industry association

The trade association representing the PMA industry is the Modification and Replacement Parts Association (MARPA). MARPA works closely with the FAA [26] [27] and other agencies to promote PMA safety.

Developments outside the United States

The United States has Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreements (BASA) with most of its major trading partners, and the standard language of these BASAs requires the trading partner to treat FAA-PMA as an importable aircraft part that is airworthy and eligible for installation on aircraft registered in the importing jurisdiction. [28] This process has been facilitated by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) which has published a book on accepting PMA parts. [29]

Although the PMA industry began in the United States, several countries have begun promoting production of approved aircraft parts within their own borders. These jurisdictions include:

Other jurisdictions have established PMA regulations and are working with trading partners to achieve acceptance of their PMA industries, and thus should be expected to enter the PMA marketplace in the near future. For example, Japan has PMA regulations and has secured a bilateral agreement with the United States that authorizes the export of these parts to the United States as airworthy aircraft parts. [33]

Related Research Articles

Federal Aviation Administration United States Government agency dedicated to civil aviation matters

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the largest transportation agency of the U.S. government and regulates all aspects of civil aviation in the country as well as over surrounding international waters. Its powers include air traffic management, certification of personnel and aircraft, setting standards for airports, and protection of U.S. assets during the launch or re-entry of commercial space vehicles. Powers over neighboring international waters were delegated to the FAA by authority of the International Civil Aviation Organization.

The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) are rules prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) governing all aviation activities in the United States. The FARs comprise Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). A wide variety of activities are regulated, such as aircraft design and maintenance, typical airline flights, pilot training activities, hot-air ballooning, lighter-than-air aircraft, man-made structure heights, obstruction lighting and marking, model rocket launches, commercial space operations, model aircraft operations, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and kite flying. The rules are designed to promote safe aviation, protecting pilots, flight attendants, passengers and the general public from unnecessary risk.

Type certificate Document noting the airworthiness of a certain type of aircraft

A type certificate signifies the airworthiness of a particular category of aircraft, according to its manufacturing design. It confirms that the aircraft of a new type intended for serial production, is in compliance with applicable airworthiness requirements established by the national air law.

Light-sport aircraft Category of lightweight aircraft that are simple to fly

A light-sport aircraft (LSA), or light sport aircraft, is a fairly new category of small, lightweight aircraft that are simple to fly. LSAs tend to be heavier and more sophisticated than ultralight aircraft, but LSA restrictions on weight and performance separates the category from established GA aircraft. There is no standard worldwide description of an LSA.

DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification is a guideline dealing with the safety of safety-critical software used in certain airborne systems. It was jointly developed by the safety-critical working group RTCA SC-167 of the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) and WG-12 of the European Organisation for Civil Aviation Equipment (EUROCAE). RTCA published the document as RTCA/DO-178B, while EUROCAE published the document as ED-12B. Although technically a guideline, it was a de facto standard for developing avionics software systems until it was replaced in 2012 by DO-178C.

RTCA DO-254 / EUROCAE ED-80, Design Assurance Guidance for Airborne Electronic Hardware is a document providing guidance for the development of airborne electronic hardware, published by RTCA, Incorporated and EUROCAE. The DO-254/ED-80 standard was formally recognized by the FAA in 2005 via AC 20-152 as a means of compliance for the design assurance of electronic hardware in airborne systems. The guidance in this document is applicable, but not limited, to such electronic hardware items as

Supplemental type certificate

A supplemental type certificate (STC) is a civil aviation authority-approved major modification or repair to an existing type certified aircraft, engine or propeller. As it adds to the existing type certificate, it is deemed "supplemental". In the United States issuance of such certificates is under the purview of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

An aircraft part is an article or component approved for installation on a type-certificated aircraft. Approval for these parts is derived from the jurisdictions of the countries that an aircraft is based. In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration oversees the approval for these parts under Federal Aviation Regulation Part 21.

Airworthiness Measure of an aircrafts suitability for safe flight

In aviation, airworthiness is the measure of an aircraft's suitability for safe flight. Initial airworthiness is demonstrated by a certificate of airworthiness issued by the civil aviation authority in the state in which the aircraft is registered, and continuing airworthiness is achieved by performing the required maintenance actions.

In the United States, there are three classes of medical certifications for pilots; such certificates are required to legally exercise the privileges of a Pilot exercising the privileges of either a Private, Commercial, or Airline Transport Pilot license. Medical Certificates are not needed for Glider, Balloon, Recreational, or Sport Pilot certifications. Each certificate must be issued by a doctor approved by the Federal Aviation Administration to a person of stable physical and mental health.

