Social space

Last updated

A social space is physical or virtual space such as a social center, online social media, or other gathering place where people gather and interact. Some social spaces such as town squares or parks are public places; others such as pubs, websites, or shopping malls are privately owned and regulated. [1] Émile Durkheim coined the term social space; [2] among other writers, sociologist Henri Lefebvre developed the concept from the 1960s.

Contents

Concept

Lefebvre emphasised that in human society all "space is social: it involves assigning more or less appropriated places to social relations ... social space has thus always been a social product." [3] Social space becomes thereby a metaphor for the very experience of social life – "society experienced alternatively as a deterministic environment or force (milieu) and as our very element or beneficent shell (ambience)." [4] In this sense "social space spans the dichotomy between 'public' and 'private' space ... is also linked to subjective and phenomenological space." [5] Maximilien Sorre and Paul-Henry Chombart de Lauwe further developed the concept of social space. [2]

As metaphor

As metaphor, "social space contributes a relational rather than an abstract dimension ... has received a large variety of attributes, interpretations, and metaphors." [6] Such "social space ... i[s] an intricate space of obligations, duties, entitlements, prohibitions, debts, affections, insults, allies, contracts, enemies, infatuations, compromises, mutual love, legitimate expectations, and collective ideals." [7]

For Lefebvre, "the family, the school, the workplace, the church, and so on – each possesses an 'appropriate' space ... for a use specified within the social division of labor." [8] Within such social spaces 'a system of "adapted" expectations and responses – rarely articulated as such because they seem obvious – acquire a quasi-natural self-evidence in everyday life and common sense": thus everybody consensually "knows what he is talking about when he refers to the town hall, the post office, the police station, the grocery store, the bus and the train, train stations, and bistros" – all underlying aspects of "a social space as such; an (artificial) edifice of hierarchically ordered institutions, of laws and conventions." [9] [10]

Morphology

Defining a stratified morphology as a series of "discrete units embedded within one another in a definite order", one can see that a distinct "morphology exists in social space – from the 'room' or hut to the house and the building; from the building to the group of houses, to the village and the neighbourhood; from the neighbourhood to the city, the region, the nation, and the State ... continent [and] planet." [11]

The interaction of different levels may be symbiotic or it may be conflictual: as a Michigan cabinet member put it to two Southern colleagues shortly before the American Civil War, "I see how it is; you are a Virginian and you are a South Carolinian; I am not a Michigander, I am an American". [12]

For the individual, as well as the social institution, different levels of social space come to the fore at different times. To a Britisher, for example, "we" sometimes narrows to southern England, sometimes broadens to refer to "Britain and America" or "Europe" or "the west"'. [13] In precisely the same way, "a resident of Rome may define himself with varying degrees of intensity as a Roman, an Italian, a Catholic, a Christian, a European, a Westerner" [14] – a sequence of stratified social spaces.

Pre/postmodern space

'In premodern societies, space and place largely coincided ... Modernity increasingly tears space away from place'. [15] Whereas in the premodern "every thing has its assigned place in social space", [16] postmodernists would proudly proclaim that "we need to substitute for the magisterial space of the past ... a less upright, less Euclidean space where no one would ever be in his final place." [17]

The way "migration, seen as a metaphor, is everywhere" in postmodernity – "we are migrants and perhaps hybrids, in but not of any situation in which we find ourselves" [18] – is rooted in the postmodern forms of production of social space.

Lefebvre considered globalization as the creation, and superimposition on nature, of "worldwide-social space ... with strong points (the centers) and weaker and dominated bases (the peripheries)." [19]

The insanity of place

Education, formal and informal, might be described as in large part a process whereby the new recruit to the human race "must learn to represent the many dimensions of the local social space ... through the veil of degraded inputs, chronic ambiguity, and the occasional deliberate deception." [7] Faced with such intricacies, R. D. Laing concluded that "it is just as well that man is a social animal, since the sheer complexity and contradiction of the social field in which he has to live is so formidable." [20]

The madman, by contrast, is not "someone to be counted on to know his place": in many ways, "mental symptoms are wilful situational improprieties." [21] [22] Whereas in "public and semi-public places —streets, shops, neighbourhoods, public transportation, and the like— ... a fine mesh of obligations obtains which ensures the orderly traffic and co-mingling of participants ... many classic symptoms of psychosis are precise and pointed violations of these territorial arrangements." [23]

Lacan considered that "it would be worthwhile mapping the places in social space that our culture has assigned to these [psychotic] subjects", and saw their difficulties as in part "the effects of the breakdown produced by the symbolic discordances that characterize the complex structures of civilization": [24] what Goffman termed "The Insanity of Place". [25]

Cultural examples

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fantasy (psychology)</span> Mental faculty of drawing imagination and desire in the human brain

