Salmon Letters

Last updated

In Britain, Salmon Letters are official letters sent out by a public inquiry to people that will be subject to criticism when that inquiry's report is released. The aim of the letter is to give the person a chance to prepare for the resultant exposure and possible legal recourse which may need to be taken when allegations against them become public. [1] The letters also serve to inform someone of the allegations they may have to answer to during the tribunal period of that inquiry which may, or may not, become something that is of interest to the public once the report is published.

Contents

The letters are so called after Cyril Salmon, Baron Salmon who first conceived of the idea in 1966 when chairing a report into how tribunals of inquiry were to be conducted. [2]

The letters are also known as Maxwellisations after Robert Maxwell, who complained after criticism of his dealings in a public report. [3] Similarly, other reports which have delved further into this process have led to the letters being named after that report, so they have also become known as Crampton Letters (Crampton v Secretary of State for Health 1993) and Scott Compliance (after the Scott Inquiry into the Matrix Churchill Affair (the ‘Arms to Iraq Inquiry’) published in 1996). [4]

In the initial stages of an inquiry, Salmon Letters are often sent out, and if further allegations are made, then more Salmon Letters will be dispatched. This is common to child abuse inquiries, such as the North Wales Child Abuse Inquiry which started in 1996. [5] In the Department for Education's guidelines on the matter (in relation to inquiries where under 18's are involved) the sample letter included, points out to alleged perpetrators that the resultant report has no connection to criminal or any other proceedings. [6]

Salmon Letters have been sent out in most major public inquiries since first being recommended by Baron Salmon in his report Royal Commission on Tribunals of Inquiry (1966). In some cases, particularly the Chilcot Inquiry (into the Iraq war (2003-2010)) it has been cited that the delay in those being criticized responding to allegations, has led (in part) to a delay in the final report. Other inquiries have been noted as demonstrating that adherence to the rules of Salmon Letters has been 'unhelpful' in obtaining clarity (the Scott Report, 1996). [2]

Whilst the 1966 report into the Tribunal Inquiry Process determined that the notification of an allegation was within the fairness of such an inquiry, the responsibility to send the letters out was not enshrined in the Inquiries Act of 2005. However, the Inquiries Rules Act of 2006 allowed, the chairperson of an inquiry to call to the attention that the inquiry will be critical of a person's conduct. This would normally be in the form of a warning letter. [7] The Inquiries Rules Act of 2006 goes further and stipulates that;
...The inquiry panel must not include any explicit or significant criticism of a person in the report, or in any interim report, unless
a. the chairman has sent that person a warning letter; and
b. the person has been given a reasonable opportunity to respond to the warning letter. [8]

Selected inquiries

The table contains a selection of recent public inquiries that employed Salmon Letters as part of that inquiry. The GMC received a letter warning of potential criticism. [9]

NameSubjectDate deliveredNotes
Shipman Inquiry Fourth Report Dr. Harold Shipman 2004Salmon Letters sent out with extra letters being dispatched if further allegations came to light.
Stockwell 2 Death of Jean Charles de Menezes July 2007 [10] The IPCC also sent out letters to whom they did not directly allege against, but also to those who witnesses alleged against. [11]
Haddon-Cave Report 2006 XV230 Nimrod Crash October 2009Salmon principles adhered to and two RAF Officers were sent letters. [12]
Chilcot InquiryThe report of the Iraq Inquiry [13] July 2016The report was beset by delays being authorized in 2009, but not being delivered until 2016 (despite its last witness being interviewed in 2011). Salmon Letters were again blamed (in the press) for adding to the delay as those being criticized objected. [14]

Related Research Articles

<i>September Dossier</i> British government document about Iraq

Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction: The Assessment of the British Government, also known as the September Dossier, was a document published by the British government on 24 September 2002. Parliament was recalled on the same day to discuss the contents of the document. The paper was part of an ongoing investigation by the government into weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, which ultimately led to the invasion of Iraq six months later. It contained a number of allegations according to which Iraq also possessed WMD, including chemical weapons and biological weapons. The dossier even alleged that Iraq had reconstituted its nuclear weapons programme.

The Hutton Inquiry was a 2003 judicial inquiry in the UK chaired by Lord Hutton, who was appointed by the Labour government to investigate the controversial circumstances surrounding the death of David Kelly, a biological warfare expert and former UN weapons inspector in Iraq.

