Rochelle C. Dreyfuss

Last updated
Rochelle C. Dreyfuss
Rochelle Dreyfuss 2020.jpg
Dreyfuss in 2020
Born
Rochelle Cooper

NationalityAmerican
Education Wellesley College (BA)
University of California, Berkeley (MA)
Columbia Law School (JD)
OccupationLaw professor
Known forExpert on patent law and intellectual property
SpouseRobert Dreyfuss

Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss is an American attorney who is the Pauline Newman Professor of Law and codirector of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law & Policy at New York University School of Law.

Contents

Biography

Dreyfuss grew up in Brooklyn, New York. [1] She studied at Wellesley College, where she obtained a B.A. in chemistry, and then received a M.A. from the University of California, Berkeley. [2] After working as a research scientist, she graduated from Columbia Law School in 1981, where she was a James Kent Scholar and served as articles and book review editor of the Columbia Law Review . [3] After law school, Dreyfuss was law clerk for Judge Wilfred Feinberg of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and then for Chief Justice Warren Burger of the Supreme Court of the United States during the 1982–1983 term. [4]

In 1983 she joined the faculty of New York University School of Law, and in 1988 was named a full professor. [5] Her research focuses on patent law, copyright and intellectual property. [6] [7] [8] [9] In 1996, she became the director of the Engelberg Center on Innovation Law and Policy, and is currently the co-director. She is co-author of a case book, Intellectual Property-Cases and Materials on Trademark, Copyright and Patent Law, originally published in 1996.

She is a member of the American Law Institute and was a reporter for its 2008 study, "Intellectual Property: Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Judgments in Transnational Disputes." [10] [11]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intellectual property</span> Ownership of creative expressions and processes

Intellectual property (IP) is a category of property that includes intangible creations of the human intellect. There are many types of intellectual property, and some countries recognize more than others. The best-known types are patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. The modern concept of intellectual property developed in England in the 17th and 18th centuries. The term "intellectual property" began to be used in the 19th century, though it was not until the late 20th century that intellectual property became commonplace in most of the world's legal systems.

Intellectual property rights (IPRs) have been acknowledged and protected in China since 1980. China has acceded to the major international conventions on protection of rights to intellectual property. Domestically, protection of intellectual property law has also been established by government legislation, administrative regulations, and decrees in the areas of trademark, copyright, and patent. Although this IP framework is developing quickly, as of 2023 it remains less developed than most industrialized countries.

International News Service v. Associated Press, 248 U.S. 215 (1918), also known as INS v. AP or simply the INS case, is a 1918 decision of the United States Supreme Court that enunciated the misappropriation doctrine of federal intellectual property common law: a "quasi-property right" may be created against others by one's investment of effort and money in an intangible thing, such as information or a design. The doctrine is highly controversial and criticized by many legal scholars, but it has its supporters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jane C. Ginsburg</span> American lawyer and legal scholar (born 1955)

Jane Carol Ginsburg is an American attorney. She is the Morton L. Janklow Professor of Literary and Artistic Property Law at the Columbia Law School. She also directs the law school's Kernochan Center for Law, Media and the Arts. In 2011, Ginsburg was elected to the British Academy.

The threshold of originality is a concept in copyright law that is used to assess whether a particular work can be copyrighted. It is used to distinguish works that are sufficiently original to warrant copyright protection from those that are not. In this context, "originality" refers to "coming from someone as the originator/author", rather than "never having occurred or existed before".

William "Terry" W. Fisher III is the WilmerHale Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Harvard Law School and faculty director of the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. His primary research and teaching areas are intellectual property law and legal history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lance Liebman</span> American law professor (born 1941)

Lance Liebman is an American law professor. He is the former Dean of Columbia Law School, and served as the Director of the American Law Institute from May 1999 to May 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Berne Convention</span> 1886 international assembly and treaty

The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, usually known as the Berne Convention, was an international assembly held in 1886 in the Swiss city of Bern by ten European countries with the goal to agree on a set of legal principles for the protection of original work. They drafted and adopted a multi-party contract containing agreements for a uniform, border-crossing system that became known under the same name. Its rules have been updated many times since then. The treaty provides authors, musicians, poets, painters, and other creators with the means to control how their works are used, by whom, and on what terms. In some jurisdictions these type of rights are being referred to as copyright.

Limitations and exceptions to copyright are provisions, in local copyright law or the Berne Convention, which allow for copyrighted works to be used without a license from the copyright owner.

