SN 386

Last updated

Supernova SN 386
G11.2-0.3.jpg
Event type Supernova
Type II
Datec. 20,100 years ago
(discovered 386)
Constellation Sagittarius
Right ascension 18h 11.5m [1]
Declination −19° 25 [1]
Distancec. 18,500 ly
RemnantShell
Host Milky Way
Other designationsSN 386
Preceded by SN 185
Followed by SN 393
  Commons-logo.svg Related media on Commons

SN 386 is a probable transient astronomical event in the constellation Sagittarius, which appeared as a "guest star" that was reported by Chinese astronomers in 386. [2]

Contents

Record

"Emperor Xiaowu of Jin, 11th year of the Taiyuan reign period, third month. There was a guest star in Nandou [LM8] that lasted until the 6th month (Jul 13 to Aug 10), when it disappeared" (Jin shu, Tianwen zhi, ch. 13; Song shu, Tianwen zhi, ch. 25 according to Xu, Pankenier, Jiang 2000 [3] ).

Nandou, the Southern Dipper, is part of the constellation of Sagittarius. The only historical information is: Something flared up there and was visible for ~3 months. As this asterism is in or close to the bulge of the Milky Way, the object should have been bright (at least 2 mag) to be recognized against bright background of the clouds of the Milky Way.

Suggested as supernova

Due to the given duration of the appearance, this record was suggested to report a supernova. [2] Since 1976, several SNR in the relatively crowded field have been suggested as counterpart:

Suggested SNR counterparts for 386
DesignationSourceComments
G011.2–01.1Stephenson & Green (2002), p. 182First guess from radio data (see below)
G011.2–00.3
G007.7–03.7Zhou et al. (2018)Possible after X-ray observations
G008.7–05.0Also small and at appropriate position

These remnants are valid suggestions but the supernova is supposed to be a "low luminosity SN" [4] because it lasted only for three months. Thus, a classical nova would also be possible. [5]

Suggested as classical nova

The decline time of classical novae is measured typically as the duration of decline by 3 mag from peak. This so-called t3 time ranges from typical 25–30 days (a month or two) for fast novae up to ten months for the slowest known classical novae (and even longer for diffusion induced novae). [6] [7] [8] Thus, this historical transient could easily have been caused by a (fast or moderately fast) classical nova: postulating a peak brightness of (at least) 2 mag for the historical sighting and vanishing to invisibility (>5 mag) within 3 months, it could be a moderately fast nova. The brighter the peak, the faster the nova: if the peak was −1 mag (like Sirius) or −4 (like Venus) and declined to >5 mag within three months (6 mag or more in three months) it likely refers to a really fast nova. [5] Possible (and certainly not the only) candidates in the Chinese constellation of Nandou are according to: [5]

Suggested classical nova counterparts for 386
DesignationComments
V1223 SgrIntermediate polar
V3890 SgrKnown recurrent nova
Four further symbiotic binaries

Supernova remnant: SNR G11.2-0.3

Although SN 386 was generally considered to be associated with the symmetrically 4 arcmin circular shell of a supernova remnant, SNR G11.2-0.3, [9] this theory is now thought not to be true. [10] [11] Its stellar progenitor was likely a Supernova Type II event. Recent studies give the more precise type as core-collapsed Type cIIb/Ibc. [10]

A measured mean expansion rate of this remnant shell is 0.0277±0.0180% per year, whose true diameter is now about 3.0  pc (9.8  ly ), suggesting its age is 1,900±500 years. Quoted distances estimated SNR G11.2–0.3 to be about 4,900 pc (16,000 ly) away from Earth, but more recent radio observation now range between 4,400–7,000 pc (14,000–23,000 ly). [10]

Rejection of SNR G11.2–0.3's association with SN 386 is by the significant very high absorption of light (AV) between the source and Earth, which is estimated from infrared observations as about 16 magnitudes. This suggests the star would not have been visible to the naked-eye. [10]

