Kidnapping

Last updated

K. J. Stahlberg (in the center-right), the first President of the Republic of Finland, and his wife at the Helsinki Central Station after their kidnapping. In the middle of picture their daughter Elli Stahlberg stands behind them. Stahlbergs' at the railwaystation.jpg
K. J. Ståhlberg (in the center-right), the first President of the Republic of Finland, and his wife at the Helsinki Central Station after their kidnapping. In the middle of picture their daughter Elli Ståhlberg stands behind them.

Kidnapping or abduction is the unlawful abduction and confinement of a person against their will, and is a crime in many jurisdictions. Kidnapping may be accomplished by use of force or fear, or a victim may be enticed into confinement by fraud or deception. Kidnapping is distinguished from false imprisonment by the intentional movement of the victim to a different location.

Contents

Kidnapping may be done to demand a ransom in exchange for releasing the victim, or for other illegal purposes. Kidnapping can be accompanied by bodily injury, which in some jurisdictions elevates the crime to aggravated kidnapping. [1]

Kidnapping of a child may be a distinct crime, depending on jurisdiction.

Motives

The abduction of Dinah, (watercolor, c. 1896-1902 by James Tissot) Dinah tissot.jpg
The abduction of Dinah, (watercolor, c. 1896–1902 by James Tissot)

Kidnapping can occur for a variety of reasons, with motivations for the crime varying particularly based on the perpetrator.

Ransom

The kidnapping of a person, most often an adult, for ransom is a common motivation behind kidnapping. This method is primarily utilized by larger organizations, such as criminal gangs, terrorist organizations, or insurgent groups. [2] [3] Typically this is done for financial incentive, with sums of money varying depending on the victim or the method of kidnapping.

Mexican gangs are estimated to have made up to $250 million in kidnappings from Central American migrants. [4]

According to a 2022 study by political scientist Danielle Gilbert, armed groups in Colombia engage in ransom kidnappings as a way to maintain the armed groups' local systems of taxation. The groups resort to ransom kidnappings to punish tax evasion and incentivize inhabitants not to shirk. [3] A 2024 study argued that insurgent groups are more likely to engage in kidnappings "under two conditions: to generate support and reinstate bargaining capacity when organizations suffer military losses on the battlefield and to enforce loyalties and display strength when organizations face violent competition from other non-state actors." [2]

Kidnapping has been identified as one source by which terrorist organizations have been known to obtain funding. [5]

Express kidnapping is a method of abduction used in some countries, mainly from Latin America, [6] where a small ransom, that a company or family can easily pay, is demanded. Express kidnapping is also used for an immediate ransom in which the victim is taken to an ATM and forced to give the captor money.

Tiger kidnapping occurs when a person is kidnapped, and the captor forces them to commit a crime such as robbery or murder. The victim is held hostage until the captor's demands are met. The term originates from the usually long preceding observation, like a tiger does when stalking prey. This is a method which has been used by the Real Irish Republican Army and the Continuity Irish Republican Army.

Virtual kidnapping is a unique form of kidnapping that has risen in recent years. Unlike previous forms of kidnapping, virtual kidnapping does not actually involve a victim of any kind. The scam involves a process of calling numerous people on the phone and making them believe the caller has a victim's loved one, such as a child, in order to gain a quick ransom from the victim. Previously these calls used to affect Spanish speaking communities in large cities, such as Los Angeles or Houston. Until around 2015 when the calls started to be directed to English speakers as well. Around 80 victims were identified as falling for this scam, with losses ranging close to $100,000. While most perpetrators behind this scam can be linked back to Mexico, one instance occurred in Houston, Texas. Yanette Rodriguez Acosta was found guilty of accosting victims for large sums of money, which she would pick up at a set drop off of point. [7] She was sentenced to seven years in prison, with an additional three years of supervision following her release. [8]

In the past, and presently in some parts of the world (such as southern Sudan), kidnapping is a common means used to obtain slaves and money through ransom. In the 19th century, kidnapping in the form of shanghaiing (or "pressganging") men supplied merchant ships with sailors, whom the law considered unfree labour. [9]

Pirates

Kidnapping on the high seas in connection with piracy has been increasing. It was reported that 661 crewmembers were taken hostage and 12 kidnapped in the first nine months of 2009. [10] The IMB Piracy Reporting Centre recorded that 141 crew members were taken hostage and 83 were kidnapped in 2018. [11]

Other

Other motivations behind kidnapping include the kidnap of a person for sexual assault purposes, or situations of domestic violence. For example, the 2003 Domestic Violence Report in Colorado shows in most instances of domestic violence people, most typically white females, will be taken from their residence by a present or former spouse or significant other. Often they will be taken by force, not with a weapon, and victims will be freed without injury to their person.

