Author | John T. Hamilton |
---|---|
Language | English |
Series | Translation/Transnation |
Subject | Security, politics, philology |
Genre | Non-fiction |
Publisher | Princeton University Press |
Publication date | 5 May 2013 |
Publication place | United States |
Media type | Print (Hardcover, Paperback), eBook |
Pages | 336 |
ISBN | 9780691157528 |
Security: Politics, Humanity, and the Philology of Care is book by American literary scholar and musician John T. Hamilton. It was published in 2013 by Princeton University Press. The book offers a philological exploration of the concept of security, a term frequently invoked in contemporary political and cultural discourse yet one that remains largely undefined. Hamilton delves into the historical and linguistic origins of the word, analyzing its dual connotations of meaning both "carefree" and "careless." Spanning a wide range of texts from ancient Greek poetry to the works of modern philosophers such as Kant, Nietzsche, and Heidegger, the book critically examines how security is intertwined with notions of safety, negligence, confidence, and ignorance. Hamilton questions whether the pursuit of security, often at the expense of freedom and human rights, truly alleviates fear or exacerbates it, and whether contemporary obsessions with achieving absolute security pose significant risks to society. [1]
The book explores the multifaceted and often ambiguous concept of security. Through a philological and philosophical lens, Hamilton examines how the notion of security has evolved over time, tracing its origins and various interpretations from ancient Greek and Roman texts to modern political and intellectual thought.
The book is divided into three parts. In the first part, "Preliminary Concerns," Hamilton discusses the broad and versatile nature of security, highlighting how the term is employed in various contexts, including national, social, and cyber-security. He argues that security, originating from the Latin securitas (meaning "freedom from care"), inherently carries a dual meaning: it can imply both a state of being carefree and a dangerous form of negligence. This section also contrasts philological approaches to security with more rigid political interpretations, questioning whether the pursuit of absolute security undermines the very freedoms it aims to protect.
The second part, "Etymologies and Figures," delves deeper into the historical and semantic roots of the term. Hamilton provides a detailed examination of the word securitas as used by Roman authors like Cicero and Seneca, exploring its connotations of mental tranquility and its implications in both public and private life. The section further investigates how literary and philosophical texts from the Greco-Roman period portray security in relation to other concepts, such as stability and instability, land and sea, and the familiar versus the unknown.
In the third part, "Occupying Security," Hamilton addresses the modern implications of security, focusing on how the concept has been shaped by political events and ideologies. He critiques the ways in which contemporary society's obsession with security has led to paradoxical outcomes, such as the erosion of civil liberties in the name of protection. Hamilton goes on to examine the tension between security and freedom, drawing on historical examples and philosophical arguments to suggest that an overemphasis on security can lead to the very dangers it seeks to prevent.
Throughout the book, Hamilton argues that the pursuit of security often serves as a distraction from the inherent uncertainties of human existence. He posits that rather than seeking to eliminate all risks, society might benefit from embracing a certain level of insecurity as a natural and valuable aspect of life. By combining philological analysis with philosophical inquiry, Security: Politics, Humanity, and the Philology of Care offers a thought-provoking critique of one of the most pervasive and yet least understood concepts in contemporary discourse.
Henrik S. Wilberg commended the book for its nuanced and in-depth exploration of the concept of security from a philological perspective. He valued Hamilton's approach, which avoided reducing security to oversimplified or non-philological frameworks. Instead, Hamilton's study offers an episodic and multifaceted examination that draws from diverse historical and intellectual contexts. Wilberg highlighted how Hamilton effectively intertwined the ideas of security and care, seamlessly merging philological methods with philosophical inquiry. [2]
Ellwood Wiggins lauded the book as a masterfully crafted and intellectually stimulating work, delving into the intricate layers and paradoxes surrounding the concept of security. Wiggins appreciated how Hamilton employed philology to trace the historical and linguistic origins of security, navigating through a wide range of texts and ideas from antiquity to the present day. He particularly admired Hamilton's skill in uncovering unexpected connections between various authors and eras, as well as his insightful critique of modern security practices. Despite noting some organizational challenges, Wiggins found the work to be a significant and illuminating contribution to the fields of security studies and philology. [3]
Hall Bjornstad regarded the book as an original and scholarly contribution, offering a meticulous and thoughtful analysis of security through a philological lens. Bjornstad was impressed by Hamilton's ability to trace the term "security" back to its etymological roots in "cura," meaning care or concern. He praised the book for its rich and detailed exploration of a wide array of texts, languages, and historical contexts, ranging from ancient Greek poetry to modern philosophical thought. Despite the book's episodic nature, Bjornstad found it to be a deeply enriching read that prompts readers to engage in further reflection, marking it as a significant work in contemporary philology and security studies. [4]
Pirathees Sivarajah described the book as a profound investigation into the concept of security, emphasizing its inherent ambiguities and contradictions. Sivarajah appreciated Hamilton's philological approach to dissecting the term "security" and its various historical, cultural, and political connotations. He noted how Hamilton skillfully portrayed security as a concept that oscillates between care and carelessness, presenting it as both a promise and a potential threat to humanity. The review praised the book for its intellectual depth and its ability to provoke thoughtful consideration of the role and impact of security in modern society. [5]
In philosophy, deconstruction is a loosely-defined set of approaches to understanding the relationship between text and meaning. The concept of deconstruction was introduced by the philosopher Jacques Derrida, who described it as a turn away from Platonism's ideas of "true" forms and essences which are valued above appearances.
