Serious play

Last updated
Improv theater as a method for enhancing public communication Improv.jpg
Improv theater as a method for enhancing public communication

The term serious play refers to an array of playful inquiry and innovation methods that serve as vehicles for complex problem-solving, typically in work-related contexts. Lego Serious Play [1] is one of the best known examples; however, serious play methods also include improv theater, role play exercises, low fidelity prototyping, as well as certain simulations and gamification interventions, etc.

Contents

In recent years, an increasing body of academic and popular literature have argued that being in a playful mode (engaging in playful processes and applying a playful, open mindset) can foster creativity and innovation as it emphasizes possibilities, freedom, and process versus outcome, self-consciousness, responsibility and shame. According to Gauntlett (2007), [2] "The non-judgmental environment of play, it is claimed, is more likely to foster surprising and innovative ideas" (see Stephenson (1998); [3] Terr (2000); [4] Gee (2004); [5] Kane (2005) [6] ).

The term "serious play" was popularized with the publication of Michael Schrage's book Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate in 2000. [7]

Serious intent methods can be used as vehicles for engaging teams in the five stages of the design thinking process: empathizing, defining, ideating, prototyping, and testing. [8] The methods are designed to create a safe environment for exploring and sharing ideas and help engage teams in behaviors and mindsets that integrate disparate knowledge and align team efforts towards problem-solving and organizational change. Serious play methods are most often used in creative industries (e.g. product and service design), yet also hold a promise to foster creativity, innovation and entrepreneurship in general management practices as well. While much of the serious play literature focuses on business, [9] [10] [11] its benefits are applied in numerous fields, including military, [12] education, [13] [14] [15] healthcare, [16] psychology, [17] and governance. [18] Serious play methods can bring together diverse groups of stakeholders/collaborators, and elicit empathy, active listening, reflexivity, and high levels of participation.

Because serious play is still an emergent field and used in various contexts, it is sometimes branded as or referred to by other names. For instance, the University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, utilizes an array of serious play methods when dealing with complex problems, which they refer to as liberating structures. [19] Similarly to serious play is the concept of strategic play, which was the subject of a facilitator's guide book written by Jacqueline Lloyd Smith & Denise Meyerson. [20]

Impact

While the concept of "serious play" may sound like an oxymoron, it is the dual nature of the concept that makes it powerful. It is play with a purpose and intentionality that goes beyond simply having fun. [13] [21] [22] [23] The serious aspect requires a degree of focus on a task or challenge, while the play aspect emphasizes imagination and toying with boundaries. Together, these seemingly juxtapose components are able to foster a deeper engagement – also known as a state of flow [24] where participants lose track of time and their inner critique. Being intentful also enables us to better tolerate the ambiguity and uncertainty that characterizes many of the problems modern organizations face.

Using play as a way to develop adaptive human potential is not new. [25] In "Product Design and Intentional Emergence facilitated by Serious Play", Mabogunje et al. [26] summarize that "play has:

Through their non-judgmental and cross sector/hierarchy communicative approaches, serious play methods allow for solutions and connections to emerge that more rigid traditional methods had missed.

There exists an array of serious play methods – from "energizers" to prototyping methods and from open-ended, emergence-oriented interventions to goal-achievement-oriented interventions (e.g. gamification) – all of which offer different affordances in terms of knowledge creation, sharing, and conversion. [32]

Characterizing different methods

Table 1 below characterizes five types of serious play methods, that are reoccurring in the academic literature, according to the following five parameters:

Wheel of Knowledge Wheel of Knowledge.png
Wheel of Knowledge

Purpose/rational: What is the purpose of applying the method?

Role(s) of the participant(s): Do the participants work individually or in teams? Which types of roles/activities do they engage in?

Level of Materiality: Does the method typically involve physical artifacts? Are the meaning of these literal or metaphorical? Or, in contrast, is the intervention typically delivered through a digital/virtual game or an incentive structure?

