Spratt Model 107

Last updated
Controlwing 107 [1]
RoleSport flying boat
National origin United States
Manufacturer homebuilt
Designer George Spratt
First flight1967
Number built60 sets of plans sold by 1977 [2]

The Spratt Controlwing 107 was an unorthodox controlwing flying boat designed in the United States in the 1960s and marketed for home building in the 1970s. [2]

Contents

The aircraft featured a flat, speedboat-like [3] hull with a square bow and with tailfins blended into each side. [4] [5] The fins were angled to form a butterfly tail and included no moving surfaces. [5] [6] The wings were mounted on struts, parasol-style, and also contained no moving surfaces. [3] [6] [7] [8] Rather, each of the two wings could pivot independently to vary their angle of attack. [6] [8] The pilot and a single passenger sat side by side in an open cockpit with a converted marine outboard motor mounted behind them that drove a pusher propeller. [3] [6] The flight controls consisted of a helicopter-style collective that varied the angle of attack of both wings simultaneously, [6] [8] [9] and a control wheel that varied their angles of attack in relation to one another. [6] [8] [10] The hull was constructed from polyurethane foam and covered with fiberglass, and the wing panels were fiberglass throughout. [6]

Designer George Spratt claimed that the Model 107 could not stall or spin, and that it was 75% less affected by turbulence than a conventional airplane design. [2] With friend Elliot Dalland, Spratt began construction of the prototype (registered N2236) in 1962. [3] During the 1970s, Spratt marketed plans for the Model 107 to homebuilders. [2] [11]


Specifications (Controlwing 107)

Data from Markowski 1979, p.384

General characteristics

Performance

Notes

  1. "American airplanes: sk - ss". Aerofiles.com. 2009-03-16. Retrieved 2011-04-06.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Taylor 1977, p.563
  3. 1 2 3 4 Spratt 1962, p.25
  4. Taylor 1977, p.565
  5. 1 2 Markowski 1979, p.384
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Taylor 1977, p.564
  7. Taylor 1989, p.839
  8. 1 2 3 4 Markowski 1979, p.380
  9. Spratt 1962, p.25–26
  10. Spratt 1962, p.26
  11. Gunston 1993, p.290

References