Section 329 of the Canada Elections Act

Last updated

Section 329 of the Canada Elections Act was designed to prevent the transmission of any election results until polls were closed nationwide. Section 329 stated that:

Contents

"No person shall transmit the result or purported result of the vote in an electoral district to the public in another electoral district before the close of all of the polling stations in that other electoral district." [1]

But on January 13, 2012, the Canadian government said it planned to repeal Section 329 of the Canada Elections Act [2] due to technological changes and the inability to enforce it. It was just another step in the changing dynamic of journalism, technology, and the democratic process.

Section 329 was repealed on June 19, 2014 as part of the Fair Elections Act. [3]

History

The idea of an election in which no one knew the results until voting was over was not present in the 19th century. In 1855, in every province but New Brunswick, voters cast their ballots orally. [4] This led to a system where information on who voted for who could be used for nefarious reasons. Intimidation and blackmail to force people to vote in a certain way. [4]

But another election practice in this time period would not work in later times. This was the practice of holding elections on different dates in different ridings. [4] In this system, knowing or guessing the results of one riding impacted the way the political parties and people acted in the others.

"The system allowed the party in power to hold elections in a safe riding first, hoping in this way to influence the vote in constituencies less favourable to them. The system even enabled a candidate who lost in one riding to run again in another." [4] In some cases this was drawn out to extremes: the 1872 election was stretched out more than two months by the Conservatives. [4]

There was no real effect to the democratic process because of these long, drawn out elections because communication between ridings and provinces was very slow. [5] It wasn't until the railroad and the telegraph that technology could interfere. In 1938, a ban was put in place to stop the transmission of results from one area to another before polls were closed. [6]

At the end of the 20th century the ban started to feel obsolete in the face of technology, but bigger issues came to the surface. Proponents of the ban stated the need to make sure each poll had the same information when they are voting. Opponents of the ban stated freedom of speech as a right that the ban infringed upon.

The ban's main purpose was to compensate for the time gap between Eastern and Western Canada. [2] Before 1996, there was a four-hour difference between closing polls in St. John's and Vancouver. [2] But in 1996 the government imposed another policy to help this gap. They introduced staggered voting hours. "Under staggered voting hours, only results from less than ten percent of ridings could be available to late voters since the majority of polls across Canada open and close at the same time. Despite this, the prohibition on the transmission of election results remains in place." [2]

In theory, staggered voting hours has helped the problem of information from other ridings getting out, due to most of the country voting around the same time. "10 per cent of the country finishes voting with 2.5 hours remaining in B.C., and 88 per cent of votes are in with only 30 minutes left in B.C. voting. Then the votes have to be counted." [7]

Dave Teixera suggests that "there is no way to mobilize the numbers required to "strategically" vote (meaning vote in a way you may not traditionally vote in order to topple the sitting government) based on Eastern results with 30 minutes remaining in B.C. voting...sharing the known voting results via social media will have zero motivating effect on voters in B.C. There is simply no time, nor any desire to change one's vote due to the outcome in another part of the country." [7]

Controversy

Most of the dissent regarding the ban comes from Western Canada. That is where the biggest challenge to Section 329 occurred during the 2000 federal election. [8]

British Columbia resident Paul Bryan posted election results in Atlantic Canada before the polls closed in B.C. [8] He posted the results on his website to deliberately protest against Section 329. [8] The fine for breaking Section 329 was determined to be $25,000 or less. [9]

According to Bryan, modern communications made the ban obsolete. [8] When the British Columbia provincial court charged him, Bryan argued that his actions were protected in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. [9] Bryan cited two sections of the charter in his defense. Bryan said the charter guaranteed him free expression and free political association and that allowed him to circumvent Section 329. [8]

During the legal proceedings, Bryan had cross-country support. He had the support of the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, the National Citizens Coalition, and the CBC. [8] Bryan even had the support of Stephen Harper. [8]

But the B.C provincial court did not agree with Bryan. He was convicted and fined $1,000. [8] In 2003, the British Columbia Supreme Court overturned the ruling. [8] This effectively made Section 329 moot in British Columbia. This had a major impact on the 2004 Federal election in B.C. It allowed the media to inform B.C voters results of the election in Eastern Canada before polls closed in British Columbia. There was no great difference between this election and past ones in terms of the fears of the proponents of Section 329.

