Phantom forest

This deforested area in Goldisthal can be called a phantom forest

A phantom forest is a forest which has failed to survive. ^[1] The phenomenon is characterized by trees that never emerged or were removed. ^{[2] [3] [4]} The trees that make up a phantom forest are called 'phantom trees'. ^[3] This may seem somewhat odd, because these trees are invisible to the human eye. We think trees are here but their not regarding the longevity of trees in general, or simply said, these trees exist as lost potential 67.

The notion is used in a variety of contexts. It may be connected to the effects of climate change or it can be used to describe the failure rate of carbon offsetting schemes. ^{[3] [5]} The phantom forest is usually seen a sign of mismanagement, such as greenwashing or intensive deforestation. ^{[4] [5]} In case of offsetting schemes, phantom forests are said to also exist 'on paper'. ^[6]

The notion of 'phantom forest' should not be confused with the notion of 'ghost forest', which refers to an area of deceased trees. However, a ghost forest may eventually become a phantom forest. ^[7]

Etymology

Although the notion rose to popularity in 2022, the use of 'phantom forest' can be traced back to a few articles that were published in the wake of 2014. One group of authors referred to it as the 'remnants of dry vegetation'. ^[8] An article by J. Funk appeared for the Union of Concerned Scientists portraying the notion as follows: 'We reached a clearing with a wide-angle view of the phantom forest and distant mountain peaks. Nearby, logging equipment sat at the edge of a recent clear-cut, and we could hear the buzz of chainsaws over the next ridge.' ^[4] It is implicitly clear in this quote that 'phantom forest' refers to the forest that once was.

Projects

• Aimed at planting 1.5 million hectares of forest in the period 2011-2019, the National Greening Program achieved a dismal survival rate of 12% over the first five years, according to the Commission on Audit of the Philippines government. ^[5]
• A 2020 field study conducted by D. Wodehouse on Luzon island revealed an astonishing survival rate of only 2% of mangrove seedlings planted. The other 98% has perished or been swept away. ^[9]
• In 2019 the Turkish government claimed to have planted 11 million trees at 2,000 sites spread across Turkey. Experts estimated that only 5% of the trees had survived. ^[9]
• Sri Lanka's ambitious mangrove planting program, launched to strengthen coastal defenses after the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, has yielded disappointing results. A 2017 study conducted by S. Kodikara revealed a survival rate of less than 37%. ^[9]

Notes

1. Rosenberg, Lizzy (May 4, 2022). "Phantom Forests: What They Are, and Why They're Controversial". greenmatters.
   'Phantom forests refer to the remains of tree planting initiatives that have either completely failed or not happened at all, because the trees have died or have been lost to deforestation.'
2. Bergen, Teresa (June 15, 2022). "Tree planting programs are actually greenwashing in disguise". Inhabitat.
   'This phenomenon of trees that aren’t really there has become known as phantom forests.'
3. Gill, Sam (June 10, 2022). "Yes, carbon offsets are imperfect—but we need them". Fortune.
   'The sector has had its fair share of scandal, with phantom trees left unplanted and baseline projections that create wildly inflated expectations of how much carbon could be saved via forest conservation.'
4. Funk, Jason (September 22, 2014). "Confronting the Climate Impacts to Rocky Mountain Forests: From the Statistical to the Visceral". The Equation.
5. Singh Khadka, Navin (May 3, 2022). "How phantom forests are used for greenwashing". BBC.
6. Davis, Sam (August 1, 2022). "Phantom forests: why we should be skeptical about planting trees". Dogwood Alliance.
   On paper, the organization planted 30,000 trees, but when you go look in person, there isn’t a forest. These are known as phantom forests – forests on paper but not in reality.
7. Scott, Nicholas (Aug 27, 2019). "Patagonia's Phantom Forests and the Invasive Beavers that Haunt Them". Island Conservation.
8. Peña-Monné, José Luis; Sancho-Marcén, Carlos; Sampietro-Vattuone, María Marta; Rivelli, Felipe; Rhodes, Edward J.; Osácar-Soriano, María Cinta; Rubio-Fernández, Virginia; García-Giménez, Rosario (15 November 2015). "Geomorphological study of the Cafayate dune field (Northwest Argentina) during the last millennium" . Elsevier. 438: 352–363. Bibcode:2015PPP...438..352P. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.08.028. hdl: 11336/12593 – via Elsevier Science Direct.
9. Pearce, Fred (October 6, 2022). "Phantom Forests: Why Ambitious Tree Planting Projects Are Failing". YaleEnvironment360.