Research Center in Entrepreneurial History

Last updated

The Research Center in Entrepreneurial History was a research center at Harvard University founded in 1948 with a grant from the Rockefeller Foundation. Led by the American economic historian Arthur H. Cole, the research center attracted numerous scholars, with varied backgrounds and religious beliefs, in the field of business and economic history such as Joseph Schumpeter, Fritz Redlich, and Thomas C. Cochran. [1] The center issued the first academic journal devoted to entrepreneurship named Explorations in Entrepreneurial History. During the time of its existence, the center attracted rising academic stars such as Alfred D. Chandler Jr., who would later become one of the seminal figures in the field of business history. Intellectually, the research center was influenced by the German Historical School and focused on the role of the entrepreneur in the economy. [2] However, historical research on entrepreneurship ran into methodological roadblocks and the research interest moved towards industrial corporations and neoclassical economics. [3] Today, the research center is seen as one of the first modern attempts to research entrepreneurship and understand the impact of entrepreneurial activities on the economy. [4] While historical research on entrepreneurship has not found much resonance in scientific and public debates, recent decades have seen a revival of the theories of Joseph Schumpeter and more recently calls for a revival of research on entrepreneurial history. [2]

Contents

Factionalism and daimonic political economy

By 1954-55, factionalism had fractured the Research Center over: 1) the extent to which counterfactuals should be applied in economic history, evinced by the conflict between Fritz Redlich and counterfactual practitioner Robert Fogel; [5] 2) the degree to which Redlich's and Arthur H. Cole's variants of business history should be equated with economic history, demonstrated by the conflict between Redlich and the chief proponent of a distinction, N.S.B. Gras (Redlich, however, critiqued U.S. entrepreneurs for only applying their capital-generating skills to public and private commerce); [6] and 3) the degree of criticism of neoclassical economics in economic history, evinced by New institutional economist Douglass North's struggles with Economic History Association trustees, including Fritz Redlich. [5] Despite the schisms, members of the Research Center were all disciples of Joseph Schumpeter (d. 1950) and Werner Sombart (d. 1941~writings frequently cited by Redlich), the principal architects of schöpferische Zerstörung revolutions in political economy. [6] Eric Reinert further traced the transmission of ideas from Friedrich Nietzsche's Thus Spoke Zarathustra , On the Genealogy of Morality , additional Nietzschean writings, works by Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Friedrich List ideas, and notations by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz into economic studies by both Werner Sombart and Joseph Schumpeter. [7] The latter examined "the history of productive apparatus" as "the history of revolutions" and "industrial mutation---if I may use that biological term---that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure from within, incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one. This process of Creative Destruction is the essential fact about capitalism." [8]

At the Research Center in Entrepreneurial History, Fritz Redlich co-authored two articles with Alfred D. Chandler Jr., a former Talcott Parsons student, in the Business History Review . [9] Redlich served as the principal English translator of publications by Arthur Spiethoff, another von Schmoller student. He additionally expounded on Spiethoff's "economic Gestalt theory," the induction of a "material substratum"---rather than historical materialism---within a given temporal moment, amidst changing historical contingencies, whilst considering the "spirit" of ideas and impulses, but not everlasting ideals as a matter of course, in political economy. [10] In a similar vein, Redlich began to publish articles, along with Arthur Cole, on the idea of an "individualist, daimonic political economy" that pushed advocates of both laissez-faire and communism into accepting "businesspeople, and generally business history, as the fountainhead of economic theory." For example, Redlich observed that " 'Adam Smith and the classical economists presupposed that the business man in following his own interests would develop his own enterprises and, automatically, the economic life of his nation.' " Redlich and Cole both believed that the idea of " 'daimonic political economy' " undermined this presupposition not only by addressing conceptions of " 'irrationality,' " but also by " 'accepting' " political economy as " 'personalities,' " for “ 'only in personalities does the daimonic receive power.' " Cole "sought to grasp the whole of economic life, of global commercial society properly understood as the dynamic interaction of resources, entrepreneurs, firms, and states in an international system." Redlich agreed that, " 'as applied to economic daimonry in the [world] capitalistic system, economic daimonry achieves its power in the entrepreneur,' " but added that, in order to fulfill this goal, one must at least consider " 'history of the given national economy from the personal angle'...only by considering the granularity of micro-activity could one understand the concomitant unfolding of the macro-economy." For both Redlich and Cole, the " 'acceptance' " of " 'daimonic political economy' " was the first step in this unity of understanding that "institutional and economic change in society" was only possible "through an intense engagement with the schizophrenic core of the daimonic, that is with its capacity to create, destroy, creatively create, creatively destroy, and, of course, destructively destroy," as well as to interconnect these "diverse manifestations." Only after full immersion into this "core" of " 'daimonic political economy' " would a scholar begin to " ' verstehen ,' " glossed as "the way to truly understand," the researching, writing, and representing of " 'history.' " [6]

