Section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867

Last updated

Proclamation bringing the Constitution Act into force, July 1, 1867 Proclamation Canadian Confederation.jpg
Proclamation bringing the Constitution Act into force, July 1, 1867

Section 101 of the Constitution Act, 1867 (French : article 101 de la Loi constitutionnelle de 1867) is a provision of the Constitution of Canada giving the federal Parliament the power to create the Supreme Court of Canada and the federal courts. Although Parliament created the Supreme Court by an ordinary federal statute in 1875, the Court is partially entrenched by the amending formula set out in the Constitution Act, 1982. The composition of the Court can only be changed by a unanimous constitutional amendment, passed by the two houses of Parliament, and all of the provincial legislative assemblies.

Contents

The Constitution Act, 1867 is the constitutional statute which established Canada. Originally named the British North America Act, 1867 , the Act continues to be the foundational statute for the Constitution of Canada, although it has been amended many times since 1867. It is now recognised as part of the supreme law of Canada.

Constitution Act, 1867

The Constitution Act, 1867 is part of the Constitution of Canada and thus part of the supreme law of Canada. [1] It was the product of extensive negotiations by the governments of the British North American provinces in the 1860s. [2] [3] The Act sets out the constitutional framework of Canada, including the structure of the federal government and the powers of the federal government and the provinces. Originally enacted in 1867 by the British Parliament under the name the British North America Act, 1867, [4] in 1982 the Act was brought under full Canadian control through the Patriation of the Constitution, and was renamed the Constitution Act, 1867 . [5] Since Patriation the Act can only be amended in Canada, under the amending formula set out in the Constitution Act, 1982 . [6]

Text of section 101

Section 101 reads:

General Court of Appeal, &c.
101. The Parliament of Canada may, notwithstanding anything in this Act, from Time to Time provide for the Constitution, Maintenance, and Organization of a General Court of Appeal for Canada, and for the Establishment of any additional Courts for the better Administration of the Laws of Canada. [7]

Section 101 is found in Part VII of the Constitution Act, 1867, dealing with the judicature. Section 101 has not been amended since the Act was enacted in 1867, but its scope was expanded by the passage of the Statute of Westminster 1931 .

Purpose and interpretation

Supreme Court of Canada

The Constitution Act, 1867 did not establish the Supreme Court of Canada. Instead, s. 101 gave the federal Parliament the power to establish a "general court of appeal" for Canada. After Confederation, there was extensive discussion of the proposed court of appeal, with three different bills being considered in the early 1870s. One of the major issues was how broad the scope of appeal would be. Should it be limited to matters of federal and constitutional law, or also allow appeals in matters of provincial law? This was a point of some concern to Members of Parliament from Quebec, who were worried that issues arising under Quebec's civil law would be determined by judges trained in the common law. [8] Eventually, in 1875 Parliament enacted The Supreme and Exchequer Courts Act. The Act created the Supreme Court as an appellate court with general appellate jurisdiction, which included matters of provincial law. [9] : ss. 15, 17 

The Supreme Court was not, however, the final court of appeal for Canada. Under British imperial law, a British subject had a right to appeal from colonial courts to the Crown in Britain. Those appeals were heard by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was effectively the highest court of appeal for the British Empire. Appeals therefore lay from the Supreme Court to the Judicial Committee. It was also possible for litigants to appeal directly from the provincial appellate courts to the Judicial Committee, bypassing the Supreme Court entirely. [10] : 327–330  The decisions of the Judicial Committee bound the Supreme Court, as a matter of stare decisis and judicial precedent. [8] A subsequent attempt by the federal Parliament to restrict appeals to the Judicial Committee, at least in criminal matters, was struck down by the Judicial Committee. [11] It was not until the passage of the Statute of Westminster 1931 that Parliament gained the power to limit appeals to the Judicial Committee, which it exercised by passing a statute in 1949 which ended appeals to the Judicial Committee. [12] [13]

