Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory

Last updated
Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory
Hull1900PettysPlaceTitlePage.png
Title page of Petty's Place 1900
Author Charles Henry Hull
LanguageEnglish
Subject William Petty
Publisher The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 14, no. 3
Publication date
1900
Pages307-340
OCLC 5545673036
Text Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory at Wikisource

"Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory" is an academic article, written by Charles Henry Hull and published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics in 1900.

Contents

The article gives an overview of the life and work of William Petty, with a strong emphasis on the contribution of Petty to the development of early economic thinking. The article has reached some fame because Hull proposes in it the division of the writings of Petty into three chronological groups.

Bibliographical information

Hull, Charles Henry (1900). "Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory"  . The Quarterly Journal of Economics . 14 (3): 307–340. doi:10.2307/1882563. ISSN   0033-5533. JSTOR   1882563. OCLC   5545673036 via Wikisource. [1]

The text was reprinted in Blaug 1991.

Background

The contribution of William Petty to the early development of economic theory had already been a subject of research by different scholars. Hull mentions Zuckerkandl and von Bergmann in the introduction, and Ingram, Roscher, Kautz, McCulloch and Travers Twiss in the final chapter of 'Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory'. [2]

Hull himself had published The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty (in 2 volumes), in 1899, in which he had already written a large 'Introduction', containing biographic information on Petty (and Graunt), and in which he spend quite some space on the debate concerning the authorship of the Observations upon the Bills of Mortality, concluding that Graunt was the author of it.

Nowadays, Hull's article is often mentioned in the same breath with Wilson Lloyd Bevan's Sir William Petty: A Study in English Economic Literature , published a few years earlier, [3] and demonstrating the revival of interest in Petty and his role in the development of (economic) thinking in the seventeenth century. [4]

Contents

After a short introductory paragraph, 'Petty's place in the history of economic theory' holds 5 chapters.

The first chapter contains a short biography of Petty, and a general description of the economic writings, in which Hull makes a division in three (or four) groups, relating to distinct periods in Petty's life, and to books with "a common provocation and common characteristics": [5]

The division given here was still used by scholars at the end of the twentieth century. [6]

The second chapter describes the method and content of the economic writings of Petty. Perhaps this chapter is biased because of Hull's interest in the use of the statistical method in history and economics. He mentions Petty's method a statistical method, which is as such inapplicable to many subjects, and therefore restricting to some extent the content of the writings. Petty's predilection for a statistical method is due to the influence of Bacon. The well-known quote of Petty is "The Method I take is not very usual; for, instead of using only comparative and superlative Words, and intellectual Arguments, I have taken the course (as a Specimen of the Political Arithmetick I have long aimed at) to express myself in Terms of Number, Weight, or Measure; to use only Arguments of Sense, and to consider only such Causes, as have visible Foundations in Nature". [7]

But statistical sources were scarce in the 17th century. So a great number of basic facts, like the population of London, of England and of Ireland, had to be calculated, with all the risks of inaccuracies. And although he was aware of the fact that most of his calculations were mere guesses, he sometimes drew conclusions, that were far behind real. "He did not hesitate to advance, in all seriousness, the most astounding proposals for increasing the national wealth of the three kingdoms by a wholesale deportation of the Irish and Scotch into England,—proposals based solely upon the results of a complicated series of guesses and multiplications." [8]

Chapter three is devoted to the content of Petty's work. As far as his contributions to economic theory are concerned, Hull thinks, that the writings in the first group (and the Quantulumcunque) are most important. This brings the focus to the Treatise of Taxes & Contributions, and thus on taxation. [9] But out of the discussion of taxes also proceeds the treatment of rent. [10] Also Petty's theory of value "is developed incidentally to the discussion of taxation. It is an uncompromising quantity-of-labor theory." [11]

In the fourth chapter attention is first given to the second group of Petty's writings, the Political Anatomy of Ireland (1672) and the Political Arithmetick (1676). They are "predominantly descriptive" and economically, they add "little or nothing new to Petty's know ideas." [12] The Political Arithmetick, in contrast to the Political Anatomy, deals chiefly with England, and especially tries to prove that England is stronger and wealthier than France. To prove this, Petty uses clever calculations.