An electrical wiring interconnect system (EWIS) is the wiring system and components for a complex system. The term originated in the aviation industry but was originally designated as Electrical Interconnection Systems (EIS). The change from EIS to EWIS was done to emphasize the focus on the actual wires and wiring of the systems throughout aircraft.

A Designated Airworthiness Representative (DAR) is a private person designated by the United States Federal Aviation Administration to act on its behalf in the certification of type certificated and amateur-built aircraft for the issuance of airworthiness certificates, special flight permits, import aircraft, export certificates for products and articles, conformity inspections, and field approvals for repair and alterations. Most DARs have limited and/or certain "functions" authorized by the FAA based on their experience and technical background. A DAR may charge a fee for their services. Qualifications and policies for appointment of Designated Airworthiness Representatives are established in FAA Order 8100.8.

The Modification and Replacement Parts Association is the Washington, D.C.-based trade association that represents manufacturers of government-approved after market aircraft parts. These aircraft parts are often known as PMA parts, from the acronym for Parts Manufacturer Approval. The manufacture of PMA parts is regulated in the United States by the Federal Aviation Administration.

Directorate General of Civil Aviation (India) National civil aviation authority of the Government of India

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is a statutory body of the Government of India to regulate civil aviation in India. It became a statutory body under the Aircraft (Amendment) Act, 2020. The DGCA investigates aviation accidents and incidents, maintains all regulations related to aviation and is responsible for issuance of licenses pertaining to aviation like PPL's, SPL's and CPL's in India. It is headquartered along Sri Aurobindo Marg, opposite Safdarjung Airport, in New Delhi. The Government of India is planning to replace the organisation with a Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), modelled on the lines of the American Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

Aircraft design process Establishing the configuration and plans for a new aeroplane

The aircraft design process is a loosely defined method used to balance many competing and demanding requirements to produce an aircraft that is strong, lightweight, economical and can carry an adequate payload while being sufficiently reliable to safely fly for the design life of the aircraft. Similar to, but more exacting than, the usual engineering design process, the technique is highly iterative, involving high level configuration tradeoffs, a mixture of analysis and testing and the detailed examination of the adequacy of every part of the structure. For some types of aircraft, the design process is regulated by civil airworthiness authorities.

Unapproved aircraft parts are aircraft parts not approved by civil aviation authorities for installation on type certified aircraft.

FAA Order 8130.34

FAA Order 8130.34D, Airworthiness Certification of Unmanned Aircraft Systems, establishes procedures for issuing either special airworthiness certificates in the experimental category or special flight permits to unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), optionally piloted aircraft (OPA), and aircraft intended to be flown as either a UAS or an OPA.

FAA Order 8100.8

FAA Order 8100.8 , Designee Management Handbook, establishes "policy and procedures for the selection, appointment, orientation, training, oversight, renewal tracking, and termination of certain representatives of the Administrator" of the Federal Aviation Administration. In particular, it is a resource for individuals interested in becoming a Designated Engineering Representative (DER).

Organization Designation Authorization

Established by FAA Order 8100.15 , the Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) program is the means by which the FAA grants airworthiness designee authority to organizations or companies. The regulations addressing the ODA program are found in Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 183, subpart D, sections 183.41 through 813.67.

FAA Order 8110.105 American regulatory order

FAA Order 8110.105A, Simple and Complex Electronic Hardware Approval Guidance, supplements RTCA DO-254 by explaining how FAA aircraft certification staff can use that document "when working on certification projects" and is recommended as a reference for developers applying for certification under DO-254. A particular focus is on clarification of the application of DO-254 guidance to "simple" custom micro-coded components as opposed to the more rigorous assurance expected of complex custom micro-coded components. Micro-coded devices are typically presumed to be complex components that cannot be verified through testing alone; however, some applicants have proposed their specific micro-coded device applications as simple components.

