Representation of Sheppard re Powell

Last updated
Representation of Sheppard re Powell
Coat of Arms of Jersey.svg
CourtCourt of Appeal
Full case nameRepresentation of Sheppard re Powell
Decided30 March 2021 (2021-03-30)
Case history
Prior action(s)Representation of Powell (2018) [1]
Appealed fromRoyal Court
Case opinions
The Clameur de Haro cannot be used to prevent court eviction orders being issued
Case opinions
Decision bySir William Bailhache
ConcurrenceJames McNeill
George Bompas
Keywords
Clameur de Haro

Representation of Sheppard re Powell is a Jersey Court of Appeal case relating to eviction injunctions. The case resolved around Powell raising a clameur de haro to prevent eviction and Sheppard appealed against the subsequent automatic injunction preventing eviction. The court ruled that a clameur could not be used to block court orders and fined Powell £50 for incorrect usage.

Contents

Background

Caroline Powell was a homeowner in St Brelade. She was subject to insolvency proceedings that included repossession of her house. She applied to the Royal Court in 2018 for remise de biens. The application failed and Powell was deemed to have made cession générale to any rights. [2] An appeal to the Court of Appeal ruled that Powell had a "precarious interest" in the property and was granted remise de biens to sell the property to pay creditors but she refused to allow people to view the house. [3] The jurats ruled that interest expired on 27 November 2020 after the Royal Court ruled the Sheppards to be tenants après dégrèvement after purchasing the house and ordered the Viscount of Jersey to oversee eviction procedures. [4]

Initial case

On 27 February 2021, when officers of the Viscount visited Powell to issue the eviction notice, Powell raised the clameur de haro , an ancient Norman legal right, by kneeling and stating the clameur and then reciting the Lord's Prayer in French. [5] According to law, an interim injunction was automatically in force and the officers were obliged to stop until the matter could be adjudicated. [5] This was the first time in 21 years that a clameur de haro was raised in Jersey. [5]

The case was heard at the Royal Court after the property owner applied to the court to have the injunction lifted. The deputy Bailiff presided over the case. [4] The Sheppards argued that the clameur was used incorrectly as all it did was prevent the officers handing over the eviction notice. Powell responded stating that the Royal Court judgment affirming the eviction process was made without her present and using incorrect evidence. [3] The deputy Bailiff, basing his judgment upon the last time the clameur was raised in 2000, ruled that the clameur had been raised unlawfully as the officers were acting under the order of the court which could not be challenged using this legal mechanism and accordingly fined Powell £50 for incorrect usage and banned her from raising the clameur in relation to this again. [6] [7]

Appeal

Powell indicated she intended to appeal to the Court of Appeal on the grounds that her case was distinct enough to distinguish from the 2000 case and that there had been deception in the gaining of the original eviction ruling. [6] The appeal was heard by Commissioners Sir William Bailhache, James McNeill and George Bompas. The court affirmed the judgment that this was an inappropriate use of the clameur as Powell had no legal title to the property. [8] Commissioner Bailhache described the case as "hopeless from the outset" though he stated Powell could appeal to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council but that she would face an "uphill battle". [8] They also granted Sheppard's request for costs for what Sheppard's attorney argued was a "frivolous and vexatious" lawsuit. [9]

Related Research Articles

Appellate procedure in the United States National rules of court appeals

United States appellate procedure involves the rules and regulations for filing appeals in state courts and federal courts. The nature of an appeal can vary greatly depending on the type of case and the rules of the court in the jurisdiction where the case was prosecuted. There are many types of standard of review for appeals, such as de novo and abuse of discretion. However, most appeals begin when a party files a petition for review to a higher court for the purpose of overturning the lower court's decision.

Injunction Legal order to stop doing something

An injunction is a legal and equitable remedy in the form of a special court order that compels a party to do or refrain from specific acts. "When a court employs the extraordinary remedy of injunction, it directs the conduct of a party, and does so with the backing of its full coercive powers." A party that fails to comply with an injunction faces criminal or civil penalties, including possible monetary sanctions and even imprisonment. They can also be charged with contempt of court. Counterinjunctions are injunctions that stop or reverse the enforcement of another injunction.

Equity is a particular body of law that was developed in the English Court of Chancery. It is not a synonym for 'general fairness' or 'natural justice'. It exists in domestic law, both in civil law and in common law systems, and in international law. The tradition of equity begins in antiquity with the writings of Aristotle (epieikeia) and with Roman law (aequitas). Later, in civil law systems, equity was integrated in the legal rules, while in common law systems it became an independent body of law.

Sark Jurisdiction of the Bailiwick of Guernsey

Sark is a part of the Channel Islands in the southwestern English Channel, off the coast of Normandy, France. It is a royal fief, which forms part of the Bailiwick of Guernsey, with its own set of laws based on Norman law and its own parliament. It has a population of about 500. Sark has an area of 2.10 square miles (5.44 km2). Little Sark is a peninsula joined by a natural but high and very narrow isthmus to the rest of Sark.

In law, a judgment, also spelled judgement, is a decision of a court regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular court order.

