Placement testing

Last updated

Placement testing is a practice that many colleges and universities use to assess college readiness and determine which classes a student should initially take. Since most two-year colleges have open, non-competitive admissions policies, many students are admitted without college-level academic qualifications. Placement exams or placement tests assess abilities in English, mathematics and reading; they may also be used in other disciplines such as foreign languages, computer and internet technologies, health and natural sciences. The goal is to offer low-scoring students remedial coursework (or other remediation) to prepare them for regular coursework. [1]

Contents

Historically, placement tests also served additional purposes such as providing individual instructors a prediction of each student's likely academic success, sorting students into homogeneous skill groups within the same course level and introducing students to course material.[ citation needed ] Placement testing can also serve a gatekeeper function, keeping academically challenged students from progressing into college programs, particularly in competitive admissions programs such as nursing within otherwise open-entry colleges.[ citation needed ]

Secondary schooling

A placement exam is a test designed to evaluate a person's knowledge of a subject and thus determine the level most suitable for the person to begin coursework on that subject. It is not unusual for students to take a placement exam in a subject such as mathematics upon admission to a school or university to determine what level of classes they should take. Scores on such exams as the Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, SAT Subject Tests, and British Advanced Level exams can serve as placement tests for students in certain subjects, where a high score would enable them to get into a more advanced class than what a freshman would normally take. [2] [3]

Test validity

In the construction of a test, subject matter experts (SMEs) construct questions that assess skills typically required of students for that content area. "Cut scores" are the minimum scores used to divide students into higher and lower level courses. SMEs sort test items into categories of appropriate difficulty, or correlate item difficulty to course levels. "Performance level descriptors" define the required skills for remedial and standard courses. [4]

Once in use, placement tests are assessed for the degree to which they predict the achievements of students once they have been assigned to remedial or standard classes. Since grades serve as a common indirect measure of student learning, in the customary analysis, a binary logistic regression is run using the test score as the independent variable, and course grades as the dependent conditions. Typically, grades of A, B or C are counted as successful, while grades of D and F are counted as unsuccessful. Grades of I (for an unconverted Incomplete) and W (a Withdrawal) may be considered unsuccessful or may be excluded from the analysis.[ citation needed ]

Test scores are interpreted based on a proposed use and assessed in that context, rather than simply by establishing a predictive relationship between scores and grades. Since placement tests are designed to predict student learning in college courses, by extension they predict the need for developmental education. However, the efficacy of developmental education has been questioned in recent research studies, such as those by Bettinger and Long; [5] Calcagno and Long; [6] Martorell and McFarlin [7] and Attewell, Lavin, Domina and Levey. [8]

One study found that one-quarter of students assigned to math remediation and one-third of students assigned to English remediation in the US would have passed regular university courses with a grade of at least a B without any additional support. [9]

The placement testing process

Upon enrollment a student will be recommended or required to take placement tests, usually in English or writing, in math and in reading. Testing may also include a computer-scored essay, or an English-as-a-second-language assessment. Students with disabilities may take an adaptive version, such as in an audio or braille format that is compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

Advisors interpret the scores and discuss course placement with the student. As a result of the placement, students may take multiple developmental courses before qualifying for college level courses. Students with the most developmental courses have the lowest odds of completing the developmental sequence or passing gatekeeper college courses such as Expository Writing or College Algebra. [10] Adelman has shown that this is not necessarily a result of developmental education itself. [11]

Student acceptance

Many students do not understand the high-stakes nature of placement testing. Lack of preparation is also cited as a problem.[ citation needed ] According to a study by Rosenbaum, Schuetz and Foran, roughly three quarters of students surveyed say that they did not prepare for their placement tests. [12]

Once students receive their placement, they either may or must begin taking developmental classes as prerequisites to credit-bearing college level classes that count toward their degree. Most students are unaware that developmental courses do not count toward a degree. [13] Some institutions prevent students from taking college level classes until they finish their developmental sequence(s), while others apply course prerequisites. For example, a psychology course may contain a reading prerequisite such that a student placing into developmental reading may not sign up for psychology until they complete the developmental reading requirement.

