Quantum artificial life

Last updated October 05, 2024

Quantum artificial life is the application of quantum algorithms with the ability to simulate biological behavior. Quantum computers offer many potential improvements to processes performed on classical computers, including machine learning and artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence applications are often inspired by the idea of mimicking human brains through closely related biomimicry.^[1] This has been implemented to a certain extent on classical computers (using neural networks), but quantum computers offer many advantages in the simulation of artificial life.^[2] Artificial life and artificial intelligence are extremely similar, with minor differences; the goal of studying artificial life is to understand living beings better, while the goal of artificial intelligence is to create intelligent beings.^[1]

In 2016, Alvarez-Rodriguez et al.^[2] developed a proposal for a quantum artificial life algorithm with the ability to simulate life and Darwinian evolution.^[3] In 2018, the same research team led by Alvarez-Rodriguez performed the proposed algorithm on the IBM ibmqx4 quantum computer, and received optimistic results. The results accurately simulated a system with the ability to undergo self-replication at the quantum scale.^[2]

Artificial life on quantum computers

The growing advancement of quantum computers has led researchers to develop quantum algorithms for simulating life processes. Researchers have designed a quantum algorithm that can accurately simulate Darwinian Evolution.^[3] Since the complete simulation of artificial life on quantum computers has only been actualized by one group, this section shall focus on the implementation by Alvarez-Rodriguez, Sanz, Lomata, and Solano on an IBM quantum computer.^[2]

Individuals were realized as two qubits, one representing the genotype of the individual and the other representing the phenotype.^[2] The genotype is copied to transmit genetic information through generations, and the phenotype is dependent on the genetic information as well as the individual's interactions with their environment.^[2] In order to set up the system, the state of the genotype is instantiated by some rotation of an ancillary state ( $|0\rangle \langle 0|$ ). The environment is a two-dimensional spatial grid occupied by individuals and ancillary states. The environment is divided into cells that are able to possess one or more individuals. Individuals move throughout the grid and occupy cells randomly; when two or more individuals occupy the same cell they interact with each other.^[3]

Self replication

The ability to self-replicate is critical for simulating life. Self-replication occurs when the genotype of an individual interacts with an ancillary state, creating a genotype for a new individual; this genotype interacts with a different ancillary state in order to create the phenotype. During this interaction, one would like to copy some information about the initial state into the ancillary state, but by the no cloning theorem, it is impossible to copy an arbitrary unknown quantum state.^[4] However, physicists have derived different methods for quantum cloning which does not require the exact copying of an unknown state. The method that has been implemented by Alvarez-Rodriguez et al.^[2] is one that involves the cloning of the expectation value of some observable.^[5] For a unitary $U$ which copies the expectation value of some set of observables ${\mathsf {X}}$ of state $\rho$ into a blank state $\rho _{e}$ , the cloning machine is defined by any $(U,\rho _{e},{\mathsf {X}})$ ^[6] that fulfill the following:

$\forall \rho \forall X\in {\mathsf {X}}$ ${\bar {X}}={\bar {X_{1}}}={\bar {X_{2}}}$

Where ${\bar {X}}$ is the mean value of the observable in $\rho$ before cloning, ${\bar {X_{1}}}$ is the mean value of the observable in $\rho$ after cloning, and ${\bar {X_{2}}}$ is the mean value of the observable in $\rho _{e}$ after cloning. Note that the cloning machine has no dependence on $\rho$ because we want to be able to clone the expectation of the observables for any initial state. It is important to note that cloning the mean value of the observable transmits more information than is allowed classically.^[6] The calculation of the mean value is defined naturally as:^[6]

${\bar {X}}=Tr[\rho X]$ , ${\bar {X_{1}}}=Tr[RX\otimes I]$ , ${\bar {X_{2}}}=Tr[RI\otimes X]$ where $R=U\rho \otimes \rho _{e}U^{\dagger }$

The simplest cloning machine clones the expectation value of $\sigma _{z}$ in arbitrary state $\rho =|\psi \rangle \langle \psi |$ to $\rho _{e}=|0\rangle \langle 0|$ using $U=CNOT$ . This is the cloning machine implemented for self-replication by Alvarez-Rodriguez et al. The self-replication process clearly only requires interactions between two qubits, and therefore this cloning machine is the only one necessary for self replication.

