Pennsylvania Mock Trial Competition

Last updated

The Pennsylvania Mock Trial Competition is a high school Mock Trial competition in Pennsylvania sponsored by the Pennsylvania Bar Association Young Lawyers Division. The winning school of the state finals advances to the National High School Mock Trial Championship. The Pennsylvania Mock Trial Competition first began in 1984. [1] The case material is usually released early in November, within the first two weeks. Typically, 250 to 300 teams compete each year making it one of the largest state competitions in the country. The Statewide Championship is held each year in late March at the Dauphin County Courthouse in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania and consists of the top 12 to 16 teams in the state. As a result of the COVID-19 Pandemic, the 2020 Statewide Championship was cancelled and the entire 2021 and 2022 competition seasons were held virtually.

Contents

Trial Format

Opening Statements

A trial starts with a 5-minute [2] opening statement by the Plaintiff/Prosecution (depending on whether the case is civil or criminal, respectively), which is immediately followed by a 5-minute opening statement by the defense. [3]

Witness Testimony

After opening statements, the plaintiff/prosecution calls its first witness. [4] The plaintiff/prosecution conducts a direct examination of the witness, and then defense conducts a cross examination of the same witness. After cross-examination, plaintiff/prosecution has the opportunity to conduct a redirect examination of the witness. If they do, defense is given the chance to recross the witness. [5] After either all four types of exams have been conducted or one party abstains from doing redirect or recross respectively, the witness steps down from the stand. This process is then repeated for two more plaintiff/prosecution witnesses. With the conclusion of testimony from the third plaintiff witness, the plaintiff rests. The Defense then calls three witnesses in the same manner described above for the plaintiff/prosecution.

Each team has 30 minutes [6] for witness testimony, including all direct, cross, redirect, and recross examinations conducted by counsel of that team. (The clock does stop, however, for a variety of reasons, including, but not limited to, objections and parts of the process for entering exhibits. [7] )

Closing Arguments

Once the third defense witness has finished giving testimony, the defense gives their closing argument. Like opening statements, closing arguments are limited to 5 minutes apiece. [8] After defense closes, plaintiff/prosecution gives its closing statement. This is a deviation from standard courtroom procedure, in which the plaintiff/prosecution closes first, followed by the defense, after which the plaintiff/prosecution may offer a rebuttal. In Mock Trial, this deviation allows each team to have the opportunity to speak first, one for opening statements and one for closing arguments. Barring any disputes being raised, the second closing argument marks the conclusion of the trial, and the jury is dismissed to tally points.

Scoring & Winner

Each member of the jury scores each part of the trial based on specific scoring categories, such as the flow of a direct examination or the effectiveness of a cross-examination. Each opening statement or closing argument is worth a maximum of 10 points. Each direct or cross-examination is also worth, at most, 10 points. Each witness can earn a maximum of 10 points independent of any other points from direct examination. There is one team evaluation category scored at the end of the trial, valued at a maximum of 10 points. Therefore, each team can earn up to 120 points during the trial. [9]

On any juror's ballot, the team with more points is the winner of that scoresheet. Each juror indicates which team he/she would choose to win if the points of the scoresheet after any penalties are assessed, adds up to a tie. Each scoresheet is worth one vote. Whichever team receives more votes is declared the winner of the trial. If there is an even number of jurors and they have a split decision, the team with total points on all of the scoresheets is the winner. [10]