Pulsar: PSR J1811-1926

At the centre of G11.2–0.3 is a fast rotating 65 ms neutron star observed in radio frequencies as pulsar PSR J1811-1926 or as X-ray source AX J1811-1926, which has also generated a small inner 10 to 15 arcsec pulsar wind nebula (PWN). [10] [12] This pulsar and its surrounding debris field was observed by the Chandra X-ray Observatory, when it was suggested SN 386 could have been created around the same time as the Chinese observations, [13] but more modern observed measured rotational velocities, spin down rate, and radio observations of PSR J1811-1926, indicate a much older 20,000 to 23,000 years. If true, this clearly discounts the conclusion that the pulsar is associated with SN 386. [10] The clear contradiction comparing this with the age determined by the expansion rate of the supernova remnant seems yet to be ascertained.

The distance of the pulsar was estimated in 2003 as 5,000 pc (16,000 ly). [14]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nova</span> Nuclear explosion in a white dwarf star

A nova is a transient astronomical event that causes the sudden appearance of a bright, apparently "new" star that slowly fades over weeks or months. All observed novae involve white dwarfs in close binary systems, but causes of the dramatic appearance of a nova vary, depending on the circumstances of the two progenitor stars. The main sub-classes of novae are classical novae, recurrent novae (RNe), and dwarf novae. They are all considered to be cataclysmic variable stars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SN 1987A</span> 1987 supernova event in the constellation Dorado

SN 1987A was a type II supernova in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a dwarf satellite galaxy of the Milky Way. It occurred approximately 51.4 kiloparsecs from Earth and was the closest observed supernova since Kepler's Supernova in 1604. Light and neutrinos from the explosion reached Earth on February 23, 1987 and was designated "SN 1987A" as the first supernova discovered that year. Its brightness peaked in May of that year, with an apparent magnitude of about 3.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supernova remnant</span> Remnants of an exploded star

A supernova remnant (SNR) is the structure resulting from the explosion of a star in a supernova. The supernova remnant is bounded by an expanding shock wave, and consists of ejected material expanding from the explosion, and the interstellar material it sweeps up and shocks along the way.

Timeline of neutron stars, pulsars, supernovae, and white dwarfs

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crab Nebula</span> Supernova remnant in the constellation Taurus

The Crab Nebula is a supernova remnant and pulsar wind nebula in the constellation of Taurus. The common name comes from a drawing that somewhat resembled a crab with arms produced by William Parsons, 3rd Earl of Rosse, in 1842 or 1843 using a 36-inch (91 cm) telescope. The nebula was discovered by English astronomer John Bevis in 1731. It corresponds with a bright supernova recorded by Chinese astronomers in 1054 as a guest star. The nebula was the first astronomical object identified that corresponds with a historically-observed supernova explosion.

PSR B1257+12, previously designated PSR 1257+12, alternatively designated PSR J1300+1240, is a millisecond pulsar located 2,300 light-years from the Sun in the constellation of Virgo, rotating at about 161 times per second. It is also named Lich, after a powerful, fictional undead creature of the same name.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pulsar wind nebula</span> Nebula powered by the pulsar wind of a pulsar

A pulsar wind nebula, sometimes called a plerion, is a type of nebula sometimes found inside the shell of a supernova remnant (SNR), powered by winds generated by a central pulsar. These nebulae were proposed as a class in 1976 as enhancements at radio wavelengths inside supernova remnants. They have since been found to be infrared, optical, millimetre, X-ray and gamma ray sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">3C 58</span> Supernova remnant

3C 58 or 3C58 is a pulsar and supernova remnant within the Milky Way. The object is listed as No. 58 in the Third Cambridge Catalogue of Radio Sources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SN 1181</span> Supernova in the constellation Cassiopeia

First observed between August 4 and August 6, 1181, Chinese and Japanese astronomers recorded the supernova now known as SN 1181 in eight separate texts. One of only five supernovae in the Milky Way confidently identified in pre-telescopic records, it appeared in the constellation Cassiopeia and was visible and motionless against the fixed stars for 185 days. F. R. Stephenson first recognized that the 1181 AD "guest star" must be a supernova, because such a bright transient that lasts for 185 days and does not move in the sky can only be a galactic supernova.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IC 443</span> Supernova remnant in the constellation Gemini