Interactions

Interactions occur between individuals when the two take up the same space on the environmental grid. The presence of interactions between individuals provides an advantage for shorter-lifespan individuals. When two individuals interact, exchanges of information between the two phenotypes may or may not occur based on their existing values. When both individual's control qubits (genotypes) are alike, no information will be exchanged. When the control qubits differ, the target qubits (phenotype) will be exchanged between the two individuals. This procedure produces a constantly changing predator-prey dynamic in the simulation. Therefore, long-living qubits, with a larger genetic makeup in the simulation, are at a disadvantage. Since information is only exchanged when interacting with an individual of different genetic makeup, the short-lived population has the advantage.^[3]

Mutation

Mutations exist in the artificial world with limited probability, equivalent to their occurrence in the real world. There are two ways in which the individual can mutate: through random single qubit rotations and by errors in the self-replication process. There are two different operators that act on the individual and cause mutations. The M operation causes a spontaneous mutation within the individual by rotating a single qubit by parameter θ. The parameter θ is random for each mutation, which creates biodiversity within the artificial environment.^[3] The M operation is a unitary matrix which can be described as:^[3]

$M={\begin{pmatrix}\cos(\theta )&sin(\theta )\\sin(\theta )&-cos(\theta )\end{pmatrix}}$

The other possible way for mutations to occur is due to errors in the replication process. Due to the no-cloning theorem, it is impossible to produce perfect copies of systems that are originally in unknown quantum states.^[4] However, quantum cloning machines make it possible to create imperfect copies of quantum states, in other words, the process introduces some degree of error.^[7] The error that exists in current quantum cloning machines is the root cause for the second kind of mutations in the artificial life experiment. The imperfect cloning operation can be seen as:^[3]

$U_{M}(\theta )=\mathrm {I} _{4}+{\frac {1}{2}}{\begin{pmatrix}0&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}}\otimes {\begin{pmatrix}-1&1\\1&-1\end{pmatrix}}(cos\theta +isin\theta +1)$

The two kinds of mutations affect the individual differently. While the spontaneous M operation does not affect the phenotype of the individual, the self-replicating error mutation, UM, alters both the genotype of the individual, and its associated lifetime.^[3]

The presence of mutations in the quantum artificial life experiment is critical for providing randomness and biodiversity. The inclusion of mutations helps to increase the accuracy of the quantum algorithm.^[2]

Death

At the instant the individual is created (when the genotype is copied into the phenotype), the phenotype interacts with the environment. As time evolves, the interaction of the individual with the environment simulates aging which eventually leads to the death of the individual.^[2] The death of an individual occurs when the expectation value of $\sigma _{z}$ is within some $\epsilon$ of 1 in the phenotype, or, equivalently, when $\rho _{p}=|0\rangle \langle 0|$

The Lindbladian describes the interaction of the individual with the environment: ${\dot {\rho }}=\gamma (\sigma \rho \sigma ^{\dagger }-{\frac {1}{2}}\sigma ^{\dagger }\sigma \rho -{\frac {1}{2}}\rho \sigma ^{\dagger }\sigma )$ with $\sigma =I\otimes |0\rangle \langle 1|$ and without $\rho =\rho _{g}\otimes \rho _{p}$ .^[3] This interaction causes the phenotype to exponentially decay over time. However, the genetic material contained in the genotype does not dissipate which allows for genes to be passed on to subsequent generations. Given the initial state of the genotype:

$\rho _{g}={\begin{pmatrix}a&b-ic\\b+ic&1-a\\\end{pmatrix}}$

The expectation values of the genotype and phenotype can be described as:^[3]

$\langle \sigma _{z}\rangle _{g}=2a-1$ , $\langle \sigma _{z}\rangle _{p}=1-2e^{\gamma t}(1-a)$ . Where 'a' represents a single genetic parameter. From this equation, we can see that as 'a' is increased, the life expectancy decreases. Equivalently, the closer the initial state is to $|1\rangle \langle 1|$ , the greater the life expectancy of the individual.