References

  1. ↑ 14 C.F.R. 21.303 PMA
  2. ↑ 14 C.F.R. 21.9(a)
  3. ↑ "Advisory Circular 20-62E: Eligibility, Quality, and Identification of Aeronautical Replacement Parts" (PDF). FAA. 2010-12-23. Retrieved 2015-04-02.
  4. ↑ 14 C.F.R. 21.9(a)(2)
  5. ↑ See Aircraft Technology, Calnek, Matthew, December 2014, A Change of Priorities, http://www.aecotechnologies.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AECO_AircraftTechnology_Dec2014.pdf, Seattle, January 5, 2015.
  6. ↑ Parts Manufacturer Approval Procedures, FAA Order 8110.42C, Chapter 2, Paragraph 5 (June 23, 2008)
  7. ↑ 14 C.F.R. 21.137
  8. ↑ See, Certification Procedures for Products and Parts, 29 Fed. Reg. 14562 (Oct. 24, 1964) (explaining in the preamble that the authority for producing parts had previously been in the ".18" sections of CARs 3, 4b, 5, 6, 7, 13, and 14).
  9. ↑ See 12 Fed. Reg. 7898 (1947) (promulgating Amendment 03-3 to CAR 3).
  10. ↑ 17 Fed. Reg. 1083 (Feb 5, 1952) (Civil Air Regulation Amendment 3-7 was effective March 5, 1952).
  11. ↑ Civil Air Regulation (CAR) 1.55 (adopted on April 13, 1956).
  12. ↑ Certification Procedures for Products and Parts, 29 Fed. Reg. 14562 (Oct. 24, 1964) (this change became effective February 1, 1965).
  13. ↑ 14 C.F.R. § 21.303(c) (1965).
  14. ↑ Replacement and Modification Parts, 37 Fed. Reg. 10658 (May 26, 1972) (this change became effective June 26, 1972).
  15. ↑ 14 C.F.R. § 21.303(c) (1973).
  16. ↑ 60 Fed. Reg. 10480 (February 27, 1995)
  17. ↑ Production and Airworthiness Approvals, Part Marking, and Miscellaneous Amendments, 74 Fed. Reg. 53368 (October 16, 2009)
  18. ↑ 14 C.F.R. 21.303(h)(2009)
  19. ↑ 14 C.F.R. 21.137
  20. ↑ SeeProduction and Airworthiness Approvals, Part Marking, and Miscellaneous Amendments, 74 Fed. Reg. 53368, 53377 (October 16, 2009) (describing the elimination of the FIS requirements and the new cross reference to section 21.137)
  21. ↑ Parts Manufacturer Approval Procedures, FAA Order 8110.42C (June 23, 2008)
  22. ↑ SeeProduction and Airworthiness Approvals, Part Marking, and Miscellaneous Amendments, 74 Fed. Reg. 53368, 53380 (October 16, 2009) (describing the implementation schedule, and setting the implementation date at 18 months after publication in the Federal Register)
  23. ↑ FAA Questions & Answers: 14 CFR Part 21 Amendments, Subpart G – Production Certificates, Section 21.137, Question Four (updated April 27, 2010)
  24. ↑ Compare 14 C.F.R. 21.9(a)(6)(authority for fabrication in the course of maintenance) with 14 C.F.R. 21.301 et seq. (PMA regulations)
  25. ↑ "AC 43-18 - Fabrication of Aircraft parts by Maintenance Personnel". FAA. March 24, 2006. Retrieved 2015-04-02.
  26. ↑ Agenda for the 2008 FAA-EASA International Safety Conference, in which MARPA's President (Jason Dickstein) is speaking on collaborative efforts to improve supplier control Archived 2008-09-20 at the Wayback Machine
  27. ↑ 70 Fed. Reg. 65713 (November 9, 2006)(FAA acknowledges the assistance of Jack Buster, MARPA Airworthiness Directive Committee) Archived May 20, 2011, at the Wayback Machine
  28. ↑ FAA Bilateral Agreement Listing
  29. ↑ Guidance Material and Best Practices for Alternate Parts (PMA) and Approved (non-OEM) Repairs (DER). 2nd Edition.
  30. ↑ See, e.g., Australian Government Production Approvals Page
  31. ↑ See, e.g., Standardization Procedure for Design Approval of Civil Aircraft and Parts, AP-21-AA-2012-20 (Nov. 5, 2012) (published by the Civil Aviation Authority of China and describing PMA parts in China)
  32. ↑ See, e.g. Why and how must Parts and Appliances be marked, when are the letters EPA required, and which exceptions are acceptable?, EASA FAQ n.20095 (November 23, 2015)
  33. ↑ Implementation Procedures for Airworthiness Under the Agreement between The Government of the United States of America and The Government of Japan For Promotion of Aviation Safety, Amendment 2, Chapter 1 (explaining that "This amendment will allow the FAA to accept JCAB Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) produced by JCAB Approved Production Organization (APO) ....")
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.