A public inquiry, also known as a tribunal of inquiry, government inquiry, or simply inquiry, is an official review of events or actions ordered by a government body. In many common law countries, such as the United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia and Canada, such an inquiry differs from a royal commission in that a public inquiry accepts evidence and conducts its hearings in a more public forum and focuses on a more specific occurrence. Interested members of the public and organisations may make (written) evidential submissions, as is the case with most inquiries, and also listen to oral evidence given by other parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Dearlove</span> Former head of MI6; Chair of the Board of Trustees at the University of London

Sir Richard Billing Dearlove is a retired British intelligence officer who was head of the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), a role known informally as "C", from 1999 until 6 May 2004. He was head of MI6 during the invasion of Iraq. He was criticised by the Iraq Inquiry for providing unverified intelligence about weapons of mass destruction to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair.

Various individuals, courts and the media around the world have raised concerns about the manner in which cases of child sexual abuse are handled when they occur in congregations of Jehovah's Witnesses. An independent 2009 study in Norway was critical of how Jehovah's Witnesses dealt with cases of child sexual abuse but stated there is no indication that the rate of sexual abuse among Jehovah's Witnesses is higher than found in general society. The organization's stated position is that it abhors child sexual abuse, and that "the incidence of this crime among Jehovah's Witnesses is rare."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phil Jones (climatologist)</span> Climatologist

Philip Douglas Jones is a former director of the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and a professor in the School of Environmental Sciences at the University of East Anglia (UEA) from 1998, having begun his career at the unit in 1976. He retired from these positions at the end of 2016, and was replaced as CRU director by Tim Osborn. Jones then took up a position as a Professorial Fellow at the UEA from January 2017.

Jawad Jabber Sadkhan is a citizen of Iraq who was held in extrajudicial detention in the United States Guantanamo Bay detainment camps, in Cuba. Sadkhan's Guantanamo Internment Serial Number was 433.

Baha Mousa was an Iraqi man who died while in British Army custody in Basra, Iraq in September 2003. The inquiry into his death found that Mousa's death was caused by "factors including lack of food and water, heat, exhaustion, fear, previous injuries and the hooding and stress positions used by British troops - and a final struggle with his guards". The inquiry heard that Mousa was hooded for almost 24 hours during his 36 hours of custody by the 1st Battalion of the Queen's Lancashire Regiment and that he suffered at least 93 injuries before his death. The report later details that Mousa was subject to several practices banned under both domestic law and the Geneva Conventions. Seven British soldiers were charged in connection with the case. Six were found not guilty. Corporal Donald Payne pleaded guilty to inhumane treatment of a prisoner and was jailed for a year and dismissed from the Army. On 19 September 2006 with his guilty plea to inhumane treatment of Mousa, Payne became the first British soldier to admit to a war crime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legality of the Iraq War</span>

Political leaders of the US and UK who led the arguments which resulted in the invasion of Iraq have claimed that the war was legal. However, legal experts, including the chairman of the Iraq Inquiry, John Chilcot, who led an investigation with hearings from 24 November 2009 to 2 February 2011, concluded that the process of identifying the legal basis for the invasion of Iraq was unsatisfactory and that the actions of the US and the UK have undermined the authority of the United Nations.

The sexual abuse in the Roman Catholic Diocese of Cloyne was investigated by the Commission of Investigation, Dublin Archdiocese, Catholic Diocese of Cloyne, examining how allegations of sexual abuse of children in the diocese were dealt with by the church and state. The investigation, which resulted in the publication of the Cloyne Report in July 2011, was led by Judge Yvonne Murphy. The inquiry was ordered to look at child protection practices in the diocese and how it dealt with complaints against 19 priests made from 1996.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iraq Inquiry</span> 2009 British public inquiry into the Iraq War

The Iraq Inquiry was a British public inquiry into the nation's role in the Iraq War. The inquiry was announced in 2009 by Prime Minister Gordon Brown and published in 2016 with a public statement by Chilcot.

The Review of Intelligence on Weapons of Mass Destruction, widely known as the Butler Review after its chairman Robin Butler, Baron Butler of Brockwell, was announced on 3 February 2004 by the British Government and published on 14 July 2004. It examined the intelligence on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction which played a key part in the Government's decision to invade Iraq in 2003. A similar Iraq Intelligence Commission was set up in the United States. Despite the apparent certainty of both governments prior to the war that Iraq possessed such weapons, no such illegal weapons or programs were found by the Iraq Survey Group.

The Tribunal of Inquiry into the Beef Processing Industry, also known as the Beef Tribunal, was established on 31 May 1991, chaired by Mr. Justice Liam Hamilton. It was set up to inquire into malpractice in the Irish beef processing industry, mainly centred on Goodman International, owned and controlled by Larry Goodman. It also examined accusations of special dispensations given by the then Minister for Industry and Commerce, Albert Reynolds, to Goodman.