IC 443 is a galactic supernova remnant (SNR) in the constellation Gemini. On the plane of the sky, it is located near the star Eta Geminorum. Its distance is roughly 5,000 light years from Earth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of supernova observation</span> Ancient and modern recorded observations of supernovae explosions

The known history of supernova observation goes back to 1006 AD. All earlier proposals for supernova observations are speculations with many alternatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RX J0852.0−4622</span> Relatively young and nearby supernova remnant

RX J0852.0−4622 is a supernova remnant. The remnant is located in the southern sky in the constellation Vela ("sail"), and sits inside the much larger and older Vela Supernova Remnant. For this reason, RX J0852.0−4622 is often referred to as Vela Junior. There have been a minority of suggestions that the remnant may be a spurious identification of a complicated substructure within the larger and better studied Vela SNR, but most studies accept that G266.2−1.2 is a SNR in its own right. Indeed, its detection in the high energy Teraelectronvolt range by the High Energy Stereoscopic System in 2005 is strong confirmation of such.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NGC 2060</span> Star cluster in the constellation Dorado

NGC 2060 is a star cluster within the Tarantula Nebula in the Large Magellanic Cloud, very close to the larger NGC 2070 cluster containing R136. It was discovered by John Herschel in 1836. It is a loose cluster approximately 10 million years old, within one of the Tarantula Nebula's superbubbles formed by the combined stellar winds of the cluster or by old supernovae.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PSR B1937+21</span> Pulsar in the constellation Vulpecula

PSR B1937+21 is a pulsar located in the constellation Vulpecula a few degrees in the sky away from the first discovered pulsar, PSR B1919+21. The name PSR B1937+21 is derived from the word "pulsar" and the declination and right ascension at which it is located, with the "B" indicating that the coordinates are for the 1950.0 epoch. PSR B1937+21 was discovered in 1982 by Don Backer, Shri Kulkarni, Carl Heiles, Michael Davis, and Miller Goss.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SN 393</span>

SN 393 is the modern designation for a probable supernova that was reported by the Chinese in the year 393 CE. An extracted record of this astronomical event was translated into English as follows:

A guest star appeared within the asterism Wěi during the second lunar month of the 18th year of the Tai-Yuan reign period, and disappeared during the ninth lunar month.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">PSR J0002+6216</span>

PSR J0002+6216, also dubbed the Cannonball Pulsar, is a pulsar discovered by the Einstein@Home project in 2017. It is one of the fastest moving pulsars known, and has moved 53 ly (5.0×1014 km; 3.1×1014 mi) away from the location of its formation supernova, where the remaining supernova nebula, CTB 1 (Abell 85), is. Due to its speed in traversing the interstellar medium, at 1,127 km/s (700 mi/s), it is leaving a 13 ly (1.2×1014 km; 7.6×1013 mi) long wake tail and is traveling fast enough to leave the Milky Way galaxy. The pulsar is currently 6,500 ly (6.1×1016 km; 3.8×1016 mi) away in the Cassiopeia constellation. The star rotates at a rate of 8.7 times a second. There is bow-shock pulsar wind nebula (PWN) associated with PSR J0002+6216.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">G54.1+0.3</span> Supernova remnant

SNR G054.1+00.3, also called G54.1+0.3, 2E 4258 and 2E 1928.3+1846 is a supernova remnant located in the constellation Sagittarius. It was identified as a supernova remnant in a study of the galactic plane in the radio continuum at wavelengths of 21 and 11 cm.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kesteven 75</span> Supernova remnant in the constellation Aquila

Kesteven 75, abbreviated as Kes 75 and also called SNR G029.7-00.3, G29.7-0.3 and 4C -03.70, is a supernova remnant located in the constellation Aquila.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">3C 392</span> Superovae remnant interacting with a molecular cloud

3C 392 is a supernova remnant located in the constellation Aquila. It was discovered by Gart Westerhout in 1958 as part of a study of continuous radiation in the Milky Way at a frequency of 1390 MHz.

