Springboard Theory

Last updated

The springboard theory or springboard perspective is an international business theory that elucidates the unique motives, processes and behaviors of international expansion of emerging market multinational enterprises (EM MNEs). Springboard theory was developed by Luo and Tung (2007), [1] and has since been used to examine EM MNEs. [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] At the core of this theory is the argument that EM MNEs systematically and recursively use international expansion as a springboard to acquire critical resources needed to compete more effectively against their global rivals at home and abroad and to reduce their vulnerability to institutional and market constraints at home. These efforts are systematic in the sense that “springboard” steps are deliberately designed as a grand plan to facilitate firm growth and as a long-range strategy to establish more solidly their competitive positions in the global marketplace. They are also recursive because such “springboard” activities are recurrent and revolving (i.e., outward activities are strongly integrated with activities back home).

Contents

Unique motives

According to Luo and Tung (2007), EM MNEs use international expansion as a springboard to (1) compensate for their competitive disadvantages, (2) overcome their latecomer disadvantage, (3) counter-attack global competitors’ major foothold in their home country market, (4) bypass stringent trade barriers into advanced markets, (5) alleviate domestic institutional and market constraints, (6) secure preferential treatments from home governments, and (7) exploit competitive advantage in other emerging and developing countries. In so doing, EM MNEs overcome their latecomer disadvantage in global competition via a series of aggressive, radical, risk-taking foreign direct investment (FDI) measures by proactively acquiring or buying critical assets from mature, often Western-based MNEs to compensate for their competitive weaknesses. EM MNEs are both asset seeking (especially critical capabilities they need, such as global brands, key technologies, global talents and international channels) and opportunity seeking (especially leveraging their mass and cost-efficient production capabilities to tap other developing countries and low- to mid-end markets in developed countries).

Thus, unlike Western MNEs who are generally motivated to go global to exploit their ownership-specific capabilities they have already possessed, [10] [11] EM MNEs go global to acquire strategic capabilities they do not have but critically needed to upgrade their capability portfolio in search for competitiveness in global competition. In contrast to newly industrialized economy MNEs (e.g., those from South Korea, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan) whose international expansion has been largely triggered by “push” factors such as appreciating currencies, rising labor costs and shortages, escalating operating costs, and smaller home markets, EM MNEs’ global expansion has been driven mainly by “pull” factors such as securing critical capabilities and resources, circumventing host country trade barriers, upgrading home-market capabilities, and seeking international reputation.

Strategic behaviors

EM MNEs uniquely use their inward FDI experience and networks (e.g., original equipment manufacturing, international joint ventures) at home before aggressively undertaking outward FDI. Through inward internationalization, EM MNEs have accumulated some experience and absorptive capabilities dealing with international competition, deepening their understanding of international markets before conducting outbound FDI.

More evidently, there are several leapfrog trajectories to mirror EM MNEs’ springboard behaviors. First, they tend to internationalize very rapidly and not in an incremental fashion as predicted by conventional internationalization process theory. [12] As global latecomers, EM MNEs accelerate their pace of internationalization so as to catch up with that of incumbents. Large EM MNEs rapidly expand internationally through high-risk, high-control entry modes such as big acquisitions and greenfield investments. Second, EM MNEs tend to be radical in their choice of location (country), showing a pattern of path departure from cultural, institutional, economic and geographical distances. Very often, they first venture into advanced markets. Third, EM MNEs’ initial commitment tends to be large and does not necessarily involve many small steps. Also, departing from the conventional wisdom of control, EM MNEs tend to use localized senior management team, rather than parent country nationals.

Facilitating forces

Luo and Tung (2007) also explained some internal and external conditions that foster EM MNEs to springboard. Springboard behaviors of EM MNEs are promoted by (1) home government support for going global, (2) willingness of global players to share or sell strategic resources and offshore availability of standardized technology, (3) corporate entrepreneurship and strong motivation to enter key foreign markets, (4) increasing competitive pressure from global rivals, and (5) quick changes in technological and market landscapes and a heightened borderless world economy. Further research shows that they are further promoted by (6) inward FDI from advanced economies that enable EM MNEs to utilize established relationships to rapidly internationalize within business networks of MNEs from advanced economies. [13]

Challenges

The springboard theory cautions that despite opportunities and expected gains for springboard behavior, EM MNEs also encounter some huge challenges associated with such behavior. First, due to underdeveloped stock markets at home, poor accountability, and lack of transparency stemming from their ties with their host government, corporate governance of EM MNEs is generally weak. These limitations, in turn, tarnish their organizational reputation and hinder confidence of global stakeholders. Second, they face enormous post-springboard, post-acquisition difficulties, including building effective working relationships with host country stakeholders, reconciling the differing cultures at national and corporate levels, organizing globally dispersed complex activities, and integrating both home and host country operations. Third, lack of global experience, managerial competence and professional expertise have posed critical bottlenecks for many EM MNEs. Finally, weaker innovation can continue to handicap EM MNEs’ success in global competition. [1]

