Spine apparatus

Last updated

The spine apparatus (SA) is a specialized form of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that is found in a subpopulation of dendritic spines in central neurons. It was discovered by Edward George Gray in 1959 when he applied electron microscopy to fixed cortical tissue. [1] The SA consists of a series of stacked discs that are connected to each other and to the dendritic system of ER-tubules. [2] The actin binding protein synaptopodin (which was originally described in podocytes of the kidney) is an essential component of the SA. [3] Mice that lack the gene for synaptopodin do not form a spine apparatus. [4] The SA is believed to play a role in synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, but the exact function of the spine apparatus is still enigmatic.

Contents

Morphology

The spine apparatus consists of membranous saccules (discs) and tubules surrounded by wispy filamentous material and is mainly found in large mushroom-shaped dendritic spines. The wispy filamentous material is the cytoskeletal network, mainly f-actin, which is responsible for the maintenance and alteration of spine shape. The spine apparatus is connected to the smooth-surfaced endoplasmic reticulum of the dendrite. [5] Consisting of continuous parallel flattened cisternae, the spine apparatus has a large surface area which is important for its function.

The spine apparatus occupies a large portion of the volume of the spine stalk, which may increase the longitudinal resistance between spine and dendrite [6] Therefore, the spine apparatus could have a direct effect on the membrane potential of the spine plasma membrane when the synapse is active. The connection to the smooth endoplasmic reticulum suggests a potential pathway for the transfer of proteins and lipids between the spine and dendrite. The spine apparatus could also function as a reservoir for calcium ions. [7]

Function

Local protein synthesis and trafficking

For some time, the function of the spine apparatus has been considered enigmatic. Recent evidence, however, suggests the spine apparatus may possess several distinct functions. After elucidating the structure of the spine apparatus, Spacek and Harris noted a continuation of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum into the spine apparatus, where it then takes on a lamellar structure. [8] This observation suggests the SA might play a role in vesicular transport, although a specific mechanism is not yet clear.

Furthermore, Pierce et al. proposed that the spine apparatus may be involved in post-translational protein processing, similar to that observed in the Golgi apparatus, and function in the post-translational processing of GluR1 and GluR2 subunits, which are locally translated in dentritic spines, of AMPA receptors. [9] The spine apparatus has also been shown to be involved in the post-translational processing and spatial delivery of NMDA receptors, which also function as glutamate receptors and play a significant role in controlling synaptic plasticity. Considering immunostaining studies have identified NMDARs and AMPARs in the spine apparatus, it has been proposed that the spine apparatus may be critical to the localization of AMPARs and NMDARs to synapses during LTP formation. [10]

The appearance of molecular markers for satellite secretory pathways provides further evidence that the spine apparatus plays a role in local integral membrane protein translocation and processing. More specifically, the protein translocation site marker (Sec61α) and the Golgi cisternae markers (giantin and α-mannosidase II) have been observed in the spine apparatus. [10]

Calcium signaling

Figure 2. Calcium uptake and calcium release by the spine apparatus Calcium uptake and release by the spine apparatus.svg
Figure 2. Calcium uptake and calcium release by the spine apparatus

Synaptic activity triggers Ca2+ influx into dendritic spines via NMDA receptors and voltage-dependent calcium channels. Free Ca2+ ions are rapidly removed from the cytoplasm through Na+/Ca2+ exchangers in the plasma membrane and by sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPases (SERCA pumps) that mediate Ca2+ uptake into the smooth endoplasmic reticulum (sER). [12] The spine apparatus, as a sub-compartment of the sER, has a large surface area and is thought to act as an efficient calcium buffer inside the spine (Figure 2).

Recent studies have shown that the spine apparatus is also able to release Ca2+ through inositol trisphosphate receptors (IP3Rs) [11] or ryanodine receptors (RyRs). [10] The calcium-sensitive nature of IP3Rs and RyRs makes both receptors capable of regenerative calcium-induced calcium release (CICR). In dendritic shafts and spines of hippocampal neurons the presence of both RyRs and IP3Rs has been shown by immunostaining. [13] Ca2+ release is triggered by glutamate release, activating Group I metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). The downstream signaling cascade leads to elevated IP3 levels inside the spine (Figure 2) which trigger Ca2+ release events only in those spines that contain sER. [11] Specifically, CICR activates RyR mostly located at the base of dendritic spines, while SERCA pumps are located in the spine head. [14] This asymmetry organization of RyR versus SERCA leads to fast calcium signaling at the base of the dendritic spine, leading to SA calcium depletion. Calcium is finally refilled by ORAI-STIM1 mostly located in clusters in the spine head. The slow calcium influx through this store operated Calcium Entry (SOCE) prevents activation of the RyR triggered by fast synaptic inputs. [15]

