Radioplane RP-77

Last updated • 2 min readFrom Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia

RP-77D
Radioplane RP-77D.jpg
Radioplane RP-77D target drone
Type Target drone
Place of originFlag of the United States.svg  United States
Service history
In service1958
Used by United States Army
Production history
Manufacturer Radioplane
No. built24
Specifications
Mass1,050 pounds (480 kg)
Length14.9 feet (4.53 m)

Engine Boeing 502 turboprop
285 shaft horsepower (213  kW)
Wingspan15.3 feet (4.66 m)
Flight ceiling47,000 feet (14,000 m)
Maximum speed 425 miles per hour (684 km/h)
Guidance
system
Radio

The Radioplane RP-77 was a small target drone missile, constructed largely of plastic materials, produced by the Radioplane division of the Northrop Corporation. Although the RP-77D was successfully tested by the United States Army, the decision was made not to procure the aircraft.

Contents

Design and development

The development of the RP-77 began in 1955. [1] Similar in outline to Radioplane's earlier OQ-19, four prototypes of the RP-77 were constructed, two each of the RP-77, powered by a four-cylinder McCulloch piston engine, and of the RP-77A, powered by a six-cylinder Lycoming engine. [1] Results of flight-testing were insufficient to interest the U.S. Army, however in 1957 a proposal for an improved RP-77D, powered by a Boeing 502 turboprop, resulted in a contract for the construction of 20 aircraft. [1]

The design of the RP-77D made extensive use of glass-polyester plastic materials. [2] [3] The drone was launched using a rocket-assisted take-off system consisting of four Loki rockets, and was fitted with a radio control apparatus that, with the assistance of radar tracking, allowed the drone to be operated at a considerable distance from its launching point. [1] In addition to equipment typically carried by target drones, the RP-77D could be equipped with reconnaissance or meteorological sensors, or with air sampling equipment. [1] The RP-77D utilised the RPTA tracking system, developed by Radioplane, using audio frequency tones for control. [4] Tip tanks allowed for carriage of additional fuel to extend the aircraft's range, and recovery at the end of the flight was by parachute. [5]

An improved version of the RP-77D was projected, with provision for launching RP-76 target missiles. [1]

Operational history

Following its maiden flight in March 1958, evaluation of the RP-77D by the U.S. Army took place throughout the remainder of that year, nearly 40 test flights being conducted. [1] Although the test results were generally satisfactory, it was determined that the performance of the aircraft was an insufficient improvement over existing types in service to have the aircraft ordered into production, and the project was cancelled, along with the improved RP-86, a dedicated reconnaissance variant. [1]

Following the termination of the Army's evaluation, Radioplane, as a private venture, conducted an improvement program for the RP-77D, fitting the aircraft with a larger wing, along with other modifications that improved the performance of the drone. However these improvements were insufficient to produce a renewed interest from the Army. [1]

Variants

RP-77D being evaluated by the U.S. Army Army RP-77.jpg
RP-77D being evaluated by the U.S. Army
RP-77
Prototype model powered by McCulloch piston engine; two built. [1]
RP-77A
Prototype model powered by Lycoming IMO-360 piston engine; two built [1] [6]
RP-77B
Proposed version of RP-77 with turbo-supercharged McCulloch engine, none built. [1]
RP-77C
Proposed version of RP-77A with turbo-supercharged Lycoming SO-360M engine, none built. [1] [7]
RP-77D
Production prototype with Boeing 502 turboprop; twenty built for evaluation. [1]
RP-86
Proposed reconnaissance version of RP-77D; none built. [1]

Specifications (RP-77D)

Data from [1] [8]

General characteristics

Performance

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northrop AQM-38</span> Target drone

The AQM-38 was an American target drone, developed during the 1950s by the Radioplane Division of the Northrop Corporation, Newbury Park, California, and manufactured by its Ventura Division at Van Nuys, California. Extensively used for surface-to-air missile training, over two thousand were built during its production run and it saw continued use within the United States Army and United States Navy for nearly twenty years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioplane OQ-2</span> 1930s American unmanned aerial vehicle

The Radioplane OQ-2 was the first mass-produced UAV or drone in the United States, manufactured by the Radioplane Company. A follow-on version, the OQ-3, became the most widely used target drone in US service, with over 9,400 being built during World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioplane BTT</span> 1940s American target drone

The Radioplane BTT, known as RP-71 by the company, as WS-426/2 by the United States Navy, and as WS-462/2 by the US Air Force, is a family of target drones produced by the Radioplane Company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GAM-67 Crossbow</span> Type of anti-radar missile

The GAM-67 Crossbow was a turbojet-powered anti-radar missile built by Northrop's Ventura Division, the successor to the Radioplane Company who developed the Crossbow's predecessor, the Q-1 target drone.

