Smith v Parsons

Last updated

Smith v Parsons
Court Supreme Court of Appeal (South Africa)
Full case nameSmith v Parsons NO and Others
Decided30 March 2010
Docket nos.187/09
Citation(s) [2010] ZASCA 39; [2010] 4 All SA 74 (SCA)
Case history
Appealed fromSmith v Parsons NO and Others [2009] ZAKZHC 2 in the High Court of South Africa, Durban and Coast Local Division
Court membership
Judges sitting Lewis JA, Heher JA, Mhlantla JA, Leach JA and Seriti AJA
Case opinions
Decision bySeriti AJA (unanimous)
Keywords

Smith v Parsons NO and Others is an important case in South African succession law, decided in the Supreme Court of Appeal in March 2010. It concerned the condonation of a suicide note as an amendment to the deceased's will.

Contents

Background

The deceased, Walter Percival Smith, had validly executed a will in 2003 making his son, Jeremy Alan Smith, his sole heir. On 25 February 2007, he committed suicide, leaving a suicide note on the kitchen counter under a crucifix. The note was addressed to his girlfriend, Heather Wendy Smith. Part of it read:

Heather you can have this house, you will obviously? sell it and should meet all your future needs. Also I authorise Standard Bank to give you immediate access to Plusplan – there is R579,000.00 which will not leave you battling... There are also several thousand Rands in the bottom drawer of the safe... My will is in the Brown envelope in the safe. I leave everything else to Jeremy as stated therein.

Heather Smith applied to the High Court of South Africa for an order directing the Master of the High Court to accept the suicide note as a codicil to the will of the deceased. Her application was opposed by the son of the deceased. The High Court held that, although the deceased had written the note, he did not unequivocally intend the suicide note to amend his will. The applicant appealed to the Supreme Court of Appeal, where the matter was heard on 5 March 2010.

Judgment

On 30 March 2010, Acting Judge of Appeal Willie Seriti delivered a unanimous judgment on behalf of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The court upheld the appeal, ordering that the suicide note should be accepted as an amendment to the deceased's will. The determination turned on the so-called condonation clause, section 2(3) of the Wills Act, 1953, which provided that an informally drafted document would be accepted as codicil to a deceased person's will if the document "was intended to be his will or an amendment of his will". [1] [2]

Seriti held that, based on the wording of the note and the surrounding circumstances, Walter Smith's suicide note constituted the deceased's "clear instruction" for the disposal of his estate. He pointed in particular to Smith's reference to his existing will, which demonstrated that "he was conscious of the fact that he had a will and that it did not make provision for the appellant, hence the instructions contained in the suicide note making provision for her." The court also dismissed the respondent's argument that the suicide note constituted a donatio mortis causa.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judicial Committee of the Privy Council</span> Judicial body in the United Kingdom

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) is the highest court of appeal for the Crown Dependencies, the British Overseas Territories, some Commonwealth countries and a few institutions in the United Kingdom. Established on 14 August 1833 to hear appeals formerly heard by the King-in-Council, the Privy Council formerly acted as the court of last resort for the entire British Empire, other than for the United Kingdom itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Will and testament</span> Legal declaration by which a person distributes their property at death

A will and testament is a legal document that expresses a person's (testator) wishes as to how their property (estate) is to be distributed after their death and as to which person (executor) is to manage the property until its final distribution. For the distribution (devolution) of property not determined by a will, see inheritance and intestacy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Ireland</span> Highest judicial authority in Ireland

The Supreme Court of Ireland is the highest judicial authority in Ireland. It is a court of final appeal and exercises, in conjunction with the Court of Appeal and the High Court, judicial review over Acts of the Oireachtas. The Supreme Court also has appellate jurisdiction to ensure compliance with the Constitution of Ireland by governmental bodies and private citizens. It sits in the Four Courts in Dublin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legal history of wills</span> United Kingdom legislation

Wills have a lengthy history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Appeal (South Africa)</span> National court beneath the Constitutional Court of South Africa

The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA), formerly known as the Appellate Division, is the second-highest court of appeal in South Africa below the Constitutional Court. The country's apex court from 1910 to 1994, it no longer holds that position, having been displaced in constitutional matters by the Constitutional Court in 1994, and in all matters by 2013. It is located in Bloemfontein. Bloemfontein is often, and has been traditionally referred to, as the "judicial capital" of South Africa because of the court, although the Constitutional Court is based in Johannesburg.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Holographic will</span> Handwritten and signed will and testament

A holographic will, or olographic testament, is a will and testament which is a holographic document, meaning that it has been entirely handwritten and signed by the testator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Missouri</span> Highest court in the U.S. state of Missouri

