Social prescribing

Last updated

Social prescribing (also known as community referral) is when a Social Prescribing Link Worker engages with a patient to support them with a plan which can be a series of signposting or referrals to support in the community, in order to improve their health and wellbeing. [1] The concept has gained support in the NHS organisations of the United Kingdom as well as in Ireland [2] and the Netherlands [3] and forms part of the NHS Long Term Plan. The referral mechanisms, target groups, services offered through social prescribing vary across settings. However, the process usually involves screening for non-medical needs and referrals to support services that are typically offered by community-based organizations. [4]

Contents

The goals of social prescribing are to reduce the rise of healthcare costs and easing pressure of general practice clinics. [1] A 2015 Commission in the UK estimated that about 20% of patient consultations were for social problems rather than medical problems. [5]

Definition

Social prescribing is a non-medical referral option for a range of professionals, including GPs and allied medical staff, as well as non-medical professionals working in the social care and charity sectors. People can also self-refer for support in many areas. [4] Doctors can refer some of their patients to a social prescribing specialist or link worker who can then suggest local social groups which they can participate in to improve their health and wellbeing. [6] These may include social enterprises, community businesses and local volunteer groups.

Evaluation

A 2016 review in The BMJ concluded that further, more robust testing was needed to determine how effective it was, noting that evidence in favour of social prescription came from small trials that were open to a range of biases. [1] A study of social prescription programs at 23 GP surgeries in central London found it produced a strong improvement in qualitative outcomes such as making participants less isolated, while quantitative outcomes such as general health and wellbeing were largely unchanged. [7] [8]

A 2020 review found that social prescribing can help people develop a sense of belonging and confidence. But for this to happen, link workers need the resources to develop extensive knowledge of local organisations and services. They also need to have enough time to build a relationship with their patients. [9] [10]

In the London borough of Merton, a review found that in ‘pre COVID’ times social prescribing reduced patients’ GP appointments by 33% and A&E attendances by 50%. Their wellbeing scores improved by 77%. [11] Five other studies looked at the effect on Accident and Emergency (A&E) attendances reporting an average 24% fall in attendance following referral. [12]

A study published in 2023 examined the medical records of 8,357 adults aged 40 – 74 with type 2 diabetes. Blood sugar control was slightly better with social prescribing but other health measures were unchanged. When support matched the needs of the person, social prescribing could help people make positive changes and deal with social and health-related problems. But providing the right support could be time-consuming and challenging. It also cost more than usual care. The experience of social prescribing depended on client circumstances. [13]

Researchers have shown how the same social factors that impact people’s health also impact their capacity to engage with social prescribing, meaning that those with greatest need may be least able to benefit from interventions [14] - an example of the inverse care law in action. For this and other reasons, it has been suggested that social prescribing is unlikely to reduce health inequalities, and may risk exacerbating them. [15]

Examples

In Brighton and Hove, pilot funding was provided in 2014 for a Community Navigator scheme. The pilot involved placing volunteer navigators in 16 of Brighton's 36 GP surgeries. In recognition of the programme's success, the local CCG took over funding the scheme when the pilot ended in 2016. The provider, Together Co, [16] has been held up as an example of good practice for its provision of social prescribing and for running a link worker network in the city so that staff at a range of organisations can benefit from ongoing learning and development. [17]

In the state of Victoria, Australia, recommendation 15 [18] from the Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System [19] [20] [21] [22] recommended the establishment of one social prescribing trial per region in Local Mental Health and Wellbeing Services to support healthcare professionals to refer people, particularly older Victorians, living with mental illness, into community initiatives. [23] Social prescribing trials are planned to commence in six Local Services. These services are being established in the local government areas of Frankston, Latrobe and Benalla-Wangaratta-Mansfield, Brimbank, Geelong-Queenscliffe and Whittlesea. [24] [25] [26]