Bride kidnapping is a term often applied loosely, to include any bride "abducted" against the will of her parents, even if she is willing to marry the "abductor". It still is traditional amongst certain nomadic peoples of Central Asia. It has seen a resurgence in Kyrgyzstan since the fall of the Soviet Union and the subsequent erosion of women's rights. [12]

Kidnapping has sometimes been used by the family and friends of a cult member as a method to remove them from the cult and begin a deprogramming process to change their allegiance away from the group. [13]

Motivations for kidnapping cannot always be easily defined. During the 1990s and afterward, for example, the New York divorce coercion gang was involved in a sting of kidnappings. They would take Jewish husbands from their homes in New York and New Jersey and torture them in order for them to grant gittin, or religious divorces, to their wives. The gang is notorious for crimes of this nature. They were later apprehended for their crimes on October 9, 2013, in connection with a foiled kidnapping plot. [14] [15]

By jurisdiction

Jurisdiction of kidnapping varies depending on the country, with each one having their own way of defining and prosecuting the crime. Some such countries with clearly defined laws on kidnapping include:

Australia

In Australia, kidnapping is a criminal offence, as defined by either the State Crimes Act or the Commonwealth Criminal Code. It is a serious indictable offence, and is punishable by up to 14 – 25 years imprisonment. [16]

Canada

Kidnapping that does not result in a homicide is a hybrid offence that comes with a maximum possible penalty of life imprisonment (18 months if tried summarily). [17] A murder that results from kidnapping is classified as 1st-degree, with a sentence of life imprisonment that results from conviction (the mandatory penalty for murder under Canadian law). [18]

Mexico

The General Law to Prevent and Punish Crimes of Kidnapping establishes a prison sentence of 20–40 years for an individual convicted of holding another person as a hostage. The prison term increases to 25–45 years if the kidnapping occurred with violence against the victims, and then increases to 25–50 years if the kidnapping was committed by members of public safety. If the kidnapping results in homicide, the prison sentence will be from 40 to 70 years. [19]

Pakistan

In Pakistan, there are two kinds of kidnapping: Kidnapping from Pakistan and kidnapping from lawful guardianship. Penal Code 360 states that whoever conveys any person beyond the limits of Pakistan without the consent of that person or of some person legally authorized to consent on behalf of that person is said to kidnap that person from Pakistan. Penal Code 363 states that whoever kidnaps any person from Pakistan or lawful guardianship shall be punished with imprisonment of either description of a term which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to a fine. Kidnapping with a motive of murder, hurt, slavery, or to the lust of any person shall be punished with imprisonment for life with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to a fine. [20]

Netherlands

Article 282 prohibits hostaging (and 'kidnapping' is a kind of 'hostaging'). [21] Part 1 of Article 282 allows sentencing kidnappers to maximum imprisonment of 8 years or a fine of the fifth category. [22] Part 2 allows maximum imprisonment of 9 years or a fine of the fifth category [22] if there are serious injuries. Part 3 allows maximum imprisonment of 12 years or a fine of the fifth category [22] if the victim has been killed. Part 4 allows sentencing people that collaborate with kidnapping (such as proposing or make available a location where the victim hostaged). Part 1, 2 and 3 will apply also to them.

United Kingdom

Kidnapping is an offence under the common law of England and Wales. Lord Brandon said in 1984 R v D: [23]

First, the nature of the offence is an attack on, and infringement of, the personal liberty of an individual. Secondly, the offence contains four ingredients as follows: (1) the taking or carrying away of one person by another; (2) by force or fraud; (3) without the consent of the person so taken or carried away; and (4) without lawful excuse. [24] [25] [26]