Mary Wong is the vice president for strategic community operations, planning & engagement at ICANN. Prior to taking up a full-time position with ICANN, she was the founding director of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property and a tenured professor at the University of New Hampshire in Concord, New Hampshire, U.S.A.

Richard Harvey Stern is an American attorney and law professor.

John R. "Jay" Thomas is a professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ralph Oman</span> American lawyer (born 1940)

Ralph Oman is an American lawyer and former Register of Copyrights. He is currently the Pravel, Hewitt, Kimball and Kreiger Professorial Lecturer in Intellectual Property and Patent Law at The George Washington University Law School.

Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 568 U.S. 519 (2013), is a United States Supreme Court copyright decision in which the Court held, 6–3, that the first-sale doctrine exhausts copyright of the works lawfully made or purchased abroad.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward J. Damich</span> American judge (born 1948)

Edward J. Damich is an American lawyer serving as a senior judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims. He served as the court's chief judge from 2002 to 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Susan G. Braden</span> American judge (born 1948)

Susan Gertrude Braden is a former judge of the United States Court of Federal Claims. Braden was appointed to that court in 2003 by President George W. Bush. She was appointed chief judge by President Donald Trump on March 13, 2017 and assumed senior status on July 13, 2018, and retired in 2019.

<i>Folsom v. Marsh</i> First "fair use" copyright case in the U.S.

Folsom v. Marsh, 9. F.Cas. 342 is a 19th-century US copyright case, widely regarded as the first "fair use" case in the United States. The opinion was written by Judge Joseph Story, who set forth four factors that are in use today, and were ultimately codified in the Copyright Act of 1976 as 17 U.S.C. § 107.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copyright Remedy Clarification Act</span> United States copyright law

The Copyright Remedy Clarification Act (CRCA) is a United States copyright law that attempted to abrogate sovereign immunity of states for copyright infringement. The CRCA amended 17 USC 511(a):

In general. Any State, any instrumentality of a State, and any officer or employee of a State or instrumentality of a State acting in his or her official capacity, shall not be immune, under the Eleventh Amendment of the Constitution of the United States or under any other doctrine of sovereign immunity, from suit in Federal Court by any person, including any governmental or nongovernmental entity, for a violation of any of the exclusive rights of a copyright owner provided by sections 106 through 122, for importing copies of phonorecords in violation of section 602, or for any other violation under this title.

C. Scott Hemphill is a legal academic whose scholarship focuses on intellectual property law and antitrust law. He is currently a Professor of Law at New York University Law School, where he has taught since 2015. Previously, Hemphill was a Professor of Law at Columbia Law School.

Star Athletica, LLC v. Varsity Brands, Inc., 580 U.S. ___ (2017), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court decided under what circumstances aesthetic elements of "useful articles" can be restricted by copyright law. The Court created a two-prong "separability" test, granting copyrightability based on separate identification and independent existence; the aesthetic elements must be identifiable as art if mentally separated from the article's practical use, and must qualify as copyrightable pictorial, graphic, or sculptural works if expressed in any medium.

References

  1. "Student Directory, 1981". Columbia Law School. p. 22. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  2. "Class of 1968 Reunion". Wellesley College. Retrieved October 12, 2018.
  3. "Board of editors masthead, Vol 81, No 1" (PDF). Columbia Law Review. January 1981. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  4. "Supreme Court Justices Appoint 34 Law Clerks". New York Times. Associated Press. July 13, 1982. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  5. Kover, Amy (June 19, 2005). "That Looks Familiar. Didn't I Design It?". New York Times. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  6. Demirjian, Karoun (May 11, 2006). "What is the price of plagiarism?". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  7. Totenberg, Nina (April 15, 2013). "Supreme Court Asks: Can Human Genes Be Patented?". National Public Radio. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  8. Chung, Andrew (June 19, 2017). "Supreme Court and top patent court rarely see eye to eye". Reuters. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  9. Goode, Lauren (June 23, 2018). "Indictment of Ex-Fitbit Employees Marks a Bigger Legal Shift". Wired. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  10. "Member page for Rochelle C. Dreyfuss". American Law Institute. Retrieved October 11, 2018.
  11. "Full text of: Intellectual Property: Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, and Judgments in Transnational Disputes (ALI report)". World Intellectual Property Organization. 2008. Retrieved October 12, 2018.

Select publications

Books

Articles