Modification and Replacement Parts Association

Last updated

The Modification and Replacement Parts Association is the Washington, D.C.-based trade association that represents manufacturers of government-approved aftermarket aircraft parts. These aircraft parts are often known as PMA parts, from the acronym for Parts Manufacturer Approval. The manufacture of PMA parts is regulated in the United States by the Federal Aviation Administration. [1]

Contents

Membership

PMA parts manufacturers

MARPA's primary focus is on representing the needs of the PMA parts community in the United States. These companies manufacture after market aircraft parts under strict FAA guidelines. [2]

In order to obtain a PMA from the FAA, the manufacturer must demonstrate that it has

  1. a design for an aircraft part that meets FAA safety requirements, and
  2. a quality assurance system that will assure that each part released from the system will meet the FAA-approved design. [3]

The manufacturers that meet these standards are issued Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) by the FAA.

Because the United States was the first nation to adopt rules permitting the manufacture of aircraft after market parts (and for many decades was the only nation with these rules), the PMA industry is primarily concentrated in the United States. Other countries have started to investigate and even adopt PMA rules. Some non-US manufacturers have started to investigate the benefits that MARPA can bring to them. In the future, MARPA's manufacturing membership may reflect a more international base.

Air carrier involvement

MARPA's members include many air carriers from around the world.

MARPA has an air carrier committee that remains quite active. [4] The committee was originally formed by MARPA Director Josh Abelson, and since then has been chaired by Cori Ferguson of Alaska Airlines (2006–2008), David Linebaugh of Delta Air Lines (2008–2011), Steve Jones of American Airlines (2011–2013), William Barrett of American Airlines (2013), Edward Pozzi of United Airlines (2013–2014), Michael Rennick of Delta Air Lines (2014–2017), and is now co-chaired by Deidre Vance of American Airlines (2016–present) and Donald "Donny" Douglas of Delta Air Lines (2017–present). Air carriers engage in a complete engineering review of a PMA part before they choose to install it (despite the fact that the FAA has already approved the part). Despite this engineering review (or perhaps because of it), air carriers have been adopting PMA usage in their fleets and recognizing reliability improvements and cost savings. [5]

History

The industry that MARPA represents, PMA parts manufacturers, is not new. PMA parts have been around as commercial competitors since at least the 1950s. [6] But the popularity of PMA parts has boomed since the turn of the millennium. [7]

MARPA was formed by George Powell, Jim Reum and Jason Dickstein. During the 1990s, the three men were members of the FAA Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) Part 21 Working Group, which was charged with developing updated manufacturing regulations. During their work on the working group, the three men came to understand the value of and need for a trade association to represent the interests of the PMA manufacturing community. On May 18, 1998 they held a "MARPA Kick-off Meeting" at Fado Irish Pub on 7th St. in Washington, DC and signed, on a restaurant placemat, an agreement to form such a trade association.

The association spent its early years in the Phoenix, Arizona, area under the guidance of George Powell and his wife Gloria Nations. In 2007, when Jason Dickstein became president, MARPA moved its headquarters to Washington, D.C., in order to be closer to the decision-makers that affect MARPA's members. [8]

MARPA has had three presidents:

PresidentTerm of office
George Powell(1999–2004)
Gloria Nations(2004–2007)
Jason Dickstein(2007–present)

MARPA has had four chairmen of the board:

ChairmanTerm of office
Jim Reum(1999–2004)
Patrick White(2004–2008)
Joshua Abelson(2008–2009)
John Hunter(2009–present)

Government and industry affairs

MARPA keeps its members informed about changes in the regulations that affect them, and also informs them about proposed changes in order to permit them to file the comments with the government. [9] MARPA works with government agencies, like the FAA and EASA, to help promote aircraft parts safety. MARPA also works with the government agencies to help promote reasonable standards of commercial fairness in the industry. MARPA is a frequent contributor to the rule making process in the United States. [10] For example, from 2009 through 2011, MARPA's president (Jason Dickstein) served on the FAA Aviation Rulemaking Committee (ARC) for Safety Management Systems (SMS), [11] and MARPA played a significant role in helping to craft a version of the rule that would most effectively promote safety. [12]

Safety initiatives

MARPA also develops programs and tools to assist its members in regulatory compliance and in meeting their safety goals. In 2004, the FAA and PMA community discussed establishing new standards for Continued Operational Safety (COS). [13] MARPA formed a committee of its members and drafted COS Guidance. [14] [15] The MARPA COS guidance represents a voluntary system under which PMA manufacturers track their parts through their entire life cycle in order to be able to collect reliability data. The purpose of the data is to support parts reliability – that will allow manufacturers to proactively respond to potential safety issues early enough in the life cycle of the parts that the potential safety issue may not have even manifested itself. [16] The data allows PMA companies to provide the same level of response and support to its customers that their competitors provide. [17]

Actions for PMA companies

MARPA has been recognized as a trade association committed to helping PMA companies to comply with FAA and other regulations. [18]

MARPA joined with the Air Transport Association in a letter to CFM International, asking them to rescind a series of advertisements that made unsupported claims. [19] Although CFM did not admit to MARPA's and ATA's claims, it did replace its factually-unsupported advertisements with ads that did not make the same allegations.