Once again in 2005, the B.C court of Appeal reversed the provincial's court decision, citing the need of fairness and ensuring all voters receive equality on election day. [8]

After the British Columbia court of appeal, Bryan took his case to the Supreme Court of Canada. It was there that the short term fate of Section 329 was decided. On March 15, 2007, the Supreme Court upheld the ban by a vote of 5-4. [8] The key to the Supreme court's decision was what they called, "informational equality for all voters." [9] In the Supreme Court's view, Section 329 "contributes in a positive way to the fairness and reputation of the electoral system." [9]

Tweet the Results

The largest mass scale protest to Section 329 came in the 2011 federal election. In this election many people took to Twitter to disobey the law. Twitter users used proxy names for parties (from fruit and soft drinks) and created fake accounts to get away with sharing the illegal information. [10]

One Twitter account in particular was key. The account, Tweettheresults, has been for some time a proponent of changing Section 329. They went offline during the 2011 election, to avoid fines or legal battles. [11] But they encouraged others to use the #tweettheresults hashtag to share the information. [12]

Other Twitter users were content with using the occasion for humour. One account sent out the following tweet, full with self-imposed censorship: "Conservatives ███ █████ in ███ ridings," the tweet said. "Liberals ███ █████. NDP █████ ██ ███ ███ seats!" [12]

During election night, the #tweettheresults hashtags topped Twitter's list of trending topics. [12]

Repeal

On January 13, 2012 the federal government announced it "would end the ban on posting early election results before polls closed across the country." [6]

The plans were announced on Twitter by Tim Uppal, minister for democratic reform. [6] At a later press conference, Uppal said, "This ban, which was enacted in 1938, is out of place and unenforceable." [6]

Elections Canada found the ban impossible to enforce because of social media and the internet. They gave up "monitoring premature release of data." [6] The plan is not just supported by the Conservatives, "Repealing the ban is consistent with recommendations by the Chief Electoral Officer, who highlighted the difficulties associated with enforcing the ban in his report following the 41st general election." [2]

Journalism

There were cases of news outlets breaking Section 329. Due to a feed switching error at the network's master control on the night of the 2011 election, CBC Television's live broadcast to the Atlantic Provinces, where the polls had already closed, began broadcasting to the rest of the country in lieu of the prerecorded lead-in special that was supposed to air at that time. [13] After about ten minutes, the broadcast was taken off the air. [13] In its place was a "Sorry, we're experiencing technical difficulties" message. [13] Once the polls closed in each region, CBC continued their coverage normally.

After the incident Election Canada said they would enforce Section 329 based on complaints. [13] CBC was never charged with breaking Section 329.

Related Research Articles

BC United (BCU), formerly known as the British Columbia Liberal Party, is a provincial political party in British Columbia, Canada. The party has been described as conservative, neoliberal, and being on the centre-right of the left–right political spectrum. The party commonly describes itself as a "free enterprise coalition" and draws support from members of both the federal Liberal and Conservative parties. Since the 1990s, BC United has been the main centre-right opposition to the centre-left New Democratic Party (NDP). Once affiliated with the Liberal Party of Canada, the British Columbia Liberal Party became independent in 1987. The party changed its name to BC United on April 12, 2023.

The Green Party of British Columbia, or simply the BC Greens, is a provincial political party in British Columbia, Canada. It was founded in 1983 and is based in Victoria. The party won its first seat in the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia in the 2013 provincial election.

<i>Canada Elections Act</i>

The Canada Elections Act is an Act of the Parliament of Canada which regulates the election of members of parliament to the House of Commons of Canada. The Act has been amended many times over Canada's history.

Canada holds elections for legislatures or governments in several jurisdictions: for the federal (national) government, provincial and territorial governments, and municipal governments. Elections are also held for self-governing First Nations and for many other public and private organizations including corporations and trade unions. Municipal elections can also be held for both upper-tier and lower-tier governments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2005 British Columbia general election</span>

The 2005 British Columbia general election was held on May 17, 2005, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) of the Province of British Columbia (BC), Canada. The British Columbia Liberal Party formed the government of the province prior to this general election under the leadership of Premier Gordon Campbell. The main opposition was the British Columbia New Democratic Party, whose electoral representation was reduced to two MLAs in the previous provincial election in 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Don Valley East</span> Federal electoral district in Ontario, Canada

Don Valley East is a federal electoral district in Ontario, Canada that covers the northeast section of the North York part of Toronto. The federal riding was created in 1976 from parts of Willowdale, York East, York North, and York—Scarborough ridings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The Sex Party</span> Political party in Canada