Kabbalah or Qabalah is an esoteric method, discipline and school of thought in Jewish mysticism. A traditional Kabbalist is called a Mekubbal. The definition of Kabbalah varies according to the tradition and aims of those following it, from its origin in medieval Judaism to its later adaptations in Western esotericism. Jewish Kabbalah is a set of esoteric teachings meant to explain the relationship between the unchanging, eternal God—the mysterious Ein Sof —and the mortal, finite universe. It forms the foundation of mystical religious interpretations within Judaism.
Philology is the study of language in oral and written historical sources. It is the intersection of textual criticism, literary criticism, history, and linguistics with strong ties to etymology. Philology is also defined as the study of literary texts and oral and written records, the establishment of their authenticity and their original form, and the determination of their meaning. A person who pursues this kind of study is known as a philologist. In older usage, especially British, philology is more general, covering comparative and historical linguistics.
Intellectual history is the study of the history of human thought and of intellectuals, people who conceptualize, discuss, write about, and concern themselves with ideas. The investigative premise of intellectual history is that ideas do not develop in isolation from the thinkers who conceptualize and apply those ideas; thus the intellectual historian studies ideas in two contexts: (i) as abstract propositions for critical application; and (ii) in concrete terms of culture, life, and history.
Katharevousa is a conservative form of the Modern Greek language conceived in the late 18th century as both a literary language and a compromise between Ancient Greek and the contemporary vernacular, Demotic Greek. Originally, it was widely used for both literary and official purposes, though sparingly in daily language. In the 20th century, it was increasingly adopted for official and formal purposes, until minister of education Georgios Rallis made Demotic Greek the official language of Greece in 1976, and in 1982 Prime Minister Andreas Papandreou abolished the polytonic system of writing for both Demotic and Katharevousa.
Zhang Binglin, also known by his art name Zhang Taiyan, was a Chinese philologist, textual critic, philosopher, and revolutionary.
Res publica is a Latin phrase, loosely meaning 'public affair'. It is the root of the word 'republic', and the word 'commonwealth' has traditionally been used as a synonym for it; however, translations vary widely according to the context. 'Res' is a nominative singular Latin noun for a substantive or concrete thing—as opposed to 'spes', which means something unreal or ethereal—and 'publica' is an attributive adjective meaning 'of or pertaining to the public, people'. Hence a literal translation is, 'the public thing, affair' or 'the people's thing, affair'. The Latin term res publica was incompatible with the idea of absolute power by any individual or group over the body of citizens. The most essential characteristic of a res publica was liberty (libertas), which meant freedom from the arbitrary control of another and the absence of a monarchical domination over the body politic, that was analogous to the absolute power of a master over a slave.
Contemporary philosophy is the present period in the history of Western philosophy beginning at the early 20th century with the increasing professionalization of the discipline and the rise of analytic and continental philosophy.
Etymology is the scientific study of the origin and evolution of a word's semantic meaning across time, including its constituent morphemes and phonemes. It is a subfield of historical linguistics, philology, and semiotics, and draws upon comparative semantics, morphology, pragmatics, and phonetics in order to construct a comprehensive and chronological catalogue of all meanings that a morpheme, phoneme, word, or sign has carried across time.