Related Research Articles

Multinational corporation Corporation operating in multiple countries

A multinational company (MNC) is a corporate organization that owns or controls the production of goods or services in at least one country other than its home country. Black's Law Dictionary suggests that a company or group should be considered a multinational corporation if it derives 25% or more of its revenue from out-of-home-country operations. A multinational corporation can also be referred to as a multinational enterprise (MNE), a transnational enterprise (TNE), a transnational corporation (TNC), an international corporation, or a stateless corporation. There are subtle but real differences between these terms.

In economics, internationalization or internationalisation is the process of increasing involvement of enterprises in international markets, although there is no agreed definition of internationalization. Internationalization is a crucial strategy not only for companies that seek horizontal integration globally but also for countries that addresses the sustainability of its development in different manufacturing as well as service sectors especially in higher education which is a very important context that needs internationalization to bridge the gap between different cultures and countries. There are several internationalization theories which try to explain why there are international activities.

Foreign direct investment Foreign ownership of a controlling stake of a business

A foreign direct investment (FDI) is an investment in the form of a controlling ownership in a business in one country by an entity based in another country. It is thus distinguished from a foreign portfolio investment by a notion of direct control.

An emerging market is a market that has some characteristics of a developed market, but does not fully meet its standards. This includes markets that may become developed markets in the future or were in the past. The term "frontier market" is used for developing countries with smaller, riskier, or more illiquid capital markets than "emerging". As of 2006, the economies of China and India are considered to be the largest emerging markets. According to The Economist, many people find the term outdated, but no new term has gained traction. Emerging market hedge fund capital reached a record new level in the first quarter of 2011 of $121 billion. The nine largest emerging and developing economies by either nominal or PPP-adjusted GDP are 4 of the 5 BRICS countries along with Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia and Turkey.

International business refers to the trade of goods, services, technology, capital and/or knowledge across national borders and at a global or transnational scale.

In international economics, international factor movements are movements of labor, capital, and other factors of production between countries. International factor movements occur in three ways: immigration/emigration, capital transfers through international borrowing and lending, and foreign direct investment. International factor movements also raise political and social issues not present in trade in goods and services. Nations frequently restrict immigration, capital flows, and foreign direct investment.

The diamond model, also known as Porter's Diamond or the Porter Diamond Theory of National Advantage, describes a nation's competitive advantage in the international market. In this model, four attributes are taken into consideration: factor conditions, demand conditions, related and supporting industries, and firm strategy, structure, and rivalry. According to Michael Porter, the model's creator, "These determinants create the national environment in which companies are born and learn how to compete."

In organizational theory, dynamic capability is the capability of an organization to purposefully adapt an organization's resource base. The concept was defined by David Teece, Gary Pisano and Amy Shuen, in their 1997 paper Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, as "the firm’s ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competences to address rapidly changing environments".

The eclectic paradigm, also known as the OLI Model or OLI Framework, is a theory in economics. It is a further development of the internalization theory and published by John H. Dunning in 1979. Modern Trade Theory incorporates this paradigm using the Grossman-Hart-Moore Theory of the firm

Foreign market entry modes are the ways in which a company can expand its services into a non-domestic market.

Max von Zedtwitz American technology manager

Max von Zedtwitz is a scholar of global R&D and innovation with a focus on emerging countries. He is Managing Director of GLORAD, a research network with locations in China, the United States, Brazil and Europe, and professor at universities in Europe and China.

Gabriel Robertstad Garcia Benito is a Norwegian economist, Professor of Strategy and International Business and a previous Dean of Doctoral Studies at BI Norwegian Business School, in Oslo, Norway. He is known for his work on foreign direct investments.

Shaker Zahra

Shaker A. Zahra is the Robert E. Buuck Chair of Entrepreneurship and professor of strategy and entrepreneurship, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota. He is also the Academic Director of the Gary S. Holmes Entrepreneurship Center.

Rajneesh Narula, is an economist and academic. He is Professor of International Business Regulation and Director of the John H. Dunning Center for International Business at Henley Business School, University of Reading in Reading, UK.

Alan M. Rugman (1945-2014) was a leading scholar in the field of international business. In his last academic role, he served as Head of International Business and Strategy at Henley Business School, University of Reading in Reading, UK.

