Slater's rules

Last updated July 20, 2022

In quantum chemistry, Slater's rules provide numerical values for the effective nuclear charge in a many-electron atom. Each electron is said to experience less than the actual nuclear charge, because of shielding or screening by the other electrons. For each electron in an atom, Slater's rules provide a value for the screening constant, denoted by s, S, or σ, which relates the effective and actual nuclear charges as

Rules

Firstly,^[1]^[4] the electrons are arranged into a sequence of groups in order of increasing principal quantum number n, and for equal n in order of increasing azimuthal quantum number l, except that s- and p- orbitals are kept together.

[1s] [2s,2p] [3s,3p] [3d] [4s,4p] [4d] [4f] [5s, 5p] [5d] etc.

Each group is given a different shielding constant which depends upon the number and types of electrons in those groups preceding it.

The shielding constant for each group is formed as the sum of the following contributions:

An amount of 0.35 from each other electron within the same group except for the [1s] group, where the other electron contributes only 0.30.
If the group is of the [ns, np] type, an amount of 0.85 from each electron with principal quantum number (n–1), and an amount of 1.00 for each electron with principal quantum number (n–2) or less.
If the group is of the [d] or [f], type, an amount of 1.00 for each electron "closer" to the nucleus than the group. This includes both i) electrons with a smaller principal quantum number than n and ii) electrons with principal quantum number n and a smaller azimuthal quantum number l.

In tabular form, the rules are summarized as:

Group	Other electrons in the same group	Electrons in group(s) with principal quantum number n and azimuthal quantum number < l	Electrons in group(s) with principal quantum number n–1	Electrons in all group(s) with principal quantum number ≤ n–2
[1s]	0.30	-	-	-
[ns,np]	0.35	-	0.85	1
[nd] or [nf]	0.35	1	1	1

Example

An example provided in Slater's original paper is for the iron atom which has nuclear charge 26 and electronic configuration 1s²2s²2p⁶3s²3p⁶3d⁶4s². The screening constant, and subsequently the shielded (or effective) nuclear charge for each electron is deduced as:^[1]

{\begin{matrix}4s&:s=0.35\times 1&+&0.85\times 14&+&1.00\times 10&=&22.25&\Rightarrow &Z_{\mathrm {eff} }(4s)=26.00-22.25=3.75\\3d&:s=0.35\times 5&&&+&1.00\times 18&=&19.75&\Rightarrow &Z_{\mathrm {eff} }(3d)=26.00-19.75=6.25\\3s,3p&:s=0.35\times 7&+&0.85\times 8&+&1.00\times 2&=&11.25&\Rightarrow &Z_{\mathrm {eff} }(3s,3p)=26.00-11.25=14.75\\2s,2p&:s=0.35\times 7&+&0.85\times 2&&&=&4.15&\Rightarrow &Z_{\mathrm {eff} }(2s,2p)=26.00-4.15=21.85\\1s&:s=0.30\times 1&&&&&=&0.30&\Rightarrow &Z_{\mathrm {eff} }(1s)=26.00-0.30=25.70\end{matrix}}

Note that the effective nuclear charge is calculated by subtracting the screening constant from the atomic number, 26.

Motivation

The rules were developed by John C. Slater in an attempt to construct simple analytic expressions for the atomic orbital of any electron in an atom. Specifically, for each electron in an atom, Slater wished to determine shielding constants (s) and "effective" quantum numbers (n*) such that

\psi _{n^{*}s}(r)=r^{n^{*}-1}\exp \left(-{\frac {(Z-s)r}{n^{*}}}\right)

provides a reasonable approximation to a single-electron wave function. Slater defined n* by the rule that for n = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 respectively; n* = 1, 2, 3, 3.7, 4.0 and 4.2. This was an arbitrary adjustment to fit calculated atomic energies to experimental data.

Such a form was inspired by the known wave function spectrum of hydrogen-like atoms which have the radial component

R_{nl}(r)=r^{l}f_{nl}(r)\exp \left(-{\frac {Zr}{n}}\right),

where n is the (true) principal quantum number, l the azimuthal quantum number, and f_nl(r) is an oscillatory polynomial with n - l - 1 nodes.^[5] Slater argued on the basis of previous calculations by Clarence Zener ^[6] that the presence of radial nodes was not required to obtain a reasonable approximation. He also noted that in the asymptotic limit (far away from the nucleus), his approximate form coincides with the exact hydrogen-like wave function in the presence of a nuclear charge of Z-s and in the state with a principal quantum number n equal to his effective quantum number n*.