The Supreme Court now is the general court of appeal for Canada, and is a court for the better administration of the laws of Canada. [14] : s. 3  It has general appellate jurisdiction over all questions of law, civil and criminal, and federal and provincial law. [14] : ss. 35–40  and its decisions are final and conclusive. [14] : s. 52  The Supreme Court Act is the major act governing appeals to the Supreme Court, but there are also appellate rights under other federal statutes, notably the Criminal Code. [15] : ss. 691–696 

Federal courts

The federal Parliament has created a number of courts "for the better administration of the laws of Canada". The first such court was the Exchequer Court, created in 1875, which had exclusive jurisdiction over all cases involving federal revenue and taxes, and concurrent jurisdiction with the provincial superior courts for civil actions against the federal government. Appeals lay from the Exchequer Court either to the Supreme Court, or to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. [9] : ss. 58, 59 

In 1971, the federal Parliament abolished the Exchequer Court and created a new Federal Court with two divisions, the Federal Court – Trial Division and the Federal Court of Appeal. The new Court had a much expanded jurisdiction, including judicial review of federal administrative agencies, exclusive jurisdiction over civil suits against the federal government, and civil actions under matters of exclusive federal jurisdiction, such as patents, trademarks and copyrights, and admiralty matters. An appeal lay from the Trial Division to the Federal Court of Appeal, with an appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada. [16]

In 2003, Parliament enacted amendments to split the two divisions of the Federal Court into two separate courts: the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal. [17]

In addition to the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal, Parliament has also created two specialised courts, the Tax Court of Canada and the Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada.

Adjudication of constitutional issues

Although section 101 gives Parliament the power to establish federal courts to administer federal law, Parliament cannot give the federal courts exclusive jurisdiction to determine constitutional issues that arise in cases under federal law. Section 96 of the Act assigns jurisdiction over constitutional matters to the provincial superior courts, and Parliament cannot reduce that core constitutional jurisdiction of those courts. Parliament can give federal courts the power to determine constitutional issues, but that grant of jurisdiction cannot eliminate the constitutional jurisdiction of the provincial superior courts. [18]

Section 41 of the Constitution Act, 1982

The Constitution Act, 1982 contains the amending formula for all amendments to the Constitution of Canada. One provision of the amending formula relates to the Supreme Court. Section 41 of the 1982 Act sets out a number of constitutional provisions which can only be changed by unanimous consent of the Senate, the House of Commons, and all ten provincial legislative assemblies. One of items listed is "the composition of the Supreme Court of Canada". [19] In Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 , the Supreme Court has held that this provision of the amending formula limits the ability of Parliament to change the qualifications for judges of the Supreme Court, which can only be done by a constitutional amendment.

Preamble to the Constitution Act, 1867

The Preamble to the Constitution Act, 1867 provides that Canada is to have a constitution "similar in principle to that of the United Kingdom". The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that this phrase means that judicial independence, which is a basic principle of the British constitution, is also an unwritten constitutional principle in Canada. As a result, the federal government is constitutionally required to have an independent commission to review proposals for judicial compensation, including for the judges of the Supreme Court and the federal courts. [20]

Section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867

Section 96 of the Act provides that the Governor General has the power to appoint judges of the provincial superior, district and county courts. Although in form an appointing power, section 96 has been interpreted as a guarantee of jurisdiction for the provincial superior courts, particularly in constitutional matters. [18]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constitution of Canada</span> Principles, institutions and law of political governance in Canada

The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law in Canada. It outlines Canada's system of government and the civil and human rights of those who are citizens of Canada and non-citizens in Canada. Its contents are an amalgamation of various codified acts, treaties between the Crown and Indigenous Peoples, uncodified traditions and conventions. Canada is one of the oldest constitutional monarchies in the world.

Canadian federalism involves the current nature and historical development of the federal system in Canada.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of Canada</span>

The legal system of Canada is pluralist: its foundations lie in the English common law system, the French civil law system, and Indigenous law systems developed by the various Indigenous Nations.