The Sex Party was a political party based in British Columbia, Canada. The party was guided by the philosophy of the sex-positive movement. Among other points, the party advocated for reform of sex education in schools so that sexual issues are taught more gradually over time and included a more comprehensive coverage of them. They advocated for the repeal of laws that promote antisexualism, such as prostitution laws and censorship. They also supported making Valentine's Day a statutory holiday and renaming Victoria Day to Eros Day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vancouver-Point Grey</span> Provincial electoral district in British Columbia, Canada

Vancouver-Point Grey is a provincial electoral district for the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia, Canada. It was first contested in the general election of 1933. It was created out of parts of Richmond-Point Grey, South Vancouver and Vancouver City. The riding began as a three-member seat, and was reduced to a two-member seat in 1966 when Vancouver-Little Mountain was created. In the redistribution preceding the 1991 election, it was reduced to a one-member riding along with the other older urban ridings, as several new one-member ridings were created.

BC-STV is the proposed voting system recommended by the Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform in October 2004 for use in British Columbia, and belongs to the single transferable vote family of voting systems. BC-STV was supported by a majority of the voters in a referendum held in 2005 but the government had legislated that it would not be bound by any vote lower than 60 percent in favour. Because of the strong majority support for BC-STV, the government elected to stage a second referendum in 2009, but with increased public funding for information campaigns to better inform the electorate about the differences between the existing and proposed systems. The leadership of both the "yes" side and the "no" side were assigned by the government. The proposal was rejected with 60.9 percent voting against, vs. 39.1 percent in favour, in the 2009 vote.

<i>Sauvé v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

Sauvé v Canada , [2002] 3 SCR 519 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision where the Court held that prisoners have a right to vote under section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court overturned the prior decision of the Federal Court of Appeal and held that section 51(e) of the old Canada Elections Act, which prohibited prisoners serving a sentence of over two years from voting, was unconstitutional. Section 51(e) had been repealed before the date of the Court's judgment, but the decision applied equally to section 4(c) of the new statute, which was substantially the same. The Court ruled that the provision violated section 3 of the Charter and was not a reasonable limit under section 1.

<i>R v Bryan</i> Supreme Court of Canada case

R v Bryan 2007 SCC 12 is a decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on freedom of expression and Canadian federal elections. The Court upheld a law that prevented the publicizing of election results from some ridings before the polls closed in others.

Election silence, blackout period,pre-election silence, electoral silence, or campaign silence is a ban on political campaigning or media coverage of a general election, before or during that election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2013 British Columbia general election</span>

The 2013 British Columbia general election took place on May 14, 2013, to elect the 85 members of the 40th Parliament of British Columbia to the Legislative Assembly in the Canadian province of British Columbia. The British Columbia Liberal Party formed the government during the 39th Parliament prior to this general election, initially under the leadership of Premier Gordon Campbell then after his resignation, Christy Clark. The British Columbia New Democratic Party under the leadership of Carole James, and then Adrian Dix, formed the Official Opposition. The BC Green Party under the leadership of Jane Sterk and the BC Conservative Party under John Cummins were also included in polling, although neither party had representation at the end of the 39th Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kerry-Lynne Findlay</span> Canadian politician

Kerry-Lynne Donna Findlay is a Canadian politician who has served as the member of Parliament for South Surrey—White Rock since 2019, and previously represented the electoral district of Delta—Richmond East in the House of Commons of Canada from 2011 to 2015. A member of the Conservative Party, she had served as Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice, Associate Minister of National Defence, and Minister of National Revenue while that party was in power under Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Canadian federal election voter suppression scandal</span> 2011 Canadian federal election scandal

The 2011 Canadian federal election voter suppression scandal is a political scandal stemming from events during the 2011 Canadian federal election. It involved robocalls and real-person calls that originated in the Conservative Party of Canada's campaign office in Guelph, Ontario. The calls were designed to result in voter suppression. Elections Canada and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) conducted investigations into the claims that calls were made to dissuade voters from casting ballots by falsely telling them that the location of their polling stations had changed. Further possible electoral law violations were alleged as the evidence unfolded. Under the Canada Elections Act, it is an offence to willfully prevent, or endeavour to prevent, an elector from voting in an election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murray Rankin</span> Canadian politician