In all cases of kidnapping of children, where it is alleged that a child has been kidnapped, it is the absence of the consent of that child which is material. This is the case regardless of the age of the child. A very small child will not have the understanding or intelligence to consent. This means that absence of consent will be a necessary inference from the age of the child. It is a question of fact for the jury whether an older child has sufficient understanding and intelligence to consent. [27] Lord Brandon said: "I should not expect a jury to find at all frequently that a child under fourteen had sufficient understanding and intelligence to give its consent." [28] If the child (being capable of doing so) did consent to being taken or carried away, the fact that the person having custody or care and control of that child did not consent to that child being taken or carried away is immaterial. If, on the other hand, the child did not consent, the consent of the person having custody or care and control of the child may support a defence of lawful excuse. [27] It is known as Gillick competence. [29]

Regarding restriction on prosecution, no prosecution may be instituted, except by or with the consent of the Director of Public Prosecutions, for an offence of kidnapping if it was committed against a child under the age of sixteen and by a person connected with the child, within the meaning of section 1 of the Child Abduction Act 1984. [30] Kidnapping is an indictable-only offence. [31] Kidnapping is punishable with imprisonment or fine at the discretion of the court. There is no limit on the fine or the term of imprisonment that may be imposed provided the sentence is not inordinate. [32] [33] [34]

A parent should only be prosecuted for kidnapping their own child "in exceptional cases, where the conduct of the parent concerned is so bad that an ordinary right-thinking person would immediately and without hesitation regard it as criminal in nature". [27] [35]

United States

Law in the United States follows from English common law. Following the highly publicized 1932 Lindbergh kidnapping, Congress passed the Federal Kidnapping Act, which authorized the FBI to investigate kidnapping at a time when the Bureau was expanding in size and authority. The fact that a kidnapped victim may have been taken across state lines brings the crime within the ambit of federal criminal law.

Most states recognize different types of kidnapping and punish according to such factors as the location, duration, method, manner and purpose of the offense. [36] There are several deterrents to kidnapping in the United States of America. Among these are:

  1. The extreme logistical challenges involved in successfully exchanging the money for the return of the victim without being apprehended or surveilled.
  2. Harsh punishment. Convicted kidnappers face lengthy prison terms. If a victim is brought across state lines, federal charges can be laid as well.
  3. Good cooperation and information sharing between law enforcement agencies, and tools for spreading information to the public (such as the AMBER Alert system).

In 2009, Phoenix, Arizona reported over 300 cases of kidnapping, gaining it a reputation as America's kidnapping capital, as according to the Los Angeles Times. Hundreds of kidnappings for ransom occurred in the city, as per the Times, most of them having connections to Mexican drug and human trafficking as a way to pay off unpaid debts. [37] These statistics would have made the city have the highest kidnapping rate of any U.S. city, and second in the world only to Mexico City. [38] However, an investigation and later audit by the U.S. Department of Justice Inspector General found these statistics to be falsified. Only 59 federally reportable kidnappings occurred in 2008. [39] [40] This is in comparison to the over 300 claimed kidnappings on grant applications. The falsified data can be attributed to a variety of issues within the southwestern United States as a whole, including misclassification by local police, lack of unified standards, a desire for Federal grants, or the Mexican Drug War. [41]

Statistics

Global kidnapping hotspots
 1999 [42]  !! 2006 [43]  !! 2014 [44]  !! 2018 [45]
1PakistanPakistanPakistanPakistan
2MexicoIraqIndiaEngland
3BrazilIndiaMexicoGermany
4PhilippinesSouth AfricaIraqMexico
5VenezuelaBrazilNigeriaMorocco
6EcuadorMexicoLibyaEcuador
7Russia and CISEcuadorAfghanistanBrazil
8NigeriaVenezuelaBangladeshNew Zealand
9IndiaColombiaSudanAustralia
10South AfricaBangladeshLebanonNetherlands

Countries with the highest rates

Arrested kidnappers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil lying on the ground Kidnappers arrested Rio.jpg
Arrested kidnappers in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil lying on the ground

In 2021, the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reported that the United States was the country with most kidnappings, totaling 56,652. [46] This is in comparison to 2010, when they were ranked sixth in the world (by absolute numbers, not per capita) for kidnapping by ransom, according to available statistics (after Colombia, Italy, Lebanon, Peru, and the Philippines). [47]

Kidnapping for ransom is a common occurrence in various parts of the world today. In 2018, the United Nations found Pakistan and England had the highest number of kidnappings while New Zealand had the highest rate among the 70 countries for which data is available. [45] As of 2007, that title belonged to Iraq with possibly 1,500 foreigners kidnapped. [48] In 2004, it was Mexico, [49] and in 2001, it was Colombia. [50] Reports suggest a world total of 12,500–25,500 per year with 3,600 per year in Colombia and 3,000 per year in Mexico around the year 2000. [51] However, by 2016, the number of kidnappings in Colombia had declined to 205 and it continues to decline. [52] [53]