Past Cases

YearNameSubject of Case
1997Marshall v. Priestley College [11] Civil Liability
1998The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Walker [12] Conspiracy and Delivery of a Controlled Substance
1999Smith v. Lorcin [13] Negligence
2000The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Krupp [14] Voluntary Manslaughter
2001Gorey v. Bushing [15] Civil Liability
2002The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. McGrath [16] Arson
2003Day v. Knight [17] Negligence
2004The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Max Ability [18] Theft
2005Gallo v. Urbanski [19] Civil Liability (and First Amendment rights)
2006The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Olson [20] Third-Degree Murder
2007Anderson v. Williams [21] Civil Cyberstalking Laws
2008The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Sinclair [22] Kidnapping
2009Hansbra v. Plane's Park & Polish, LLC [23] Negligence
2010The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Legan Arabach [24] Third-Degree Murder
2011The Estate of Simone Langston v. Dr. Lefu Harrison [25] Competency to Consent
2012The Wisawe Chapter of Friends of Bog Turtles v. ZenoPharma, Inc. [26] Critical habitat determination
2013The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tatum Zillias [27] Third-Degree Murder
2014The Estate of Jordan Simon v. Ruffed Grouse High School [28] Wrongful death
2015The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Harper Marmalard [29] First Degree
2016Lilienthal Insurance, Inc. v. Natural Habitat Preserve [30] Insurance Indemnification
2017The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Taylor Edsel [31] Arson
2018Silva Morel v. Tiger Tail Technologies [32] Civil- Adverse Employment Action
2019The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Rae Shafer, M.D. [33] Drug Delivery Resulting in Death (1 Count)
2020Addison Babbage v. Ruffed Grouse High School [34] Negligence
2021Estate of George Romero v. Ashley Williams [35] Wrongful death
2022The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Edi Arcaro [36] First-Degree Murder
2023Estate of Alejandro Desafios v. Storm Chase LLC [37] Gross Negligence
2024The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Addison Booker [38] First-Degree Murder and Conspiracy to Commit Murder

State Finals Results

YearWinnerPlace at NationalsRunner-Up
1987 Central Cambria High School
1988 Bensalem High School 4 Bishop Carrol High School
1989 Bensalem High School
1990 Quigley Catholic High School Delone Catholic High School
1991 Scranton Preparatory High School 5 Kiski Area High School
1992 Norristown Area High School J. P. McCaskey High School
1993 North Pocono High School 26 Bensalem High School
1994 Quigley Catholic High School 9 North Pocono High School
1995 Quigley Catholic High School 20 North Pocono High School
1996 Quigley Catholic High School 10 North Allegheny High School
1997 Overbrook High School Seton LaSalle High School
1998 Punxsutawney Area High School 30 George Washington Carver High School of Engineering & Science
1999 Julia R. Masterman High School [39] 15 Quigley Catholic High School
2000 Quigley Catholic High School [40] 21 Mount Saint Joseph Academy
2001 Greensburg-Salem High School [41] 18 Devon Preparatory High School
2002 Quigley Catholic High School [42] 2 Gateway High School
2003 Gateway High School [43] 22 Quigley Catholic High School
2004 Overbrook High School [44] 32 Oliver High School
2005 Greensburg-Salem High School [45] 12 Scranton Preparatory High School
2006 Greensburg-Salem High School [46] 4 Julia R. Masterman High School
2007 Greensburg-Salem High School [47] 14 Scranton Preparatory High School
2008 Overbrook High School [48] 15 Greensburg-Salem High School
2009 Central High School [49] 10 Overbrook High School
2010 Scranton Preparatory High School [50] 10 B. Reed Henderson High School
2011 Wyoming Seminary High School [51] 6 St. Joseph's Preparatory School
2012 Scranton Preparatory High School [52] 10 J.P. McCaskey High School
2013 Quigley Catholic High School 16 Greensburg-Salem High School
2014 Altoona Area High School 22 Roman Catholic High School
2015 Quigley Catholic High School 13 Roman Catholic High School
2016

Quigley Catholic High School

18 Wyoming Seminary High School
2017

Greensburg-Salem High School

30 Roman Catholic High School
2018

Wyoming Seminary High School

11 Penn-Trafford High School
2019 Holy Cross High School [53] 9 Germantown Friends School
2020Cancelled due to the ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic
2021 Abington Heights High School [54] 24 Nazareth High School
2022 Abington Heights High School [55] 15 St. Joseph's Preparatory School
2023 Roman Catholic High School [56] 19 Cumberland Valley High School
2024 Abington Heights High School TBD Spring Grove Area High School