Federal Student Aid programs pay for up to 30 hours of developmental coursework. Under some placement regimens and at some community colleges, low-scoring students may require more than 30 hours of such classes.

History

Placement testing has its roots in remedial education, which has always been part of American higher education. Informal assessments were given at Harvard as early as the mid-1600s in the subject of Latin. Two years earlier, the Massachusetts Law of 1647, also known as the "Old Deluder Satan Law," called for grammar schools to be set up with the purpose of "being able to instruct youth so far as they shall be fitted for the university." [14] Predictably, many in-coming students lacked sufficient fluency with Latin and got by with the help of tutors who had graduated as early as 1642. [15]

In 1849 the University of Wisconsin established country's first in-house preparatory department. Late in the century, Harvard introduced a mandatory expository writing course, and by the end of the 19th century, most colleges and universities had instituted both preparatory departments and mandatory expository writing programs.

According to John Willson, [16]

The chief function of the placement examination is prognosis. It is expected to yield results which will enable the administrator to predict with fair accuracy the character of work which a given individual is likely to do. It should afford a reasonable basis for sectioning a class into homogeneous groups in each of which all individuals would be expected to make somewhat the same progress. It should afford the instructor a useful device for establishing academic relations with his class at the first meeting of the group. It should indicate to the student something of the preparation he is assumed to have made for the work upon which he is entering and introduce him to the nature of the material of the course.

Historically, the view that colleges can remediate abilities that may be lacking was not universal. Hammond and Stoddard wrote in 1928: "Since, as has been amply demonstrated, scholastic ability is, in general, a quite permanent quality, any instrument that measures factors contributing to success in the freshman year will also be indicative of success in later years of the curriculum." [17]

Entrance examinations began with the purpose of predicting college grades by assessing general achievement or intelligence. In 1914 T.L. Kelley published the results of his course-specific high school examinations designed to predict "the capacity of the student to carry a prospective high school course." [18] The courses were algebra, English, geometry and history, with correlations ranging from R =.31 (history) to .44 (English).

Entrance examinations and the College Entrance Examination Board (now the College Board) allowed colleges and universities to formalize entrance requirements and shift the burden of remedial education to junior colleges in the early 20th century and later to community and technical colleges. [19]

Policies

Required placement testing and remediation was not always considered desirable. According to Robert McCabe, former president of Miami-Dade Community College, at one time "community colleges embraced a completely open policy. They believed that students know best what they could and could not do and that no barriers should restrict them....This openness, however, came with a price....By the early 1970s, it became apparent that this unrestricted approach was a failure." [20]

Examples of state or college placement testing policies:

Alternatives

Testing other elements of student ability

Conley recommends adding assessments of contextual skills and awareness, academic behaviors, and key cognitive strategies to the traditional math, reading and traditional tests [1] Boylan proposes examining affective factors such as "motivation, attitudes toward learning, autonomy, or anxiety." [21]

Alternative test formats

In 1988, Ward predicted that computer adaptive testing would evolve to cover more advanced and varied item types, including simulations of problem situations, assessments of conceptual understanding, textual responses and essays. [22] :6–8 Tests now being developed incorporate conceptual questions in multiple choice format (for example by presenting a student with a problem and the correct answer and then asking why that answer is correct); and computer-scored essays such as e-Write, and WritePlacer[ citation needed ].

In a Request for Information on a centralized assessment system, the California Community Colleges System asked for "questions that require students to type in responses (e.g. a mathematical equation)" and for questions where "Students can annotate/highlight on the screen in the reading test." [23] Some massive open online courses, such as those run by edX or Udacity, automatically assess user-written computer code for correctness. [24]

Diagnostic placement testing

Placement testing focuses on a holistic score to decide placement into various levels, but is not designed for more specific diagnoses. Increasing diagnostic precision could involve changes to both scoring and test design and to better targeted remediation programs, where students focus on areas of demonstrated weakness within a broader subject.[ citation needed ]

"The ideal diagnostic test would incorporate a theory of knowledge and a theory of instruction. The theory of knowledge would identify the student's skills and the theory of instruction would suggest remedies for the student's weaknesses. Moreover, the test would be, in a different sense of the word from what we have previously employed, adaptive. That is, it would not subject students to detailed examinations of skills in which they have acceptable overall competence or in which a student has important strengths and weaknesses—areas where an overall score is not an adequate representation of the individual's status." [22] :5

Test preparation

A controversy exists over the value of test preparation and review. Test publishers maintain that their assessments should be taken without preparation, and that such preparation will not yield significantly higher scores. Test preparation organizations claim the opposite. Some schools have begun to support test preparation.