Resources

A National Academy for Social Prescribing was established in the UK. [27] There is also a National Association of Link Workers, which aims to support social prescribing staff, to lobby for improvements, and to provide guidance and continuing professional development to members. [28]

Healthy London Partnership has produced a report intended to help CCG commissioners make decisions about implementing social prescribing [29] and are also hosting a wiki specifically on Social Prescribing and Self Care. [30]

Conclusions

Social prescribing is a logical extension of the biopsychosocial model of healthcare. There are several theoretical and practical factors in favor of this scheme. [4] Therefore, the momentum for social prescribing is likely to be sustained, even with the lack of evidence to support its growth. This scheme presents an approach for expanding the avenue of social care for the patients. However, it will only see success when healthcare professionals fully accept it as a useful mechanism for improving the overall health and wellbeing of their patients. [4]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>British National Formulary</i> Pharmaceutical reference book for the UK

The British National Formulary (BNF) is a United Kingdom (UK) pharmaceutical reference book that contains a wide spectrum of information and advice on prescribing and pharmacology, along with specific facts and details about many medicines available on the UK National Health Service (NHS). Information within the BNF includes indication(s), contraindications, side effects, doses, legal classification, names and prices of available proprietary and generic formulations, and any other notable points. Though it is a national formulary, it nevertheless also includes entries for some medicines which are not available under the NHS, and must be prescribed and/or purchased privately. A symbol clearly denotes such drugs in their entry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General practice</span> Patient-based medical care provided across age, gender and specialty boundaries

General practice is personal, family, and community-orientated comprehensive primary care that includes diagnosis, continues over time and is anticipatory as well as responsive.

Polyclinics in England were intended to offer a greater range of services than were offered by current general practitioner (GP) practices and local health centres. In addition to traditional GP services they would offer extended urgent care, healthy living services, community mental health services and social care, whilst being more accessible and less medicalised than hospitals. A variety of models were proposed, ranging from networks of existing clinics to larger premises with several colocated general practitioner (GP) practices, more extensive facilities and additional services provided by allied healthcare professionals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NHS Scotland</span> Publicly-funded healthcare system in Scotland

NHS Scotland, sometimes styled NHSScotland, is the publicly–funded healthcare system in Scotland and one of the four systems that make up the National Health Service in the United Kingdom. It operates 14 territorial NHS boards across Scotland, supported by seven special non-geographic health boards, and Public Health Scotland.

Health and Social Care is the publicly funded healthcare system in Northern Ireland. Although having been created separately to the National Health Service (NHS), it is nonetheless considered a part of the overall national health service in the United Kingdom. The Northern Ireland Executive through its Department of Health is responsible for its funding, while the Public Health Agency is the executive agency responsible for the provision of public health and social care services across Northern Ireland. It is free of charge to all citizens of Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom.

A virtual ward allows patients to get the care they need at home safely and conveniently, rather than being in hospital.

Unwarranted variation in health care service delivery refers to medical practice pattern variation that cannot be explained by illness, medical need, or the dictates of evidence-based medicine. It is one of the causes of low value care often ignored by health systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Health Service (England)</span> Publicly-funded healthcare system in England

The National Health Service (NHS) is the publicly funded healthcare system in England, and one of the four National Health Service systems in the United Kingdom. It is the second largest single-payer healthcare system in the world after the Brazilian Sistema Único de Saúde. Primarily funded by the government from general taxation, and overseen by the Department of Health and Social Care, the NHS provides healthcare to all legal English residents and residents from other regions of the UK, with most services free at the point of use for most people. The NHS also conducts research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR).

SystmOne is a centrally hosted clinical computer system developed by Horsforth-based The Phoenix Partnership (TPP). It is used by healthcare professionals in the UK predominantly in primary care. The system is being deployed as one of the accredited systems in the government's programme of modernising IT in the NHS.