The Supreme Court of Missouri is the highest court in the state of Missouri. It was established in 1820 and is located at 207 West High Street in Jefferson City, Missouri. Missouri voters have approved changes in the state's constitution to give the Supreme Court exclusive jurisdiction – the sole legal power to hear – over five types of cases on appeal. Pursuant to Article V, Section 3 of the Missouri Constitution, these cases involve:

Before 1982, modifying the Constitution of Canada primarily meant amending the British North America Act, 1867. Unlike most other constitutions, however, the Act had no amending formula; instead, changes were enacted through Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom called the British North America Acts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wills Act 1837</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Wills Act 1837 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that confirms the power of every adult to dispose of their real and personal property, whether they are the outright owner or a beneficiary under a trust, by will on their death (s.3). The act extends to all testamentary dispositions or gifts, where "a person makes a disposition of his property to take effect after his decease, and which is in its own nature ambulatory and revocable during his life." As of 2012, much of it remains in force in England and Wales.

The law of persons in South Africa regulates the birth, private-law status and the death of a natural person. It determines the requirements and qualifications for legal subjectivity in South Africa, and the rights and responsibilities that attach to it.

<i>Geldenhuys v National Director of Public Prosecutions</i> South African legal case

Geldenhuys v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa which struck down as unconstitutional a law which set the age of consent at 19 for homosexual sex but only 16 for heterosexual sex.

The South African law of succession prescribes the rules which determine the devolution of a person's estate after his death, and all matters incidental thereto. It identifies the beneficiaries who are entitled to succeed to the deceased's estate, and the extent of the benefits they are to receive, and determines the different rights and duties that persons may have in a deceased's estate. It forms part of private law.

Mthembu v Letsela and Another, an important case in South African customary law, was heard in the Transvaal Provincial Division by Le Roux J on 21 November 1996, with judgment handed down on 25 November.

The Coloured vote constitutional crisis, also known as the Coloured vote case, was a constitutional crisis that occurred in the Union of South Africa during the 1950s as the result of an attempt by the Nationalist government to remove coloured voters in the Union's Cape Province from the common voters' rolls. It developed into a dispute between the judiciary and the other branches of government over the power of Parliament to amend an entrenched clause in the South Africa Act and the power of the Appellate Division to overturn the amendment as unconstitutional. The crisis ended when the government enlarged the Senate and altered its method of election, allowing the amendment to be successfully enacted.

<i>Nadan v R</i> 1926 Judicial Committee of the Privy Council ruling

Nadan v R is a key ruling of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in determining the competence of the Parliament of Canada with respect to the restrictions laid out in the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865, and whether it possessed extraterritorial jurisdiction.

Henriques v Giles NO and Another; Henriques v Giles NO and Others is an important case in the South African law of succession, decided in the Supreme Court of Appeal in May 2009. It concerned the rectification of cross-signed wills. The matter was an appeal from the High Court of South Africa, where it was heard in 2007 by Judge Patricia Goliath of the Cape Town High Court.

Testate succession exists under the law of succession in South Africa.

Blackwell v Blackwell [1929] UKHL 1 is an English trusts law case, concerning the doctrine of secret trusts.

Wills, Estates And Succession Act of British Columbia (WESA) is a provincial statute that governs the law of inheritance in British Columbia, Canada. The bill was introduced in Legislative Assembly of British Columbia on September 24, 2009 and received royal assent on October 29, 2009. WESA amalgamated and in some cases replaced five earlier pieces of legislation. These include: Estate Administration Act RSBC 1996, c. 122,Probate Recognition RSBC 1996, c. 376, Wills Act RSBC 1996, c. 489, Wills Variation Act RSBC 1996, c.Law and Equity Act RSBC 1996, c. 253, s. 46, 49, 50 & 51 and Survivorship and Presumption of Death Act RSBC 1996, c. 444. WESA has given the court curative discretion under Part 5, and in Section 60 allows the court to invalidate and supplant testamentary instruments that are deemed by the court defective as regards proper maintenance and support of the will-maker's spouse or children.

Legoabe Willie Seriti is a South African retired judge who served in the Supreme Court of Appeal between 2010 and 2019. Before his elevation to that court, he was a judge of the Gauteng High Court from 2003 to 2010. He is best known for his role in the Seriti Commission of Inquiry into the Arms Deal, which he chaired between 2011 and 2015. He was formerly an attorney in his hometown of Pretoria.

References

  1. Wood-Bodley, M. (2011). "Suicide notes, wills, testamentary capacity, and s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953: Smith v Parsons NO; Henriques v Giles NO: notes". South African Law Journal. 128 (612–620).
  2. Schoeman-Malan, Linda; Du Toit, Francois; Van der Linde, Anton; Faber, James (2014). "Section 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953: a retrospective and critical appraisal of some unresolved issues". Acta Juridica. 1: 78–103. ISSN   0065-1346.