Degree of structure: Is the method explorative/open-ended? Does it allow for emergence? Or is there a "one best way" of doing the activity? Is there a quantifiable output?

Phase applicability: In which of the phase(s) mentioned in the Wheel of Knowledge [32] is this method applicable? (Socialization, Externalization, Internalization, and/or Combination).

Serious play methodPurposeRole(s) of participant(s)MaterialityDegree of structurePhase applicabilityReferences
LEGO Serious PlayTo access and make knowledge, wisdom, and perspectives shared through model construction and storytelling. To facilitate a constructive dialogue (ideate, reflect, and strategize) about a given topic/ issue.Participants take on roles as: individual builder, storyteller, active listener, co-constructor of physical models and metaphorical meaning. Non-competitive. The physical constraints of the building system puts emphasis on metaphors and meaning-making and takes pressure off making something that resembles.Material and metaphoricalSemi structured: Facilitated, structured process and turn taking. Process does allow for pursuing new directions as new knowledge emerge. Participants build and tell in response to prompt, there is however no right or wrong answer – the model is their interpretation.Exploration, socialization, ideation, innovation(Roos & Victor, 1999) (Mabogunje et al., 2008) (Gauntlett & Holzwarth, 2006)
Low fidelity prototypingTo engage participants in generating, sharing, and maturing ideas through constructing, explaining, and refining low fidelity prototypes.Participants take on roles as: individual builder, storyteller, active listener. Non-competitive, though participants may feel self-conscious about their drawing or building skills.Highly material and literalSemi structured: Facilitated, structured process and turn taking. However, the process allows for pursuing new directions as new knowledge emerge.Exploration, socialization, ideation, innovation(Schulz et al., 2015) (Sanders & Stappers, 2008) (Von Hippel, 2006)
Role-play / improvTo practice thinking and (inter)acting improvisational, understanding visceral reactions, suspending judgment, and going with a situation as it develops through unrehearsed open-ended scenarios.Participants are impromptu storytellers as they act out their interpretation of the prompt, through using their body-language, mimic, voice, humor, gesticulation, etc. Audience when other participants are performing. Non-competitive, though participants often feel self-conscious when pushing their comfort zone.Generally immaterial, but can include propsLow degree of imposed structure, Explorative in nature, Open-ended within the contextual prompt given and adhering to the rules of improv: say "yes and...", make statements, agree to the premise proposed, blurt out what comes to mind, whatever happens is right (Robson, 2015) [33] [34] Exploration, socialization(Boess, 2006) (Thoring & Mueller, 2012) (Lloyd-Smith & Meyerson, 2015)
SimulationsTo practice task-specific interactions with people and/or technologies by simulating scenarios in risk-free educational environments (physical or virtual).Participants are the main character of their own mission. Can be individual or collaborative (team based). Performance may be rated comparatively to personal best or that of other individuals.Virtual (e.g. virtual reality) or material (taking place in the physical world)Structured: goals and desired outcomes are predefined. Room to experiment with ways of doing the task. Learning by doing.Internalization (learning), socialization (if done in groups)(Colella, 2000) (Rieber, 1996) (Aldrich, 2005)
Gamification To incentivize productivity and/or behavior change through competition and/or a game-like reward- structureParticipants strive to achieve the goals outlined to obtain rewards and reinforcing, positive feedback. This can be individually or collaboratively. Typically competitive (against personal best or other participants/teams)Immaterial (e.g. company incentive structure) or virtual (e.g. game or app)Highly structured: "one best way", desired goals and outcomes are predefined. May appear open-ended to the participant, however, structure is imposed through the underlying game algorithms or company policies (incentives).Optimization, exploitation(Jagoda, 2013) (Millen, DiMicco, & Street, 2012) (Muntean, 2011)

Workshops will often use multiple serious play methods to complement each other and allow participants to explore different applicability phases of the challenges they face.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collective action</span> Action taken together by a group of people to further a common objective

Collective action refers to action taken together by a group of people whose goal is to enhance their condition and achieve a common objective. It is a term that has formulations and theories in many areas of the social sciences including psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science and economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Team building</span> Term for activities used to enhance social relations and define roles within teams

Team building is a collective term for various types of activities used to enhance social relations and define roles within teams, often involving collaborative tasks. It is distinct from team training, which is designed by a combine of business managers, learning and development/OD and an HR Business Partner to improve the efficiency, rather than interpersonal relations.

