Sedentarization of Kurdish tribes

Last updated

Sedentarization of Kurdish tribes was a policy pursued by the Ottoman Empire as early as the sixteenth century and became prominent in the nineteenth century. [1] This policy was also pursued by the Committee of Union and Progress, [2] Turkey, [3] as well as Iran in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, in order to limit the movement of nomadic Kurds. [4] [5]

Contents

Sedentarization within the Ottoman Empire

This policy was conceived in the Ottoman Empire through the empire's centralizing program leading nomadic hereditary Kurdish rulers to lose power and be sedentarized. [6] Many nomads were settled into villages of Armenian peasants, leading to tension between the two groups. [6] This tension was often exacerbated when Kurds were able to gain power in administrative roles. [7] The goals of sedentarization of nomadic Kurdish Tribes in the Ottoman Empire were pursued on the basis of nomadic groups being a threat to central authority. [1] Additionally, sedentarization was implemented in order to regain control over taxation of Kurdish tribes. [1] Prior to sedentarization, taxation was overseen by Tribal leaders, and therefore not within a direct sphere of control of Ottoman administrators. [1] Agricultural taxation was one of the most significant forms of revenue within the Ottoman Empire, hence the desire by Ottoman Statesmen to have more direct control. [1] Another proposed reason for sedentarization was to control violence that Kurdish nomads were inflicting on Ottoman people, although it is likely that these beliefs were based on stereotypes of nomadic people.Although there were efforts to centralize and sedentarize these groups for centuries, but it was not until the sixteenth century that these efforts became more prominent. [1]

Tanzimat Reforms

This policy was a part of the Tanzimat Reforms of from 1839 to 1869. [2] The Tanzimat Reforms revolved around security, military and modernized taxation within the Ottoman Empire. [1] Although these reforms were part of a centralizing program, sedentarization was an important part of this policy. [2] These reforms also came to be most prominent in the 19th century with the Tanzimat Reforms, where the sedentarization efforts became more systemized. [2] The systemization of the Tanzimat Reforms in regard to effectiveness also seemed to draw upon past mistakes in attempts at sedentarization. [1] Additionally, the process of reforms and implementation were adjusted accordingly to the responses they faced in different regions. [2] That being said they inflicted more restrictions in order to keep the movement of nomadic Kurds under control. [1] This included the policy that nomadic Kurds must settle in winter pastures or summer pastures. [6]

Means of implementation

There was often resistance to sedentarization by many Kurdish Tribes. [2] This resistance came in different forms, which led the Ottoman statesmen to utilize different means to implement their policies. [2] These means often included either mediation or coercion. [2] Aside from resistance, Ottoman statesmen also might have used the means of mediation and coercion because of the geopolitical locations. [2] This was especially the case for regions of Kurdish tribes that moved near borders, where Ottoman statesmen were more concerned about centralizing their control in regions close to other states. [2] There was also a significant emphasis on the discouragement of tribalism as a means of sedentarization. [1] This was because of the inherent connection and interrelation with nomadism. [1]

Effects of sedentarization

The post-sedentarization era created a lot of consequences that arose from the adjustment of nomadic Kurds into sedentary life. [1] Some of these consequences may have included the loss of culture and traditions. [1]

Notable tribes

There were countless tribes of nomadic Kurdish tribes subject to sedentarization at the hands of Ottoman statesmen. One being the Risvan Tribe, and another the Asfar Tribe. [1] These tribes were both powerful and influential, which led Ottoman Statesmen to exhort more control. [1] Ottoman officials did this through mediation by appointing certain tribe leaders to control summer and winter pastures of the tribes. [1] This was a tool to further centralize the Ottoman's power. [1]

Sedentarization within Iran

The Reza Shah Pahlavi of Iran implemented policies of sedentarization starting early on in his reign, as early as the 1920s. [8] This policy was implemented by the Iranian Government in order to accelerate modernization within the country. [9] It was believed by the Shah and the Iranian Government that the nomadic Kurds were resistant to the political, social and economic changes [9] they wished to implement within the country, and their nomadic lifestyles were impeding their acceptance to these changes. [9]

Policies of Sedentarization within Iran

The specific policies of sedentarization in Iran is not thoroughly document, leading scholars to believe that sedentarization occurred slowly in different areas of Iranian Kurdistan. [10] Policies of sedentarization within Iran stem from the wish to strip autonomy from Kurds, which became a fear from Kurdish Nationalist movements. [11] The Iranian Government therefore used sedentarization as a part of their policies to demographically engineer the country. [11]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of the Kurds</span>