Plasticity

The spine apparatus’ ability to release calcium into the cytosol is thought to contribute to the development of synaptic plasticity. This was first shown in an experiment using synaptopodin(SP)-deficient mice, which do not show a spine apparatus in dendritic spines. [8] These SP-deficient mice showed a decrease in long-term potentiation (LTP). Furthermore, LTP1 (short-term plasticity which requires post-translational protein modifications, but is protein synthesis independent), LTP2 (slowly decaying plasticity which is protein synthesis-dependent but does not require gene transcription modifications), and LTP3 (long-lasting LTP that is translation- and transcription-dependent) were decreased as a result of the absence of the spine apparatus.

Further studies have shown that altered expression and distribution of RyRs, IP3Rs, and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels (L-VDCCs) can decrease LTP1, LTP2, and LTP3. [10] This observation, combined with the observation that SP-deficient mice have decreased LTP, suggests the proper expression and distribution of calcium channels within the spine apparatus is required for controlling synaptic plasticity. Moreover, the spine apparatus is critical for maintaining the cytosolic calcium levels which are central to the formation of synaptic plasticity.

SP-deficient mice also exhibited behavioral changes, including decreased horizontal locomotor activity, decreased anxiety, and a decreased ability to acquire LTP3-related spatial memory, as shown in a radial arm maze. [10] The decreased locomotor activity and decreased spatial learning suggest the spine apparatus’ role in inducing cerebellar LTP, in addition to hippocampal LTP. The exact mechanisms of these deficiencies are not fully understood. These behavioral modifications are thought to be epiphenomena of the absence of a spine apparatus and the changes in cytosolic calcium control mechanisms typically provided by the spine apparatus.

Synaptopodin, a protein that binds actin and α-actinin-2, is closely associated with the spine apparatus. [6] Although SP-deficient mature mice both lack the spine apparatus and display impaired LTP, the relationship between SP, the spine apparatus, and plasticity is complicated by the following three findings: (1) In addition to being associated with the spine apparatus, SP is also located in the cisternal organelle, which is structurally similar to the spine apparatus. (2) The spine apparatus is generally found in mushroom spines of mature neurons, but ample levels of SP and expression of LTP have been detected in juvenile rats just 15 days old. (3) Unlike SP, the spine apparatus has not been found in cultured neurons. These findings have led some to the conclusion that the spine apparatus is implicated in plasticity only because this organelle is associated with SP.

Direct evidence for an essential function of the spine apparatus in mGluR-dependent long-term depression (LTD) has been provided by comparing plasticity of synapses on spines with or without spine apparatus. [11] In this study, only synapses associated with sER displayed this form of depression. Blocking IP3-mediated Ca2+ release blocked synaptic depression, indicating a causal role of the spine apparatus in the induction of mGluR-dependent LTD.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dendritic spine</span> Small protrusion on a dendrite that receives input from a single axon

A dendritic spine is a small membranous protrusion from a neuron's dendrite that typically receives input from a single axon at the synapse. Dendritic spines serve as a storage site for synaptic strength and help transmit electrical signals to the neuron's cell body. Most spines have a bulbous head, and a thin neck that connects the head of the spine to the shaft of the dendrite. The dendrites of a single neuron can contain hundreds to thousands of spines. In addition to spines providing an anatomical substrate for memory storage and synaptic transmission, they may also serve to increase the number of possible contacts between neurons. It has also been suggested that changes in the activity of neurons have a positive effect on spine morphology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Long-term potentiation</span> Persistent strengthening of synapses based on recent patterns of activity

In neuroscience, long-term potentiation (LTP) is a persistent strengthening of synapses based on recent patterns of activity. These are patterns of synaptic activity that produce a long-lasting increase in signal transmission between two neurons. The opposite of LTP is long-term depression, which produces a long-lasting decrease in synaptic strength.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AMPA receptor</span> Transmembrane protein family

The α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor is an ionotropic transmembrane receptor for glutamate (iGluR) that mediates fast synaptic transmission in the central nervous system (CNS). It has been traditionally classified as a non-NMDA-type receptor, along with the kainate receptor. Its name is derived from its ability to be activated by the artificial glutamate analog AMPA. The receptor was first named the "quisqualate receptor" by Watkins and colleagues after a naturally occurring agonist quisqualate and was only later given the label "AMPA receptor" after the selective agonist developed by Tage Honore and colleagues at the Royal Danish School of Pharmacy in Copenhagen. The GRIA2-encoded AMPA receptor ligand binding core was the first glutamate receptor ion channel domain to be crystallized.