Brian Francis Gill Jones was a UK metallurgist who worked as an intelligence analyst, was skeptical of claims of Iraqi WMD and gave evidence concerning the justification for the Iraq war.

The Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT) is a unit set up by the British government in March 2010 to investigate allegations of abuse and torture by British soldiers in Iraq. Much of these have focused on three interrogation sites near Basra operated by the Joint Forward Interrogation Team (JFIT) between March 2003 and December 2008. The inquiry was established in November 2010 after 146 Iraqi men said they had been tortured.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Northern Ireland Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry</span> Legal inquiry

The 2014–2016 Northern Ireland Historical Institutional Abuse Inquiry, often referred to as the HIA Inquiry, is the largest inquiry into historical institutional sexual and physical abuse of children in UK legal history. Its remit covers institutions in Northern Ireland that provided residential care for children from 1922 to 1995, but excludes most church-run schools.

The Edinburgh Tram inquiry was a public inquiry, chaired by Lord Hardie, that was held in Edinburgh to establish why the Edinburgh Trams project incurred delays, cost more than originally budgeted and delivered significantly less than was projected. Its report, which was published in August 2023, put much of the blame for the delays and cost overruns on Edinburgh Council and on various arms-length companies employed by the council, singling out Transport Initiatives Edinburgh for particular criticism.

Philip Joseph Shiner is a British former human rights solicitor. He was struck off the roll of solicitors in England and Wales in 2017 over misconduct relating to false abuse claims against British troops. He was Head of Strategic Litigation at Public Interest Lawyers (International) from 2014 until the firm's closure on 31 August 2016. He had previously been Principal at Public Interest Lawyers Ltd from 1999 to 2014.

References

  1. ↑ "ALLEGATIONS MADE - SALMON LETTERS". National Archives. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  2. 1 2 "APPLICATION OF RULE 13 OF THE INQUIRY RULES 2006" (PDF). National Archives. Paragraph 9. p. 3. Archived from the original on 22 January 2014. Retrieved 23 September 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) CS1 maint: location (link)
  3. ↑ Leftly, Mark (19 July 2014). "Chilcot inquiry: Blair and Straw to get warning letters ahead of publication of report into 2003 invasion of Iraq". The Independent. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  4. ↑ "Training Materials and LSCB Commissioning Materials" (PDF). uea.ac.uk. Department for Education. 24 February 2014. p. 13. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  5. ↑ Corby, Brian; Doig, Alan; Roberts, Vicki (2001). "7; North Wales Tribunal of Inquiry - Issues of Process". Public Inquiries into Residential Abuse of Children. London: Jessica Kingsley. pp.  130–135. ISBN   978-1-85302-895-3.
  6. ↑ "Training Materials and LSCB Commissioning Materials" (PDF). uea.ac.uk. Department for Education. 24 February 2014. p. 20. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  7. ↑ Blom-Cooper, Louis. "10: On fairness". In Shetreet, Shimon (ed.). The Culture of Judicial Independence. Boston: Brill Nijhoff. pp. 147–148. ISBN   978-90-04-25780-1.
  8. ↑ "APPLICATION OF RULE 13 OF THE INQUIRY RULES 2006" (PDF). National Archives. Paragraph 4. p. 5. Archived from the original on 22 January 2014. Retrieved 23 September 2016.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) CS1 maint: location (link)
  9. ↑ White, Tony (2010). "Acts, Circulars, Reports and Inquiries". A guide to the NHS. Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing. p. 205. ISBN   978-1-138-03123-4.
  10. ↑ "An investigation into complaints about the" (PDF). National Archives. IPCC. July 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 September 2010. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  11. ↑ Dodd, Vikram (18 January 2007). "Met chiefs warned over De Menezes investigation". The Guardian. Retrieved 23 September 2016.
  12. ↑ Haddon-Cave, Charles (28 October 2009). "An independent review into the broader issues surrounding the loss of the RAF Nimrod MR2 Aircraft XV230 in Afghanistan in 2006" (PDF). .Gov. p. 5. Retrieved 24 September 2016.
  13. ↑ "Iraq Inquiry - The Report". Iraq Inquiry. .gov. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
  14. ↑ Wintour, Patrick; Perraudin, Francis; Watt, Nicholas (21 January 2015). "Chilcot confirms delay to publication of Iraq war report". The Guardian. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.