When $\langle \sigma _{z}\rangle _{p}=1-\epsilon$ , the individual is considered dead, the phenotype is used as the ancillary state for a new individual. Thus, the cycle continues and the process becomes self-sustaining.^[3]

Related Research Articles

Quantum teleportation is a technique for transferring quantum information from a sender at one location to a receiver some distance away. While teleportation is commonly portrayed in science fiction as a means to transfer physical objects from one location to the next, quantum teleportation only transfers quantum information. The sender does not have to know the particular quantum state being transferred. Moreover, the location of the recipient can be unknown, but to complete the quantum teleportation, classical information needs to be sent from sender to receiver. Because classical information needs to be sent, quantum teleportation cannot occur faster than the speed of light.

In quantum mechanics, a density matrix is a matrix that describes an ensemble of physical systems as quantum states. It allows for the calculation of the probabilities of the outcomes of any measurements performed upon the systems of the ensemble using the Born rule. It is a generalization of the more usual state vectors or wavefunctions: while those can only represent pure states, density matrices can also represent mixed ensembles. Mixed ensembles arise in quantum mechanics in two different situations:

when the preparation of the systems lead to numerous pure states in the ensemble, and thus one must deal with the statistics of possible preparations, and
when one wants to describe a physical system that is entangled with another, without describing their combined state; this case is typical for a system interacting with some environment. In this case, the density matrix of an entangled system differs from that of an ensemble of pure states that, combined, would give the same statistical results upon measurement.

In physics, the CHSH inequality can be used in the proof of Bell's theorem, which states that certain consequences of entanglement in quantum mechanics cannot be reproduced by local hidden-variable theories. Experimental verification of the inequality being violated is seen as confirmation that nature cannot be described by such theories. CHSH stands for John Clauser, Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and Richard Holt, who described it in a much-cited paper published in 1969. They derived the CHSH inequality, which, as with John Stewart Bell's original inequality, is a constraint—on the statistical occurrence of "coincidences" in a Bell test—which is necessarily true if an underlying local hidden-variable theory exists. In practice, the inequality is routinely violated by modern experiments in quantum mechanics.

Quantum decoherence is the loss of quantum coherence. Quantum decoherence has been studied to understand how quantum systems convert to systems which can be explained by classical mechanics. Beginning out of attempts to extend the understanding of quantum mechanics, the theory has developed in several directions and experimental studies have confirmed some of the key issues. Quantum computing relies on quantum coherence and is one of the primary practical applications of the concept.

In quantum physics, a measurement is the testing or manipulation of a physical system to yield a numerical result. A fundamental feature of quantum theory is that the predictions it makes are probabilistic. The procedure for finding a probability involves combining a quantum state, which mathematically describes a quantum system, with a mathematical representation of the measurement to be performed on that system. The formula for this calculation is known as the Born rule. For example, a quantum particle like an electron can be described by a quantum state that associates to each point in space a complex number called a probability amplitude. Applying the Born rule to these amplitudes gives the probabilities that the electron will be found in one region or another when an experiment is performed to locate it. This is the best the theory can do; it cannot say for certain where the electron will be found. The same quantum state can also be used to make a prediction of how the electron will be moving, if an experiment is performed to measure its momentum instead of its position. The uncertainty principle implies that, whatever the quantum state, the range of predictions for the electron's position and the range of predictions for its momentum cannot both be narrow. Some quantum states imply a near-certain prediction of the result of a position measurement, but the result of a momentum measurement will be highly unpredictable, and vice versa. Furthermore, the fact that nature violates the statistical conditions known as Bell inequalities indicates that the unpredictability of quantum measurement results cannot be explained away as due to ignorance about "local hidden variables" within quantum systems.

In physics, the Rabi cycle is the cyclic behaviour of a two-level quantum system in the presence of an oscillatory driving field. A great variety of physical processes belonging to the areas of quantum computing, condensed matter, atomic and molecular physics, and nuclear and particle physics can be conveniently studied in terms of two-level quantum mechanical systems, and exhibit Rabi flopping when coupled to an optical driving field. The effect is important in quantum optics, magnetic resonance and quantum computing, and is named after Isidor Isaac Rabi.