In this same chapter Hull treats the third group of Petty's writings, the Essays in Political Arithmetick, together with the Quantulumcunque. The Essays had a public purpose: to prove that London "was a greater city than Paris, and, indeed, the greatest in the world. (…) The present interest of the Essays lies chiefly in the light which they throw upon Petty's statistical method. Economically, they are barren. The Quantulumcunque, on the other hand, is full of meat." [13]

The final chapter tries to give a summary of the findings.

Critical reception

The division of the writings of Petty into three groups, which was proposed by Hull in this article, was still referred to at the end of the twentieth century, for instance by Hutchison in 1988 [14] and by Yang in 1994. [15]

In 1955 Matsukawa [16] criticized Hull, for not giving proper appraisal to some of the later essays of Petty. In Hull's opinion, these essays, generally regarded as his works on vital statistics, "added practically nothing of economic interest to these earlier books", [17] while Matsukawa thinks they are "in final analysis his arguments for the increase of the 'Superlucration'." [16]

Roll, in his A History of Economic Thought, [18] is annoyed by Hull's characterization of Petty as "a sort of English cameralist". [19] According to Roll, identifying Petty with the "pseudo-economist advisers of absolute monarchs" is based on "misconception" and "must seriously interfere with a just estimate of Petty's position in the history of economic thought." [20]

In 1991 Mark Blaug published the first volume in the series on "Pioneers in Economics" on Pre-Classical Economists. [21] This volume was dedicated to Charles Davenant (1656-1687) and William Petty. It contained ten scholarly articles, all previously published. The first article in the (chronologically ordered) volume was Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory. In the short introduction to the volume Blaug did not further explain his choice of articles.

In 1993 Hong-Seok Yang referred to the classification of Petty's writings in chronological groups by Hull in his treatment of Petty's concept of 'natural price' in The political economy of trade and growth : an analytical interpretation of Sir James Steuart's Inquiry. [22]

In 2002 Dooley referred to Hull 1900 as a "notable commentator" on Petty in the context of the early development of the labour theory of value. [23]

In 2011 Erba, in an analysis of the contribution of Giammaria Ortes (1713-1790) to economic science, remarks that Ortes' calculations on income, consumption and distribution "are significantly more complete and accurate than those obtained by Petty". [24] He cites Hull 1900 who says that no good grounds for Petty's assumptions can be found. [25]