Slater then argued, again based on the work of Zener, that the total energy of a N-electron atom with a wavefunction constructed from orbitals of his form should be well approximated as

E=-\sum _{i=1}^{N}\left({\frac {Z-s_{i}}{n_{i}^{*}}}\right)^{2}.

Using this expression for the total energy of an atom (or ion) as a function of the shielding constants and effective quantum numbers, Slater was able to compose rules such that spectral energies calculated agree reasonably well with experimental values for a wide range of atoms. Using the values in the iron example above, the total energy of a neutral iron atom using this method is −2497.2 Ry, while the energy of an excited Fe⁺ cation lacking a single 1s electron is −1964.6 Ry. The difference, 532.6 Ry, can be compared to the experimental (circa 1930) K absorption limit of 524.0 Ry.^[1]

Related Research Articles

In atomic theory and quantum mechanics, an atomic orbital is a function describing the location and wave-like behavior of an electron in an atom. This function can be used to calculate the probability of finding any electron of an atom in any specific region around the atom's nucleus. The term atomic orbital may also refer to the physical region or space where the electron can be calculated to be present, as predicted by the particular mathematical form of the orbital.

In atomic physics, the Bohr model or Rutherford–Bohr model, presented by Niels Bohr and Ernest Rutherford in 1913, is a system consisting of a small, dense nucleus surrounded by orbiting electrons—similar to the structure of the Solar System, but with attraction provided by electrostatic forces in place of gravity. It came after the solar system Joseph Larmor model (1897), the cubical model (1902), the Hantaro Nagaoka Saturnian model (1904), the plum pudding model (1904), the quantum Arthur Haas model (1910), the Rutherford model (1911), and the nuclear quantum John William Nicholson model (1912). The improvement over the 1911 Rutherford model mainly concerned the new quantum physical interpretation introduced by Haas and Nicholson, but forsaking any attempt to align with classical physics radiation.

A hydrogen atom is an atom of the chemical element hydrogen. The electrically neutral atom contains a single positively charged proton and a single negatively charged electron bound to the nucleus by the Coulomb force. Atomic hydrogen constitutes about 75% of the baryonic mass of the universe.

Paramagnetism Weak, attractive magnetism possessed by most elements and some compounds

Paramagnetism is a form of magnetism whereby some materials are weakly attracted by an externally applied magnetic field, and form internal, induced magnetic fields in the direction of the applied magnetic field. In contrast with this behavior, diamagnetic materials are repelled by magnetic fields and form induced magnetic fields in the direction opposite to that of the applied magnetic field. Paramagnetic materials include most chemical elements and some compounds; they have a relative magnetic permeability slightly greater than 1 and hence are attracted to magnetic fields. The magnetic moment induced by the applied field is linear in the field strength and rather weak. It typically requires a sensitive analytical balance to detect the effect and modern measurements on paramagnetic materials are often conducted with a SQUID magnetometer.

The atomic radius of a chemical element is a measure of the size of its atom, usually the mean or typical distance from the center of the nucleus to the outermost isolated electron. Since the boundary is not a well-defined physical entity, there are various non-equivalent definitions of atomic radius. Four widely used definitions of atomic radius are: Van der Waals radius, ionic radius, metallic radius and covalent radius. Typically, because of the difficulty to isolate atoms in order to measure their radii separately, atomic radius is measured in a chemically bonded state; however theoretical calculations are simpler when considering atoms in isolation. The dependencies on environment, probe, and state lead to a multiplicity of definitions.

A quantum mechanical system or particle that is bound—that is, confined spatially—can only take on certain discrete values of energy, called energy levels. This contrasts with classical particles, which can have any amount of energy. The term is commonly used for the energy levels of the electrons in atoms, ions, or molecules, which are bound by the electric field of the nucleus, but can also refer to energy levels of nuclei or vibrational or rotational energy levels in molecules. The energy spectrum of a system with such discrete energy levels is said to be quantized.