Healthcare in England is mainly provided by the National Health Service (NHS), a public body that provides healthcare to all permanent residents in England, that is free at the point of use. The body is one of four forming the UK National Health Service, as health is a devolved matter; there are differences with the provisions for healthcare elsewhere in the United Kingdom, and in England it is overseen by NHS England. Though the public system dominates healthcare provision in England, private health care and a wide variety of alternative and complementary treatments are available for those willing and able to pay.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Healthcare in Wales</span> Overview of the health care system in Wales

Healthcare in Wales is mainly provided by the Welsh public health service, NHS Wales. NHS Wales provides healthcare to all permanent residents that is free at the point of need and paid for from general taxation. Health is a matter that is devolved, and considerable differences are now developing between the public healthcare systems in the different countries of the United Kingdom, collectively the National Health Service (NHS). Though the public system dominates healthcare provision, private health care and a wide variety of alternative and complementary treatments are available for those willing to pay.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Health and Social Care Act 2012</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Health and Social Care Act 2012 is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It provided for the most extensive reorganisation of the structure of the National Health Service in England to date. It removed responsibility for the health of citizens from the Secretary of State for Health, which the post had carried since the inception of the NHS in 1948. It abolished primary care trusts (PCTs) and strategic health authorities (SHAs) and transferred between £60 billion and £80 billion of "commissioning", or healthcare funds, from the abolished PCTs to several hundred clinical commissioning groups, partly run by the general practitioners (GPs) in England. A new executive agency of the Department of Health, Public Health England, was established under the act on 1 April 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sam Everington</span> British physician and administrator

Sir Anthony Herbert Everington, known as Sam Everington, is a GP at a health centre within the Bromley by Bow Centre, in Tower Hamlets, an area of East London.

The Five Year Forward View was produced by NHS England in October 2014 under the leadership of Simon Stevens as a planning document.

Patient record access in the United Kingdom has developed most fully in respect of the GP record, because computerisation in that field is almost universal. British hospitals were slower to move into electronic records. From 1 April 2015 all GP practices in England have to provide online services to patients, including access to summary electronic medical records.

Healthcare in Cornwall was until July 2022 the responsibility of Kernow clinical commissioning group, until it got replaced by Integrated care system, as a result of the Health and Care Act 2022. As far as the NHS is concerned, Cornwall includes the Isles of Scilly.

The "Greater Manchester Model" of NHS health care was a system uniquely devolved within England, by way of close integration with the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and local authorities, led by the Mayor of Greater Manchester. In July 2022 the Greater Manchester integrated care system took over responsibility for health and social care in the conurbation. The financial plan for 2022–23 had an initial shortage of £187 million.

Healthcare in the West Midlands was, until July 2022, the responsibility of five integrated care groups: Birmingham and Solihull, Sandwell and West Birmingham, Dudley, Wolverhampton, and Walsall.

In 2005 the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom began deployment of electronic health record systems in NHS Trusts. The goal was to have all patients with a centralized electronic health record by 2010. Lorenzo patient record systems were adopted in a number of NHS trusts. While many hospitals acquired electronic patient records systems in this process, there was no national healthcare information exchange. Ultimately, the program was dismantled after a cost to the UK taxpayer was over $24 billion, and is considered one of the most expensive healthcare IT failures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paintings in Hospitals</span> British charitable organization