The Kurds are an Iranian ethnic group in the Middle East. They have historically inhabited the mountainous areas to the south of Lake Van and Lake Urmia, a geographical area collectively referred to as Kurdistan. Most Kurds speak Northern Kurdish Kurmanji Kurdish (Kurmanji) and Central Kurdish (Sorani).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanzimat</span> Ottoman Empire reform period (1839-1876)

The Tanzimat was a period of reform in the Ottoman Empire that began with the Gülhane Hatt-ı Şerif in 1839 and ended with the First Constitutional Era in 1876. The Tanzimat era began with the purpose not of radical transformation, but of modernization, desiring to consolidate the social and political foundations of the Ottoman Empire. It was characterised by various attempts to modernise the Ottoman Empire and to secure its territorial integrity against internal nationalist movements and external aggressive powers. The reforms encouraged Ottomanism among the diverse ethnic groups of the Empire and attempted to stem the rise of nationalism in the Ottoman Empire.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decline and modernization of the Ottoman Empire</span> Period of the Ottoman empire

In the late 18th century, the Ottoman Empire faced threats on numerous frontiers from multiple industrialised European powers. In response, the empire initiated a period of internal reform, attempting to bring itself into competition with the expanding West. The period of these reforms is known as the Tanzimat, and led to the end of the Old Regime period. Despite the Ottoman empire's precarious international position, the central state was significantly strengthened. The process of reforming and modernization in the empire began with the declaration of the Nizam-I Cedid during the reign of Sultan Selim III and was punctuated by several reform decrees, such as the Hatt-ı Şerif of Gülhane in 1839 and the Hatt-ı Hümayun in 1856. Over the course of the 19th century, the Ottoman state became increasingly powerful and rationalized, exercising a greater degree of influence over its population than in any previous era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sayfo</span> Assyrian genocide (1914–1924)

The Sayfo, also known as the Seyfo or the Assyrian genocide, was the mass slaughter and deportation of Assyrian/Syriac Christians in southeastern Anatolia and Persia's Azerbaijan province by Ottoman forces and some Kurdish tribes during World War I.

Kurds in Iran constitute a large minority in the country with a population of around 9 and 10 million people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Turkish Kurdistan</span> Kurdish inhabited area of Turkey

Turkish Kurdistan or Northern Kurdistan is the southeastern part of Turkey where Kurds form the predominant ethnic group. The Kurdish Institute of Paris estimates that there are 20 million Kurds living in Turkey, the majority of them in the southeast.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kurdish mythology</span>

Kurdish mythology is the collective term for the beliefs and practices of the culturally, ethnically or linguistically related group of ancient peoples who inhabited the Kurdistan mountains of northwestern Zagros, northern Mesopotamia and southeastern Anatolia. This includes their Indo-European pagan religion prior to them converting to Islam, as well the local myths, legends and folklore that they produced after becoming Muslims.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kurdish nationalism</span> Political movement

Kurdish nationalism is a nationalist political movement which asserts that Kurds are a nation and espouses the creation of an independent Kurdistan from Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mangur (tribe)</span> Major Kurdish tribe

Mangur is one of the largest Kurdish tribe of northwestern Iran and has a minor presence in northern Iraq. Historically semi-nomadic and war-like, they are native to a basin on the little Zab river called “Mangurayeti” in Mukriyan and also inhabit the districts and cities of Sardasht, Piranshahr, Mahabad, and Pshdar District, the latter of which is in Iraq and not considered to be a part of the geo-cultural region of Mukriyan.

The Milan is a Kurdish tribe that was historically at the head of a multi-confessional tribal confederacy, and is the subject of one of the legends of origin of Kurds, together with their rivals, the Zilan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Simko Shikak revolt (1918–1922)</span> Battle of Gulkhama

The Simko Shikak revolt refers to an armed Ottoman-backed tribal Kurdish uprising against the Qajar dynasty of Iran from 1918 to 1922, led by Kurdish chieftain Simko Shikak from the Shekak tribe.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early Kurdish nationalism</span> Independence movements of the Kurdish people

The nationalist movement among the Kurdish people first emerged in the late 19th century with an uprising in 1880 led by Sheik Ubeydullah. Many Kurds worked with other opponents of the Ottoman regime within the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP). A growth in ethnic consciousness at the start of the 20th century was spearheaded by the Society for the Elevation of Kurdistan. Some Kurdish nationalist groups agitated for secession, others for autonomy.

The Emirate of Hakkâri was a Kurdish emirate centered around the city of Hakkâri, and to the west of Lake Urmia on the border with Iran, which ruled a wide variety of peoples.

Reşwan, also known as Reşiyan, is a Kurdish tribe, native to the western frontier of Kurdistan, mostly populating Adıyaman, Gaziantep, Kahramanmaraş and Malatya provinces in Turkey and also present in Konya and Ankara provinces, Raqqa in Syria, and

The Kordshuli tribe is a nomadic and pastoral Kurdish tribe in Fars Province in Iran. Their main settlement is Khonjesht.

