Socinian controversy

Last updated

The Socinian controversy in the Church of England (sometimes called the First Socinian controversy to distinguish it from a debate around 1800 mainly affecting Protestant nonconformists; and also called the Trinitarian controversy [1] ) was a theological argument on christology carried out by English theologians for around a decade from 1687. Positions that had remained largely dormant since the death in 1662 of John Biddle, an early Unitarian, were revived and discussed, in pamphlet literature (much of it anonymous).

Contents

This controversy was part of a larger debate after the Act of Toleration 1689, which excluded anti-trinitarian beliefs. By the end of the 1690s it had become clear that, for the time being, religious tolerance would not be extended. Formally, the Blasphemy Act 1697, directed against Unitarians, with religious disabilities against non-trinitarian believers, continued in law and settled the matter until the early nineteenth century. [2] On the other hand, the arguments had become well aired, and the Church of England was shown to be hardly united on the theology. An unintended consequence of strong attacks by theologically orthodox Anglicans, in the longer term, was a resulting greater de facto tolerance extending among English Protestants, after a halt was called to the aggressive stance in particular of William Sherlock. This tolerance, becoming a hallmark of Latitudinarian views as they changed into low church attitudes, worked its way out in controversies of the eighteenth century.

Detailed history

The Socinian argument, of which little had been heard for 25 years, was revived in 1687 by the publication of a ‘Brief History’ of the unitarians, as they from now on often designated themselves (see Stephen Nye). There followed (1689) a sheet of ‘Brief Notes’ on the Athanasian creed (see Thomas Firmin). [3]

These two publications prompted William Sherlock's Vindication (1690) of the doctrine of the Trinity. Shortly afterwards (11 August 1690) the subject was also taken up by John Wallis. The Socinians and others accused Sherlock's ‘Vindication’ of tritheism; and reputedly this work had the effect of making a Socinian of William Manning and an Arian of Thomas Emlyn. Sherlock's position was attacked also by another Anglican, Robert South, with a mixture of irony and invective. [3]

Sherlock's doctrine, as preached at Oxford by Joseph Bingham, was condemned by the hebdomadal council (25 November 1695), as ‘falsa, impia et hæretica’ (false, impious and heretical). Sherlock defended himself in an ‘Examination’ (1696) of the decree. [3]

On 3 February 1696 William III addressed to the hierarchy ‘Directions,’ drawn up by Thomas Tenison, prohibiting the use of ‘all new terms’ relating to the Trinity. In his ‘Present State of the Socinian Controversy’ (1698, but most of it printed 1696) Sherlock in practical terms gave up on the positions that had been impugned. [3]

Literature related to the argument was still voluminous, however, in the period up to 1704. One notable reader and student of the debate was John Locke. [4]

Timeline of publications

YearAuthorPublicationPositionReplies
1690 Arthur Bury The Naked GospelLatitudinarian William Nicholls, An Answer to an Heretical Book, called the Naked Gospel, 1691; [5]

Thomas Long, An Answer to a Socinian Treatise called 'The Naked Gospel", 1691. [6]

1690 William Sherlock [3] A vindication of the doctrine of the holy and ever blessed Trinity, and the incarnation of the Son of God: Occasioned by the Brief notes on the creed of St. Athanasius, and the Brief history of the Unitarians, or Socinians, and containing an answer to both [7] Trinitarian Anglican Robert South (anonymous) Animadversions on Dr Sherlock's Book, entitled a Vindication of the Holy and Ever Blessed Trinity, 1693;

Remarks upon a Book Lately Published by Dr. William Sherlock, 1695.