The PADC Defiant was a trainer and light attack aircraft that was developed by the Philippine Aerospace Development Corporation to reduce dependence on second-hand aircraft for the Philippine Air Force.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lycoming ALF 502</span> High bypass turbofan aircraft engine

The Lycoming ALF 502/LF 507 is a geared turbofan engine produced by Lycoming Engines, AlliedSignal, and then Honeywell Aerospace.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ryan YQM-98 R-Tern</span> Type of aircraft

The Ryan YQM-98 R-Tern was a developmental aerial reconnaissance drone developed by Ryan Aeronautical. It could take off and land from a runway like a manned aircraft, and operate at high altitudes for up to 24 hours to perform surveillance, communications relay, or atmospheric sampling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing T50</span>

The Boeing T50 was a small turboshaft engine produced by Boeing. Based on Boeing's earlier Model 500 gas generator, the T50's main application was in the QH-50 DASH helicopter drone of the 1950s. An up-rated version designated Model 550 was developed to power the QH-50D and was given the military designation T50-BO-12.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioplane Q-1</span> Type of aircraft

The Radioplane Q-1 was an American target drone, developed in the early 1950s for the United States Air Force by the Radioplane Company. Originally powered by a pulsejet engine, then later developed as an improved turbojet-powered aircraft, the Q-1 failed to win the favor of the USAF. However, the aircraft provided the basis of the GAM-67 Crossbow anti-radar missile.

The Omega BS-12 was a utility helicopter with high ground clearance designed to carry loads behind the cabin at, or near, the center of gravity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Globe KD6G Firefly</span> Type of aircraft

The Globe KD6G Firefly is an American target drone, built by the Globe Aircraft Corporation for operation by the United States Navy during the 1950s and early 1960s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioplane XKD4R</span> 1950s American target drone

The Radioplane XKD4R, known by the company designation RP-70, was an American target drone developed by the Radioplane Division of the Northrop Corporation. Although it was not produced in quantity, it was developed into the successful AQM-38.

The Frankfort OQ-16, also known as the TD3D, was a target drone designed by the Frankfort Sailplane Company for use by the United States Army Air Forces and United States Navy.

The Aerojet SD-2 Overseer was an unmanned aerial vehicle developed by Aerojet General and Rheem Manufacturing Co. in the late 1950s for use by the United States Army. Built in limited numbers, it never saw operational service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioplane Company</span>

The Radioplane Company was an American aviation company that produced drone aircraft primarily for use as gunnery targets. During World War II, they produced over 9,400 of their Radioplane OQ-3 model, a propeller-powered monoplane, making it the most-used target aircraft in the US. In the post-World War II era they introduced their Radioplane BTT series, which was produced for years and eventually reached almost 60,000 examples. They also produced several radio control and self-guided missiles, the largest being the GAM-67 Crossbow, which did not enter service. The company was purchased by Northrop Corporation in 1952, and moved to one of Northrop's factories in 1962. One of the last projects carried out at the original Radioplane factory in Van Nuys, California, was the construction of the Gemini Paraglider.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radioplane OQ-17</span> 1940s American target drone

The Radioplane OQ-17 was a target drone produced by the Radioplane Company for the United States Army Air Forces and, as the TD4D/KDR Quail, the United States Navy. Suffering from an unreliable engine, the OQ-17 production run was cut short in favor of the OQ-19.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republic SD-3 Snooper</span> Type of aircraft

The Republic SD-3 Snooper was an early reconnaissance drone developed by Republic Aviation for the United States Army. It was evaluated by the Army Signal Corps in 1959, but did not enter operational service.

The Radioplane OQ-6 was a target drone developed by the Radioplane Company under the designation RP-14 and evaluated by the United States Army Air Forces for service use. A small number were procured, but major production contracts were cancelled by the end of World War II.

The OQ-15 was a prototype American subscale drone built for the US Army Air Forces in the mid-1940s.

References

Notes
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Parsch 2004.
  2. Merrill 1956, p.108.
  3. Duffin 1958, p.160.
  4. Interavia p. 359
  5. Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Volume LXIII, January–December 1959, p.165.
  6. Erickson 2009
  7. Jane's 1958
  8. The Aeronautical Journal, p.165.
Bibliography