Mexican numbers are hard to confirm because of fears of police involvement in kidnapping. [54] According to Pax Christi, a Catholic peace movement, "Kidnapping seems to flourish particularly in fragile states and conflict countries, as politically motivated militias, organized crime and the drugs mafia fill the vacuum left by government". [43]

Since 2019, the risk of kidnapping has risen worldwide, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase is mostly seen in kidnappings for ransom. This factors from a variety of aspects, including socioeconomic disparities, insufficient resources, and flawed judicial systems. Another impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on kidnappers is the economic strain that it had put many families through. This pressured kidnappers to increase kidnappings as well as ransom demands. After 2022, the diminishing effects of COVID-19 have led many countries to welcome back in-person interactions, travel and tourism. The connection between increased tourism and kidnapping is reflected through the rise of global kidnapping rates from 2019 to 2021–2023. [55]

Top 10 countries with the highest kidnapping rates in 2023 Kidnappings Per 100,000 Population.png
Top 10 countries with the highest kidnapping rates in 2023

The highest recorded ransom demand in 2021 was $77.3 million while in 2019, it was $28.7 million. Between those two years, the average global ransom demand increased 43% while the median global ransom demand increased by 6%. In Sub-Saharan Africa, regions such as Congo (DRC), Nigeria, and South Africa are likely to maintain higher levels of kidnappings due to ongoing effects of religious extremist groups, recent genocides, and civil wars. While there is no hard evidence of which country had the most kidnappings in 2021, the American region (which includes Mexico) maintains its position as the region with the second highest kidnapping rates. [57]

One notorious failed example of kidnap for ransom was the 1976 Chowchilla bus kidnapping, in which 26 children were abducted with the intention of bringing in a $5 million ransom. The children and driver escaped from an underground van without the aid of law enforcement. [58] According to the Department of Justice, kidnapping makes up 2% of all reported violent crimes against juveniles. [38]

By country

The annual number of recorded kidnappings per capita by country for the last available year according to United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime is shown in below table. [59] Each countries definition of kidnapping might differ and does not include unreported kidnappings.

See also

Related Research Articles

Robbery is the crime of taking or attempting to take anything of value by force, threat of force, or by use of fear. According to common law, robbery is defined as taking the property of another, with the intent to permanently deprive the person of that property, by means of force or fear; that is, it is a larceny or theft accomplished by an assault. Precise definitions of the offence may vary between jurisdictions. Robbery is differentiated from other forms of theft by its inherently violent nature ; whereas many lesser forms of theft are punished as misdemeanors, robbery is always a felony in jurisdictions that distinguish between the two. Under English law, most forms of theft are triable either way, whereas robbery is triable only on indictment. The word "rob" came via French from Late Latin words of Germanic origin, from Common Germanic raub "theft".

Assault occasioning grievous bodily harm is a term used in English criminal law to describe the severest forms of battery. It refers to two offences that are created by sections 18 and 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. The distinction between these two sections is the requirement of specific intent for section 18; the offence under section 18 is variously referred to as "wounding with intent" or "causing grievous bodily harm with intent", whereas the offence under section 20 is variously referred to as "unlawful wounding", "malicious wounding" or "inflicting grievous bodily harm".

In Canada and England and Wales, certain convicted persons may be designated as dangerous offenders and subject to a longer, or indefinite, term of imprisonment in order to protect the public. Dangerousness in law is a legal establishment of the risk that a person poses to cause harm. Other countries, including Denmark, Norway, and parts of the United States have similar provisions of law.

In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred.

Malfeasance in office is any unlawful conduct that is often grounds for a just cause removal of an elected official by statute or recall election, or even additionally a crime. Malfeasance in office contrasts with "misfeasance in office", which is the commission of a lawful act, done in an official capacity, that improperly causes harm; and "nonfeasance in office", which is the failure to perform an official duty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theft Act 1978</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Theft Act 1978 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It supplemented the earlier deception offences contained in sections 15 and 16 of the Theft Act 1968 by reforming some aspects of those offences and adding new provisions. See also the Fraud Act 2006.