Schools with Multiple State Finals Appearances

AppearancesTeamWinsLosses
11 Quigley Catholic High School 92
7 Greensburg-Salem High School 52
5 Scranton Preparatory High School 32
4 Overbrook High School 31
4 Roman Catholic High School 13
3 Abington Heights High School 30
3 Wyoming Seminary High School 21
3 Bensalem High School 21
3 North Pocono High School 12
2 Gateway High School 11
2 Julia R. Masterman High School 11
2 St. Joseph's Preparatory School 02
2 J. P. McCaskey High School 02

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mumia Abu-Jamal</span> American political activist and journalist convicted of the murder of a police officer (born 1954)

Mumia Abu-Jamal is an American political activist and journalist who was convicted of murder and sentenced to death in 1982 for the 1981 murder of Philadelphia police officer Daniel Faulkner. While on death row, he has written and commented on the criminal justice system in the United States. After numerous appeals, his death penalty sentence was overturned by a federal court. In 2011, the prosecution agreed to a sentence of life imprisonment without parole. He entered the general prison population early the following year.

In common law jurisdictions, a preliminary hearing, preliminary examination, preliminary inquiry, evidentiary hearing or probable cause hearing is a proceeding, after a criminal complaint has been filed by the prosecutor, to determine whether there is enough evidence to require a trial. At such a hearing, the defendant may be assisted by a lawyer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prosecutor</span> Legal profession

A prosecutor is a legal representative of the prosecution in states with either the common law adversarial system or the civil law inquisitorial system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against the defendant, an individual accused of breaking the law. Typically, the prosecutor represents the state or the government in the case brought against the accused person.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discovery (law)</span> Pretrial procedure in common law countries for obtaining evidence

Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a phase of pretrial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from other parties by means of methods of discovery such as interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admissions and depositions. Discovery can be obtained from nonparties using subpoenas. When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. Conversely, a party or nonparty resisting discovery can seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion for a protective order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mock trial</span> Simulation of court hearings

A mock trial is an act or imitation trial. It is similar to a moot court, but mock trials simulate lower-court trials, while moot court simulates appellate court hearings. Attorneys preparing for a real trial might use a mock trial consisting of volunteers as role players to test theories or experiment with each other. Mock trial is also the name of an extracurricular program in which students participate in rehearsed trials to learn about the legal system in a competitive manner. Interscholastic mock trials take place on all levels including primary school, middle school, high school, college, and law school. Mock trial is often taught in conjunction with a course in trial advocacy or takes place as an after school enrichment activity. Some gifted and talented programs may also take place in one.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Quinnipiac University School of Law</span> Law school in Connecticut, U.S.

Quinnipiac University School of Law is located in North Haven, Connecticut. It is one of Quinnipiac University's graduate schools. Quinnipiac Law is the newest law school in Connecticut, having received full accreditation from the American Bar Association (ABA) in 1992. It is a member of the Association of American Law Schools, and is currently ranked 147-192 by U.S. News & World Report.

Witness impeachment, in the law of evidence of the United States, is the process of calling into question the credibility of an individual testifying in a trial. The Federal Rules of Evidence contain the rules governing impeachment in US federal courts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Closing argument</span> Concluding statement of each partys counsel in a trial

A closing argument, summation, or summing up is the concluding statement of each party's counsel reiterating the important arguments for the trier of fact, often the jury, in a court case. A closing argument occurs after the presentation of evidence. A closing argument may not contain any new information and may only use evidence introduced at trial. It is not customary to raise objections during closing arguments, except for egregious behavior. However, such objections, when made, can prove critical later in order to preserve appellate issues.

<i>Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District</i> 2005 court case in Pennsylvania

Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp. 2d 707 was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts testing a public school district policy that required the teaching of intelligent design (ID), ultimately found by the court to not be science. In October 2004, the Dover Area School District of York County, Pennsylvania, changed its biology teaching curriculum to require that intelligent design be presented as an alternative to evolution theory, and that Of Pandas and People, a textbook advocating intelligent design, was to be used as a reference book. The prominence of this textbook during the trial was such that the case is sometimes referred to as the Dover Panda Trial, a name which recalls the popular name of the Scopes Monkey Trial in Tennessee, 80 years earlier. The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism, and that the school board policy violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. The judge's decision sparked considerable response from both supporters and critics.