In physics and chemistry, ionization energy (IE) (American English spelling), ionisation energy (British English spelling) is the minimum energy required to remove the most loosely bound electron of an isolated gaseous atom, positive ion, or molecule. The first ionization energy is quantitatively expressed as

The Bohr radius (a₀) is a physical constant, approximately equal to the most probable distance between the nucleus and the electron in a hydrogen atom in its ground state. It is named after Niels Bohr, due to its role in the Bohr model of an atom. Its value is 5.29177210903(80)×10⁻¹¹ m.

In physics, screening is the damping of electric fields caused by the presence of mobile charge carriers. It is an important part of the behavior of charge-carrying fluids, such as ionized gases, electrolytes, and charge carriers in electronic conductors . In a fluid, with a given permittivity $ε$ , composed of electrically charged constituent particles, each pair of particles interact through the Coulomb force as

In quantum chemistry, electron density or electronic density is the measure of the probability of an electron being present at an infinitesimal element of space surrounding any given point. It is a scalar quantity depending upon three spatial variables and is typically denoted as either $or . The density is determined, through definition, by the normalised -electron wavefunction which itself depends upon variables. Conversely, the density determines the wave function modulo up to a phase factor, providing the formal foundation of density functional theory.$

Rydberg formula Formula for spectral line wavelengths in alkali metals

In atomic physics, the Rydberg formula calculates the wavelengths of a spectral line in many chemical elements. The formula was primarily presented as a generalization of the Balmer series for all atomic electron transitions of hydrogen. It was first empirically stated in 1888 by the Swedish physicist Johannes Rydberg, then theoretically by Niels Bohr in 1913, who used a primitive form of quantum mechanics. The formula directly generalizes the equations used to calculate the wavelengths of the hydrogen spectral series.

Slater-type orbitals (STOs) are functions used as atomic orbitals in the linear combination of atomic orbitals molecular orbital method. They are named after the physicist John C. Slater, who introduced them in 1930.

In computational physics and chemistry, the Hartree–Fock (HF) method is a method of approximation for the determination of the wave function and the energy of a quantum many-body system in a stationary state.

The shielding effect sometimes referred to as atomic shielding or electron shielding describes the attraction between an electron and the nucleus in any atom with more than one electron. The shielding effect can be defined as a reduction in the effective nuclear charge on the electron cloud, due to a difference in the attraction forces on the electrons in the atom. It is a special case of electric-field screening. This effect also has some significance in many projects in material sciences.

In atomic physics, the effective nuclear charge is the actual amount of positive (nuclear) charge experienced by an electron in a multi-electron atom. The term "effective" is used because the shielding effect of negatively charged electrons prevent higher energy electrons from experiencing the full nuclear charge of the nucleus due to the repelling effect of inner layer. The effective nuclear charge experienced by an electron is also called the core charge. It is possible to determine the strength of the nuclear charge by the oxidation number of the atom. Most of the physical and chemical properties of the elements can be explained on the basis of electronic configuration. Consider the behavior of ionization energies in the periodic table. It is known that the magnitude of ionization potential depends upon the following factors:

Size of atom;
The nuclear charge;
The screening effect of the inner shells, and
The extent to which the outermost electron penetrates into the charge cloud set up by the inner lying electron.

In atomic physics, the magnetic quantum number is one of the four quantum numbers which describe the unique quantum state of an electron. The magnetic quantum number distinguishes the orbitals available within a subshell, and is used to calculate the azimuthal component of the orientation of orbital in space. Electrons in a particular subshell are defined by values of $ℓ$ . The value of $m l$ can range from $- ℓ$ to $+ ℓ$ , including zero. Thus the s, p, d, and f subshells contain 1, 3, 5, and 7 orbitals each, with values of $m$ within the ranges 0, ±1, ±2, ±3 respectively. Each of these orbitals can accommodate up to two electrons, forming the basis of the periodic table.

Moseley's law is an empirical law concerning the characteristic x-rays emitted by atoms. The law had been discovered and published by the English physicist Henry Moseley in 1913-1914. Until Moseley's work, "atomic number" was merely an element's place in the periodic table and was not known to be associated with any measurable physical quantity. In brief, the law states that the square root of the frequency of the emitted x-ray is approximately proportional to the atomic number.