A note on Fritz Redlich and Germany

Fritz Redlich opposed and satirized the antisemitism of Nazi Germany as well as Third Reich iterations of lebensraum . As late as 1976, however, he continued to cite Eduard Wechssler's (mis)interpretations of Karl Mannheim's theory of generations. Redlich did so in order to sustain his own conceived "generation's" pre-Nazi zeitgeist in fin-de-siècle sociocultural evolution. He also periodically returned to his notion of reizbarkeit, which he glossed in English as " 'Impressionism' [instead of 'a choleric nationalism']," in order to explain the conceptual underpinnings of " 'my work.' " In 1964, he elaborated on reizbarkeit as “ 'half or entire nights spent alone in harmony with the nature of the [German] homeland [that] cannot be separated from my intellectual development' ” as well as a life commitment " 'to defend the inherited cultural patrimony and the ravines of the Reich.' " In a 2018 conference paper, Monika Poettinger argued that, "as apparent from his own recount, Redlich did not regret his involvement in nationalist movements," although he distinguished such movements from "extremism." For instance, Redlich endorsed Gustav Stresemann and the German People's Party during the Weimar Republic. In 1964, Redlich disclosed that he even joined the German People's Party's Reichsklub, "notwithstanding that the Volkspartei had a clear-cut position in regard to the Judenfrage , the party accepted among its rank the Jews who had proved their German nationalist sentiments." [11]

Bernard Bailyn at the Research Center

In 1952, historian Bernard Bailyn began receiving financial and career support from the Research Center. Bailyn described his early 1950s colleagues at the Research Center as an "excellent group, led by Arthur Cole of the Harvard Business School. The ultimate intellectual influence behind the center was [Joseph] Schumpeter." [12] Schumpeter examined "the history of revolutions" and "industrial mutation...that incessantly revolutionizes the economic structure 'from within,' incessantly destroying the old one, incessantly creating a new one. This process of Creative Destruction is the essential fact about capitalism." [8]

In 1953, Bailyn observed that studies of "associations" among "colonial merchants" and "entrepreneurs" as a "social group" contributed to "the movement that led to Revolution." [13] A year later, Bailyn noted that this "merchant group" had also captured the attentions of 1940s and 1950s "students of business and entrepreneurial history." For these "economic historians," it had become "clear that the colonial merchants were never a 'class'...were they not, then, at least 'conservatives?' It depends when. They were radicals throughout the revolutionary agitation---radicals not only in regard to the question of home rule but also to the question 'of who shall rule at home.' " [14]

At the Research Center, Bailyn gravitated toward a "a strange, eccentric, but very learned man, Fritz Redlich." In 1994, Bailyn still recommended essays, articles, and books by Redlich. [12] During his stint at the Research Center, Bailyn believed that he had detected a pattern by the mid-eighteenth century: a given "colonial" merchant "attains a position on the colonial Council, creates friendships with influential peoples in England...The heir grows up in a different society from that of his father, solidifies the family position in Anglican officialdom...and becomes a colonial member of the British ruling class." [15] After the Stamp Act Crisis, "the merchants discovered that they could no longer satisfy their fundamental interests [so] they rose in protest against the new imperial policies and demanded the rights of Englishmen...New England merchants reacted not as a unit but as individuals" with "common interests." [16]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joseph Schumpeter</span> Austrian political economist (1883–1950)

Joseph Alois Schumpeter was an Austrian political economist. He served briefly as Finance Minister of Austria in 1919. In 1932, he emigrated to the United States to become a professor at Harvard University, where he remained until the end of his career, and in 1939 obtained American citizenship.

Creative destruction is a concept in economics that describes a process in which new innovations replace and make obsolete older innovations.