In psychology, fantasy is a broad range of mental experiences, mediated by the faculty of imagination in the human brain, and marked by an expression of certain desires through vivid mental imagery. Fantasies are generally associated with scenarios that are impossible or unlikely to happen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jacques Lacan</span> French psychoanalyst and writer (1901–1981)

Jacques Marie Émile Lacan was a French psychoanalyst and psychiatrist. Described as "the most controversial psycho-analyst since Freud", Lacan gave yearly seminars in Paris, from 1953 to 1981, and published papers that were later collected in the book Écrits. Transcriptions of his seminars, given between 1954 and 1976, were also published. His work made a significant impact on continental philosophy and cultural theory in areas such as post-structuralism, critical theory, feminist theory and film theory, as well as on the practice of psychoanalysis itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Space</span> Framework of distances and directions

Space is a three-dimensional continuum containing positions and directions. In classical physics, physical space is often conceived in three linear dimensions. Modern physicists usually consider it, with time, to be part of a boundless four-dimensional continuum known as spacetime. The concept of space is considered to be of fundamental importance to an understanding of the physical universe. However, disagreement continues between philosophers over whether it is itself an entity, a relationship between entities, or part of a conceptual framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Émile Durkheim</span> French sociologist (1858–1916)

David Émile Durkheim was a French sociologist. Durkheim formally established the academic discipline of sociology and is commonly cited as one of the principal architects of modern social science, along with both Karl Marx and Max Weber.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of knowledge</span> Field of study

The sociology of knowledge is the study of the relationship between human thought, the social context within which it arises, and the effects that prevailing ideas have on societies. It is not a specialized area of sociology. Instead, it deals with broad fundamental questions about the extent and limits of social influences on individuals' lives and the social-cultural basis of our knowledge about the world. The sociology of knowledge has a subclass and a complement. Its subclass is sociology of scientific knowledge. Its complement is the sociology of ignorance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social reality</span> Distinct from biological reality or individual cognitive reality

Social reality is distinct from biological reality or individual cognitive reality, representing as it does a phenomenological level created through social interaction and thereby transcending individual motives and actions. As a product of human dialogue, social reality may be considered as consisting of the accepted social tenets of a community, involving thereby relatively stable laws and social representations. Radical constructivism would cautiously describe social reality as the product of uniformities among observers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social environment</span> Setting in which people live or something happens, from a social perspective

The social environment, social context, sociocultural context or milieu refers to the immediate physical and social setting in which people live or in which something happens or develops. It includes the culture that the individual was educated or lives in, and the people and institutions with whom they interact. The interaction may be in person or through communication media, even anonymous or one-way, and may not imply equality of social status. The social environment is a broader concept than that of social class or social circle.

<i>Fashionable Nonsense</i> 1997 book by Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont

Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science, first published in French in 1997 as Impostures intellectuelles, is a book by physicists Alan Sokal and Jean Bricmont. As part of the so-called science wars, Sokal and Bricmont criticize postmodernism in academia for the misuse of scientific and mathematical concepts in postmodern writing.

Social philosophy examines questions about the foundations of social institutions, social behavior, and interpretations of society in terms of ethical values rather than empirical relations. Social philosophers emphasize understanding the social contexts for political, legal, moral and cultural questions, and the development of novel theoretical frameworks, from social ontology to care ethics to cosmopolitan theories of democracy, natural law, human rights, gender equity and global justice.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henri Lefebvre</span> French philosopher and sociologist (1901–1991)

Henri Lefebvre was a French Marxist philosopher and sociologist, best known for pioneering the critique of everyday life, for introducing the concepts of the right to the city and the production of social space, and for his work on dialectical materialism, alienation, and criticism of Stalinism, existentialism, and structuralism. In his prolific career, Lefebvre wrote more than sixty books and three hundred articles. He founded or took part in the founding of several intellectual and academic journals such as Philosophies, La Revue Marxiste, Arguments, Socialisme ou Barbarie, Espaces et Sociétés.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microsociology</span>

Microsociology is one of the main levels of analysis of sociology, concerning the nature of everyday human social interactions and agency on a small scale: face to face. Microsociology is based on subjective interpretative analysis rather than statistical or empirical observation, and shares close association with the philosophy of phenomenology. Methods include symbolic interactionism and ethnomethodology; ethnomethodology in particular has led to many academic sub-divisions and studies such as micro-linguistical research and other related aspects of human social behaviour. Macrosociology, by contrast, concerns the social structure and broader systems.

Performativity is the concept that language can function as a form of social action and have the effect of change. The concept has multiple applications in diverse fields such as anthropology, social and cultural geography, economics, gender studies, law, linguistics, performance studies, history, management studies and philosophy.