Bailiff Manager, overseer or custodian

A bailiff is a manager, overseer or custodian; a legal officer to whom some degree of authority or jurisdiction is given. Bailiffs are of various kinds and their offices and duties vary greatly.

The Crown is the state in all its aspects within the jurisprudence of the Commonwealth realms and their subdivisions. Legally ill-defined, the term has different meanings depending on context. It is used to designate the monarch in either a personal capacity, as Head of the Commonwealth, or as the king or queen of his or her realms. It can also refer to the rule of law; however, in common parlance 'The Crown' refers to the functions of government and the civil service.

Bailiwick of Guernsey British Crown dependency consisting of several islands

The Bailiwick of Guernsey is one of three Crown Dependencies.

Small-claims courts have limited jurisdiction to hear civil cases between private litigants. Courts authorized to try small claims may also have other judicial functions, and go by different names in different jurisdictions. For example, it may be known as a county or magistrate's court. These courts can be found in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England and Wales, Hong Kong, Ireland, Israel, New Zealand, Philippines, Scotland, Singapore, South Africa and the United States.

<i>Clameur de haro</i> Ancient legal injunction of restraint still enforceable in Jersey and Guernsey

The clameur de haro is an ancient legal injunction of restraint employed by a person who believes they are being wronged by another at that moment. It survives as a fully enforceable law to this day in the legal systems of Jersey and Guernsey, and is used, albeit infrequently, for matters affecting land.

The legislative, executive, and judicial branches, of both the United States federal government and the State of Florida, were involved in the case of Terri Schiavo. In November 1998 Michael Schiavo, husband of Terri Schiavo, first sought permission to remove his wife's feeding tube. Schiavo had suffered brain damage in February 1990, and in February 2000 had been ruled by a Florida circuit court to be in a persistent vegetative state. Her feeding tube was removed first on April 26, 2001, but was reinserted two days later on an appeal by her parents, Bob and Mary Schindler.

DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the case had become moot and so declined to render a decision on the merits. American student Marco DeFunis, who had been denied admission to the University of Washington School of Law in the state of Washington before he was provisionally admitted during the pendency of the case, was slated to graduate within a few months of the decision being rendered.

Jersey Eastern Railway

The Jersey Eastern Railway was a standard gauge railway that began operations on 6 August 1873 in Jersey. The line closed on 21 June 1929. It is not to be confused with the Jersey Railway.

The law of Jersey has been influenced by several different legal traditions, in particular Norman customary law, English common law and modern French civil law. The Bailiwick of Jersey is a separate jurisdiction from that of the United Kingdom, and is also distinct from that of the other Channel Islands such as Guernsey, although they do share some historical developments. Jersey's legal system is 'mixed' or 'pluralistic', and sources of law are in French and English languages, although since the 1950s the main working language of the legal system is English.

Courts of Jersey

The Courts of Jersey are responsible for the administration of justice in the Bailiwick of Jersey, one of the Channel Islands. They apply the law of the Island, which is a mixture of customary law and legislation passed by the legislature, the States Assembly.

Google has been involved in multiple lawsuits over issues such as privacy, advertising, intellectual property and various Google services such as Google Books and YouTube. The company's legal department expanded from one to nearly 100 lawyers in the first five years of business, and by 2014 had grown to around 400 lawyers. Google's Chief Legal Officer is Senior Vice President of Corporate Development David Drummond.

Courts of Guernsey

The Courts of Guernsey are responsible for the administration of justice in the Bailiwick of Guernsey, one of the Channel Islands. They apply the law of the Island, which is a mixture of customary law dating back as far as the 10th century and legislation passed by the legislature, the States of Deliberation.

Law of Guernsey

The Law of Guernsey originates in Norman Customary Law, overlaid with principles taken from English common law and Equity, as well as from statute law enacted by the competent legislature(s) -- usually, but not always, the States of Guernsey

<i>PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd</i>

PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26 is a UK constitutional law case in which an anonymised privacy injunction was obtained by a claimant, identified in court documents as "PJS", in order to prohibit publication of the details of a sexual encounter between him and two other people. Media outside England and Wales identified PJS as David Furnish.

References

  1. "Representation of Sheppard re Powell". Bailii. Retrieved 2021-05-19.
  2. "Representation of Powell (Apr-2018)". Jersey Legal Information Board. 2018-04-20. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
  3. 1 2 "Haro, goodbye... Ancient property plea fails". Bailiwick Express. 2021-03-03. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
  4. 1 2 "Representation of Sheppard re Powell". Jersey Legal Information Board. 2021-03-02. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
  5. 1 2 3 "Clameur de Haro raised for the first time in 20 years". Bailiwick Express. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
  6. 1 2 "Failed Clameur de Haro raiser takes case to Court of Appeal". Bailiwick Express. 2021-03-25. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
  7. "Woman fined nominal £50 after wrongly raising Clameur de Haro". Jersey Evening Post. 2021-03-03. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
  8. 1 2 "Clameur de Haro raiser loses "hopeless" appeal". Bailiwick Express. 2021-03-30. Retrieved 2021-05-11.
  9. "Woman fined for raising Clameur de Haro loses her appeal". Jersey Evening Post. 2021-03-30. Retrieved 2021-05-11.