The historical school of economics was an approach to academic economics and to public administration that emerged in the 19th century in Germany, and held sway there until well into the 20th century. The professors involved compiled massive economic histories of Germany and Europe. Numerous Americans were their students. The school was opposed by theoretical economists. Prominent leaders included Gustav von Schmoller (1838–1917), and Max Weber (1864–1920) in Germany, and Joseph Schumpeter (1883–1950) in Austria and the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernard Bailyn</span> American historian (1922–2020)

Bernard Bailyn was an American historian, author, and academic specializing in U.S. Colonial and Revolutionary-era History. He was a professor at Harvard University from 1953. Bailyn won the Pulitzer Prize for History twice. In 1998 the National Endowment for the Humanities selected him for the Jefferson Lecture. He was a recipient of the 2010 National Humanities Medal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Baumol</span> American economist (1922–2017)

William Jack Baumol was an American economist. He was a professor of economics at New York University, Academic Director of the Berkley Center for Entrepreneurship and Innovation, and Professor Emeritus at Princeton University. He was a prolific author of more than eighty books and several hundred journal articles. He is the namesake of the Baumol effect.

Entrepreneurial economics is the field of study that focuses on the study of entrepreneur and entrepreneurship within the economy. The accumulation of factors of production per se does not explain economic development. They are necessary factors of production, but they are not sufficient for economic growth.

An economic ideology is a set of views forming the basis of an ideology on how the economy should run. It differentiates itself from economic theory in being normative rather than just explanatory in its approach, whereas the aim of economic theories is to create accurate explanatory models to describe how an economy currently functions. However, the two are closely interrelated, as underlying economic ideology influences the methodology and theory employed in analysis. The diverse ideology and methodology of the 74 Nobel laureates in economics speaks to such interrelation.

Schumpeterian rents are earned by innovators and occur during the period of time between the introduction of an innovation and its successful diffusion. It is expected that successful innovations, in time, will be imitated, but until that occurs, the innovator will earn Schumpeterian rents. They were named after economist Joseph Schumpeter, who saw profits made by businesses as resulting from the development of new processes which disturb economic equilibrium, temporarily raising revenues above their resource costs. This type of profit is also called entrepreneurial rent.

Innovation economics is new, and growing field of economic theory and applied/experimental economics that emphasizes innovation and entrepreneurship. It comprises both the application of any type of innovations, especially technological, but not only, into economic use. In classical economics this is the application of customer new technology into economic use; but also it could refer to the field of innovation and experimental economics that refers the new economic science developments that may be considered innovative. In his 1942 book Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, economist Joseph Schumpeter introduced the notion of an innovation economy. He argued that evolving institutions, entrepreneurs and technological changes were at the heart of economic growth. However, it is only in recent years that "innovation economy," grounded in Schumpeter's ideas, has become a mainstream concept".

Entrepreneurship is the creation or extraction of economic value in ways that generally entail beyond the minimal amount of risk, and potentially involving values besides simply economic ones.

<i>Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy</i> 1942 book by Joseph Schumpeter

Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy is a book on economics, sociology, and history by Joseph Schumpeter, arguably his most famous, controversial, and important work. It's also one of the most famous, controversial, and important books on social theory, social sciences, and economics—in which Schumpeter deals with capitalism, socialism, and creative destruction.

Thomas Kincaid McCraw was an American business historian and Isidor Straus Professor of Business History, Emeritus at Harvard Business School, who won the 1985 Pulitzer Prize for History for Prophets of Regulation: Charles Francis Adams, Louis D. Brandeis, James M. Landis, Alfred E. Kahn (1984), which "used biography to explore thorny issues in economics."

The Other Canon Foundation is a center and network for research of heterodox economics founded by Erik Reinert. The name refers to the founders' message of there being another economic canon, alternative to the ruling neoclassical economics. Their suggestions, they claim, are valid for and can be applicated in the first, second and third world.

Alexander Ebner is a German social scientist and Professor of Social Economics, esp. Economic Sociology and Political Economy at the Goethe University Frankfurt. His main research fields are Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Governance and Public Policy, Regional Development, and the History of Economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cläre Tisch</span> German economist

Cläre Tisch, also "Kläre Tisch" or "Klara Tisch," was a German economist.

Crisis theory, concerning the causes and consequences of the tendency for the rate of profit to fall in a capitalist system, is associated with Marxian critique of political economy, and was further popularised through Marxist economics.

Christine Katharina Volkmann is a German Economist and holds the UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship and Intercultural Management at the Schumpeter School of Business and Economics of the University of Wuppertal.

Arthur Harrison Cole was an American economic historian and was the head of the Harvard University Business School's library. Cole created the Research Center in Entrepreneurial History that was addressed by Joseph Schumpeter, and that had as participants several graduate students who later went on to distinguished careers in economic history.