Murray Rankin is a Canadian lawyer, politician and public law expert who serves as British Columbia's Minister of Indigenous Relations and Reconciliation. A member of the New Democratic Party, Rankin represents the riding of Oak Bay-Gordon Head in the Legislative Assembly of British Columbia. Rankin previously served as the federal Member of Parliament for Victoria from 2012 to 2019, with senior roles including Justice and Attorney General Critic, Health Critic, and NDP House Leader. From 2019 to 2020, Rankin was head of Canada's National Security and Intelligence Review Agency (NSIRA), overseeing all national security and intelligence activities carried out by the Government of Canada. Previously, he was a professor of law at the University of Victoria, where he taught environmental and administrative law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2017 British Columbia general election</span> Provincial general election in Canada, on May 9, 2017

The 2017 British Columbia general election was held on May 9, 2017, to elect 87 members (MLAs) to the Legislative Assembly to serve in the 41st Parliament of the Canadian province of British Columbia. In the 40th Parliament prior to this general election, the British Columbia Liberal Party formed the government under the leadership of Christy Clark, while the British Columbia New Democratic Party (NDP), under the leadership of Adrian Dix and then John Horgan, formed the Official Opposition; the Green Party of British Columbia were also represented in the legislature with sole MLA and later leader Andrew Weaver.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 British Columbia general election</span> Provincial election in Canada

The 2020 British Columbia general election was held on October 24, 2020, to elect members of the Legislative Assembly to serve in the 42nd parliament of the Canadian province of British Columbia. The incumbent New Democratic Party of British Columbia won a majority government, making John Horgan the first leader in the history of the BC NDP to win a second consecutive term as premier. The incoming Legislature marked the first time the NDP commanded an outright majority government in BC since the 1996 election, as well as the first province-wide popular vote win for the party since 1991.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 British Columbia electoral reform referendum</span> Referendum on British Columbias voting system

A referendum on electoral reform took place by mail-in ballot between October 22 and December 7, 2018, in the Canadian province of British Columbia. 61.3 percent of voters supported maintaining the first-past-the-post voting system rather than switching to a proportional representation voting system, which was supported by 38.7 percent of voters. This was British Columbia's third referendum on electoral reform, following ones in 2005 and 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rural–urban proportional representation</span> Canadian hybrid proportional electoral system

Rural–urban proportional representation (RUP), also called Flexible District PR, is a hybrid proportional system designed by Fair Vote Canada with the intention of meeting the special challenges of Canada's geography, which includes wide-flung, sparsely populated areas. As conceived in general terms by Fair Vote Canada, the rural–urban proportional model combines the use of multi-member ridings and top-up seats to meet the different needs of both rural and urban areas, while protecting the objective of proportionality. Sweden, Denmark and Iceland use similar voting models.

References

  1. ↑ The Canadian Elections Act, Accessed April 13, 2012.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Harper Government Committed to Repealing Dated Ban on Early Communication of Election Results, Government of Canada: Democratic Reform. Accessed April 13, 2012.
  3. ↑ Bill would allow reporting results before B.C. polls close, Accessed September 17, 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 A History of the Vote in Canada, Elections Canada. Accessed April 13, 2012.
  5. ↑ Duncan, Shelly. Why Vote on a Tuesday? Farmer's Almanca (October 27, 2008). Accessed April 13, 2012.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Twitter and Facebook force end to Canada's Election night Internet Gag, The National Post (January 13, 2012). Accessed April 13, 2012
  7. 1 2 Teixera, Dave (May 2, 2011). "Reporting the Canadian Election Results", BC Business. Accessed April 13, 2012.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Supreme Court Upholds Blackout on Early Election Night Results (March 15, 2007), CBC News. Accessed April 13, 2012.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Norris, Gary (May 2, 2011). Canada Election Result Bloggers Face Fines Under 1938 Law, Bloomberg. Accessed April 13, 2012.
  10. ↑ Harris, Misty. Twitterverse Rebels Flout Election Canada Ban, The Vancouver Sun (May 2, 2011). Accessed April 13, 2012.
  11. ↑ Tweet the Results
  12. 1 2 3 Early Election Results Ban Breached on Twitter, CBC News (May 2, 2011). Accessed April 13, 2012.
  13. 1 2 3 4 Boesveld, Sarah. CBC May Have Violated the Elections Canada Blackout Law, The National Post (May 2, 2011). Accessed on April 13, 2012.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.