References

  1. 1 2 Galactic SNRs: Detailed Listings
  2. 1 2 Clark, D. H.; Stephenson, F. R. (1976). "Which Historical New Stars were Supernovae?". Q. J. R. Astron. Soc. 17: 290. Bibcode:1976QJRAS..17..290C. The position of the star AD 386 corresponds very well with that of the SNR G11.2–0.3, and this leads us to make the tentative suggestion that this source is the remnant of the star.
  3. Zhentao Xu;, David W. Pankenier;, Yaotiao Jiang. (2000). East Asian Archaeoastronomy: Historical Records of Astronomical Observations of China, Japan, and Korea. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  4. Zhou, Ping; Vink, Jacco; Li, Geng; Domcek, Vladimír (1 September 2018). "G7.7-3.7: A Young Supernova Remnant Probably Associated with the Guest Star in 386 CE (SN 386)". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 865 (1): L6. arXiv: 1809.03535 . Bibcode:2018ApJ...865L...6Z. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aae07d . S2CID   119446399.
  5. 1 2 3 Hoffmann, Susanne M.; Vogt, Nikolaus (1 July 2020). "A search for the modern counterparts of the Far Eastern guest stars 369 CE, 386 CE and 393 CE". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 497 (2): 1419–1433. arXiv: 2007.01013 . Bibcode:2020MNRAS.497.1419H. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1970 .
  6. Strope, Richard J.; Schaefer, Bradley E.; Henden, Arne A. (1 July 2010). "Catalog of 93 Nova Light Curves: Classification and Properties". The Astronomical Journal. 140 (1): 34–62. arXiv: 1004.3698 . Bibcode:2010AJ....140...34S. doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/1/34 .
  7. Hoffmann, Susanne M.; Vogt, Nikolaus (1 May 2020). "Cataclysmic variables as possible counterparts of ancient Far Eastern guest stars". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 494 (4): 5775–5786. arXiv: 2005.03733 . Bibcode:2020MNRAS.494.5775H. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1162 .
  8. Hoffmann, Susanne M.; Vogt, Nikolaus (1 July 2020). "Counterparts of Far Eastern Guest Stars: Novae, supernovae, or something else?". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 496 (4): 4488–4506. arXiv: 2006.00977 . Bibcode:2020MNRAS.496.4488H. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1685 .
  9. "SNR G11.2-0.3". SIMBAD . Centre de données astronomiques de Strasbourg . Retrieved 23 May 2016.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Borkowski, K. J.; Reynolds, S. P.; Roberts, M.S.E. (2016). "G11.2-0.3: the young remnant of a stripped-envelope supernova". Astrophysical Journal. 819 (2): 160. arXiv: 1602.03531 . Bibcode:2016ApJ...819..160B. doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/819/2/160 . S2CID   118348504.
  11. Kaspi, V. M.; Roberts, M. E.; Vasisht, G.; Gotthelf, E. V.; Pivovaroff, M.; Kaawai, N. (10 October 2001). "Chandra X-Ray Observations of G11.2–0.3: Implications for Pulsar Ages". The Astrophysical Journal. 560 (1): 372. arXiv: astro-ph/0107292 . Bibcode:2001ApJ...560..371K. doi:10.1086/322515. S2CID   119361956. The supernova remnant SNR G11.2–0.3 has received considerable observational attention because of the possibility that it is associated with a 'guest star' witnessed by Chinese astronomers in the year A.D. 386 (Clark & Stephenson 1977).
  12. Roberts, Mallory (April 2002). G11.2-0.3 the Remnant of SN 386 AD: Is it too good to be true?. Albuquerque, New Mexico: American Physical Society/American Astronomical Society.
  13. NASA/CXC/Eureka Scientific/M.Roberts et al, A Textbook Supernova Remnant
  14. "SIMBAD Astronomical Database". Results for PSR J1811-1926. Retrieved 23 May 2016.