Footnotes

  1. A transcription is also available in the Archive for the History of Economic Thought at McMaster University; see also this entry in EconPapers.
  2. Most of the writers on the early development of economic thought are only mentioned in a few sentences. They are:
    • Bergmann, Eugen von (1895) - Die Wirtschaftskrisen. Geschichte der nationalökonomischen Krisentheorieen. copy at the Internet Archive . There is only one place where Petty is mentioned: p. 235.
    • Ingram, John Kells (1885) – Wikisource-logo.svg Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Petty, Sir William". Encyclopædia Britannica . Vol. 21 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 336–337.
    • Kautz, Gyula (1860) - Die geschichtliche Entwickelung der National-Oekonomik und ihrer Literatur (Theorie und Geschichte der National-Oekonomik. Propyläen zum volks- und staatswirtschaftlichen Studium; vol. 2). Wien : Gerold. OCLC   64744129; also spelled as "Die geschichtliche Entwicklung...." ( OCLC   603617578). Die geschichtliche Entwicklung der National-Oekonomik und ihrer Literatur at Google Books. Reprint 1970: Glashütten im Taunus : Auvermann, OCLC   74196935. See for instance p. 311f.. The paragraph is entitled "Die anti-merkantilistische Richtung und die Anfänge der wissenschaftlicheren Nationalökonomie in England" (p. 307-322) and comprises also Dudley North (1641-1691) and others.
    • McCulloch, John Ramsay (1845) – The Literature of Political Economy. Hull mentions McCulloch only once in 'Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory' (without mentioning a publication), but in his Economic Writings of 1899 (Hull (1899)), Hull does mention McCulloch on a few more place: on p. xxxix and p. l in regard to the relation of Petty and Graunt; on p. 257 on Political Arithmetick, ref Evelyn in "A select collection…."; on p. 639 = 638/9/40: bibl. [10e] on the reprint Quantulumcunque 1856 in "A select collection…." by McCulloch. In the list of books used (p. 668) he only mentions McCulloch 1845.
    • Roscher, Wilhelm Georg Friedrich (1851) – Zur Geschichte der englischen Volkswirthschaftslehre im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert. In: Abhandlungen der k. sächs. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, Bd. 3. Leipzig. OCLC   741741146. copy at the Internet Archive ; see ch. VII – 'Der politische Arithmetiker Petty', pp. 67-85 (mentioned by Hull on p. 339).
    • Twiss, Travers (1847) - View of the Progress of Political Economy in Europe since the Sixteenth Century. London : Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans. OCLC   1026140282. Copy at the Internet Archive , 2nd copy, 3rd copy, 4th copy.
    • Zuckerkandl, Robert (1889) - Zur Theorie des Preises. OCLC   186012050, copy at the Internet Archive and 2nd copy, e.g. p. 12-15, 229-233. See also summary (in German).
    One of the writers, that credited Petty for his contribution to the history of economic thought, was of course Karl Marx (especially in Theorien über den Mehrwert (Theories of Surplus Value), written 1861-1863, first published 1905-1910). Hull does not mention Marx here, nor in his Economic Writings, although he does mention Petty a "founder of political economy".( Hull 1900 , p. 338)
    Inglis Palgrave published the first edition of his Dictionary of Political Economy between 1894 and 1899. Edmond Fitzmaurice wrote an article on Petty in the third volume, p. 99-102. It is not mentioned by Hull.
  3. Bevan 1894.
  4. See for instance Roncaglia 1985 , p. 17, Reyes 2002 , p. 73 and McCormick 2009 , p. 1.
  5. Hull 1900, p. 311f.
  6. One may wonder why Hull does not mention A Treatise of Ireland in this list. He was the first to have this manuscript, dated 1687, printed. (Hull 1899 , pp. 545–621).
  7. Hull 1900, p. 314/5 see also: Petty's Political Arithmetick (Preface) in Hull 1899 Wikisource-logo.svg The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty vol. 1, p. 244. The quote dates back to 1672-6.
  8. Hull 1900, p. 318.
  9. Hull 1900, p. 322-325.
  10. Hull 1900, p. 325-330.
  11. Hull 1900 , p. 330 Hull's peremptory statement is in contrast with for instance Kühnis 1960, who did extensive research on the value and price theoretical concepts of Petty and the "dogmenhistorische" background. Kühnis does not mention Hull's essay.
  12. Hull 1900, p. 332.
  13. Hull 1900, p. 337.
  14. Hutchison 1988, p. 29.
  15. Yang 1994, p. 62 (footnote 6).
  16. 1 2 Matsukawa 1955, p. 76.
  17. Hull 1900, p.  322.
  18. Roll 1973.
  19. Hull 1900, p.  339.
  20. Roll 1973 , p. 101. See also: Granados 2005.
  21. Blaug 1991.
  22. Yang 1994, p. 62.
  23. Dooley 2002, p. 2.
  24. Erba 2011 , p. 66; Erba dates Petty's Place in the History of Economic Theory 1907.
  25. Hull 1900, p.  324.

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

Carl Menger Founder of the Austrian School of economics (1840–1921)

Carl Menger von Wolfensgrün was an Austrian economist and the founder of the Austrian School of economics. Menger contributed to the development of the theories of marginalism and marginal utility, which rejected cost-of-production theory of value, such as developed by the classical economists such as Adam Smith and David Ricardo. As a departure from such, he would go on to call his resultant perspective, the subjective theory of value.

William Petty English economist, physician, scientist and philosopher

Sir William PettyFRS was an English economist, physician, scientist and philosopher. He first became prominent serving Oliver Cromwell and the Commonwealth in Ireland. He developed efficient methods to survey the land that was to be confiscated and given to Cromwell's soldiers. He also remained a significant figure under King Charles II and King James II, as did many others who had served Cromwell.

John Ramsay McCulloch

John Ramsay McCulloch was a Scottish economist, author and editor, widely regarded as the leader of the Ricardian school of economists after the death of David Ricardo in 1823. He was appointed the first professor of political economy at University College London in 1828. He wrote extensively on economic policy, and was a pioneer in the collection, statistical analysis and publication of economic data.

Gregory King was an English genealogist, engraver and statistician.

Jacob Hollander American economist

Jacob Harry Hollander (1871–1940) was an American economist.

Economic methodology is the study of methods, especially the scientific method, in relation to economics, including principles underlying economic reasoning. In contemporary English, 'methodology' may reference theoretical or systematic aspects of a method. Philosophy and economics also takes up methodology at the intersection of the two subjects.