The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides that "in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to be confronted with the witnesses against him." The right only applies to criminal prosecutions, not civil cases or other proceedings. Generally, the right is to have a face-to-face confrontation with witnesses who are offering testimonial evidence against the accused in the form of cross-examination during a trial. The Fourteenth Amendment makes the right to confrontation applicable to the states and not just the federal government.

Trial advocacy is the branch of knowledge concerned with making attorneys and other advocates more effective in trial proceedings. Trial advocacy is an essential trade skill for litigators and is taught in law schools and continuing legal education programs. It may also be taught in primary, secondary, and undergraduate schools, usually as a mock trial elective.

A private prosecution is a criminal proceeding initiated by an individual private citizen or private organisation instead of by a public prosecutor who represents the state. Private prosecutions are allowed in many jurisdictions under common law, but have become less frequent in modern times as most prosecutions are now handled by professional public prosecutors instead of private individuals who retain barristers.

<i>Commonwealth v. Abu-Jamal</i> 1982 murder trial in Pennsylvania

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Mumia Abu-Jamal was a 1982 murder trial in which Mumia Abu-Jamal was tried for the first-degree murder of police officer Daniel Faulkner. A jury convicted Abu-Jamal on all counts and sentenced him to death.

United States criminal procedure derives from several sources of law: the baseline protections of the United States Constitution; federal and state statutes; federal and state rules of criminal procedure ; and state and federal case law. Criminal procedures are distinct from civil procedures in the US.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Federation of Cheerleading</span>

The International Federation of Cheerleading (IFC) was formed in 1998 and is a non-profit federation based in Tokyo, Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wisconsin circuit courts</span>

The Wisconsin circuit courts are the general trial courts in the state of Wisconsin. There are currently 69 circuits in the state, divided into 10 judicial administrative districts. Circuit court judges hear and decide both civil and criminal cases. Each of the 249 circuit court judges are elected and serve six-year terms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States at the 2012 Summer Olympics</span> Sporting event delegation

The United States of America (USA), represented by the United States Olympic Committee (USOC), competed at the 2012 Summer Olympics in London, from July 27 to August 12, 2012. U.S. athletes have competed at every Summer Olympic Games in the modern era, except the 1980 Summer Olympics in Moscow which they boycotted in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The USOC sent a total of 530 athletes to the Games, 262 men and 268 women, to compete in 25 sports. For the first time in its Olympic history, the United States was represented by more female than male athletes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Perry Mason moment</span> Moment during a trial that radically shifts the likely outcome

In court proceedings in the United States, a Perry Mason moment is said to have occurred whenever information is unexpectedly, and often dramatically, introduced into the record that changes the perception of the proceedings greatly and often influences the outcome. Often it takes the form of a witness's answer to a question, but it can sometimes come in the form of new evidence. It takes its name from Perry Mason, a fictional character in novels and stories written by Erle Stanley Gardner, where such dramatic reversals occurred, often in the form of witnesses confessing to crimes others were accused of in response to the sudden exposure of an inconsistency in their alibi.

The Illinois State Bar Association High School Mock Trial Invitational is a mock trial tournament that has been held every year since 1983. The event is administered by the Illinois State Bar Association. The winning team represents the state of Illinois at the National High School Mock Trial Championship. Originally held in Springfield, Illinois, the invitational moved to Champaign, Illinois in 2013, before moving back to Springfield for the 2019 competition. In 2019, 40 high schools participated. The defending champion is York Community High School.

In direct response to Pennsylvania Democratic Party v. Boockvar and the 2020 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania, the Donald Trump 2020 presidential campaign launched numerous lawsuits contesting the purview of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the election processes of Pennsylvania. All of these have either been dismissed or dropped. The last two remaining cases were dismissed without comment by the Supreme Court on February 22, 2021. On April 19, 2021, more than five months after the November 3, 2020 election, the Supreme Court declined to hear the outstanding case brought by former Republican congressional candidate Jim Bognet, dismissing it without comment.