The publishers' claims are partly based on the theory that any test a student can prepare for does not measure general proficiency. Institutional test preparation programs are also said to risk washback, which is the tendency for the test content to dictate the prior curriculum, or "teaching to the test". [25] Various test preparation methods have shown effectiveness: test-taking tips and training, familiarity with the answer sheet format along with strategies that mitigate test anxiety. [26]

Some studies offer partial support for the test publishers' claims. For example, several studies concluded that for admissions tests, coaching produces only modest, if statistically significant, score gains. [27] [28] Other studies, and claims by companies in the preparation business were more positive. [29] Other research has shown that students score higher with tutoring, with practice using cognitive and metacognitive strategies and under certain test parameters, such as when allowed to review answers before final submission, something that most computer adaptive tests do not allow. [30] [31] [32]

Other research indicates that reviewing for placement tests may raise scores by helping students to become comfortable with the test format and item types. It also might serve to refresh skills that have simply grown rusty. Placement tests often involve subjects and skills that students haven't studied since elementary or middle school, and for older adults, the might be many years between high school and college. In addition, students who attach a consequence to test results and therefore take placement tests more seriously are likely to achieve higher scores. [33]

According to a 2010 California community college study, about 56% of colleges did not provide practice placement tests, and for those that did, many students were not made aware of them. In addition, their students "did not think they should prepare, or thought that preparation would not change their placement." [34]

By 2011, at least three state community colleges systems (California, Florida, and North Carolina), had asked publishers to bid to create customized placement tests, with integrated test reviews and practice tests. Meanwhile, some individual colleges have created online review courses complete with instructional videos and practice tests.

Simulations

In "Using Microcomputers for Adaptive Testing," Ward predicted the computerization of branching simulation problems, such as those used in professional licensing exams. [22]

Secondary/tertiary alignment

Since placement testing is done to measure college readiness, and high schools in part prepare students for college, it only makes sense that K-12 and higher education curricula be aligned. Such realignment could take many forms, including K-12 changes, collegiate changes or even collaboration between the two levels. Various efforts to improve education may undertake this challenge, such as the national K-12 Common Core State Standards Initiative in the United States, Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC), or the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC).

As of 2012 neither kind of alignment has progressed to the point of close coordination of curriculum, assessments, or learning methodologies between public school systems and systems of higher education. Recently, state legislatures (including California, Florida, and Connecticut) passed a series of mandates to redefine developmental curricula. This was done in response to diminishing four-year graduation rates in college.

Succeeding in a college course requires students to fulfill a multitude of tasks in order to demonstrate their competency in a given class. Frederick's Ngo's study of Multiple Measures further criticized the use of placement tests by considering that “college readiness is a function of several academic and non-academic factors that placement tests do not adequately capture”. [35] Furthermore, Belfield and Crosta's 2012 study establishes “positive but weak association between placement test scores and college GPA”. [35] Defining key skills and attributes that lead to college success cannot be simply extrapolated from performance on a single placement test.

Scott-Clayton claims “it is easier to distinguish between those likely to do very well and everyone else than it is to distinguish between those likely to do very poorly and everyone else”. [36] This exacerbates the issue of the placement test as it highlights the fact that those who do well on the placement test have a high probability (with high predictive validity) of succeeding in college-level coursework. Meanwhile, those who do poorly on the placement test aren't necessarily put on a trajectory that has predictive validity. Regardless, those who start in remediation, end up becoming victims to the vicious cycle of being stuck in remediation.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Certificate of Secondary Education</span> British public examinations, generally taken aged 15-16

The General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) is an academic qualification in a range of particular subjects, taken in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. State schools in Scotland use the Scottish Qualifications Certificate instead. However, private schools in Scotland often choose to follow the GCSE system in England.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Standardized test</span> Test administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner

A standardized test is a test that is administered and scored in a consistent, or "standard", manner. Standardized tests are designed in such a way that the questions and interpretations are consistent and are administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Advanced Placement</span> American program with college-level classes offered to high school students

Advanced Placement (AP) is a program in the United States and Canada created by the College Board. AP offers undergraduate university-level curricula and examinations to high school students. Colleges and universities in the US and elsewhere may grant placement and course credit to students who obtain qualifying scores on the examinations. The AP curriculum for each of the various subjects is created for the College Board by a panel of experts and college-level educators in that academic discipline. For a high school course to have the designation, the course must be audited by the College Board to ascertain that it satisfies the AP curriculum as specified in the Board's Course and Examination Description (CED). If the course is approved, the school may use the AP designation and the course will be publicly listed on the AP Course Ledger.

In the Scottish secondary education system, the Higher is one of the national school-leaving certificate exams and university entrance qualifications of the Scottish Qualifications Certificate (SQC) offered by the Scottish Qualifications Authority. It superseded the old Higher Grade on the Scottish Certificate of Education (SCE). Both are normally referred to simply as "Highers".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">College Board</span> US educational nonprofit testing organization

The College Board is an American not-for-profit organization that was formed in December 1899 as the College Entrance Examination Board (CEEB) to expand access to higher education. While the College Board is not an association of colleges, it runs a membership association of institutions, including over 6,000 schools, colleges, universities, and other educational organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twelfth grade</span> Twelth post-kindergarten year of school education in some school systems

Twelfth grade is the twelfth year of formal or compulsory education. It is typically the final year of secondary school in most parts of the world. Students in twelfth grade are usually 17–18 years old. Some countries have a thirteenth grade, while other countries do not have a 12th grade/year at all.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills</span> Former Texas state standardized test

The Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) was the fourth Texas state standardized test previously used in grade 3-8 and grade 9-11 to assess students' attainment of reading, writing, math, science, and social studies skills required under Texas education standards. It is developed and scored by Pearson Educational Measurement with close supervision by the Texas Education Agency. Though created before the No Child Left Behind Act was passed, it complied with the law. It replaced the previous test, called the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS), in 2002.

In New York State, Regents Examinations are statewide standardized examinations in core high school subjects. Students are required to pass these exams to earn a Regents Diploma. To graduate, students are required to have earned appropriate credits in a number of specific subjects by passing year-long or half-year courses, after which they must pass at least five Regents examinations in some of the subject areas. For higher-achieving students, a Regents with Advanced designation and an Honors designation are also offered. Students with disabilities or enrolled in an English as a Second Language program are able to earn a local diploma.

Basic writing, or developmental writing, is a subdiscipline of composition studies which focuses on the writing of students sometimes otherwise called "remedial" or "underprepared", usually freshman college students.

Education in Jamaica is primarily modeled on the British education system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">A-level</span> British educational certification

The A-level is a subject-based qualification conferred as part of the General Certificate of Education, as well as a school leaving qualification offered by the educational bodies in the United Kingdom and the educational authorities of British Crown dependencies to students completing secondary or pre-university education. They were introduced in England and Wales in 1951 to replace the Higher School Certificate. The A-level permits students to have potential access to university if their grades are of satisfactory quality.

Remedial education is assigned to assist students in order to achieve expected competencies in core academic skills such as literacy and numeracy.

The General Certificate of Education (GCE) Advanced Level, or A Level, is a main school leaving qualification in England, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man. It is available as an alternative qualification in other countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exam</span> Educational assessment

An examination or test is an educational assessment intended to measure a test-taker's knowledge, skill, aptitude, physical fitness, or classification in many other topics. A test may be administered verbally, on paper, on a computer, or in a predetermined area that requires a test taker to demonstrate or perform a set of skills.

The Postsecondary Education Readiness Test (PERT) is a computer adaptive test which measures a student's level of preparedness for college-level courses. The test is currently being used by all Florida high schools and the 28 members of the Florida College System. The PERT was created by McCann Associates in cooperation with Florida educators. The test is divided into three sections: Mathematics, Reading, and Writing.