1690 John Wallis The Doctrine of the Blessed Trinity, briefly explained in a letter to a friend [8] Trinitarian Presbyterian
1691 Daniel Whitby Tractatus de vera Christi Deitate adversus Arii et Socini hæreses [9] Latitudinarian
1691 William Freke The Arrian's Vindication of Himself [10] ArianJohn Wallis, A Fourth Letter, Concerning the Sacred Trinity, 1691.
1693 Stephen Nye, anonymouslyConsiderations on the Explications of the Doctrine of the Trinity, By Dr. Wallis, Dr. Sherlock, Dr. South, Dr. Cudworth, and Mr. Hooker; as also on the Account given by those that say, the Trinity is an Unconceivable and Inexplicable MysterySabellian [11]
1693 Edward Fowler Twenty-eight Propositions, by which the Doctrine of the Trinity is endeavoured to be explained (anonymous), and subsequent defences. [12] Latitudinarian Matthew Tindal, Reflections on the 28 Propositions, 1695. [13]
1693Francis Fullwood [14] The Socinian ControversieTrinitarian Anglican (ex non-juror)
1693 Jonathan Edwards A Preservative Against Socinianism (appeared in parts from this year)Argued that Socinus had founded a new non-Christian religion. [15]
1694 George Bull Judicium Ecclesiae Catholicae [16] Athanasian Gilbert Clerke and Samuel Crellius, Tractatus Tres, 1695. [17]
1695 Charles Leslie The Charge of Socinianism against Dr. Tillotson Considered [18] Church of Ireland non-juror
1695 John Smith A designed End to the Socinian Controversy: or a rational and plain Discourse that no other person but the Father of Christ is God Most HighUnitarian Francis Gregory, A divine antidote against a devilish poyson, or, A scriptural answer to an anti-scriptural and heretical pamphlet entituled A designed end to the Socinian controversie, written by John Smith, 1695. [19] [20]
1696 John Edwards Socinianism Unmask'd, followed by The Socinian Creed, (1697)Calvinist [21] John Locke, Vindication of his Essay of the Reasonableness of Christianity ;

Samuel Bold, Discourse on the true Knowledge of Christ Jesus, 1697. [22]

1702 Thomas Emlyn An Humble Inquiry into the Scripture Account of Jesus Christ (anonymous)Unitarian [23]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Sherlock</span> English church leader

William Sherlock was an English church leader.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bangorian Controversy</span> 18th-century theological argument in the Church of England

The Bangorian Controversy was a theological argument within the Church of England in the early 18th century, with strong political overtones. The origins of the controversy lay in the 1716 posthumous publication of George Hickes's Constitution of the Catholic Church, and the Nature and Consequences of Schism. In it, Hickes, as Bishop of Thetford, on behalf of the minority non-juror faction that had broken away from the Church of England after the Glorious Revolution, excommunicated all but the non-juror churchmen. Benjamin Hoadly, the Bishop of Bangor, wrote a reply, Preservative against the Principles and Practices of Non-Jurors; his own Erastian position was sincerely proposed as the only test of truth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Johnson Fox</span>

William Johnson Fox was an English Unitarian minister, politician, and political orator.

William Webster was a British priest in the Church of England and a theological writer.

<i>Theological Repository</i> Periodical

The Theological Repository was a periodical founded and edited from 1769 to 1771 by the eighteenth-century British polymath Joseph Priestley. Although ostensibly committed to the open and rational inquiry of theological questions, the journal became a mouthpiece for Dissenting, particularly Unitarian and Arian, doctrines.

Samuel Bolde (1649–1737) was an English clergyman and controversialist, a supporter of the arguments of John Locke for religious toleration.

Arthur Bury, D.D. (1624-1714?) was an English college head and Anglican theologian of controversial views. His 1690 antitrinitarian work, The Naked Gospel, first published anonymously, was commanded to be burnt at Oxford, and, in a complex sequence of events involving legal action, Bury lost his position as Rector of Exeter College, Oxford after being expelled initially in 1689.

William Belsham (1752–1827) was an English political writer and historian, noted as a supporter of the Whig Party and its principles. He justified the American Revolution in excusing Americans in their resistance to the demands of England, and he was an advocate of progressive political liberty.

William Manning (1630?–1711) was an English ejected minister and Unitarian writer.

William Freke (1662–1744) was an English mystical writer, of Wadham College, Oxford and barrister of the Temple.

John Smith (1647/8–1727?) of St. Augustine's London was an English craftsman and writer, known as "philomath". He was also a Unitarian writer who was coerced into recanting at the height of the 1690s "Socinian controversy".