The atomic number of a material exhibits a strong and fundamental relationship with the nature of radiation interactions within that medium. There are numerous mathematical descriptions of different interaction processes that are dependent on the atomic number, Z. When dealing with composite media, one therefore encounters the difficulty of defining Z. An effective atomic number in this context is equivalent to the atomic number but is used for compounds and mixtures of different materials. This is of most interest in terms of radiation interaction with composite materials. For bulk interaction properties, it can be useful to define an effective atomic number for a composite medium and, depending on the context, this may be done in different ways. Such methods include (i) a simple mass-weighted average, (ii) a power-law type method with some relationship to radiation interaction properties or (iii) methods involving calculation based on interaction cross sections. The latter is the most accurate approach, and the other more simplified approaches are often inaccurate even when used in a relative fashion for comparing materials.

A hydrogen-like atom (or hydrogenic atom) is any atom or ion with a single valence electron. These atoms are isoelectronic with hydrogen. Examples of hydrogen-like atoms include, but are not limited to, hydrogen itself, all alkali metals such as Rb and Cs, singly ionized alkaline earth metals such as Ca⁺ and Sr⁺ and other ions such as He⁺, Li²⁺, and Be³⁺ and isotopes of any of the above. A hydrogen-like atom includes a positively charged core consisting of the atomic nucleus and any core electrons as well as a single valence electron. Because helium is common in the universe, the spectroscopy of singly ionized helium is important in EUV astronomy, for example, of DO white dwarf stars.

The Bohr–Sommerfeld model was an extension of the Bohr model to allow elliptical orbits of electrons around an atomic nucleus. Bohr–Sommerfeld theory is named after Danish physicist Niels Bohr and German physicist Arnold Sommerfeld. Sommerfeld argued that if electronic orbits could be elliptical instead of circular, the energy of the electron would be the same, except in the presence of a magnetic field, introducing what is now known as quantum degeneracy.

References

1 2 3 4 Slater, J. C. (1930). "Atomic Shielding Constants" (PDF). Phys. Rev. 36 (1): 57–64. Bibcode:1930PhRv...36...57S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.57. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-23.
↑ Clementi, E.; Raimondi, D. L. (1963). "Atomic Screening Constants from SCF Functions". J. Chem. Phys. 38 (11): 2686–2689. Bibcode:1963JChPh..38.2686C. doi:10.1063/1.1733573.
↑ Clementi, E.; Raimondi, D. L.; Reinhardt, W. P. (1967). "Atomic Screening Constants from SCF Functions. II. Atoms with 37 to 86 Electrons". Journal of Chemical Physics. 47 (4): 1300–1307. Bibcode:1967JChPh..47.1300C. doi:10.1063/1.1712084.
↑ Miessler, Gary L.; Tarr, Donald A. (2003). Inorganic Chemistry. Prentice Hall. pp. 38. ISBN 978-0-13-035471-6.
↑ Robinett, Richard W. (2006). Quantum Mechanics Classical Results, Modern Systems, and Visualized Examples. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 503. ISBN 978-0-13-120198-9.
↑ Zener, Clarence (1930). "Analytic Atomic Wave Functions". Phys. Rev. 36 (1): 51–56. Bibcode:1930PhRv...36...51Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.51.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[slater57-1] 1 2 3 4 Slater, J. C. (1930). "Atomic Shielding Constants" (PDF). Phys. Rev. 36 (1): 57–64. Bibcode:1930PhRv...36...57S. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.57. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-23.

[2] Clementi, E.; Raimondi, D. L. (1963). "Atomic Screening Constants from SCF Functions". J. Chem. Phys. 38 (11): 2686–2689. Bibcode:1963JChPh..38.2686C. doi:10.1063/1.1733573.

[clem67-3] Clementi, E.; Raimondi, D. L.; Reinhardt, W. P. (1967). "Atomic Screening Constants from SCF Functions. II. Atoms with 37 to 86 Electrons". Journal of Chemical Physics. 47 (4): 1300–1307. Bibcode:1967JChPh..47.1300C. doi:10.1063/1.1712084.

[4] Miessler, Gary L.; Tarr, Donald A. (2003). Inorganic Chemistry. Prentice Hall. pp. 38. ISBN 978-0-13-035471-6.

[5] Robinett, Richard W. (2006). Quantum Mechanics Classical Results, Modern Systems, and Visualized Examples. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 503. ISBN 978-0-13-120198-9.

[6] Zener, Clarence (1930). "Analytic Atomic Wave Functions". Phys. Rev. 36 (1): 51–56. Bibcode:1930PhRv...36...51Z. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.36.51.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]