The Community College Research Center (CCRC) is an independent research center that studies two-year colleges and open-access four-year institutions in the United States. Its researchers use qualitative and quantitative methods to assess programs, policies, and reforms in areas including remedial education, academic advising, institutional effectiveness, and college transfer. CCRC is housed at Teachers College, Columbia University, and is led by Thomas W. Brock.

A high school diploma is a diploma awarded upon graduation of high school. A high school diploma is awarded after completion of courses of studies lasting four years, typically from grade 9 to grade 12. It is the school leaving qualification in the United States and Canada.

ACT, Inc. is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, primarily known for the ACT, a standardized test designed to assess high school students' academic achievement and college readiness. For the U.S. high school graduating class of 2019, 52 percent of graduates had taken the ACT test; the more than 1.78 million students included virtually all high school graduates in 17 states.

Advanced Placement (AP) International English Language is an AP Examinations course managed by Educational Testing Service (ETS) with the sponsorship of the College Board in New York. It is designed for non-native speakers to prepare for studying in an English-speaking university, particularly in North America. The course also gives students a chance to earn college credit. The three-hour exam assesses four language skills: listening, reading, writing, and speaking. The test paper has two sections: multiple-choice questions and free-response questions. APIEL committee consists of high school and university English teachers from Belgium, China, France, Germany, Switzerland, and the United States.