The imaginary is the set of values, institutions, laws, and symbols through which people imagine their social whole. It is common to the members of a particular social group and the corresponding society. The concept of the imaginary has attracted attention in anthropology, sociology, psychoanalysis, philosophy, and media studies.

<i>Anti-Oedipus</i> 1972 nonfiction book by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari

Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia is a 1972 book by French authors Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, the former a philosopher and the latter a psychoanalyst. It is the first volume of their collaborative work Capitalism and Schizophrenia, the second being A Thousand Plateaus (1980).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociological theory</span> Theory advanced by social scientists to explain facts about the social world

A sociological theory is a supposition that intends to consider, analyze, and/or explain objects of social reality from a sociological perspective, drawing connections between individual concepts in order to organize and substantiate sociological knowledge. Hence, such knowledge is composed of complex theoretical frameworks and methodology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward Soja</span> American urban planner and geographer (1940–2015)

Edward William Soja was an urbanist, a postmodern political geographer and urban theorist. He worked on socio-spatial dialectic and spatial justice.

Civil inattention is the process whereby strangers who are in close proximity demonstrate that they are aware of one another, without imposing on each other – a recognition of the claims of others to a public space, and of their own personal boundaries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sociology of space</span> Sub-discipline of sociology

The sociology of space is a sub-discipline of sociology that mostly borrows from theories developed within the discipline of geography, including the sub fields of human geography, economic geography, and feminist geography. The "sociology" of space examines the social and material constitution of spaces. It is concerned with understanding the social practices, institutional forces, and material complexity of how humans and spaces interact. The sociology of space is an inter-disciplinary area of study, drawing on various theoretical traditions including Marxism, postcolonialism, and Science and Technology Studies, and overlaps and encompasses theorists with various academic disciplines such as geography and architecture. Edward T. Hall developed the study of Proxemics which concentrates on the empirical analysis of space in psychology.

What social psychologists call "the principle of superficiality versus depth" has pervaded Western culture since at least the time of Plato.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David Macey</span>

David Macey was an English translator and intellectual historian of the French left. He translated around sixty books from French to English, and wrote biographical studies of Jacques Lacan, Michel Foucault and Frantz Fanon.

References

  1. Dyer, Hadley; Ngui, Marc. (2010). Watch this Space: Designing, Defending, and Sharing Public Space. Kids Can Press. pp. 12, 23–24, 34, 78. ISBN   978-1-55453-293-3
  2. 1 2 Buttimer, Anne (1986) [1969]. "Social Space in Interdisciplinary Perspective". The Geographical Review. LIX (3): 417–426. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
  3. Henri Lefebvre, State, Space, World (London 2009) pp. 186–187
  4. John O'Neill, Sociology as a Skin Trade (London 1972) p. 174
  5. Paul Smethurst. (2000). The Postmodern Chronotype. p. 44
  6. Aharon Kellerman, The Internet on Earth (2002) pp. 31–32
  7. 1 2 Churchland, Paul M. (2007). The Engine of Reason, the Seat of the Soul: A Philosophical Journey Into the Brain. MIT Press. p. 123. ISBN   9780262531429.
  8. 1 2 Lefebvre, p. 225
  9. Lefebvre, pp. 224–225
  10. Schober, Anna (2013). The Cinema Makers. Public life and the exhibition of difference in south-eastern and central Europe since the 1960s, Exeter: Intellect books. p. 33
  11. Lefebvre, pp. 235–236
  12. H. G. Nicholas, The American Union (1950) p. 162
  13. Roger Fowler, Language in the News (London 1994) p. 49
  14. S. P. Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (1996) p. 43
  15. Anthony Giddens, quoted in Kellerman, p. 46
  16. Emile Durkheim, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (London 1971) p. 442
  17. Roland Barthes, in E. D. Ermath, Sequel to History (Oxford 1992) p. 18
  18. Said, Edward W. (September 1986). After the Last Sky: Palestinian Lives. Photography by Mohr, Jean (1st ed.). New York: Random House; Pantheon. p. 164. ISBN   978-0-394-74469-8.
    • Later quoted in: Rushdie, Salman (1991). Imaginary Homeland: Essays and Criticism 1981-1991. London: Granta; Penguin. pp. 171, 278. ISBN   9780140140361.
  19. Lefebvre, pp. 199, 213
  20. R. D. Laing, The Politics of Experience (Penguin 1984) pp. 81–82
  21. Goffman 1972, p. 407.
  22. Goffman 1972, p. 411.
  23. Goffman 1972, p. 415.
  24. Jacques Lacan, Ecrits: A Selection (London 1997) p. 69
  25. Goffman 1972, p. 389.
  26. Tony Tanner, "Introduction", Jane Austen: Pride and Prejudice (Penguin 1972) pp. 33–34
  27. Ermath pp. 107–108
  28. Smethurst, p. 52

Further reading