The Deportations of Kurds by Turkey refers to the population transfer of hundreds of thousands of Kurds from Turkish Kurdistan that was perpetuated by the Ottoman Empire and its successor Turkey in order to Turkify the region. Most of the Kurds who were deported were forced to leave their autochthonous lands, but the deportations also included the forced sedentarization of Kurdish tribes. Turkish historian İsmail Beşikçi emphasized the influence of fascism on these policies, and Italian historian Giulio Sappeli argued: "The ideals of Kemal Atatürk meant that war against the Kurds was always seen as an historical mission aimed at affirming the superiority of being Turkish." Occurring just after the Armenian genocide, many Kurds believed that they would share the same fate as the Armenians. Historians Dominik J. Schaller and Jürgen Zimmerer state that this event "not only serves as a reminder of the unsettling fact that victims could become perpetrators, but also that perpetrators [as some Kurds were during the Armenian Genocide] could turn victims".

Süleymani Principality, established in 1520 by Seyyid Ahmed Bey Ruzeki, was a Kurdish principality, that governed the regions of Silvan and Batman. It maintained a significant political presence within the Ottoman sphere, exerting influence over the socio-political landscape of the era. However, with the Tanzimat reforms of 1839, the Süleymani Principality lost its administrative autonomy, marking the end of its era as an independent entity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ottoman Kurds</span> Ethnic Kurds living within the Ottoman Empire

Ottoman Kurds were ethnic Kurds who lived in the Ottoman Empire. At its peak, the Ottoman Empire ruled Turkish Kurdistan, Iraqi Kurdistan, Syrian Kurdistan, and a small part of Iranian Kurdistan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canbeg</span> Canbegans, a Kurdish tribe named Canbeg. More in depth about these people.

Canbeg is a Kurdish tribe native to Bakur Kurdistan, mostly populating Central Anatolia and Eastern Anatolia in Turkey. Members of the tribe mostly adhere to Sunnism of Islam but some are Alevi. There’s also few Zaza/Zazaki Canbeg members.

Kurdish mafia is a general term for organized criminal gangs that consist of ethnic Kurds. Kurdish crime groups are active worldwide, especially throughout Turkey, Europe, and sometimes in the Middle East.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Dede 2011, p. [ page needed ].
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Köksal, Yonca (2006). "Coercion and Mediation: Centralization and Sedentarization of Tribes in the Ottoman Empire". Middle Eastern Studies. 42 (3): 469–491. doi:10.1080/00263200600601171. JSTOR   4284464. S2CID   54665900.
  3. Falah, Ghazi (1985). "The spatial pattern of Bedouin Sedentarization in Israel". GeoJournal. 11 (4): 361–368. doi:10.1007/BF00150770. S2CID   153981975.
  4. Koohi-Kamali, Farideh (2003). "The Political Economy of Kurdish Tribalism". The Political Development of the Kurds in Iran: Pastoral Nationalism. Palgrave Macmillan UK. pp. 44–65. doi:10.1057/9780230535725_3. ISBN   978-0-230-53572-5.
  5. Salzman, Philip C. (1971). "National Integration of the Tribes in Modern Iran". Middle East Journal. 25 (3): 325–336. JSTOR   4324777.
  6. 1 2 3 Koç, Yener (April 2024). "Winter-Quartering Tribes: Nomad–Peasant Relations in the Northeastern Frontiers of the Ottoman Empire (1800s–1850s)". International Review of Social History. 69 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1017/S0020859023000639.
  7. Bruinessen, Martin van (1992). Agha, Shaikh and State: The Social and Political Structures of Kurdistan. Bloomsbury Academic. ISBN   978-1-85649-018-4.[ page needed ]
  8. Koohi-Kamali, Farideh (2003). "Nationalism or Tribalism? Simko's Revolt". The Political Development of the Kurds in Iran. pp. 66–88. doi:10.1057/9780230535725_4. ISBN   978-1-349-40671-5.
  9. 1 2 3 Salzman, Philip C. (1971). "National Integration of the Tribes in Modern Iran". Middle East Journal. 25 (3): 325–336. JSTOR   4324777.
  10. Koohi-Kamali, Farideh (2003). The Political Development of the Kurds in Iran. doi:10.1057/9780230535725. ISBN   978-1-349-40671-5.[ page needed ]
  11. 1 2 Hassaniyan, Allan (June 2019). "Demographic Engineering and Population Alteration in Iranian Kurdistan". Contemporary Review of the Middle East. 6 (2): 172–190. doi:10.1177/2347798919832698.

Sources