Fairness remained an issue as some of the larger manufacturers of aircraft products attempted to inhibit trade in PMAs by inaccurately claiming that PMA parts were not subject to the same Instructions for Continued Airworthiness as the parts that they replace. [20] MARPA continued to inform the industry and the government about these issues and in 2008, the FAA released a Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin to remind the industry that PMA parts are FAA-approved in the United States, and therefore PMA parts are valid replacement parts that continue to enjoy the same Instructions for Continued Airworthiness as the parts that they replace. [21] [22]

As an educator

MARPA has always had an education focus. MARPA has assisted its members in complying with the regulations and developing strategies to obtain PMAs. [23] It also educates the PMA community about the changing standards that apply to them through their website, a monthly newsletter, a blog, and an Annual Conference.

In addition to keeping the PMA industry informed about the changes that surround it, MARPA has also focused on educating PMA users (and potential users) about the benefits of using PMA parts. [24] MARPA's efforts to educate air carriers are credited with a significant decrease in the amount of time that an air carrier needs in order to review and approve a PMA part for use in their fleet. [25]

MARPA also supports member efforts to educate the public about PMA parts. [26]

Annual conference

MARPA holds an annual conference each year to share information about the rules that apply to PMA, changing legal standards that could influence PMA manufacturers, and industry conditions that affect PMA. [27] There usually one or more analysis of current aviation industry economic conditions and airline market conditions in order to facilitate industry strategic planning. [28] The Conference generally features significant participation by the FAA and other government entities (like EASA, U.S. Air Force, U.S. International Trade Administration, U.S. Justice Department, etc.), which makes it an important forum for exchanging information.

International focus

MARPA is based in the United States and mostly made up of US-based companies because the United States was the first country to have a body of regulations that supported government-approved manufacturing of aftermarket aircraft parts. Other countries have begun to investigate options to support such industries.

The European Aviation Safety Agency has issued a decision verifying that PMA parts from the United States are accepted and used in European Community member countries. [29] This decision followed a long-standing policy of the Joint Aviation Authorities (JAA). The tenets of European acceptance also exist in the bilateral agreements between the United States and a number of European nations. [30]

In 2010, MARPA appeared on a panel at the FAA / EASA International Safety Meeting. [31] The panel also include Eurocopter and both FAA and EASA senior management. The purpose of the panel was to explore the safety paradigms that could be introduced to address the relationships between the aftermarket and the OEM market. MARPA's presentation focused on the Association's initiatives designed to provide a foundation for data gathering, data analysis, predictive risk management, and cooperative hazard mitigation.

MARPA's air carrier and maintenance facility members include a number of non-US parties.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Aviation Administration</span> U.S. government agency regulating civil aviation

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is a U.S. federal government agency within the U.S. Department of Transportation which regulates civil aviation in the United States and surrounding international waters. Its powers include air traffic control, certification of personnel and aircraft, setting standards for airports, and protection of U.S. assets during the launch or re-entry of commercial space vehicles. Powers over neighboring international waters were delegated to the FAA by authority of the International Civil Aviation Organization.

The Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) are rules prescribed by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) governing all aviation activities in the United States. The FARs comprise Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations. A wide variety of activities are regulated, such as aircraft design and maintenance, typical airline flights, pilot training activities, hot-air ballooning, lighter-than-air aircraft, human-made structure heights, obstruction lighting and marking, model rocket launches, commercial space operations, model aircraft operations, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) and kite flying. The rules are designed to promote safe aviation, protecting pilots, flight attendants, passengers and the general public from unnecessary risk.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European Union Aviation Safety Agency</span> European Union civil aviation authority

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) is an agency of the European Commission with responsibility for civil aviation safety in the European Union. It carries out certification, regulation and standardisation and also performs investigation and monitoring. It collects and analyses safety data, drafts and advises on safety legislation and co-ordinates with similar organisations in other parts of the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eclipse 500</span> Very light business jet

The Eclipse 500 is a very light jet (VLJ) originally produced by Eclipse Aviation of Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States. The company was founded in 1998 to develop the 1997 Williams V-Jet II demonstrator. The prototype first flew with Williams EJ22 turbofans on August 26, 2002. The engines were replaced by Pratt & Whitney Canada PW610Fs in 2004 and Eclipse Aviation won the Collier Trophy in February 2006 for the design. A provisional FAA type certification was received on 27 July 2006 and the first delivery occurred on 31 December 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Type certificate</span> Document noting the airworthiness of a certain type of aircraft

A type certificate signifies the airworthiness of a particular category of aircraft, according to its manufacturing design. Certification confirms that the aircraft of a new type intended for serial production is in compliance with applicable airworthiness requirements established by the national air law.