In neuroscience, synaptic plasticity is the ability of synapses to strengthen or weaken over time, in response to increases or decreases in their activity. Since memories are postulated to be represented by vastly interconnected neural circuits in the brain, synaptic plasticity is one of the important neurochemical foundations of learning and memory.

In neurophysiology, long-term depression (LTD) is an activity-dependent reduction in the efficacy of neuronal synapses lasting hours or longer following a long patterned stimulus. LTD occurs in many areas of the CNS with varying mechanisms depending upon brain region and developmental progress.

In neuroscience, a silent synapse is an excitatory glutamatergic synapse whose postsynaptic membrane contains NMDA-type glutamate receptors but no AMPA-type glutamate receptors. These synapses are named "silent" because normal AMPA receptor-mediated signaling is not present, rendering the synapse inactive under typical conditions. Silent synapses are typically considered to be immature glutamatergic synapses. As the brain matures, the relative number of silent synapses decreases. However, recent research on hippocampal silent synapses shows that while they may indeed be a developmental landmark in the formation of a synapse, that synapses can be "silenced" by activity, even once they have acquired AMPA receptors. Thus, silence may be a state that synapses can visit many times during their lifetimes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brain-derived neurotrophic factor</span> Protein found in humans

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), or abrineurin, is a protein that, in humans, is encoded by the BDNF gene. BDNF is a member of the neurotrophin family of growth factors, which are related to the canonical nerve growth factor (NGF), a family which also includes NT-3 and NT-4/NT-5. Neurotrophic factors are found in the brain and the periphery. BDNF was first isolated from a pig brain in 1982 by Yves-Alain Barde and Hans Thoenen.

Synaptogenesis is the formation of synapses between neurons in the nervous system. Although it occurs throughout a healthy person's lifespan, an explosion of synapse formation occurs during early brain development, known as exuberant synaptogenesis. Synaptogenesis is particularly important during an individual's critical period, during which there is a certain degree of synaptic pruning due to competition for neural growth factors by neurons and synapses. Processes that are not used, or inhibited during their critical period will fail to develop normally later on in life.

Schaffer collaterals are axon collaterals given off by CA3 pyramidal cells in the hippocampus. These collaterals project to area CA1 of the hippocampus and are an integral part of memory formation and the emotional network of the Papez circuit, and of the hippocampal trisynaptic loop. It is one of the most studied synapses in the world and named after the Hungarian anatomist-neurologist Károly Schaffer.

An apical dendrite is a dendrite that emerges from the apex of a pyramidal cell. Apical dendrites are one of two primary categories of dendrites, and they distinguish the pyramidal cells from spiny stellate cells in the cortices. Pyramidal cells are found in the prefrontal cortex, the hippocampus, the entorhinal cortex, the olfactory cortex, and other areas. Dendrite arbors formed by apical dendrites are the means by which synaptic inputs into a cell are integrated. The apical dendrites in these regions contribute significantly to memory, learning, and sensory associations by modulating the excitatory and inhibitory signals received by the pyramidal cells.

Metaplasticity is a term originally coined by W.C. Abraham and M.F. Bear to refer to the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Until that time synaptic plasticity had referred to the plastic nature of individual synapses. However this new form referred to the plasticity of the plasticity itself, thus the term meta-plasticity. The idea is that the synapse's previous history of activity determines its current plasticity. This may play a role in some of the underlying mechanisms thought to be important in memory and learning such as long-term potentiation (LTP), long-term depression (LTD) and so forth. These mechanisms depend on current synaptic "state", as set by ongoing extrinsic influences such as the level of synaptic inhibition, the activity of modulatory afferents such as catecholamines, and the pool of hormones affecting the synapses under study. Recently, it has become clear that the prior history of synaptic activity is an additional variable that influences the synaptic state, and thereby the degree, of LTP or LTD produced by a given experimental protocol. In a sense, then, synaptic plasticity is governed by an activity-dependent plasticity of the synaptic state; such plasticity of synaptic plasticity has been termed metaplasticity. There is little known about metaplasticity, and there is much research currently underway on the subject, despite its difficulty of study, because of its theoretical importance in brain and cognitive science. Most research of this type is done via cultured hippocampus cells or hippocampal slices.

