Representation of Sheppard re Powell

Last updated
Representation of Sheppard re Powell
Coat of Arms of Jersey.svg
CourtCourt of Appeal
Full case nameRepresentation of Sheppard re Powell
Decided30 March 2021 (2021-03-30)
Case history
Prior action(s)Re Powell (2018)
Appealed fromRoyal Court
Case opinions
The Clameur de Haro cannot be used to prevent court eviction orders being issued
Case opinions
Decision bySir William Bailhache
ConcurrenceJames McNeill QC
George Bompas QC
Clameur de Haro

Representation of Sheppard re Powell is a Jersey Court of Appeal case relating to eviction injunctions. The case resolved around Powell raising a Clameur de Haro to prevent eviction and Sheppard appealed against the subsequent automatic injunction preventing eviction. The court ruled that a Clameur could not be used to block court orders and fined Powell £50 for incorrect usage.



Caroline Powell was a homeowner in St Brelade. She was subject to insolvency proceedings that included repossession of her house. She applied to the Royal Court in 2018 for remise de biens. The application failed and Powell was deemed to have made cession générale to any rights. [1] An appeal to the Court of Appeal ruled that Powell had a "precarious interest" in the property and was granted remise de biens to sell the property to pay creditors but she refused to allow people to view the house. [2] The Jurats ruled that interest expired on 27 November 2020 after the Royal Court ruled the Sheppards to be tenants apres dégrèvement after purchasing the house and ordered the Viscount of Jersey to oversee eviction procedures. [3]

Initial case

On 27 February 2021, when officers of the Viscount visited Powell to issue the eviction notice, Powell raised the Clameur de Haro, an ancient Norman legal right, by kneeling and stating the Clameur and then reciting The Lord's Prayer in French. [4] According to law, an interim injunction was automatically in force and the officers were obliged to stop until the matter could be adjudicated. [4] This was the first time in twenty one years that a Clameur de Haro was raised in Jersey. [4]

The case was heard at the Royal Court after the property owner applied to the court to have the injunction lifted. The deputy Bailiff presided over the case. [3] The Sheppards argued that the Clameur was used incorrectly as all it did was prevent the officers handing over the eviction notice. Powell responded stating that the Royal Court judgement affirming the eviction process was made without her present and using incorrect evidence. [2] The deputy Bailiff, basing his judgement upon the last time the Clameur was raised in 2000, ruled that the Clameur had been raised unlawfully as the officers were acting under the order of the court which could not be challenged using this legal mechanism and accordingly fined Powell £50 for incorrect usage and banned her from raising the Clameur in relation to this again. [5] [6]


Powell indicated she intended to appeal to the Court of Appeal on the grounds that her case was distinct enough to distinguish from the 2000 case and that there had been deception in the gaining of the original eviction ruling. [5] The appeal was heard by Commissioners Sir William Bailhache, James McNeill QC and George Bompas QC. The court affirmed the judgement that this was an inappropriate use of the Clameur as Powell had no legal title to the property. [7] Commissioner Balliache described the case as "hopeless from the outset" though he stated Powell could appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council but that she would face an "uphill battle". [7] They also granted Sheppard's request for costs for what Sheppard's attorney argued was a "frivolous and vexatious" lawsuit. [8]

Related Research Articles

Sark Jurisdiction of the Bailiwick of Guernsey

Sark is a part of the Channel Islands in the southwestern English Channel, off the coast of Normandy, France. It is a royal fief, which forms part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, with its own set of laws based on Norman law and its own parliament. It has a population of about 500. Sark has an area of 2.10 square miles (5.44 km2). Little Sark is a peninsula joined by a natural but high and very narrow isthmus to the rest of Sark.

In law, a judgment, also spelled judgement, is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.

The Crown is the state in all its aspects within the jurisprudence of the Commonwealth realms and their subdivisions. Legally ill-defined, the term has different meanings depending on context. It is used to designate the monarch in either a personal capacity, as Head of the Commonwealth, or as the king or queen of his or her realms. It can also refer to the rule of law; however, in common parlance 'The Crown' refers to the functions of government and the civil service.

Bailiwick of Guernsey British Crown dependency consisting of several islands

The Bailiwick of Guernsey is one of three Crown Dependencies.

<i>Clameur de haro</i> Ancient legal injunction of restraint still enforceable in Jersey and Guernsey

The Clameur de Haro is an ancient legal injunction of restraint employed by a person who believes they are being wronged by another at that moment. It survives as a fully enforceable law to this day in the legal systems of Jersey and Guernsey, and is used, albeit infrequently, for matters affecting land.

Supreme Court of New Jersey The highest court in the U.S. state of New Jersey

The Supreme Court of New Jersey is the highest court in the U.S. state of New Jersey. In its current form, the Supreme Court of New Jersey is the final judicial authority on all cases in the state court system, including cases challenging the validity of state laws under the state constitution. It has the sole authority to prescribe and amend court rules and regulate the practice of law, and it is the arbiter and overseer of the decennial legislative redistricting. One of its former members, William J. Brennan Jr., became an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Jersey Eastern Railway

The Jersey Eastern Railway was a standard gauge railway that began operations on 6 August 1873 in Jersey. The line closed on 21 June 1929. It is not to be confused with the Jersey Railway.

<i>Jacobsen v. Katzer</i>

Jacobsen v. Katzer was a lawsuit between Robert Jacobsen (plaintiff) and Matthew Katzer (defendant), filed March 13, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The case addressed claims on copyright, patent invalidity, cybersquatting, and Digital Millennium Copyright Act issues arising from Jacobsen under an open source license developing control software for model trains.