Positivism is a philosophical school that holds that all genuine knowledge is either true by definition or positive—meaning a posteriori facts derived by reason and logic from sensory experience. Other ways of knowing, such as intuition, introspection, or religious faith, are rejected or considered meaningless.
Friedrich W. Solmsen was a German-American philologist and professor of classical studies. He published nearly 150 books, monographs, scholarly articles, and reviews from the 1930s through the 1980s. Solmsen's work is characterized by a prevailing interest in the history of ideas. He was an influential scholar in the areas of Greek tragedy, particularly for his work on Aeschylus, and the philosophy of the physical world and its relation to the soul, especially the systems of Plato and Aristotle.
Eric Alfred Havelock was a British classicist who spent most of his life in Canada and the United States. He was a professor at the University of Toronto and was active in the Canadian socialist movement during the 1930s. In the 1960s and 1970s, he served as chair of the classics departments at both Harvard and Yale. Although he was trained in the turn-of-the-20th-century Oxbridge tradition of classical studies, which saw Greek intellectual history as an unbroken chain of related ideas, Havelock broke radically with his own teachers and proposed an entirely new model for understanding the classical world, based on a sharp division between literature of the 6th and 5th centuries BC on the one hand, and that of the 4th on the other.
Sheldon I. Pollock is an American scholar of Sanskrit, the intellectual and literary history of India, and comparative intellectual history. He is the Arvind Raghunathan Professor of South Asian Studies at Columbia University. He was the general editor of the Clay Sanskrit Library and the founding editor of the Murty Classical Library of India.
Han learning, or the Han school of classical philology, was an intellectual movement that reached its height in the middle of the Qing dynasty (1644–1912) in China. The focus of the movement was to reject neo-Confucianism in order to return to a study of the original Confucian texts.
Postcolonialism is the critical academic study of the cultural, political and economic legacy of colonialism and imperialism, focusing on the impact of human control and exploitation of colonized people and their lands. The field started to emerge in the 1960s, as scholars from previously colonized countries began publishing on the lingering effects of colonialism, developing a critical theory analysis of the history, culture, literature, and discourse of imperial power.
The debate over whether the ancient Chinese masters can be counted as philosophers has been discussed since the academic study of philosophy was introduced in China in the 19th century. Cultural immersion in the West by figures such as Hu Shih and Feng Youlan led to an increased interest in a Chinese philosophy and stimulated the creation of this field which had not yet been labeled nor discussed as such until this point.
John T. Hamilton is a literary scholar, musician, and William R. Kenan Professor of German and Comparative Literature at Harvard University. He previously held positions at the University of California-Santa Cruz and New York University, and has also taught as a visiting professor at the Institute of Greece, Rome, and the Classical Tradition at Bristol University. Numerous academic fellowships include the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin, the ETH-Zürich, the Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung Berlin, and the Hamburg Institute for Advanced Study.
Anthony Dirk Moses is an Australian scholar who researches various aspects of genocide. In 2022 he became the Anne and Bernard Spitzer Professor of Political Science at the City College of New York, after having been the Frank Porter Graham Distinguished Professor of Global Human Rights History at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He is a leading scholar of genocide, especially in colonial contexts, as well as of the political development of the concept itself. He is known for coining the term racial century in reference to the period 1850–1950. He is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Genocide Research.
Confucianism in the United States dates back to accounts of missionaries who traveled to China during the early 19th century and from the 1800's with the practice and Study of Traditional Chinese medicine and acupuncture in the United states by Chinese immigrant Doctors and via trade of technology, science and philosophy from east Asia to Europe and the America's. Since the second half of the 20th century, it has had a increased medical and scholarly interest. Confucianism is also studied under the umbrella of the profession of eight principle Chinese Acupuncture and Chinese philosophy. American scholars of Confucianism are generally taught in universities in the philosophy or religions departments. Whether Confucianism should be categorized as a religion in academia or Confucian based traditional Chinese medicine is to be recognised as a legitimate mainstream medicine has been controversial in U.S and abroad.
The Problems of Genocide: Permanent Security and the Language of Transgression is a 2021 book by Australian historian A. Dirk Moses. The book explores what Moses sees as flaws in the concept of genocide, which he argues allows killings of civilians that do not resemble the Holocaust to be ignored. Moses proposes "permanent security" as an alternative to the concept of genocide. The book was described as important, but his emphasis on security is considered only one factor to be causing mass violence.