In common law systems, a superior court is a court of general jurisdiction over civil and criminal legal cases. A superior court is "superior" in relation to a court with limited jurisdiction, which is restricted to civil cases involving monetary amounts with a specific limit, or criminal cases involving offenses of a less serious nature. A superior court may hear appeals from lower courts. For courts of general jurisdiction in civil law system, see ordinary court.

<i>Constitution Act, 1867</i> Primary constitutional document of Canada

The Constitution Act, 1867, originally enacted as the British North America Act, 1867, is a major part of the Constitution of Canada. The act created a federal dominion and defines much of the operation of the Government of Canada, including its federal structure, the House of Commons, the Senate, the justice system, and the taxation system. In 1982, with the patriation of the Constitution, the British North America Acts which were originally enacted by the British Parliament, including this Act, were renamed. Although, the acts are still known by their original names in records of the United Kingdom. Amendments were also made at this time: section 92A was added, giving provinces greater control over non-renewable natural resources.

The Federal Court of Canada, which succeeded the Exchequer Court of Canada in 1971, was a national court of Canada that had limited jurisdiction to hear certain types of disputes arising under the federal government's legislative jurisdiction. Originally composed of two divisions, the Appellate Division and the Trial Division, in 2003 the Court was split into two separate Courts, the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal. The jurisdiction and powers of the two courts remained largely unchanged from the predecessor divisions.

The court system of Canada forms the country's judiciary, formally known as "The King on the Bench", which interprets the law and is made up of many courts differing in levels of legal superiority and separated by jurisdiction. Some of the courts are federal in nature, while others are provincial or territorial.

In Canadian law, a reference question or reference case is a submission by the federal or a provincial government to the courts asking for an advisory opinion on a major legal issue. Typically the question concerns the constitutionality of legislation.

<i>Supreme Court Act</i>

The Supreme Court Act is an Act passed by the Parliament of Canada which established the Supreme Court of Canada. It was originally passed in 1875 as the Supreme and Exchequer Courts Act. However, at the time, the Supreme Court was not the supreme authority on Canadian law, as Supreme Court cases could still be appealed to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

Before 1982, modifying the Constitution of Canada primarily meant amending the British North America Act, 1867. Unlike most other constitutions, however, the Act had no amending formula; instead, changes were enacted through Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom called the British North America Acts.

<i>Russell v R</i> Canadian constitutional law case – 1882

Russell v R is a Canadian constitutional law decision dealing with the power of the federal Parliament. The case was decided by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, at that time the highest court in the British Empire, including Canada. The Judicial Committee held that the Canada Temperance Act was valid federal legislation under the peace, order and good government power, set out in section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The case expanded upon the jurisprudence that was previously discussed in Citizen's Insurance Co. v. Parsons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme court</span> Highest court in a jurisdiction

In most legal jurisdictions, a supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.

<i>LUnion St Jacques de Montreal v Bélisle</i> Canadian constitutional law case - 1874

L'Union St. Jacques de Montreal v Bélisle is a Canadian constitutional law decision by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. The issue was whether a provincial statute which altered the contractual liabilities of a benevolent organization, reducing its financial obligations to two widows, was within the constitutional authority of the province of Quebec under the British North America Act, 1867.