The Delphi method or Delphi technique is a structured communication technique or method, originally developed as a systematic, interactive forecasting method which relies on a panel of experts. The technique can also be adapted for use in face-to-face meetings, and is then called mini-Delphi. Delphi has been widely used for business forecasting and has certain advantages over another structured forecasting approach, prediction markets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Problem-based learning</span> Learner centric pedagogy

Problem-based learning (PBL) is a student-centered pedagogy in which students learn about a subject through the experience of solving an open-ended problem found in trigger material. The PBL process does not focus on problem solving with a defined solution, but it allows for the development of other desirable skills and attributes. This includes knowledge acquisition, enhanced group collaboration and communication.

David Gauntlett is a British sociologist and media theorist, and the author of several books including Making is Connecting.

An intervention is an orchestrated attempt by one or many people – usually family and friends – to get someone to seek professional help with a substance use disorder or some kind of traumatic event or crisis, or other serious problem. Intervention can also refer to the act of using a similar technique within a therapy session.

LEGO SERIOUS PLAY is a facilitation methodology developed at The Lego Group. Since 2010 it is available under an open source community-based model. Its goal is improving creative thinking and communication. People build with Lego bricks 3-dimensional models of their ideas and tell stories about their models. Hence the name "serious play".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Play therapy</span> Childrens mental health therapy method

Play therapy refers to a range of methods of capitalising on children's natural urge to explore and harnessing it to meet and respond to the developmental and later also their mental health needs. It is also used for forensic or psychological assessment purposes where the individual is too young or too traumatised to give a verbal account of adverse, abusive or potentially criminal circumstances in their life.

Joint application design (JAD) is a process used in the life cycle area of the dynamic systems development method (DSDM) to collect business requirements while developing new information systems for a company. "The JAD process also includes approaches for enhancing user participation, expediting development, and improving the quality of specifications." It consists of a workshop where "knowledge workers and IT specialists meet, sometimes for several days, to define and review the business requirements for the system." The attendees include high level management officials who will ensure the product provides the needed reports and information at the end. This acts as "a management process which allows Corporate Information Services (IS) departments to work more effectively with users in a shorter time frame".

Co-creation, in the context of a business, refers to a product or service design process in which input from consumers plays a central role from beginning to end. Less specifically, the term is also used for any way in which a business allows consumers to submit ideas, designs or content. This way, the firm will not run out of ideas regarding the design to be created and at the same time, it will further strengthen the business relationship between the firm and its customers. Another meaning is the creation of value by ordinary people, whether for a company or not.

The nominal group technique (NGT) is a group process involving problem identification, solution generation, and decision making. It can be used in groups of many sizes, who want to make their decision quickly, as by a vote, but want everyone's opinions taken into account. The method of tallying is the difference. First, every member of the group gives their view of the solution, with a short explanation. Then, duplicate solutions are eliminated from the list of all solutions, and the members proceed to rank the solutions, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and so on.

Praxis intervention is a form of participatory action research that emphasizes working on the praxis potential, or phronesis, of its participants. This contrasts with other forms of participatory action research, which emphasize the collective modification of the external world. Praxis potential means the members' potential to reflexively work on their respective mentalities; participant here refers not just to the clientele beneficiaries of the praxis intervention project, but also the organisers and experts participating in such a project. Praxis intervention is intended to lead its members through a "participant objectivation". The method prioritizes unsettling the settled mentalities, especially where the settled mindsets prevalent in the social world or individuals is suspected to have sustained or contributed to their suffering or marginality.