Assault occasioning actual bodily harm is a statutory offence of aggravated assault in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Hong Kong and the Solomon Islands. It has been abolished in the Republic of Ireland and in South Australia, but replaced with a similar offence.

In criminal law and in the law of tort, recklessness may be defined as the state of mind where a person deliberately and unjustifiably pursues a course of action while consciously disregarding any risks flowing from such action. Recklessness is less culpable than malice, but is more blameworthy than carelessness.

Common assault is an offence in English law. It is committed by a person who causes another person to apprehend the immediate use of unlawful violence by the defendant. In England and Wales, the penalty and mode of trial for this offence is provided by section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988.

"Deception" was a legal term of art used in the definition of statutory offences in England and Wales and Northern Ireland. It is a legal term of art in the Republic of Ireland.

Murder is an offence under the common law legal system of England and Wales. It is considered the most serious form of homicide, in which one person kills another with the intention to unlawfully cause either death or serious injury. The element of intentionality was originally termed malice aforethought, although it required neither malice nor premeditation. Baker states that many killings done with a high degree of subjective recklessness were treated as murder from the 12th century right through until the 1974 decision in DPP v Hyam.

Violent disorder is a statutory offence in England and Wales. It is created by section 2(1) of the Public Order Act 1986. Sections 2(1) to (4) of that Act provide:

In the English law of homicide, manslaughter is a less serious offence than murder, the differential being between levels of fault based on the mens rea or by reason of a partial defence. In England and Wales, a common practice is to prefer a charge of murder, with the judge or defence able to introduce manslaughter as an option. The jury then decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of either murder or manslaughter. On conviction for manslaughter, sentencing is at the judge's discretion, whereas a sentence of life imprisonment is mandatory on conviction for murder. Manslaughter may be either voluntary or involuntary, depending on whether the accused has the required mens rea for murder.

Conspiracy to defraud is an offence under the common law of England and Wales and Northern Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English criminal law</span> Legal system of England and Wales relating to crime

English criminal law concerns offences, their prevention and the consequences, in England and Wales. Criminal conduct is considered to be a wrong against the whole of a community, rather than just the private individuals affected. The state, in addition to certain international organisations, has responsibility for crime prevention, for bringing the culprits to justice, and for dealing with convicted offenders. The police, the criminal courts and prisons are all publicly funded services, though the main focus of criminal law concerns the role of the courts, how they apply criminal statutes and common law, and why some forms of behaviour are considered criminal. The fundamentals of a crime are a guilty act and a guilty mental state. The traditional view is that moral culpability requires that a defendant should have recognised or intended that they were acting wrongly, although in modern regulation a large number of offences relating to road traffic, environmental damage, financial services and corporations, create strict liability that can be proven simply by the guilty act.

Child abduction or child theft is the unauthorized removal of a minor from the custody of the child's natural parents or legally appointed guardians.

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

Sentencing in England and Wales refers to a bench of magistrates or district judge in a magistrate's court or a judge in the Crown Court passing sentence on a person found guilty of a criminal offence. In deciding the sentence, the court will take into account a number of factors: the type of offence and how serious it is, the timing of any plea of guilty, the defendant's character and antecedents, including their criminal record and the defendant's personal circumstances such as their financial circumstances in the case of a fine being imposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Child Abduction Act 1984</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Child Abduction Act 1984 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It creates offences that replace, in England and Wales, the offence of child stealing under section 56 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861.

Conspiracy to murder is a statutory offence defined by the intent to commit murder.