In mathematics, more specifically in group theory, the character of a group representation is a function on the group that associates to each group element the trace of the corresponding matrix. The character carries the essential information about the representation in a more condensed form. Georg Frobenius initially developed representation theory of finite groups entirely based on the characters, and without any explicit matrix realization of representations themselves. This is possible because a complex representation of a finite group is determined by its character. The situation with representations over a field of positive characteristic, so-called "modular representations", is more delicate, but Richard Brauer developed a powerful theory of characters in this case as well. Many deep theorems on the structure of finite groups use characters of modular representations.

In quantum mechanics and computing, the Bloch sphere is a geometrical representation of the pure state space of a two-level quantum mechanical system (qubit), named after the physicist Felix Bloch.

The Stokes parameters are a set of values that describe the polarization state of electromagnetic radiation. They were defined by George Gabriel Stokes in 1852, as a mathematically convenient alternative to the more common description of incoherent or partially polarized radiation in terms of its total intensity (I), (fractional) degree of polarization (p), and the shape parameters of the polarization ellipse. The effect of an optical system on the polarization of light can be determined by constructing the Stokes vector for the input light and applying Mueller calculus, to obtain the Stokes vector of the light leaving the system. They can be determined from directly observable phenomena. The original Stokes paper was discovered independently by Francis Perrin in 1942 and by Subrahamanyan Chandrasekhar in 1947, who named it as the Stokes parameters.

In quantum computing, a graph state is a special type of multi-qubit state that can be represented by a graph. Each qubit is represented by a vertex of the graph, and there is an edge between every interacting pair of qubits. In particular, they are a convenient way of representing certain types of entangled states.

In quantum mechanics, notably in quantum information theory, fidelity quantifies the "closeness" between two density matrices. It expresses the probability that one state will pass a test to identify as the other. It is not a metric on the space of density matrices, but it can be used to define the Bures metric on this space.

Resonance fluorescence is the process in which a two-level atom system interacts with the quantum electromagnetic field if the field is driven at a frequency near to the natural frequency of the atom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">One-way quantum computer</span> Method of quantum computing

The one-way quantum computer, also known as measurement-based quantum computer (MBQC), is a method of quantum computing that first prepares an entangled resource state, usually a cluster state or graph state, then performs single qubit measurements on it. It is "one-way" because the resource state is destroyed by the measurements.

In applied mathematics, the numerical sign problem is the problem of numerically evaluating the integral of a highly oscillatory function of a large number of variables. Numerical methods fail because of the near-cancellation of the positive and negative contributions to the integral. Each has to be integrated to very high precision in order for their difference to be obtained with useful accuracy.

In quantum mechanics, and especially quantum information theory, the purity of a normalized quantum state is a scalar defined as $where is the density matrix of the state and is the trace operation. The purity defines a measure on quantum states, giving information on how much a state is mixed.$

In the theory of quantum communication, an amplitude damping channel is a quantum channel that models physical processes such as spontaneous emission. A natural process by which this channel can occur is a spin chain through which a number of spin states, coupled by a time independent Hamiltonian, can be used to send a quantum state from one location to another. The resulting quantum channel ends up being identical to an amplitude damping channel, for which the quantum capacity, the classical capacity and the entanglement assisted classical capacity of the quantum channel can be evaluated.

The Maxwell–Bloch equations, also called the optical Bloch equations describe the dynamics of a two-state quantum system interacting with the electromagnetic mode of an optical resonator. They are analogous to the Bloch equations which describe the motion of the nuclear magnetic moment in an electromagnetic field. The equations can be derived either semiclassically or with the field fully quantized when certain approximations are made.

The min-entropy, in information theory, is the smallest of the Rényi family of entropies, corresponding to the most conservative way of measuring the unpredictability of a set of outcomes, as the negative logarithm of the probability of the most likely outcome. The various Rényi entropies are all equal for a uniform distribution, but measure the unpredictability of a nonuniform distribution in different ways. The min-entropy is never greater than the ordinary or Shannon entropy and that in turn is never greater than the Hartley or max-entropy, defined as the logarithm of the number of outcomes with nonzero probability.

In quantum computing, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) is a quantum algorithm for quantum chemistry, quantum simulations and optimization problems. It is a hybrid algorithm that uses both classical computers and quantum computers to find the ground state of a given physical system. Given a guess or ansatz, the quantum processor calculates the expectation value of the system with respect to an observable, often the Hamiltonian, and a classical optimizer is used to improve the guess. The algorithm is based on the variational method of quantum mechanics.