Paintings in Hospitals is an arts in health charity in the United Kingdom. Founded in 1959, the charity's services include the provision of artwork loans, art projects and art workshops to health and social care organisations. The charity's activities are based on clinical evidence demonstrating health and wellbeing benefits of the arts to patients and care staff.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Bickerdike L, Booth A, Wilson PM, Farley K, Wright K (13 December 2016). "Social prescribing: less rhetoric and more reality. A systematic review of the evidence". BMJ Open. 2017 (7): e013384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013384 . PMC   5558801 . PMID   28389486.
  2. "What is social prescribing and how it can benefit your health". Irish Times. 9 April 2019. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
  3. "Community activity as a path to better health". Financial Times. 20 November 2018. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Islam, M. Mofizul (27 November 2020). "Social Prescribing—An Effort to Apply a Common Knowledge: Impelling Forces and Challenges". Frontiers in Public Health. Vol. 8. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.515469 .
  5. "Plan to expand social prescribing in bid to tackle health inequalities". GP Online. 24 August 2017. Retrieved 8 October 2017.
  6. "Social Prescribing Network". Patient Outcomes in Health Research Group Projects. University of Westminster. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
  7. "Social Prescribing: integrating GP and community health assets". The Health Foundation. Retrieved 7 May 2019.
  8. Sarah Kinsella; et al. (Wirral Council Business & Public Health Intelligence Team) (July 2015). Social Prescribing: A review of the evidence (PDF) (Report). Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 April 2017.
  9. "Social prescribing could empower patients to address non-medical problems in their lives". NIHR Evidence (Plain English summary). 19 May 2020. doi:10.3310/alert_40304. S2CID   240873346.
  10. Tierney, Stephanie; Wong, Geoff; Roberts, Nia; Boylan, Anne-Marie; Park, Sophie; Abrams, Ruth; Reeve, Joanne; Williams, Veronika; Mahtani, Kamal R. (13 March 2020). "Supporting social prescribing in primary care by linking people to local assets: a realist review". BMC Medicine. 18 (1): 49. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1510-7 . ISSN   1741-7015. PMC   7068902 . PMID   32164681.
  11. "A GP perspective on social prescribing and the response to COVID-19 in Merton". NHS England. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
  12. "A review of the evidence assessing impact of social prescribing on healthcare demand and cost implications" (PDF). Westminster.ac.uk. Retrieved 5 July 2022.
  13. "Can social prescribing improve the health of people with diabetes?". National Institute for Health and Care Research - NIHR Evidence. 2024. doi:10.3310/nihrevidence_61876 . Retrieved 26 January 2024.
  14. Gibson K, Pollard TM, Moffatt S (16 May 2021). "Social prescribing and classed inequality: A journey of upward health mobility?". Social Science & Medicine. 280. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114037 . PMID   34033978.
  15. Moscrop A (6 April 2023). "Social prescribing is no remedy for health inequalities". BMJ. 381: 715. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p715 . PMID   37024118.
  16. "Social Prescribing Brighton & Hove". Together Co.
  17. Cole, Aimie; Jones, Dan; Jopling, Kate (September 2020). "Rolling Out Social Prescribing" (PDF). National Voices . Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 January 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
  18. System, Royal Commission into Victorias Mental Health. "Recommendations". Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  19. Department of Health. Victoria, Australia. "About the final report of the Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System". www.health.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  20. System, Royal Commission into Victorias Mental Health. "Home". Royal Commission into Victoria’s Mental Health System. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  21. "Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System". rcvmhs.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  22. "Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System | RANZCP". www.ranzcp.org. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  23. Department of Health. Victoria, Australia. "Recommendation 15". www.health.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  24. Department of Health. Victoria, Australia. "Social Prescribing Trials". www.health.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  25. "A Mental Health System To Work For Every Victorian | Premier of Victoria". www.premier.vic.gov.au. Retrieved 13 April 2023.
  26. "The Royal Commission into Victoria's Mental Health System – one year on". Victorian Health Building Authority. 13 April 2023.
  27. "National Academy for Social Prescribing". National Academy for Social Prescribing . Archived from the original on 1 June 2023. Retrieved 2 July 2023.
  28. "National Association of Link Workers". www.nalw.org.uk. Archived from the original on 2 May 2023. Retrieved 1 July 2023.
  29. "Steps towards implementing self-care". Healthy London Partnership. NHS. Archived from the original on 4 April 2017.
  30. "Social Prescribing and Self Care wiki". Healthy London Partnership. NHS. Retrieved 7 May 2019.