Impact evaluation assesses the changes that can be attributed to a particular intervention, such as a project, program or policy, both the intended ones, as well as ideally the unintended ones. In contrast to outcome monitoring, which examines whether targets have been achieved, impact evaluation is structured to answer the question: how would outcomes such as participants' well-being have changed if the intervention had not been undertaken? This involves counterfactual analysis, that is, "a comparison between what actually happened and what would have happened in the absence of the intervention." Impact evaluations seek to answer cause-and-effect questions. In other words, they look for the changes in outcome that are directly attributable to a program.

A serious game or applied game is a game designed for a primary purpose other than pure entertainment. The "serious" adjective is generally prepended to refer to video games used by industries like defense, education, scientific exploration, health care, emergency management, city planning, engineering, politics and art. Serious games are a subgenre of serious storytelling, where storytelling is applied "outside the context of entertainment, where the narration progresses as a sequence of patterns impressive in quality ... and is part of a thoughtful progress". The idea shares aspects with simulation generally, including flight simulation and medical simulation, but explicitly emphasizes the added pedagogical value of fun and competition.

Human-centered design is an approach to problem-solving commonly used in process, product, service and system design, management, and engineering frameworks that develops solutions to problems by involving the human perspective in all steps of the problem-solving process. Human involvement typically takes place in initially observing the problem within context, brainstorming, conceptualizing, developing of concepts and implementing the solution.

Real-time Delphi (RTD) is an advanced form of the Delphi method. The advanced method "is a consultative process that uses computer technology" to increase efficiency of the Delphi process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gamification</span> Using game design elements in non-games

Gamification is the strategic attempt to enhance systems, services, organizations, and activities by creating similar experiences to those experienced when playing games in order to motivate and engage users. This is generally accomplished through the application of game design elements and game principles in non-game contexts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gamification of learning</span> Educational approach aiming to promote learning by using video game design and game elements

The gamification of learning is an educational approach that seeks to motivate students by using video game design and game elements in learning environments. The goal is to maximize enjoyment and engagement by capturing the interest of learners and inspiring them to continue learning. Gamification, broadly defined, is the process of defining the elements which comprise games, make those games fun, and motivate players to continue playing, then using those same elements in a non-game context to influence behavior. In other words, gamification is the introduction of game elements into a traditionally non-game situation.

A transreality game, sometimes written as trans-reality game, describes a type of video game or a mode of gameplay that combines playing a game in a virtual environment with game-related, physical experiences in the real world and vice versa. In this approach a player evolves and moves seamlessly through various physical and virtual stages, brought together in one unified game space. Alongside the rising trend of gamification, the application of game mechanics to tasks that are not traditionally associated with play, a transreality approach to gaming incorporates mechanics that extend over time and space, effectively playing through a players day-to-day interactions.

A Behavioral Change Support System (BCSS) is any information and communications technology (ICT) tool, web platform, or gamified environment which targets behavioral changes in its end-users. BCSS are built upon persuasive systems design techniques.