The entanglement of formation is a quantity that measures the entanglement of a bipartite quantum state.

References

1 2 "What Is Biomimicry". biomimicry.org. Retrieved 2020-09-21.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Alvarez-Rodriguez, U.; Sanz, M.; Lamata, L.; Solano, E. (October 2018). "Quantum Artificial Life in an IBM Quantum Computer". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 14793. arXiv: 1711.09442 . Bibcode:2018NatSR...814793A. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33125-3. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6172259 . PMID 30287854.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Alvarez-Rodriguez, Unai; Sanz, Mikel; Lamata, Lucas; Solano, Enrique (2016-02-08). "Artificial Life in Quantum Technologies". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 20956. arXiv: 1505.03775 . Bibcode:2016NatSR...620956A. doi:10.1038/srep20956. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 4745074 . PMID 26853918.
1 2 Wootters, W. K.; Zurek, W. H. (October 1982). "A single quantum cannot be cloned". Nature. 299 (5886): 802–803. Bibcode:1982Natur.299..802W. doi:10.1038/299802a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4339227.
↑ Alvarez-Rodriguez, U.; Sanz, M.; Lamata, L.; Solano, E. (2014-05-09). "Biomimetic Cloning of Quantum Observables". Scientific Reports. 4 (1): 4910. arXiv: 1312.3559 . Bibcode:2014NatSR...4E4910A. doi:10.1038/srep04910. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5381281 . PMID 24809937.
1 2 3 Ferraro, Alessandro; Galbiati, Matteo; Paris, Matteo G A (2006-03-22). "Cloning of observables". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 39 (14): L219–L228. arXiv: quant-ph/0509170 . doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/14/l02. ISSN 0305-4470. S2CID 2497716.
↑ Cerf, Nicolas J. (2000-02-01). "Asymmetric quantum cloning in any dimension". Journal of Modern Optics. 47 (2–3): 187–209. arXiv: quant-ph/9805024 . Bibcode:2000JMOp...47..187C. doi:10.1080/09500340008244036. ISSN 0950-0340. S2CID 117838209.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[:4-1] 1 2 "What Is Biomimicry". biomimicry.org. Retrieved 2020-09-21.

[:0-2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Alvarez-Rodriguez, U.; Sanz, M.; Lamata, L.; Solano, E. (October 2018). "Quantum Artificial Life in an IBM Quantum Computer". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 14793. arXiv: 1711.09442 . Bibcode:2018NatSR...814793A. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33125-3. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 6172259 . PMID 30287854.

[:1-3] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Alvarez-Rodriguez, Unai; Sanz, Mikel; Lamata, Lucas; Solano, Enrique (2016-02-08). "Artificial Life in Quantum Technologies". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 20956. arXiv: 1505.03775 . Bibcode:2016NatSR...620956A. doi:10.1038/srep20956. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 4745074 . PMID 26853918.

[:3-4] 1 2 Wootters, W. K.; Zurek, W. H. (October 1982). "A single quantum cannot be cloned". Nature. 299 (5886): 802–803. Bibcode:1982Natur.299..802W. doi:10.1038/299802a0. ISSN 0028-0836. S2CID 4339227.

[5] Alvarez-Rodriguez, U.; Sanz, M.; Lamata, L.; Solano, E. (2014-05-09). "Biomimetic Cloning of Quantum Observables". Scientific Reports. 4 (1): 4910. arXiv: 1312.3559 . Bibcode:2014NatSR...4E4910A. doi:10.1038/srep04910. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 5381281 . PMID 24809937.

[:2-6] 1 2 3 Ferraro, Alessandro; Galbiati, Matteo; Paris, Matteo G A (2006-03-22). "Cloning of observables". Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General. 39 (14): L219–L228. arXiv: quant-ph/0509170 . doi:10.1088/0305-4470/39/14/l02. ISSN 0305-4470. S2CID 2497716.

[7] Cerf, Nicolas J. (2000-02-01). "Asymmetric quantum cloning in any dimension". Journal of Modern Optics. 47 (2–3): 187–209. arXiv: quant-ph/9805024 . Bibcode:2000JMOp...47..187C. doi:10.1080/09500340008244036. ISSN 0950-0340. S2CID 117838209.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]