Springboard injunction

Last updated

A springboard injunction is a specific type of court order issued under English and Welsh law, which is typically used to prevent a former employee from misusing their former employer's confidential information. [1] [2] It potentially has relevance in other jurisdictions. [3] [4]

Contents

The classic, albeit very wide, definition of the springboard injunction was given by Roxburgh J in Terrapin Ltd v Builders' Supply Co (Hayes) Ltd [1967] RPC 375, [5] namely that it is an injunction whereby a party is: "placed under a special disability in the field of competition in order to ensure that he does not get an unfair start". [5] The underlying legal principle is referred to in this case as the "springboard principle", [5] and in the later Attorney-General v Observer Ltd. case (1990) as the "springboard doctrine". [6] Unlike other forms of injunction, its purpose is to prevent a person gaining an unfair advantage as a result of earlier unlawful activity, not preventing future unlawful activity. [7]

In recent years [ when? ] however the springboard injunction has been confined to cases where former employees threaten to abuse confidential information acquired during the currency of their employment. In an employment context a leading case is that of Roger Bullivant v. Ellis, [8] which arose because Mr Ellis, Bullivant’s managing director, had taken confidential information with him when he left the company to set up a rival business. [7]

Requirements

Springboard injunctions must meet the pre-requisite conditions that are standard for the granting of injunctions, [9] however, there are additional criteria that the court must be satisfied with before this particular type of relief will be awarded: [10]

Duration

A springboard advantage cannot last indefinitely and therefore a springboard injunction usually applies for a specific period. In the Bullivant case referred to above, the injunction was applied "until judgment or further order". [7]

Related Research Articles

Trade secrets are a type of intellectual property that includes formulas, practices, processes, designs, instruments, patterns, or compilations of information that have inherent economic value because they are not generally known or readily ascertainable by others, and which the owner takes reasonable measures to keep secret. Intellectual property law gives the owner of a trade secret the right to restrict others from disclosing it. In some jurisdictions, such secrets are referred to as confidential information.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom labour law</span> Labour rights in the UK

United Kingdom labour law regulates the relations between workers, employers and trade unions. People at work in the UK can rely upon a minimum set of employment rights, which are found in Acts of Parliament, Regulations, common law and equity. This includes the right to a minimum wage of £9.50 for over-23-year-olds from April 2022 under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998. The Working Time Regulations 1998 give the right to 28 days paid holidays, breaks from work, and attempt to limit long working hours. The Employment Rights Act 1996 gives the right to leave for child care, and the right to request flexible working patterns. The Pensions Act 2008 gives the right to be automatically enrolled in a basic occupational pension, whose funds must be protected according to the Pensions Act 1995.

In employment law, constructive dismissal, also called constructive discharge or constructive termination, occurs when an employee resigns as a result of the employer creating a hostile work environment. Since the resignation was not truly voluntary, it is, in effect, a termination. For example, when an employer places extraordinary and unreasonable work demands on an employee to obtain their resignation, this can constitute a constructive dismissal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Specific performance</span> Equitable remedy in contract law

Specific performance is an equitable remedy in the law of contract, whereby a court issues an order requiring a party to perform a specific act, such as to complete performance of the contract. It is typically available in the sale of land law, but otherwise is not generally available if damages are an appropriate alternative. Specific performance is almost never available for contracts of personal service, although performance may also be ensured through the threat of proceedings for contempt of court.

In United Kingdom law, the concept of wrongful dismissal refers exclusively to dismissal contrary to the contract of employment, which effectively means premature termination, either due to insufficient notice or lack of grounds. Although wrongful dismissal is usually associated with lack of notice sometimes it can also be caused by arbitrary dismissal where no notice was required but certain grounds were specified in the contract as being the only ones available but none existed.

Unfair dismissal in the United Kingdom is the part of UK labour law that requires fair, just and reasonable treatment by employers in cases where a person's job could be terminated. The Employment Rights Act 1996 regulates this by saying that employees are entitled to a fair reason before being dismissed, based on their capability to do the job, their conduct, whether their position is economically redundant, on grounds of a statute, or some other substantial reason. It is automatically unfair for an employer to dismiss an employee, regardless of length of service, for becoming pregnant, or for having previously asserted certain specified employment rights. Otherwise, an employee must have worked for two years. This means an employer only terminates an employee's job lawfully if the employer follows a fair procedure, acts reasonably and has a fair reason.