In regards to copyright on religious works, it is not always clear who the rightholder is. Under the provisions of the Berne Convention, copyright is granted to the author on the creation of the work. Several religions claim that all or some of their works were authored by their god or gods.

The law of Jersey has been influenced by several different legal traditions, in particular Norman customary law, English common law and modern French civil law. The Bailiwick of Jersey is a separate jurisdiction from that of the United Kingdom, and is also distinct from that of the other Channel Islands such as Guernsey, although they do share some historical developments. Jersey's legal system is 'mixed' or 'pluralistic', and sources of law are in French and English languages, although since the 1950s the main working language of the legal system is English.

Justice of the peace (Belgium) Belgian court for minor civil claims

The justice of the peace is the small claims court in the judicial system of Belgium, and stands at the bottom of the Belgian judicial hierarchy. There is a justice of the peace for each judicial canton, which is the smallest geographical subdivision of Belgium for judicial purposes. Most judicial cantons cover multiple municipalities, except in the case of larger towns and cities, which are often divided into multiple judicial cantons. A judicial canton has an average population of 50,000 to 60,000 people, but some have a population as low as 30,000 people or as high as 100,000 people. The justices of the peace only have jurisdiction over their own canton. As of 2017, there are 187 cantons with as many justices of the peace in Belgium, who hear cases in 229 seats.

In England and Wales, a section 21 notice, also known as a section 21 notice of possession or a section 21 eviction, is the notice which a landlord must give to their tenant to begin the process to take possession of a property let on an assured shorthold tenancy without providing a reason for wishing to take possession. The expiry of a section 21 notice does not bring a tenancy to its end. The tenancy would only be ended by a landlord obtaining an order for possession from a court, and then having that order executed by a County Court bailiff or High Court enforcement officer. Such an order for possession may not be made to take effect earlier than six months from the beginning of the first tenancy unless the tenancy is a demoted assured shorthold tenancy. If the court is satisfied that a landlord is entitled to possession, it must make an order for possession, for a date no later than 14 days after the making of the order unless exceptional hardship would be caused to the tenant in which case possession may be postponed to a date no later than six weeks after the making of the order. The court has no power to grant any adjournment or stay of execution from enforcement unless the tenant has a disability discrimination, public law or human rights defence, or the case is pending an appeal.

WER v REW was an anonymised legal case in which Chris Hutcheson, represented by Hugh Tomlinson, QC, of Schillings, took out an injunction to prevent Popdog Ltd from publishing details regarding his private life, and was heard before Justice Sir Charles Grey in January 2009. Hutcheson – Gordon Ramsay's former business partner and father-in-law – gained an injunction but it was later partially lifted, and ultimately overturned in the Court of Appeal, with Hutcheson being publicly named by the judge.

Steven Donziger is an American attorney known for his legal battles with Chevron, particularly the Lago Agrio oil field case.

Google has been involved in multiple lawsuits over issues such as privacy, advertising, intellectual property and various Google services such as Google Books and YouTube. The company's legal department expanded from one to nearly 100 lawyers in the first five years of business, and by 2014 had grown to around 400 lawyers. Google's Chief Legal Officer is Senior Vice President of Corporate Development David Drummond.

Courts of Guernsey

The Courts of Guernsey are responsible for the administration of justice in the Bailiwick of Guernsey, one of the Channel Islands. They apply the law of the Island, which is a mixture of customary law dating back as far as the 10th century and legislation passed by the legislature, the States of Deliberation.

Law of Guernsey

The Law of Guernsey originates in Norman Customary Law, overlaid with principles taken from English common law and Equity, as well as from statute law enacted by the competent legislature(s) -- usually, but not always, the States of Guernsey

<i>PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd</i>

PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26 is a UK constitutional law case in which an anonymised privacy injunction was obtained by a claimant, identified in court documents as "PJS", in order to prohibit publication of the details of a sexual encounter between him and two other people. Media outside England and Wales identified PJS as David Furnish.

<i>University of Oxford v. Rameshwari Photocopy Service</i>

The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford and Others v. Rameshwari Photocopy Services and Others, colloquially known as the DU Photocopy Case, was an Indian copyright law court case in the Delhi High Court filed by academic publishers Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press and Taylor & Francis, against Rameshwari Photocopy Services and the University of Delhi, the former being a shop licensed to operate within the precincts of the Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi. The plaintiffs alleged copyright infringement and sought a permanent injunction, and the defendants successfully argued that their actions fell within the bounds of fair dealing.

The Bray boxing club shooting happened on 5 June 2018. Three men were shot, one died and one of the survivors was Pete Taylor, father of Katie Taylor.


  1. "Representation of Powell (Apr-2018)". Jersey Legal Information Board. 2018-04-20. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  2. 1 2 "Haro, goodbye... Ancient property plea fails". Bailiwick Express. 2021-03-03. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  3. 1 2 "Representation of Sheppard re Powell". Jersey Legal Information Board. 2021-03-02. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  4. 1 2 3 "Clameur de Haro raised for the first time in 20 years". Bailiwick Express. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  5. 1 2 "Failed Clameur de Haro raiser takes case to Court of Appeal". Bailiwick Express. 2021-03-25. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  6. "Woman fined nominal £50 after wrongly raising Clameur de Haro". Jersey Evening Post. 2021-03-03. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  7. 1 2 "Clameur de Haro raiser loses "hopeless" appeal". Bailiwick Express. 2021-03-30. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)
  8. "Woman fined for raising Clameur de Haro loses her appeal". Jersey Evening Post. 2021-03-30. Retrieved 2021-05-11.CS1 maint: discouraged parameter (link)