Ca<sup>2+</sup>/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II

Ca2+
/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II
is a serine/threonine-specific protein kinase that is regulated by the Ca2+
/calmodulin complex. CaMKII is involved in many signaling cascades and is thought to be an important mediator of learning and memory. CaMKII is also necessary for Ca2+
homeostasis and reuptake in cardiomyocytes, chloride transport in epithelia, positive T-cell selection, and CD8 T-cell activation.

Coincidence detection is a neuronal process in which a neural circuit encodes information by detecting the occurrence of temporally close but spatially distributed input signals. Coincidence detectors influence neuronal information processing by reducing temporal jitter and spontaneous activity, allowing the creation of variable associations between separate neural events in memory. The study of coincidence detectors has been crucial in neuroscience with regards to understanding the formation of computational maps in the brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kalirin</span> Protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Kalirin, also known as Huntingtin-associated protein-interacting protein (HAPIP), protein duo (DUO), or serine/threonine-protein kinase with Dbl- and pleckstrin homology domain, is a protein that in humans is encoded by the KALRN gene. Kalirin was first identified in 1997 as a protein interacting with huntingtin-associated protein 1. Is also known to play an important role in nerve growth and axonal development.

Activity-dependent plasticity is a form of functional and structural neuroplasticity that arises from the use of cognitive functions and personal experience; hence, it is the biological basis for learning and the formation of new memories. Activity-dependent plasticity is a form of neuroplasticity that arises from intrinsic or endogenous activity, as opposed to forms of neuroplasticity that arise from extrinsic or exogenous factors, such as electrical brain stimulation- or drug-induced neuroplasticity. The brain's ability to remodel itself forms the basis of the brain's capacity to retain memories, improve motor function, and enhance comprehension and speech amongst other things. It is this trait to retain and form memories that is associated with neural plasticity and therefore many of the functions individuals perform on a daily basis. This plasticity occurs as a result of changes in gene expression which are triggered by signaling cascades that are activated by various signaling molecules during increased neuronal activity.

Actin remodeling is a biochemical process in cells. In the actin remodeling of neurons, the protein actin is part of the process to change the shape and structure of dendritic spines. G-actin is the monomer form of actin, and is uniformly distributed throughout the axon and the dendrite. F-actin is the polymer form of actin, and its presence in dendritic spines is associated with their change in shape and structure. Actin plays a role in the formation of new spines as well as stabilizing spine volume increase. The changes that actin brings about lead to the formation of new synapses as well as increased cell communication.

Long-term potentiation (LTP), thought to be the cellular basis for learning and memory, involves a specific signal transmission process that underlies synaptic plasticity. Among the many mechanisms responsible for the maintenance of synaptic plasticity is the cadherin–catenin complex. By forming complexes with intracellular catenin proteins, neural cadherins (N-cadherins) serve as a link between synaptic activity and synaptic plasticity, and play important roles in the processes of learning and memory.

Memory allocation is a process that determines which specific synapses and neurons in a neural network will store a given memory. Although multiple neurons can receive a stimulus, only a subset of the neurons will induce the necessary plasticity for memory encoding. The selection of this subset of neurons is termed neuronal allocation. Similarly, multiple synapses can be activated by a given set of inputs, but specific mechanisms determine which synapses actually go on to encode the memory, and this process is referred to as synaptic allocation. Memory allocation was first discovered in the lateral amygdala by Sheena Josselyn and colleagues in Alcino J. Silva's laboratory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homosynaptic plasticity</span> Type of synaptic plasticity.

Homosynaptic plasticity is one type of synaptic plasticity. Homosynaptic plasticity is input-specific, meaning changes in synapse strength occur only at post-synaptic targets specifically stimulated by a pre-synaptic target. Therefore, the spread of the signal from the pre-synaptic cell is localized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Synaptic stabilization</span> Modifying synaptic strength via cell adhesion molecules

Synaptic stabilization is crucial in the developing and adult nervous systems and is considered a result of the late phase of long-term potentiation (LTP). The mechanism involves strengthening and maintaining active synapses through increased expression of cytoskeletal and extracellular matrix elements and postsynaptic scaffold proteins, while pruning less active ones. For example, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) play a large role in synaptic maintenance and stabilization. Gerald Edelman discovered CAMs and studied their function during development, which showed CAMs are required for cell migration and the formation of the entire nervous system. In the adult nervous system, CAMs play an integral role in synaptic plasticity relating to learning and memory.

References

  1. Gray EG (June 1959). "Electron microscopy of synaptic contacts on dendrite spines of the cerebral cortex". Nature. 183 (4675): 1592–1593. Bibcode:1959Natur.183.1592G. doi:10.1038/1831592a0. PMID   13666826. S2CID   4258584.
  2. Cooney JR, Hurlburt JL, Selig DK, Harris KM, Fiala JC (March 2002). "Endosomal compartments serve multiple hippocampal dendritic spines from a widespread rather than a local store of recycling membrane". The Journal of Neuroscience. 22 (6): 2215–2224. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-06-02215.2002. PMC   6758269 . PMID   11896161.
  3. Deller T, Merten T, Roth SU, Mundel P, Frotscher M (March 2000). "Actin-associated protein synaptopodin in the rat hippocampal formation: localization in the spine neck and close association with the spine apparatus of principal neurons". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 418 (2): 164–181. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000306)418:2<164::AID-CNE4>3.0.CO;2-0. PMID   10701442. S2CID   147420.
  4. Deller T, Korte M, Chabanis S, Drakew A, Schwegler H, Stefani GG, et al. (September 2003). "Synaptopodin-deficient mice lack a spine apparatus and show deficits in synaptic plasticity". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 100 (18): 10494–10499. Bibcode:2003PNAS..10010494D. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1832384100 . PMC   193589 . PMID   12928494.
  5. Calabrese B, Wilson MS, Halpain S (February 2006). "Development and regulation of dendritic spine synapses". Physiology. 21: 38–47. doi:10.1152/physiol.00042.2005. PMID   16443821. S2CID   41410.
  6. 1 2 Kuwajima M, Spacek J, Harris KM (October 2013). "Beyond counts and shapes: studying pathology of dendritic spines in the context of the surrounding neuropil through serial section electron microscopy". Neuroscience. 251: 75–89. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.061. PMC   3535574 . PMID   22561733.
  7. Deller T, Mundel P, Frotscher M (2000). "Potential role of synaptopodin in spine motility by coupling actin to the spine apparatus". Hippocampus. 10 (5): 569–581. doi:10.1002/1098-1063(2000)10:5<569::aid-hipo7>3.3.co;2-d. PMID   11075827.
  8. 1 2 Segal M, Vlachos A, Korkotian E (April 2010). "The spine apparatus, synaptopodin, and dendritic spine plasticity". The Neuroscientist. 16 (2): 125–131. doi:10.1177/1073858409355829. PMID   20400711. S2CID   44682354.
  9. Bourne JN, Harris KM (2008). "Balancing structure and function at hippocampal dendritic spines". Annual Review of Neuroscience. 31: 47–67. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125646. PMC   2561948 . PMID   18284372.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Jedlicka P, Vlachos A, Schwarzacher SW, Deller T (September 2008). "A role for the spine apparatus in LTP and spatial learning". Behavioural Brain Research. 192 (1): 12–19. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.02.033. PMID   18395274. S2CID   11723155.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Holbro N, Grunditz A, Oertner TG (September 2009). "Differential distribution of endoplasmic reticulum controls metabotropic signaling and plasticity at hippocampal synapses". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 106 (35): 15055–15060. Bibcode:2009PNAS..10615055H. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905110106 . PMC   2736455 . PMID   19706463.
  12. Sabatini BL, Oertner TG, Svoboda K (January 2002). "The life cycle of Ca(2+) ions in dendritic spines". Neuron. 33 (3): 439–452. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00573-1 . PMID   11832230. S2CID   792386.
  13. Sharp AH, McPherson PS, Dawson TM, Aoki C, Campbell KP, Snyder SH (July 1993). "Differential immunohistochemical localization of inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate- and ryanodine-sensitive Ca2+ release channels in rat brain". The Journal of Neuroscience. 13 (7): 3051–3063. doi: 10.1523/jneurosci.13-07-03051.1993 . PMC   6576698 . PMID   8392539.
  14. Basnayake K, Mazaud D, Bemelmans A, Rouach N, Korkotian E, Holcman D (May 2022). "Correction: Fast calcium transients in dendritic spines driven by extreme statistics". PLOS Biology. 20 (5): e3001663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001663 . PMC   9142164 . PMID   35623029.
  15. Basnayake K, Mazaud D, Kushnireva L, Bemelmans A, Rouach N, Korkotian E, Holcman D (September 2021). "Nanoscale molecular architecture controls calcium diffusion and ER replenishment in dendritic spines". Science Advances. 7 (38): eabh1376. Bibcode:2021SciA....7.1376B. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abh1376. PMC   8443180 . PMID   34524854.