<i>Dow v Black</i> Canadian constitutional law case – 1875

Dow v Black is a Canadian constitutional law decision. It was one of the first major cases examining in detail the division of powers between the federal Parliament and the provincial Legislatures, set out in the Constitution Act, 1867. The issue was whether a provincial statute which authorised the municipality of St. Stephen, New Brunswick to issue a debenture to fund a railway connecting to the United States was within provincial jurisdiction as a local tax matter, or whether it intruded on federal jurisdiction over inter-provincial and international railways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision in the Constitution of Canada that sets out the legislative powers of the federal Parliament. The federal powers in section 91 are balanced by the list of provincial legislative powers set out in section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The dynamic tension between these two sets of legislative authority is generally known as the "division of powers". The interplay between the two lists of powers have been the source of much constitutional litigation since the Confederation of Canada in 1867.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision in the Constitution of Canada that sets out the legislative powers of the legislatures of the provinces of Canada. The provincial powers in section 92 are balanced by the list of federal legislative powers set out in section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867. The dynamic tension between these two sets of legislative authority is generally known as the "division of powers". The interplay between the two lists of powers have been the source of much constitutional litigation since Confederation of Canada in 1867.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 96 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada relating to the appointment of judges of the provincial superior, district and county courts. It provides that the judges of those courts are appointed by the Governor General of Canada. By constitutional convention, the Governor General exercises that power on the advice of the federal Cabinet

<i>Valin v Langlois</i> Canadian constitutional law decision – 1879

Valin v Langlois is a Canadian constitutional law decision from the Supreme Court of Canada, concerning the jurisdiction of the federal Parliament over federal elections, as well as the constitutional jurisdiction of the provincial superior courts. The Court held that the Parliament of Canada has sole jurisdiction to enact laws regulating federal elections, including provisions for controverted elections. The Court also held that the provincial superior courts have general jurisdiction over questions of federal and provincial law, and that Parliament could give provincial courts jurisdiction to apply federal laws.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Section 94 of the Constitution Act, 1867</span> Provision of the Constitution of Canada

Section 94 of the Constitution Act, 1867 is a provision of the Constitution of Canada allowing the federal Parliament to implement uniform laws relating to property and civil rights, and procedure in the civil courts, in three of the original provinces: New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Ontario. The power under section 94 cannot be used without the consent of those provinces, as those subject matters are normally within exclusive provincial jurisdiction. The power has never been used.

References

  1. ↑ Constitution Act, 1982, s. 52(1).
  2. ↑ Donald Creighton, The Road to Confederation (Toronto: Macmillan Publishing, 1864; revised ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.)
  3. ↑ Christopher Moore, 1867 — How the Fathers Made a Deal (Toronto: McClelland & Stewart, 1997).
  4. ↑ British North America Act, 1867, 30 & 31 Victoria, c. 3 (UK).
  5. ↑ Constitution Act, 1982, s. 52, s. 53, and Schedule, Item 1.
  6. ↑ Constitution Act, 1982, Part V.
  7. ↑ Constitution Act, 1867, s. 101.
  8. 1 2 James G. Snell and Frederick Vaughan, The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution (Toronto: Osgoode Society, 1985).
  9. 1 2 The Supreme and Exchequer Courts Act , SC 1875, c. 11.
  10. ↑ W.H. McConnell, Commentary on the British North America Act (Toronto: MacMillan of Canada, 1977).
  11. ↑ Nadan v The King, [1926] AC 482, [1926] UKPC 13 (PC).
  12. ↑ Attorney-General of Ontario v. Attorney-General of Canada, [1947] AC 127, [1947] UKPC 1 (PC).
  13. ↑ An Act to amend the Supreme Court Act , SC 1949 (2nd session), c. 37, s. 3
  14. 1 2 3 Supreme Court Act , RSC 1985, c. S-26.
  15. ↑ Criminal Code , RSC 1985, c. C-46.
  16. ↑ Federal Court Act, RSC 1970, c. 10 (2nd Supp.), s. 4; Federal Court Act, RSC 1985, c. F-7, s. 4.
  17. ↑ Federal Courts Act , RSC 1985, c. F-7.
  18. 1 2 Attorney General of Canada v Law Society of British Columbia, [1982] 2 SCR 307, pp. 327–328.
  19. ↑ Constitution Act, 1982, s. 41(d).
  20. ↑ Reference re Remuneration of Judges of the Provincial Court of Prince Edward Island, [1997] 3 SCR 3.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.