References

  1. 1 2 Conley, David. "Replacing Remediation with Readiness" (working paper). Prepared for the NCPR Developmental Education Conference: What Policies and Practices Work for Students? September 23–24, 2010, Teachers College, Columbia University, p. 12.
  2. Association, National Education. "History of Standardized Testing in the United States | NEA". www.nea.org. Retrieved 2022-07-04.
  3. Reichard, Gary; Keirn, Tim (1999). "The Advanced Placement Exam in History: Growth, Controversies, and New Perspectives". The History Teacher. 32 (2): 169–173. doi:10.2307/494438. ISSN   0018-2745.
  4. Morgan, Deanna. "Best Practices for Setting Placement Cut Scores in Postsecondary Education" (working paper). Prepared for the NCPR Developmental Education Conference: What Policies and Practices Work for Students? September 23–24, 2010, Teachers College, Columbia University, p. 12.
  5. Bettinger, E., and Long, B. T. "Remediation at the Community College: Student Participation and Outcomes." In C. A. Kozeracki (ed.), Responding to the Challenges of Developmental Education. New Directions for Community Colleges, no. 129. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005.
  6. Calcagno, J. C., and Long, B. T. "The Impact of Postsecondary Remediation Using a Regression Discontinuity Approach: Addressing Endogenous Sorting and Noncompliance." New York: National Center for Postsecondary Research, 2008.
  7. Martorell, P., and McFarlin, I. "Help or Hindrance? The Effects of College Remediation on Academic and Labor Market Outcomes." Dallas: University of Texas at Dallas, 2007.
  8. Attewell, P., Lavin, D., Domina, T., and Levey, T. "New Evidence on College Remediation." Journal of Higher Education 2006, 77(5), pp 886–924.
  9. Judith Scott-Clayton (20 April 2012). "Are College Entrants Overdiagnosed as Underprepared?". NYTimes.com. Retrieved 2012-04-24.
  10. Bailey, T., Jeong, D. W., & Cho, S. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29, 255-270.
  11. Adelman, Clifford (2006). "The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college." U.S. Department of Education.
  12. Rosenbaum, James E., Schuetz, Pam & Foran, Amy. "How students make college plans and ways schools and colleges could help." (working paper, Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, July 15, 2010).
  13. Rosenbaum, J., Deil-Amen, R., & Person, A. (2006). After admission: From college access to college success. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  14. Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries http://www.lawlib.state.ma.us/docs/DeluderSatan.pdf .
  15. Wright, Thomas Goddard (1920). Literary culture in early New England, 1620-1730. New Haven, CT: Yale UP, Ch. 6, p. 99. https://web.archive.org/web/20051025080258/http://www.dinsdoc.com/wright-1-6.htm
  16. Willson, J.M. (1931). A study of an objective placement examination for sectioning college physics classes. Thesis submitted to the faculty of the School of Mines and Metallurgy of the University of Missouri, p. 5. http://scholarsmine.mst.edu/thesis/pdf/Willson_1931_09007dcc8073add4.pdf
  17. "A Study of Placement Examinations." University of Iowa Studies in Education. Charles L. Robbins, Editor. Volume 4(7) Published by UIA, Iowa City, p9.
  18. Kelley, T. Educational Guidance: An Experimental Study in the Analysis and Prediction of High School Pupils. Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education. No. 71.
  19. Boylan, 1988
  20. McCabe, Robert H. (2000). No One to Waste: A Report to Public Decision-Makers and Community College Leaders. Washington, DC: Community College Press, p. 42.
  21. Saxon, Patrick; Levine-Brown, Patti; & Boylan, Hunter. "Affective Assessment for Developmental Students, Parts 1 & 2." Research in Developmental Education, 22(1&2), 2008, p. 1.
  22. 1 2 3 Ward, William C. "Using Microcomputers for Adaptive Testing," in Computerized adaptive testing: The state of the art in assessment at three community colleges." League for Innovation in the Community College, Laguna Hills, CA, 1988
  23. "CCCAssess Proof of Concept Report 2011: Centralizing Assessment in the California Community Colleges." California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office, Telecommunications and Technology Division, Sacramento, CA, 2011, pp. 30, 33.
  24. "Free Online Courses. Advance your College Education & Career". Udacity. Retrieved 2012-11-22.
  25. Robb, Thomas N., & Ercanbrack, Jay. (1999). "A Study of the Effect of Direct Test preparation on the TOEIC Scores of Japanese University Students." TESL-EJ, 3(4).
  26. Perlman, Carole L. (2003). "Practice Tests and Study Guides: Do They Help? Are They Ethical? What Is Ethical Test Preparation Practice?" Measuring Up: Assessment Issues for Teachers, Counselors, and Administrators, ERIC, 12 pages.
  27. Briggs, Derek C. 2001. "Are standardized test coaching programs effective? The effect of admissions test preparation: Evidence from NELS:88. Chance, Vol. 14,(1) pp 10-21.
  28. Scholes, Roberta J., & Lain, M. Margaret. (1997). "The Effects of Test Preparation Activities on ACT Assessment Scores." Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. March 24–28, 22 pages.
  29. Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). "Shadow Education, American Style: Test Preparation, the SAT and College Enrollment." Social Forces, 89(2), 435-461.
  30. Rothman, Terri, & Henderson, Mary. (2011). "Do School-Based Tutoring Programs Significantly Improve Student Performance on Standardized Tests?" Research in Middle Level Education Online, 34 (6), p1-10.
  31. Shokrpour, N., Zareii, E., Zahedi, S. S., & Rafatbakhsh, M. M. (2011). "The Impact of Cognitive and Meta-cognitive Strategies on Test Anxiety and Students' Educational Performance." European Journal of Social Science, 21(1), 177-188.
  32. Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). "Item Review and the Rearrangement Procedure: Its process and its results." Educational Research And Evaluation, 11(4), 303-321.
  33. Napoli, Anthony R., & Raymond, Lanette A. (2004). "How Reliable Are Our Assessment Data?: A Comparison of the Reliability of Data Produced in Graded and Un-Graded Conditions." Research in Higher Education, 45(8), 921-929.
  34. Venezia, A., Bracco, K. R., & Nodine, T. (2010). One-shot deal? Students' perceptions of assessment and course placement in California's community colleges. San Francisco: WestEd. http://www.wested.org/online_pubs/OneShotDeal.pdf
  35. 1 2 Ngo, Federick; Kwon, William W. (2015-08-01). "Using Multiple Measures to Make Math Placement Decisions: Implications for Access and Success in Community Colleges". Research in Higher Education. 56 (5): 442–470. doi:10.1007/s11162-014-9352-9. ISSN   1573-188X.
  36. Scott-Clayton, Judith (February 2012). Do High-Stakes Placement Exams Predict College Success? CCRC Working Paper No. 41. Community College Research Center.