References

  1. ↑ "Definition of kidnapping". 2017. Sources: Cornell University Law School. Cambridge English Dictionary. English Oxford Living Dictionaries. Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
  2. 1 2 Welsh, Blair (2024). "Taking Civilians: Terrorist Kidnapping in Civil War". International Studies Quarterly. 68 (2). doi:10.1093/isq/sqae074. ISSN   0020-8833.
  3. 1 2 Gilbert, Danielle (November 2022). "The Logic of Kidnapping in Civil War: Evidence from Colombia". American Political Science Review. 116 (4): 1226–1241. doi:10.1017/S0003055422000041. ISSN   0003-0554.
  4. ↑ Stargardter, Gabriel; Gardner, Simon. "Mexican Gangs Could Be Making Up To $250 Million A Year By Abusing And Extorting Migrants". Business Insider. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  5. ↑ Perri, Frank S.; Lichtenwald, Terrance G.; MacKenzie, Paula M. (2009). "Evil Twins: The Crime-Terror Nexus" (PDF). Forensic Examiner. pp. 16–29.
  6. ↑ Garcia Jr; Juan A. "Express kidnappings". Thepanamanews.com. Archived from the original on 30 July 2007. Retrieved 7 December 2006.
  7. ↑ "Virtual Kidnapping: A New Twist on a Frightening Scam". fbi.gov. 16 October 2017. Retrieved 13 October 2024.
  8. ↑ "Southern District of Texas | Texas Woman Sentenced in Virtual Kidnapping Extortion Scheme | United States Department of Justice". www.justice.gov. 20 September 2018. Retrieved 13 October 2024.
  9. ↑ "Shanghaiing - FoundSF". www.foundsf.org. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  10. ↑ "Unprecedented increase in Somali pirate activity". Commercial Crime Services. 21 October 2009. Archived from the original on 16 December 2010. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
  11. ↑ "IMB piracy report 2018: attacks multiply in the Gulf of Guinea". Commercial Crime Services. 16 January 2019.
  12. ↑ "Bride Kidnapping - a Channel 4 documentary". Channel4.com.
  13. ↑ Object, object. "Tort Liability for Cult Deprogramming: Peterson v. Sorlien". CORE.
  14. ↑ Samaha, Albert; "Bad Rabbi: Tales of Extortion and Torture Depict a Divorce Broker's Brutal Grip on the Orthodox Community" Archived April 7, 2016, at the Wayback Machine , Dec 4, 2013; Village Voice
  15. ↑ "Three Orthodox Jewish Rabbis Convicted of Conspiracy to Kidnap Jewish Husbands in Order to Force Them to Consent to Religious Divorces" Archived March 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine , Apr 21, 2015; U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation
  16. ↑ "CRIMES ACT 1900 - SECT 86 Kidnapping". www5.austlii.edu.au. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022. Retrieved 16 February 2022.
  17. ↑ "Kidnapping and Unlawful Confinement (Offence) - Criminal Law Notebook". criminalnotebook.ca. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  18. ↑ "Murder (Offence) - Criminal Law Notebook". criminalnotebook.ca. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  19. ↑ "Mexico: New Anti-Kidnapping Law Promulgated". Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. 20540 USA. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  20. ↑ "Pakistan Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860)". www.pakistani.org. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  21. ↑ "wetten.nl - Regeling - Wetboek van Strafrecht - BWBR0001854". wetten.overheid.nl (in Dutch). Archived from the original on 2 May 2015. Retrieved 18 September 2016.
  22. 1 2 3 € 78,000
  23. ↑ The Law Reports. Lord Brandon: R v D [1984] AC 778, [1984] 3 WLR 186, [1984] 2 All ER 449, 79 Cr App R 313, [1984] Crim LR 558, HL, reversing [1984] 2 WLR 112, [1984] 1 All ER 574, 78 Cr App R 219, [1984] Crim LR 103, CA
  24. ↑ Lord Brandon: R v D [1984] AC 778 at 800, HL. The following cases are relevant: R v Reid [1973] QB 299, [1972] 3 WLR 395, [1972] 2 All ER 1350, 56 Cr App R 703, [1972] Crim LR 553, CA; [as well as:] R v Wellard [1978] 1 WLR 921, [1978] 3 All ER 161, 67 Cr App R 364, CA; [and:] R v Cort [2003] EWCA Crim 2149, [2003] 3 WLR 1300, [2004] 1 Cr App R 18, CA; [and:] R v Hendy-Freegard.
  25. ↑ "Hendy-Freegard v R [2007] EWCA Crim 1236 (23 May 2007)". Bailii.org. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
  26. ↑ Chris Johnston. "The Times". Business. timesonline.co.uk. Retrieved 14 May 2012. EWCA Crim 1236, [2007] 3 WLR 488.[ dead link ]
  27. 1 2 3 R v D [1984] AC 778, HL
  28. ↑ R v D [1984] AC 778 at 806, HL
  29. ↑ For the Charging child abduction and kidnapping in the same indictment see: R v C [1991] 2 FLR 252, [1991] Fam Law 522, CA.
  30. ↑ The Child Abduction Act 1984, section 5 Archived January 4, 2016, at the Wayback Machine
  31. ↑ "Kidnapping - False Imprisonment:Offences against the Person: Sentencing Manual: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service". Cps.gov.uk. 31 March 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2012. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
  32. ↑ For background, see: R v Morris [1951] 1 KB 394, 34 Cr App R 210, CCA. (Also:) R v Spence and Thomas, 5 Cr App R (S) 413, [1984] Crim LR 372, CA. Further information: Crown Prosecution Service: "Kidnapping - False Imprisonment: Offences against the Person: Sentencing Manual: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service". Cps.gov.uk. 24 June 2011. Archived from the original on 21 April 2012. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
  33. ↑ For the CPS guidance, see: "Legal Guidance:The Crown Prosection Service: Prosecuting Cases of Child Abuse". Cps.gov.uk. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
  34. ↑ For Offences against the person, see: "Offences against the Person: Legal Guidance: The Crown Prosecution Service". Cps.gov.uk. Archived from the original on 10 April 2012. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
  35. ↑ Gary Slapper (23 August 2007). "The Law Explored: abduction and false imprisonment". The Times . London. Retrieved 9 January 2011.[ dead link ]
  36. ↑ King, M.J. (1983). "Kidnapping in Florida: Don't Move or You've Done It". Stetson Law Review. 13: 197.
  37. ↑ Quinones, Sam (12 February 2009). "Phoenix, kidnap-for-ransom capital". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
  38. 1 2 "Project America: Crime: Crime Rates: Kidnapping". Project.org. Archived from the original on 27 March 2012. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
  39. ↑ "Phoenix Kidnappings: Uncovering the Truth". Archived from the original on 13 April 2013.
  40. ↑ U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Inspector General Audit Division (2012). Report GR-60-12-006 Review of the Phoenix Police Department's 2008 Kidnapping Statistic reported in Department of Justice Grant Applications (PDF).
  41. ↑ Ross, Brian (11 February 2009). "Kidnapping Capital of the U.S.A." ABC News. Retrieved 5 February 2013.
  42. ↑ Rachel Briggs (November 2001). "The Kidnapping Business". Guild of Security Controllers Newsletter. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  43. 1 2 IKV Pax Christi (July 2008). "Kidnapping is a booming business" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2011. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  44. ↑ RiskMap Report 2015 - Kidnap and extortion overview (PDF). controlrisks.com. p. 122. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 January 2015. Retrieved 30 January 2015.
  45. 1 2 "Kidnapping". dataUNODC.
  46. ↑ "dp-crime-violent-offences | dataUNODC". dataunodc.un.org. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  47. ↑ "Business Horizons". FindArticles.com. 14 May 2011. Archived from the original on 9 July 2012.
  48. ↑ "(NCCI) | NGO Coordination Committee for Iraq". www.ncciraq.org.
  49. ↑ "Welcome to Mexico City the new kidnap capital of the World". The Independent on Sunday . 5 September 2004. Archived from the original on 24 May 2007. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
  50. ↑ "Colombia: Kidnap capital of the world". BBC News. 27 June 2001. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
  51. ↑ "Facts about Kidnapping". Free Legal Advice. Archived from the original on 15 December 2010. Retrieved 9 January 2011.
  52. ↑ "Military Personnel – Logros de la Política Integral de Seguridad y Defensa para la Prosperidad" (PDF) (in Spanish). mindefensa.gov.co. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 April 2015.
  53. ↑ "Colombia kidnappings down 92% since 2000, police say". bbc.com. 28 December 2016.
  54. ↑ Dickerson, Marla; Sanchez, Cecilia (5 August 2008). "Mexican police linked to rising kidnappings". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  55. ↑ Dowding, Tony (20 February 2023). "Kidnap and ransom risk on the rise". Global Risk Manager. Retrieved 19 March 2024.
  56. ↑ Papadopoulos, Anna (8 October 2023). "Ranked: These Are the Countries with the Highest Kidnapping Rates, 2023". CEOWORLD magazine. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  57. ↑ "Kidnap for ransom in 2022". www.controlrisks.com. 14 February 2024. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
  58. ↑ "Chowchilla kidnap, Crime Library website". Crimelibrary.com. 15 July 1976. Archived from the original on 3 April 2014. Retrieved 20 January 2012.
  59. 1 2 "United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, crime-violent-offences" . Retrieved 17 August 2024.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.