An airworthiness directive is a notification to owners and operators of certified aircraft that a known safety deficiency with a particular model of aircraft, engine, avionics or other system exists and must be corrected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aircraft maintenance checks</span> Periodic scheduled inspection performed on aircraft to keep it airworthy

Aircraft maintenance checks are periodic inspections that have to be done on all commercial and civil aircraft after a certain amount of time or usage. Military aircraft normally follow specific maintenance programmes which may, or may not, be similar to those of commercial and civil operators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supplemental type certificate</span> Document of approval for modifications or repairs to an aircraft

A supplemental type certificate (STC) is a civil aviation authority-approved major modification or repair to an existing type certified aircraft, engine or propeller. As it adds to the existing type certificate, it is deemed "supplemental". In the United States issuance of such certificates is under the purview of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).

An aircraft part is an article or component approved for installation on a type-certificated aircraft. Approval for these parts is derived from the jurisdictions of the countries that an aircraft is based. In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration oversees the approval for these parts under Federal Aviation Regulation Part 21.

Parts Manufacturer Approval (PMA) is an approval granted by the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to a manufacturer of aircraft parts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Airworthiness</span> Measure of an aircrafts suitability for safe flight

In aviation, airworthiness is the measure of an aircraft's suitability for safe flight. Initial airworthiness is demonstrated by a certificate of airworthiness issued by the civil aviation authority in the state in which the aircraft is registered, and continuing airworthiness is achieved by performing the required maintenance actions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aircraft maintenance</span> Performance of tasks which maintain an aircrafts airworthiness

Aircraft maintenance is the performance of tasks required to ensure the continuing airworthiness of an aircraft or aircraft part, including overhaul, inspection, replacement, defect rectification, and the embodiment of modifications, compliance with airworthiness directives and repair.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jat Tehnika</span> Serbian aerospace company

Jat Tehnika is a Serbian aerospace company providing aircraft maintenance, repair and overhaul. The company is based at Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport and provides services for Air Serbia and other airlines across Europe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air operator's certificate</span> Approval by civil aviation authorities to operate aircraft for "commercial air transport" purposes

An air operator's certificate (AOC) is the approval granted by a civil aviation authority (CAA) to an aircraft operator to allow it to use aircraft for commercial air transport purposes. This requires the operator to have personnel, assets and systems in place to ensure the safety of its employees and of the flying public. The certificate lists the approved aircraft types, each registration number approved to fly, the approved flying purpose, and in what area the holder may operate.

A civil aviation authority (CAA) is a national or supranational statutory authority that oversees the regulation of civil aviation, including the maintenance of an aircraft register.

An emergency airworthiness directive (EAD) is an airworthiness directive issued when unsafe conditions require immediate action by an aircraft owner or operator. An EAD is published by a responsible authority such as the FOCA, EASA or FAA related to airworthiness and maintenance of aircraft and aircraft parts. It contains measures which must be accomplished and the related periods to preserve their airworthiness. Technical information is addressed to operators and maintenance organisations of affected aircraft only. EADs become effective upon receipt of notification.

Unapproved aircraft parts are aircraft parts not approved by civil aviation authorities for installation on type certified aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AerSale</span> Aviation Company

AerSale, Inc. is a Doral, Florida-based global supplier of aftermarket commercial jet aircraft, engines, used materials, and aeronautical engineering services to passenger and cargo airlines, government, multinational original equipment manufacturers, and independent MROs. AerSale is a member of the Aircraft Fleet Recycling Association.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southwest Airlines Flight 1380</span> 2018 aviation accident over Pennsylvania

Southwest Airlines Flight 1380 was a Boeing 737-700 that experienced a contained engine failure in the left CFM International CFM56 engine after departing from New York–LaGuardia Airport en route to Dallas Love Field on April 17, 2018. The engine cowl was broken in the failure, and cowl fragments damaged the fuselage, shattering a cabin window and causing explosive depressurization of the aircraft. Other fragments caused damage to the wing. The crew carried out an emergency descent and diverted to Philadelphia International Airport. One passenger was partially ejected from the aircraft and sustained fatal injuries, while eight other passengers sustained minor injuries. The aircraft was substantially damaged.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing 737 MAX certification</span> Certification of aircraft

The Boeing 737 MAX was initially certified in 2017 by the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). Global regulators grounded the plane in 2019 following fatal crashes of Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302. Both crashes were linked to the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), a new automatic flight control feature. Investigations into both crashes determined that Boeing and the FAA favored cost-saving solutions, which ultimately produced a flawed design of the MCAS instead. The FAA's Organization Designation Authorization program, allowing manufacturers to act on its behalf, was also questioned for weakening its oversight of Boeing.