Thomas Nixon Carver

Thomas Nixon Carver was an American economics professor.

In economics, utility is the satisfaction or benefit derived by consuming a product; thus the marginal utility of a good or service describes how much pleasure or satisfaction is gained from an increase in consumption. It may be positive, negative, or zero. For example, purchasing more than one needs brings little satisfaction as the purchaser feels it is wasted money, hence zero marginal utility. If one is actually harmed by extra consumption then it is negative, and if some satisfaction is gained by extra consumption then it is positive. In other words, a negative marginal utility suggests that each additional unit of a good consumed provides more harm than benefits and leads to a lower level of overall utility, whereas a positive marginal utility suggests each additional unit consumed provides more benefit and leads to a higher level of overall utility.

John Graunt British demographer

John Graunt has been regarded as the founder of demography. Graunt was one of the first demographers, and perhaps the first epidemiologist, though by profession he was a haberdasher. He was bankrupted later in life by losses suffered during Great Fire of London and the discrimination he faced following his conversion to Catholicism.

Edward Chamberlayne

Edward Chamberlayne was an English writer, known as the author of The Present State of England.

William Blake was an English classical economist who contributed to the early theory of purchasing power parity.

Thomas M. Humphrey American economist (born 1935)

Thomas MacGillivray Humphrey is an American economist. Until 2005 he was a research advisor and senior economist in the research department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and editor of the Bank's flagship publication, the Economic Quarterly. His publications cover macroeconomics, monetary economics, and the history of economic thought. Mark Blaug called him the "undisputed master" of British classical monetary thought.

Charles Henry Hull was an American economist and historian. He worked at Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.. In 1900, he was appointed professor of American History.

<i>The Advice to Hartlib</i>

The Advice to Hartlib was a treatise on education, written by Sir William Petty (1623–1687) in 1647 as a letter to Samuel Hartlib. and published in 1647/8. It was the first printed work by Petty and covers a total of 31 pages.

<i>Double Writing</i> (Petty)

A Declaration Concerning the newly invented Art of Double Writing was a pamphlet of 6 leaves, written by Sir William Petty (1623-1687) and first published in 1648. It contained information regarding his invention of the "Art of Double Writing", especially a claim for patent rights. It did not contain any information on what his invention exactly was.

<i>Proceedings Between Sankey and Petty</i>

The Proceedings between Sankey and Petty is a pamphlet that contains a summary of the controversy that arose between Sir Hierom Sankey and Sir William Petty in the aftermath of the Down Survey. Sankey accused Petty of bribery and fraud. One of the ways in which Petty answered to this accusations was by this pamphlet, that was published in print by Petty in 1659 and covers a total of ten pages.

<i>The Life of Sir William Petty, 1623–1687</i>

The Life of Sir William Petty 1623-1687 is a book, written by Lord Edmond Fitzmaurice, and published in 1895. It is a biography of Sir William Petty, the 17th-century scientist, known for his inventions, his charting of large parts of Ireland, in the Down Survey, and his publications on many different topics, like "political arithmetic" and political economy.

<i>The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty</i>

The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty is a book with texts, written by William Petty (1623-1687), and published in 1899 by Charles Henry Hull (1864-1936), in two volumes. The Economic Writings were published together with an introduction about the life and work of William Petty, and did also contain Natural and Political Observations upon the Bills of Mortality, by John Graunt.

Tony Aspromourgos is an Australian historian of economic thought, professor at the University of Sydney and a Fellow of the Academy of the Social Sciences in Australia (ASSA). He has published several books and many articles in economic journals on different subjects concerning the history of economic thought, especially on William Petty, Richard Cantillon and Adam Smith.

A history of economic thought is a book by the Russian economist Isaak Illich Rubin (1886-1937). A second revised edition published in Russian in 1929 was first translated into English by Donald Filtzer and published in 1979. The book covers the period from mercantilism in the 16th century to the decline of the classical school of political economy with writers like John Stuart Mill in the mid-19th century. It critically appraises the theories of major writers, and places their thought in the context of the economic and social changes of their day. It adopts a Marxist standpoint in making critiques, but Marx's work is not itself discussed at any length. The book ends with the state of economics as Marx found it when he first turned to it in the mid-19th century. Rubin's other major work, Essays on Marx's theory of value, takes up Marx's own contributions.