In contract law, a non-compete clause, restrictive covenant, or covenant not to compete (CNC), is a clause under which one party agrees not to enter into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party. Some courts refer to these as "restrictive covenants". As a contract provision, a CNC is bound by traditional contract requirements including the consideration doctrine.

A letter of recommendation or recommendation letter, also known as a letter of reference, reference letter or simply reference, is a document in which the writer assesses the qualities, characteristics, and capabilities of the person being recommended in terms of that individual's ability to perform a particular task or function. Letters of recommendation are typically related to employment, admission to institutions of higher education, or scholarship eligibility. They are usually written by someone who worked with or taught the person, such as a supervisor, a colleague or teacher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Employment Rights Act 1996</span> United Kingdom Law

The Employment Rights Act 1996 is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament passed by the Conservative government to codify existing law on individual rights in UK labour law.

<i>Attorney General v Blake</i> English contract law case on damages for breach of contract

Attorney General v Blake[2000] UKHL 45, [2001] 1 AC 268 is a leading English contract law case on damages for breach of contract. It established that in some circumstances, where ordinary remedies are inadequate, restitutionary damages may be awarded.

Attorney General v Observer Ltd [1990] is an English tort law case on breach of confidentiality. It also raised questions of the interests of public policy and freedom of expression under the European Convention on Human Rights because it involved a spy's publication of secret information.

Breach of confidence in English law is an equitable doctrine that allows a person to claim a remedy when their confidence has been breached. A duty of confidence arises when confidential information comes to the knowledge of a person in circumstances in which it would be unfair if it were disclosed to others. Breach of confidence gives rise to a civil claim. The Human Rights Act 1998 has developed the law on breach of confidence so that it now applies to private bodies as well as public ones.

An employment contract in English law is a specific kind of contract whereby one person performs work under the direction of another. The two main features of a contract is that work is exchanged for a wage, and that one party stands in a relationship of relative dependence, or inequality of bargaining power. On this basis, statute, and to some extent the common law, requires that compulsory rights are enforceable against the employer.

In Canada, trade secrets are generally considered to include information set out, contained or embodied in, but not limited to, a formula, pattern, plan, compilation, computer program, method, technique, process, product, device or mechanism; it may be information of any sort; an idea of a scientific nature, or of a literary nature, as long as they grant an economical advantage to the business and improve its value. Additionally, there must be some element of secrecy. Matters of public knowledge or of general knowledge in an industry cannot be the subject-matter of a trade secret.

<i>Commerzbank AG v Keen</i>

Commerzbank AG v Keen [2006] EWCA Civ 1536 is a UK labour law case, concerning the construction of terms in a contract of employment.

<i>Hubbard v Vosper</i>

Hubbard v Vosper, [1972] 2 Q.B. 84, is a leading English copyright law case on the defence of fair dealing. The Church of Scientology sued a former member, Cyril Vosper, for copyright infringement due to the publication of a book, The Mind Benders, criticizing Scientology. The Church of Scientology alleged that the books contained material copied from books and documents written by L. Ron Hubbard, as well as containing confidential information pertaining to Scientology courses. Vosper successfully defended the claim under the fair dealing doctrine, with the Court of Appeal deciding unanimously in his favour. The judgment given by Lord Denning clarified the scope and content of the fair dealing defence.

<i>FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC</i>

FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC[2014] UKSC 45 is a landmark decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court which holds that a bribe or secret commission accepted by an agent is held on trust for his principal. In so ruling, the Court partially overruled Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd in favour of The Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid (UKPC), a ruling from the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from New Zealand.

<i>Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust</i>

Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and Botham v Ministry of Defence[2011] UKSC 58 is a UK labour law case, concerning wrongful dismissal.

<i>Spring v Guardian Assurance plc</i> United Kingdom labour law court case

Spring v Guardian Assurance plc[1994] UKHL 7, [1995] 2 AC 296 is a UK labour law and English tort law case, concerning the duty to provide accurate information when writing an employee reference.

<i>Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd</i>

Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1975] 3 All ER 484 is a UK constitutional law case, concerning the rule of law.

References

  1. "Glossary: Springboard Injunction". Thomson Reuters Practical Law. Retrieved 2021-07-15.
  2. "Court of Appeal gives Guidance on Springboard Injunctions". Addkeshaw Goddard. 2019-07-30. Retrieved 2021-07-15.
  3. Pinsler, Jeffrey (September 2017). "The Springboard Injunction and its Future Potential in Singapore". Law Gazette. