Spontaneous alternation

Last updated

Spontaneous Alternation Behavior (SAB) describes the tendency to alternate in the pursuit of different stimuli in consecutive trials, despite a lack of training or reinforcement. [1] [2] The behavior emerged from experiments using animals, mainly rodents, who naturally demonstrated the behavioral pattern when placed in previously unexplored maze shapes (eg. using a T/Y-maze). [2] [3]

Contents

Spontaneous alternation testing is a behavioral assessment method derived from SAB. It is used to investigate exploratory behavior [4] and cognitive function (related to spatial learning and memory). [4] [5] These assessments are most often done with non-human animals. The test serves great purpose in comparative psychology, [6] wherein non-human animals are studied to investigate differences within and between species with the aims of applying their findings to a greater understanding of human behavior. [7] It is particularly useful in studying the potential neuroanatomical and neurobiological mediators of cognitive function, [8] seeing that there are ethical limitations posed in the physiological study of humans, there is greater opportunity for more invasive procedures to be ethically conducted on non-human animals.

Explanations for spontaneous alternation

Earlier explanations for SAB thought the behavior to be a result of reactive inhibition. According to Hull's concept, the animal turns right in a T-maze after it has already turned left, as turning left the first time diminished the value of the tendency to do so again. [2] [8] [9] The inhibitive response is cumulative and therefore repeats, resulting in SAB. [10] Several experiments conducted in the 1950s found reason to refute this theory, demonstrating SAB to be a stimulus-based behavior, as opposed to one which is response-based. [8] [11] These experiments point towards perception, attention, memory and motivation as psychological processes which produce SAB.

Perception: The pursuit of directional movement relies on the subject's manner of gathering information from its surroundings. [8]

Attention: The subject selectively abstracts cues from the greater informational environment, informing their concentrate focus and influencing behavior. [8]

Memory: In order to demonstrate a consistent alternating pattern in behavior, the cues which are attended to and perceived from the first arm of the maze must be stored and retrieved for the pursuit of the alternate arm to be initiated. [8]

Motivation: As movement into either arm of the maze isn't traced, nor reinforced, the animal must have a purpose which is fulfilled by SAB that is not exclusively cognitive. Experimental research suggests that the behavior is underpinned by an innate drive towards exploring that which is unfamiliar, or less familiar than the other alternative/s. [8] Dember and Earl (1957) describe this to be 'a manifestation of exploratory motivation' within their general theory of exploration and curiosity. [2] [8] [12] The implied hardwiring of the behavior in the brain draws on the concept of evolutionary psychology. Estes and Schoeffler (1955) proposed that SAB originated as an adaptive behavior which enabled animals to gather information related to the distribution of resources needed for survival (e.g. food and shelter). With this logic, an animal is likely motivated to enter environments in an alternating pattern, because they will have already exhausted the resources from that which they most recently visited. [8]

Spontaneous alternation and spatial working memory

There is a comprehensive amount of research which suggests that efficient spatial alternation behaviour requires optimal spatial working memory. [13]

Spatial working memory refers to the ability to retain spatial information, in the form of environmental cues, in working memory, where it is stored temporarily and elicited actively during the completion of a task. [14] This allows one to build, and continuously update, cognitive spatial maps of novel environments as they are being explored, so that they are able to return to areas which they distinguish as less familiar – thereby optimizing information gathering strategies. [13]

Therefore, in tests where SAB is reduced, there is an indication of impairment in spatial working memory, seeing as one's ability to distinguish where they have or have not been is diminished. [15] Hence, spontaneous alternation tests are useful in investigating spatial working memory and the factors which may influence it.

Aging was found to be a factor which influences SAB. Spontaneous alternation testing with a Y-maze found that the frequency of the behavior reduces with age in mice at 9- and 12- months of age. [16] Variation in physiological ability (e.g. motor function), did not account for this, instead, the observations were attributed to gradual degradation in spatial learning. [13] [16] Anatomical changes to limbic and non-limbic pathways associated with normal and pathological aging in rodents correlate with the decrease in SAB. These include the neurochemical pathways in the hippocampus and basal forebrain– both of which are associated with spatial working memory and learning in humans, as well as in rodents. Legions in the brain (particularly in the hippocampus), and various drugs can significantly impair spontaneous alteration. [17] In another study done with mice, increasing the hormone estrogen showed improved spontaneous alteration performance. [18] These findings may suggest a decrease in exploratory behavior as a result of associated neurobiological changes, which implicate the capacity and function of spatial working memory. [19]

Apparatus design and test calculations

The apparatus used for spontaneous alternation testing takes multiple forms – the T-maze and the Y-maze being those which are most commonly used in experimental psychology. Both apparatus are named to mimic the maze shapes which they portray. [2] [4] [8] [20] The rat is placed in the middle of the maze, and is allowed to move freely through each arm. Variations in apparatus (e.g. shape, material, incline etc.), can result in subtle changes to the rate of SAB, though the general behavioral pattern persists. [2]

SAB can be evaluated as a percentage indicating how frequently spontaneous alternation is observed across several trials. There are three outputs of the spontaneous alternation test. [21] One output is the number of entries one makes into each arm of the maze – one entry being defined by when the hind paws of the subject species crosses the boundary distinguishing one arm completely. Another output is the number of alternations the animal makes – one alternation being the number of consecutive entries into each arm of the maze without any repeats in any order. These are then put into the following equation to yield percentage alternation:

The cognition of the animal can be assessed based on the score, with a lower score is considered cognitively impaired. Chance is determined by the number of arms the maze has, in a three-arm maze it is 22%, in a four-arm or greater maze, it is around 9%.

Human infants

Spontaneous alteration was tested in human infants at the ages of 6 months and 18 months. [22] The young children were presented two identical toys placed in different spots. [22] The six-month-old infants had no significant interchange with which toy they chose in subsequent trials, so the pattern of spontaneous alternation was not present. [22] However, the 18-month-old infants did alternate between the toys, curiosity motivating them to try the toy they had not chosen (the novel toy), displaying spontaneous alternation as well as spatial memory. [22] Although both ages showed inhibition of return, which is described as reacting to an object that has not been seen before, only the 18-month-old children actually chose the novel toy. [22] [23] This suggests that inhibitory control, or voluntary control over actions, is needed to, at least physically, perform spontaneous alteration. [22]

Stress

When testing the effects of stress on spontaneous alteration in mice, two different methods of stressors have been involved in research studies. [24] The first is called the inescapable stressor, where the mouse could not escape the bright light being shined into the maze (open field test), and escapable, where the light was shining into the maze, but there were areas that were covered, and therefore were dark for the mice to find shelter. [24] These methods caused stress, because mice prefer dim areas to bright areas. [24] The inescapable stressor (the bright light that lit up the entire maze), caused the mice's spontaneous alteration to decrease, but the escapable stressor (where only some parts of the maze were lit up), did not have an effect on their levels of spontaneous alteration. [24]

Criticisms

Animal Models: As a method predominantly used in studies involving non-human animals, there are inherent criticisms which arise from the extent to which findings can extend towards humans in comparative psychology. [25] While the spontaneous alternation test was designed to gain insight into human cognition and behavior, its direct replication using human subjects is rarely conducted. Life-sized mazes are impractical to create, and lack naturalism in their implementation, eliciting a number of confounding variables related to social desirability and demand characteristics. Proposals have been made for the use of virtual reality mazes to test SAB, with one study reporting that SAB was observed in a VR representation of a T-maze. [26]

The Mere-Exposure Hypothesis: Zajonc's (1968) hypothesis reflects the tendency for animals to be drawn towards stimuli which is familiar. [27] Addressing this contradiction to SAB, some experiments suggest that SAB is more likely to be demonstrated after the animal has been subjected to a period of long-term confinement to one environment, following which a preference for novel environments is built. [27]

Related Research Articles

Working memory is a cognitive system with a limited capacity that can hold information temporarily. It is important for reasoning and the guidance of decision-making and behavior. Working memory is often used synonymously with short-term memory, but some theorists consider the two forms of memory distinct, assuming that working memory allows for the manipulation of stored information, whereas short-term memory only refers to the short-term storage of information. Working memory is a theoretical concept central to cognitive psychology, neuropsychology, and neuroscience.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Animal cognition</span> Intelligence of non-human animals

Animal cognition encompasses the mental capacities of non-human animals including insect cognition. The study of animal conditioning and learning used in this field was developed from comparative psychology. It has also been strongly influenced by research in ethology, behavioral ecology, and evolutionary psychology; the alternative name cognitive ethology is sometimes used. Many behaviors associated with the term animal intelligence are also subsumed within animal cognition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Spatial memory</span> Memory about ones environment and spatial orientation

In cognitive psychology and neuroscience, spatial memory is a form of memory responsible for the recording and recovery of information needed to plan a course to a location and to recall the location of an object or the occurrence of an event. Spatial memory is necessary for orientation in space. Spatial memory can also be divided into egocentric and allocentric spatial memory. A person's spatial memory is required to navigate around a familiar city. A rat's spatial memory is needed to learn the location of food at the end of a maze. In both humans and animals, spatial memories are summarized as a cognitive map.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Morris water navigation task</span> Task used in experiments to measure spatial learning and memory

The Morris water navigation task, also known as the Morris water maze, is a behavioral procedure mostly used with rodents. It is widely used in behavioral neuroscience to study spatial learning and memory. It enables learning, memory, and spatial working to be studied with great accuracy, and can also be used to assess damage to particular cortical regions of the brain. It is used by neuroscientists to measure the effect of neurocognitive disorders on spatial learning and possible neural treatments, to test the effect of lesions to the brain in areas concerned with memory, and to study how age influences cognitive function and spatial learning. The task is also used as a tool to study drug-abuse, neural systems, neurotransmitters, and brain development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radial arm maze</span>

The radial arm maze was designed by Olton and Samuelson in 1976 to measure spatial learning and memory in rats. The original apparatus consists of eight equidistantly spaced arms, each about 4 feet long, and all radiating from a small circular central platform. At the end of each arm there is a food site, the contents of which are not visible from the central platform.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cognitive map</span> Mental representation of information

A cognitive map is a type of mental representation which serves an individual to acquire, code, store, recall, and decode information about the relative locations and attributes of phenomena in their everyday or metaphorical spatial environment. The concept was introduced by Edward Tolman in 1948. He tried to explain the behavior of rats that appeared to learn the spatial layout of a maze, and subsequently the concept was applied to other animals, including humans. The term was later generalized by some researchers, especially in the field of operations research, to refer to a kind of semantic network representing an individual's personal knowledge or schemas.

A water maze is a device used to test an animal's memory in which the alleys are filled with water, providing a motivation to escape.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Barnes maze</span>

The Barnes maze is a tool used in psychological laboratory experiments to measure spatial learning and memory. The test was first developed by Dr. Carol Barnes in 1979. The test subjects are usually rodents such as mice or lab rats, which either serve as a control or may have some genetic variable or deficiency present in them which will cause them to react to the maze differently. The basic function of Barnes maze is to measure the ability of a mouse to learn and remember the location of a target zone using a configuration of distal visual cues located around the testing area. This noninvasive task is useful for evaluating novel chemical entities for their effects on cognition as well as identifying cognitive deficits in transgenic strains of rodents that model for disease such as Alzheimer's disease. It is also used by neuroscientists to determine whether there is a causative effect after mild traumatic brain injury on learning deficits and spatial memory retention (probe) at acute and chronic time points. This task is dependent on the intrinsic inclination of the subjects to escape from an aversive environment and on hippocampal-dependent spatial reference memory.

Spatial visualization ability or visual-spatial ability is the ability to mentally manipulate 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional figures. It is typically measured with simple cognitive tests and is predictive of user performance with some kinds of user interfaces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elevated plus maze</span> Scientific test for laboratory mice

The elevated plus maze (EPM) is a test measuring anxiety in laboratory animals that usually uses rodents as a screening test for putative anxiolytic or anxiogenic compounds and as a general research tool in neurobiological anxiety research such as PTSD and TBI. The model is based on the test animal's aversion to open spaces and tendency to be thigmotaxic. In the EPM, this anxiety is expressed by the animal spending more time in the enclosed arms. The validity of the model has been criticized as non-classical clinical anxiolytics produce mixed results in the EPM test. Despite this, the model is still commonly used for screening putative anxiolytics and for general research into the brain mechanisms of anxiety.

It has been estimated that over 20% of adults suffer from some form of sleep deprivation. Insomnia and sleep deprivation are common symptoms of depression, and can be an indication of other mental disorders. The consequences of not getting enough sleep could have dire results, not only to the health, cognition, energy level and the mood of the person, but also to those around them. Sleep deprivation increases the risk of human-error related accidents, especially with vigilance-based tasks involving technology.

The study of memory incorporates research methodologies from neuropsychology, human development and animal testing using a wide range of species. The complex phenomenon of memory is explored by combining evidence from many areas of research. New technologies, experimental methods and animal experimentation have led to an increased understanding of the workings of memory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Memory improvement</span> Act of improving ones memory

Memory improvement is the act of enhancing one's memory. Research on improving memory is driven by amnesia, age-related memory loss, and people’s desire to enhance their memory. Research involved in memory improvement has also worked to determine what factors influence memory and cognition. There are many different techniques to improve memory some of which include cognitive training, psychopharmacology, diet, stress management, and exercise. Each technique can improve memory in different ways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carol A. Barnes</span> American neuroscientist

Carol A. Barnes is an American neuroscientist who is a Regents' Professor of psychology at the University of Arizona. Since 2006, she has been the Evelyn F. McKnight Chair for Learning and Memory in Aging and is director of the Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute. Barnes has been president of the Society for Neuroscience and is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and foreign member of the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters. She was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Methylazoxymethanol acetate</span> Chemical compound

Methylazoxymethanol acetate, MAM, is a neurotoxin which reduces DNA synthesis used in making animal models of neurological diseases including schizophrenia and epilepsy. MAM is found in cycad seeds, and causes zamia staggers. It selectively targets neuroblasts in the central nervous system. In rats, administration of MAM affects structures in the brain which are developing most quickly. It is an acetate of methylazoxymethanol.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T-maze</span> Forked passage used in animal cognition tests

In behavioral science, a T-maze is a simple forked passage used in animal cognition experiments. It is shaped like the letter T, providing the subject, typically a rodent, with a straightforward choice. T-mazes are used to study how the rodents function with memory and spatial learning through applying various stimuli. Starting in the early 20th century, rodents were used in experiments such as the T-maze. These concepts of T-mazes are used to assess rodent behavior. The different tasks, such as left-right discrimination and forced alternation, are mainly used with rodents to test reference and working memory.

The g factor, or general factor, of intelligence is a psychometric construct that summarizes observed correlations between an individual’s scores on various measures of cognitive abilities. First described in humans, a g factor has since been identified in a number of non-human species.

Sex differences in cognition are widely studied in the current scientific literature. Biological and genetic differences in combination with environment and culture have resulted in the cognitive differences among males and females. Among biological factors, hormones such as testosterone and estrogen may play some role mediating these differences. Among differences of diverse mental and cognitive abilities, the largest or most well known are those relating to spatial abilities, social cognition and verbal skills and abilities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cincinnati Water Maze</span> Water maze used in rodent experiments

The Cincinnati Water Maze (CWM) is a type of water maze. Water mazes are experimental equipment used in laboratories; they are mazes that are partially filled with water, and rodents are put in them to be observed and timed as they make their way through the maze. Generally two sets of rodents are put through the maze, one that has been treated, and another that has not, and the results are compared. The experimenter uses this type of maze to learn about the subject's cognitive or emotional processes.

The Hebb–Williams maze is a maze used in comparative psychology to assess the cognitive ability of small animals such as mice and rats. It was developed by Donald O. Hebb and his student Kenneth Williams in 1946, when both men were working at Queen's University at Kingston. A modified version, intended specifically to measure the intelligence of rats, was described in a 1951 paper by Hebb's students Rabinovitch and Rosvold. This modified version is the most commonly used in research where the aim is to measure animals' problem-solving abilities. In general, animals are tested in the Hebb–Williams maze's twelve separate mazes after acclimating to six practice mazes, though some studies have not used all twelve testing mazes. The two main procedures for the maze are the reward conditioning task and the water escape task. The maze has been used to investigate strain and sex differences in mice. A 2018 study argued that the maze is potentially useful for translational research in fragile X syndrome in humans.

References

  1. ↑ d'Isa, R.; Comi, G.; Leocani, L. (2021). "Apparatus design and behavioural testing protocol for the evaluation of spatial working memory in mice through the spontaneous alternation T-maze". Scientific Reports. 11 (1): 21177. Bibcode:2021NatSR..1121177D. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-00402-7. PMC   8551159 . PMID   34707108.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dember, W. N., & Richman, C. L. (2012). Spontaneous Atlernation Behaviour . Springer.
  3. ↑ Dennis, W. (1935). A Comparison of the Rat's First and Second Explorations of a Maze Unit. The American Journal of Psychology, 47(3), 488. doi : 10.2307/1416343
  4. 1 2 3 T Maze Spontaneous Alternation . (n.d.). [TLD]. Stanford Medicine. Retrieved 22 March 2020
  5. ↑ Wolf, A., Bauer, B., Abner, E. L., Ashkenazy-Frolinger, T., & Hartz, A. M. S. (2016). A Comprehensive Behavioral Test Battery to Assess Learning and Memory in 129S6/Tg2576 Mice. PLoS One, 11(1). doi : 10.1371/journal.pone.0147733
  6. ↑ The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (2020). Comparative psychology. In Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, inc.
  7. ↑ Domjan, M. (1987). Comparative Psychology and the Study of Animal Learning. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 101(3), 237–241. doi : 10.1037/0735-7036.101.3.237
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Richman, C. L., Dember, W. N., & Kim, P. (1986). Spontaneous Alternation Behavior in Animals: A Review. Current Psychological Research & Reviews, 5, 358–391. doi : 10.1007/BF02686603
  9. ↑ Ryan, R. M. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation . Oxford University Press.
  10. ↑ Glanzer, M. (1953). Stimulus satiation: An explanation of spontaneous alternation and related phenomena. Psychological Review, 60(4), 257–268. doi : 10.1037/h0062718
  11. ↑ Wayne, D. (1939). Spontaneous alternation in rats as an indicator of the persistence of stimulus effects. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 28(2), 305–312. doi : 10.1037/h0056494
  12. ↑ Dember, W. N., & Earl, R. W. (1957). Analysis of exploratory, manipulatory, and curiosity behaviors. Psychological Review, 64(2), 91–96. doi : 10.1037/h0046861
  13. 1 2 3 Lewis, S. A., Negelspach, D. C., Kaladchibachi, S., Cowen, S. L., & Fernandez, F. (2017). Spontaneous alternation: A potential gateway to spatial working memory in Drosophila. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 142, 230–235. doi : 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.05.013
  14. ↑ van Asselen, M., Kessels, R. P., Neggers, S. F., Kappelle, L. J., Frijns, C. J., & Postma, A. (2005). Brain areas involved in spatial working memory. Neuropsychologia, 44(7), 1185–1194. doi : 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.10.005
  15. ↑ Li, B., Arime, Y., Hall, F. S., & Uhl, G. R. (2009). Impaired spatial working memory and decreased frontal cortex BDNF protein level in dopamine transporter knockout mice. European Journal of Pharmacology, 628(1–3), 104–107. doi : 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.11.036
  16. 1 2 Lamberty, Y., & Gower, A. J. (1990). Age-related changes in spontaneous behavior and learning in NMRI mice from maturity to middle age. Physiology & Behavior, 47(6), 1137–1144. doi : 10.1016/0031-9384(90)90364-A
  17. ↑ Douglas, Robert J. (1989), Dember, William N.; Richman, Charles L. (eds.), "Spontaneous Alternation Behavior and the Brain", Spontaneous Alternation Behavior, Springer, pp. 73–108, doi : 10.1007/978-1-4613-8879-1_5, ISBN   978-1-4613-8879-1, retrieved 2020-03-17
  18. ↑ Miller, M. M.; Hyder, S. M.; Assayag, R.; Panarella, S. R.; Tousignant, P.; Franklin, K. B. J. (1999-07-01). "Estrogen modulates spontaneous alternation and the cholinergic phenotype in the basal forebrain". Neuroscience. 91 (3): 1143–1153. doi : 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00690-3. ISSN   0306-4522.
  19. ↑ Adelöf, J., Ross, M., Lazic, S., Zetterberg, M., Wiseman, J., & Hernebring, M. (2019). Conclusions from a behavioral aging study on male and female F2 hybrid mice on age-related behavior, buoyancy in water-based tests, and an ethical method to assess lifespan.Aging, 11(17), 7150–7168. doi : 10.18632/aging.102242
  20. ↑ Y Maze Spontaneous Alternation Test . (n.d.). [TLD]. Stanford Medicine. Retrieved 22 March 2020
  21. ↑ Ohno, M., Sametsky, E. A., Younkin, L. H., Oakley, H., Younkin, S. G., Citron, M., Vassar, R., & Disterhoft, J. F. (2004). BACE1 deficiency rescues memory deficits and cholinergic dysfunction in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neuron, 41(1), 27–33. doi : 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00810-9
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Vecera, Sham P.; Rothbart, Mary K.; Posner, Michael I. (1991-10-01). "Development of Spontaneous Alternation in Infancy". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 3 (4): 351–354. doi : 10.1162/jocn.1991.3.4.351. ISSN   0898-929X.
  23. ↑ Dukewich, Kristie R.; Klein, Raymond M. (2015-07). "Inhibition of return: A phenomenon in search of a definition and a theoretical framework". Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 77 (5): 1647–1658. doi : 10.3758/s13414-015-0835-3. ISSN   1943-3921.
  24. 1 2 3 4 Bats, S; Thoumas, J. L; Lordi, B; Tonon, M. C; Lalonde, R; Caston, J (2001-01-08). "The effects of a mild stressor on spontaneous alternation in mice". Behavioural Brain Research. 118 (1): 11–15. doi : 10.1016/S0166-4328(00)00285-0. ISSN   0166-4328.
  25. ↑ Bracken, M. B. (2008). Why animal studies are often poor predictors of human reactions to exposure. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 102(3), 120–122. doi : 10.1258/jrsm.2008.08k033
  26. ↑ Rothacher, Y., Nguyen, A., Lenggenhager, B., Kunz, A., & Brugger, P. (2020). Walking through virtual mazes: Spontaneous alternation behaviour in human adults. Cortex, 127, 1–16. doi : 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.018
  27. 1 2 Syme, G. J., & Syme, L. A. (1977). Spontaneous Alternation in Mice: A Test of the Mere-Exposure Hypothesis. The American Journal of Psychology, 90(4), 621–633. doi : 10.2307/1421736
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.