The concepts of a global value chain (GVC) and global supply chain refer to the people, roles and activities involved in the production of goods and services and their supply, distribution, and post-sales activities when those activities must be coordinated across geographies. GVC is similar to Industry Level Value Chain but encompasses operations at the global level.

Co-opetition or coopetition – simultaneous competition and cooperation – is an important philosophy or strategy that goes beyond the conventional rules of competition and cooperation to achieve advantages of both. Global co-opetition, an application of co-opetition in a global context, is first systematically addressed in Luo’s (2004) book “Coopetition in international business”. According to this book, global co-opetition refers to the simultaneous competition and cooperation between multinational enterprises (MNEs) and their geographically dispersed business stakeholders such as global rivals, global suppliers, global distributors, global alliance partners, and foreign governments as well as among foreign subsidiaries within an MNE.

The composition-based view (CBV) was recently developed by Luo and Child (2015). It is a new theory that explicates the growth of firms without the benefit of resource advantages, proprietary technology, or market power. The CBV complements some existing theories such as resource-based view (RBV), resource management view, and dynamic capability – to create novel insights into the survival of firms that do not possess such strategic assets as original technologies and brands. It emphasizes how ordinary firms with ordinary resources may generate extraordinary results through their creative use of open resources and unique integrating capabilities, resulting in an enhanced speed and a high price-value ratio that are well suited to large numbers of low- to mid-end mass market consumers. The CBV has been commented as “a new view with significant application” for emerging market firms and for small and medium sized enterprises in many countries. The view cautions though that composition-generated advantages are temporary in nature and that composition itself mandates special skills in distinctively identifying, leveraging, and combining open or existing resources inside and outside the firm.

Yadong Luo

Yadong Luo is the Emery M. Findley Distinguished Chair and Professor of Management at the University of Miami. He is a Fellow of Academy of Management (AOM) and a Fellow of Academy of International Business. He has written over a dozen books and nearly two hundred articles, dealing with topics from global strategy and cooperative alliances to cross-cultural management and emerging market businesses. His contributions also include springboard theory, composition-based view, global co-opetition, among others. His writing on the development of business and management in emerging markets also offers a wealth of understanding of this context.

Niron Hashai

Prof. Niron Hashai is a Professor of Strategy and International Business at Reichman University. In September 2021 he was appointed as the dean of the Arison School for Business Management in Reichman University.

References

  1. 1 2 Luo, Y.; Tung, R. L. (2007). "International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective". Journal of International Business Studies. 38 (4): 481–498.
  2. ↑ De Beulea, F.; Eliab, S.; Piscitellob, L. (2014). "Entry and access to competencies abroad: Emerging market firms versus advanced market firms". Journal of International Management. 20 (2): 137–152.
  3. ↑ Kotharia, T.; Kotabeb, M.; Murphy, P. (2013). "Rules of the game for emerging market multinational companies from China and India". Journal of International Management. 19 (3): 276–299.
  4. ↑ Ramamurti, R. (2012). "What is really different about emerging market multinationals?". Global Strategy Journal. 2 (1): 41–47.
  5. ↑ Chen, V.; Li, J.; Shapiro, D. (2012). "International reverse spillover effects on parent firms: Evidences from emerging-market MNEs in developed markets". European Management Journal. 30 (3): 204–218.
  6. ↑ Jormanainen, I.; Koveshnikov, A. (2012). "International activities of emerging market firms". Management International Review. 52 (5): 691–725.
  7. ↑ Yaprak, A.; Karademir, B. (2010). "The internationalization of emerging market business groups: An integrated literature review". International Business Review. 27 (2): 245–262.
  8. ↑ Gaur, A.; Kumar, V. (2010). "Internationalization of emerging market firms: A Case for theoretical extension". Advances in International Management: The past, present and future of international business and management. 23.
  9. ↑ Gubbi, S.; Aulakh, P.; Ray, S.; Sarkar, M. B.; Chittoor, R. (2010). "Do international acquisitions by emerging-economy firms create shareholder value? The case of Indian firms". Journal of International Business Studies. 41 (3): 397–418.
  10. ↑ Buckley, P. J.; Niron Hashai (2009). "Formalizing internationalization in the eclectic paradigm". Journal of International Business Studies. 40 (1): 58–70.
  11. ↑ Dunning, J. H. (1988). "The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions". Journal of International Business Studies. 19 (1): 1–31.
  12. ↑ Johanson, J.; Vahlne, J. E. (1977). "The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment". Journal of International Business Studies. 8: 23–32.
  13. ↑ Hertenstein, P.; Sutherland, D.; Anderson, J. (2017). "Internationalization within networks: Exploring the relationship between inward and outward FDI in China's auto components industry". Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 34: 69–96.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.