References

  1. 14 C.F.R. 21.303
  2. FAA Order 8110.42C, Parts Manufacturer Approval Procedures, (June 23, 2008).
  3. See FAA Order 8110.42C, Parts Manufacturer Approval Procedures, (June 23, 2008).
  4. Cari Shane Parven, Product Focus: The Dawning of a New Era for PMA Parts<, Aviation Maintenance (April 1, 2007).
  5. Id.
  6. Cari Shane Parven, Product Focus: The Dawning of a New Era for PMA Parts, Aviation Maintenance (April 1, 2007).
  7. Id.
  8. MARPA Moves to Washington, Aviation Today (May 11, 2007).
  9. FAA Issues New Guidance for PMA Holders, Aircraft International News (Sept 3, 2008).
  10. MARPA's Mission, Aviation Week: MRO Blog (January 24, 2007) (noting that MARPA had filed 156 Federal Register Comments in the prior three years).
  11. Summary of an Safety Management System Aviation Rulemaking Committee Meeting (November 16, 2010)
  12. MARPA Comments on the Safety Management System Rulemaking Proposal (March 8, 2011)
  13. Matt Thurber, PMA Industry Facing Maturity Challenge, Aviation Maintenance (March 1, 2005).
  14. Positive COS and Effect for PMAs, Aviation Maintenance, Vicki McConnell, Technology Editor (March 6, 2008)
  15. Matt Thurber, PMA Industry Facing Maturity Challenge, Aviation Maintenance (March 1, 2005) (noting the Committee leadership).
  16. MARPA's Guidance Material for a PMA Continued Operational Safety (COS) System (Revision One – September 17, 2007).
  17. Matt Thurber, PMA Industry Facing Maturity Challenge, Aviation Maintenance (March 1, 2005).
  18. Michelle Gardner, Parts Manufacturing Approval: Negotiating Through the PMA Process can be Daunting but Help is Available<, Aircraft Maintenance Technology (October, 2004).
  19. MARPA Refutes CFM International's Inflammatory Claims That Competitors Replacement Aircraft Products Are Inferior, AMT Online (July 2008).
  20. SeeThe MARPA Report: PMA Makes Great Strides for an Industry in Need, Aviation Maintenance (Jan 1, 2008).
  21. Anti-PMA Rhetoric is Wrong; PMA Parts are Valid, Says FAA, AMT Online (August 2008).
  22. Dionne Shearer, PMA Parts Prevail, Aircraft Maintenance Technology (September 22, 2008).
  23. Michelle Gardner, Parts Manufacturing Approval: Negotiating through the PMA process can be daunting but help is available, Aircraft Maintenance Technology (October 2004).
  24. The MARPA Report: PMA Makes Great Strides for an Industry in Need, Aviation Maintenance (Jan 1, 2008).
  25. Cari Shane Parven, Product Focus: The Dawning of a New Era for PMA Parts, Aviation Maintenance (April 1, 2007).
  26. Wencor Wins MARPA Award, Wencor Press Release (October 26, 2005) (Wencor won the award for its efforts to educate the Asian marketplace about the value of PMA parts).
  27. E.g. Matt Thurber, "PMA Industry To Convene at MARPA Conference," Aviation International News (September 1, 2010)
  28. E.g. Tom Tran (Aerostrategy), "PMA Market Outlook: Impact of the Recession," (September 30, 2009)
  29. European Aviation Safety Agency Decision No. 2007/003/C (16 July 2007) ("On the Acceptance of Certification Findings made by the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States of America (FAA) for Parts Designed in the United States of America under the Part Manufacturer Approval (PMA) System of the FAA").
  30. See, e.g., Bilateral Aviation Safety Agreement – Implementation Procedures for Design Approval, Production Activities, Export Airworthiness Approval, Post Design Approval Activities, and Technical Assistance Between Authorities, sec. 3.0.4.1 (August 24, 2001) (Agreement between the United States and France) (revised June 2008).
  31. 2010 FAA / EASA International Safety Meeting website