The Society for Promoting the Knowledge of the Scriptures was a group founded in 1783 in London, with a definite but rather constrained plan for Biblical interpretation. While in practical terms it was mainly concerned with promoting Unitarian views, it was broadly based.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Octagon Chapel, Liverpool</span> Former chapel in England

The Octagon Chapel, Liverpool, was a nonconformist church in Liverpool, England, opened in 1763. It was founded by local congregations, those of Benn's Garden and Kaye Street chapels. The aim was to use a non-sectarian liturgy; Thomas Bentley was a major figure in founding the chapel, and had a hand in the liturgy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convocation of 1563</span>

The Convocation of 1563 was a significant gathering of English and Welsh clerics that consolidated the Elizabethan religious settlement, and brought the Thirty-Nine Articles close to their final form. It was, more accurately, the Convocation of 1562/3 of the province of Canterbury, beginning in January 1562.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1696 Jacobite assassination plot</span>

The 1696 Jacobite assassination plot was an unsuccessful attempt led by George Barclay to ambush and kill William III and II of England, Scotland and Ireland in early 1696.

Thomas Bell (1733–1802) was a Scottish minister, known as a theologian and translator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francis Bugg</span>

Francis Bugg (1640–1727) was an English writer against Quakerism.

References

  1. ↑ Burns, William E. "Sherlock, William". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/25381.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  2. ↑ William Gibson, The Church of England 1688–1832: Unity and Accord (2001), p. 15.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Sherlock, William (1641?-1707)"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  4. ↑ John Marshall, John Locke: resistance, religion and responsibility (1994) p. 418. Google Books.
  5. ↑ "Nicholls, William"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  6. ↑ "Long, Thomas"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  7. ↑ Sherlock, William (18 March 1690). A Vindication of the Doctrine of the Holy and Ever Blessed Trinity, and the Incarnation of the Son of God: Occasioned by the Brief Notes on the Creed of St. Athanasius, and the Brief History of the Unitarians, Or Socinians, and Containing an Answer to Both. W. Rogers. ISBN   9780598938589 – via Google Books.
  8. ↑ "Record not found | National Library of Australia". Archived from the original on 16 October 2012. Retrieved 7 May 2011.
  9. ↑ "Whitby, Daniel"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  10. ↑ Greig, Martin. "Freke, William". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/10158.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.). The first edition of this text is available at Wikisource:  "Freke, William"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  11. ↑ McLachlan, H. J. "Nye, Stephen". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/20418.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  12. ↑ "Fowler, Edward"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  13. ↑ "Tindal, Matthew"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  14. ↑ Goldie, Mark. "Fullwood, Francis". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/67192.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  15. ↑ "Edward, Jonathan"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  16. ↑ "Bull, George"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  17. ↑ "Clerke, Gilbert"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  18. ↑ The charge of Socinianism against Dr. Tillotson considered: In examination of some sermons he has lately published on purpose to clear himself from that imputation, by way of a dialogue betwixt F. A friend of Dr. T's and C. A Catholick Christian: To which is added some reflections upon the second of Dr. Burnet's four discourses, concerning the divinity and death of Christ, printed 1694: To which is likewise annexed, A supplement upon occasion of a history of religion, lately published, supposed to be wrote by Sir R-- H--d [Robert Howard]: Wherein likewise Charles Blount's Great Diana is considered, and both compar'd with Dr. Tillotson's sermons. 1695.
  19. ↑ Key, Newton E. "Gregory, Francis". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/11462.(Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  20. ↑ A divine antidote against a devilish poyson, or, A scriptural answer to an anti-scriptural and heretical pamphlet entituled a designed end to the Socinian controversie, written by John Smith. Printed for Richard Sare and Jos. Hindmarsh. 1696.
  21. ↑ "Edwards, John (1637-1716)"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  22. ↑ "Bold, Samuel"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
  23. ↑ "Emlyn, Thomas"  . Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.
Attribution

Wikisource-logo.svg This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain : "Sherlock, William (1641?-1707)". Dictionary of National Biography . London: Smith, Elder & Co. 1885–1900.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.