References

  1. ↑ "Lego Official Serious Play Site".
  2. ↑ Gauntlett, David (2007). Creative explorations: new approaches to identities and audiences. Routledge. ISBN   978-0415396592.
  3. ↑ Stephenson, William (1988). Play Theory of Mass Communication (revised ed.). Transaction Publishers. ISBN   9780887387050.
  4. ↑ Terr, Lenore (2000). Beyond Love and Work: why adults need to play. Touchstone. ISBN   978-0684863160.
  5. ↑ James Paul Gee (2004). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy .
  6. ↑ Kane, Patrick (2005). The Play Ethic: a manifesto for a different way of living . Pan. ISBN   9780330489300.
  7. ↑ Schrage, Michael (2000). Serious Play: How the World's Best Companies Simulate to Innovate. Harvard Business School Press. ISBN   9780875848143.
  8. ↑ "The Design Thinking Process". ReDesigning Theater. Retrieved June 21, 2016.
  9. ↑ Kristiansen; Rasmussen (2014). Building A Better Business: Using The Lego Serious Play Method. Wiley. ISBN   978-1118832455.
  10. ↑ Burgi; Victor; Lentz (2004). "Modeling how their business really works prepares managers for sudden change". Strategy & Leadership. 32 (2): 28–35. doi:10.1108/10878570410525106.
  11. ↑ Sorensen; Spoelstra (2012). "Play at Work: continuation, intervention, and usurpation". Organization. 19 (1): 81–97. doi:10.1177/1350508411407369. S2CID   143679779.
  12. ↑ Aliya Sternstein (June 29, 2016). "Check out the US military's sandbox of silly-putty that predicts disasters and war". Defense One.
  13. 1 2 Evans; Palmer (1989). "Intergroup Encounters of a Different Kind: the experiential research model". Studies in Higher Education. 14 (3): 297–308. doi:10.1080/03075078912331377683.
  14. ↑ Dale Mann: Serious Play (1996)
  15. ↑ Montesa-Andres; Garrigos-Simon; Narangajavana (2011). "A Proposal for Using Lego Serious Play in Education". Innovation and Teaching Technologies. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04825-3_10. ISBN   978-3-319-04824-6.
  16. ↑ Katie Watson (2011). "Teaching Medical Skills with Improvisation Techniques". Acad. Med. 86 (10): 1260–5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31822cf858 . PMID   21869654.
  17. ↑ Mary Anne Peabody (2015). "Building with Purpose: Using Lego Serious Play in Therapy Supervision". International Journal of Play Therapy. 24 (1): 30–40. doi:10.1037/a0038607.
  18. ↑ Hubbard, Ruth; Paquet, Gilles. "Cat's Cradling: APEX Forums on Wicked Problems".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  19. ↑ "University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies / Red Teaming". University of Foreign Military and Cultural Studies. Retrieved June 21, 2016.
  20. ↑ Jacqueline Lloyd Smith; Denise Meyerson (2015). Strategic Play: The Creative Facilitator's Guide. Wordzworth Publishing. ISBN   978-1783240258.
  21. ↑ Statler; Heracleous; Jacobs (2011). "Serious Play as a Practice of Paradox". Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 47 (2): 236–256. doi:10.1177/0021886311398453. S2CID   143939406.
  22. ↑ Roos; Victor (1999). "Towards a New Model of Strategy-making as Serious Play". European Management Journal. 17 (4): 348–355. doi:10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00015-8.
  23. ↑ Rieber; Smith; Noah (1998). "The Value of Serious Play". Educational Technology. 38 (6): 29–37.
  24. 1 2 Csikszentmyhalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience . New York: Harper & Row. ISBN   9780060162535.
  25. ↑ Sutton-Smith, B. (1997). The ambiguity of play. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN   9780674017337.
  26. ↑ Mabogunje; et al. (2008). L. Roosimölder (ed.). "Product Design and Intentional Emergence facilitated by Serious Play". Ds 50: Proceedings of Norddesign 2008 Conference, Tallinn, Estonia, 21.-23.08.2008: 9–18.
  27. ↑ Piaget, J. (1951). The Child's Conception of the World. London: Routledge.
  28. ↑ Papert, Seymond (1996). The Connected Family. Atlanta: Longstreet Press. ISBN   9781563523359.
  29. ↑ Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN   9780674576292.
  30. ↑ Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an Ecology of Mind (PDF). Northvale NJ: Jason Aronson Inc.
  31. ↑ Mainemelis, C. (2001). "When the Muse takes it All: A model for the Experience of Timeliness in Organizations". Academy of Management Review. 26 (4): 548–565. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.5393891.
  32. 1 2 Jensen, Camilla; et al. (2016). "Play is the Proper Prescription for Entrepreneurship".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  33. ↑ Tina Fey (2011). Bossypants . New York: Little, Brown and Co. ISBN   9781609419691.
  34. ↑ "Putting the rules of improv to work". MPD Adventures. June 30, 2014. Retrieved June 21, 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.