<i>Capitalism in America</i> 2018 book by Alan Greenspan and Adrian Wooldridge

Capitalism in America: A History is a 2018 book written by former chairman of the Federal Reserve Alan Greenspan and Adrian Wooldridge, political editor at The Economist. The book traces the economic history of the United States since its founding and the authors argue that America's embrace of capitalism and creative destruction has given the nation's economy a superior edge.

Fritz Leonhard Redlich (1892–1978) was a German businessman and American economic historian. He was a pioneer of the history of entrepreneurship and the author of a widely respected study of American banking.

References

  1. ↑ Fredona, Robert; Reinert, Sophus A. (2017). "The Harvard Research Center in Entrepreneurial History and the Daimonic Entrepreneur". History of Political Economy. 49 (2): 267–314. doi:10.1215/00182702-3876481.
  2. 1 2 Wadhwani, R. Daniel; Lubinski, Christina (2017). "Reinventing Entrepreneurial History". Business History Review. 91 (4): 767–799. doi: 10.1017/S0007680517001374 . ISSN   0007-6805. S2CID   158098172.
  3. ↑ Jones, Geoffrey; Wadhwani, R. Daniel (2006). "Entrepreneurship and Business History: Renewing the Research Agenda" (PDF). Harvard Business School Working Paper Series. 07 (7): 1–49.
  4. ↑ Carlsson, Bo; Braunerhjelm, Pontus; McKelvey, Maureen; Olofsson, Christer; Persson, Lars; Ylinenpää, Håkan (December 2013). "The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research". Small Business Economics. 41 (4): 913–930. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y . hdl: 10419/81446 . ISSN   0921-898X. S2CID   54837813.
  5. 1 2 Lamoreaux, Naomi (1998). "Economic History and the Cliometric Revolution". Imagined Histories: American Historians Interpret the Past: 59–84.
  6. 1 2 3 Fredona, Robert; Reinert, Sophus A. (1 June 2017). "The Harvard Research Center in Entrepreneurial History and the Daimonic Entrepreneur". History of Political Economy. 49 (2): 267–314. doi:10.1215/00182702-3876481.
  7. ↑ Reinert, Erik S. (2019). The Visionary Realism of German Economics: From the Thirty Years' War to the Cold War. London, UK: Anthem Press. pp. 365–412. ISBN   9781783089031.
  8. 1 2 Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (5th; with a new introduction by Tom Bottomore ed.). London: Allen and Unwin. pp. 81–86. ISBN   9780415107624.
  9. ↑ Reinert, Erik S. (2019). The Visionary Realism of German Economics: From the Thirty Years' War to the Cold War. London, UK: Anthem Press. pp. 424–426. ISBN   9781783089031.
  10. ↑ Ebner, Alexander (2001). "Schumpeter and the 'Schmollerprogramm:' Integrating Theory and History in the Analysis of Economic Development". Capitalism and Democracy in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Vienna, 1998 "Capitalism and Socialism in the 21st Century". Physica-Verlag: 366–367. ISBN   9783790813500.
  11. ↑ Poettinger, Monika. "An Actor of Change: The Entrepreneur of Fritz Redlich". 22nd Annual ESHET Conference.
  12. 1 2 Ekirch, A. Roger (October 1994). "Sometimes an Art, Never a Science, Always a Craft: A Conversation with Bernard Bailyn". The William and Mary Quarterly. 51 (4): 625–658. doi:10.2307/2946922. JSTOR   2946922.
  13. ↑ Bailyn, Bernard (1953). "Communications and Trade: The Atlantic in the Seventeenth Century". The Journal of Economic History. 13 (4): 378–387. doi:10.1017/S0022050700088665. ISSN   0022-0507. JSTOR   2114770. S2CID   154840677.
  14. ↑ Bailyn, Bernard (1954). "The Blount Papers: Notes on the Merchant "Class" in the Revolutionary Period". The William and Mary Quarterly. 11 (1): 98–104. doi:10.2307/1923153. ISSN   0043-5597. JSTOR   1923153.
  15. ↑ Bailyn, Bernard (May 1954). "Kinship and Trade in Seventeenth Century New England". Explorations in Entrepreneurial History. 6 (4): 197–206.
  16. ↑ Bailyn, Bernard (1955). The New England Merchants in the Seventeenth Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 168 and 197.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.