References

  1. The Wisawe Chapter of Friends of Bog Turtles v. ZenoPharma, Inc- Introduction and Acknowledgements
  2. 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.23
  3. 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.10(b)
  4. 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 4.1
  5. 2011 PA Mock Trial Rules of Evidence- Rule 611d
  6. http://www.pabar.org/pdf/2013-14%20Rules%20of%20Competition%20w%20Changes%20-%2%5B%5D
  7. 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.26
  8. 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 6.23
  9. http://www.pabar.org/pdf/14MTOfficialScoreSheet.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  10. 2011 PA Rules of Competition- Rule 8.1 (g) iii
  11. Marshall v. Priestley College
  12. Commonwealth v. Walker
  13. Smith v. Lorcin
  14. Commonwealth v. Krupp
  15. Gorey v. Bushing
  16. Commonwealth v. McGrath
  17. Day v. Knight
  18. Commonwealth v. Max Ability
  19. Gallo v. Urbanski
  20. Commonwealth v. Olson
  21. Anderson v. Williams
  22. Commonwealth v. Sinclair
  23. Hansbra v. Plane's Park & Polish, LLC
  24. Commonwealth of PA v. Legan Arabach
  25. The Estate of Simone Langston v. Dr Lefu Harrison
  26. The Wisawe Chapter of Friends of Bog Turtles v. ZenoPharma, Inc.
  27. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tatum Zillias
  28. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tatum Zillias
  29. http://www.pabar.org/pdf/PAHSMT%202015%20HAZING%20Final.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  30. http://www.pabar.org/pdf/2016%20PA%20Case%20-%20Lilienthal%20Ins%20Co%20v%20NHP%20-%20Final%20for%20Circulation.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  31. "2017 Pennsylvania Statewide High School Mock Trial Competition" (PDF).
  32. http://www.pabar.org/pdf/MockTrial/2018/2018-OPERATION-MUSHROOM.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  33. https://www.pabar.org/pdf/mocktrial/2019/2019-Operation-PainAway-Final.pdf [ dead link ]
  34. https://www.pabar.org/pdf/MockTrial/2020/2020%20The%20Eye%20Final.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  35. https://www.pabar.org/pdf/mocktrial/2021/2021Zombies.PDF [ bare URL PDF ]
  36. "ThePoniesvfinal.pdf" (PDF). pabar.org.
  37. "Mudd%20Run%20FINAL%20-%20111022.pdfurl=https://www.pabar.org/pdf/2022/Mudd%20Run%20FINAL%20-%20111022.pdf". pabar.org.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |url= (help)
  38. "The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania vs. Addison Booker" (PDF).
  39. PBA Press Release- March 18, 2010
  40. PBA Press Release- April, 2000
  41. PBA Press Release- April, 2001
  42. PBA Press Release- March 23, 2002
  43. PBA Press Release- March 31, 2003
  44. PBA Press Release- March 29, 2004
  45. Westmoreland Bar Association Newsletter- March-April 2005
  46. PBA Press Release- April 3, 2006
  47. PBA Press Release- March 31, 2007
  48. PBA Press Release- March 29, 2008
  49. PBA Press Release- March 28, 2009
  50. PBA Press Release- March 27, 2010
  51. PBA Press Release- March 26, 2011
  52. Lancaster Online- McCaskey team takes 2nd place in Pa. mock trial [ permanent dead link ]
  53. "PBA Press Release- April 1, 2019". www.pabar.org.
  54. "Abington Heights wins state mock trial competition". www.thetimes-tribune.com. 30 March 2021.
  55. "Abington Heights High School Wins Pennsylvania Bar Association Statewide Mock Trial Competition". www.pabar.org.
  56. "Roman Catholic High School in Philadelphia County Wins Pennsylvania Bar Association Statewide Mock Trial Competition". www.pabar.org.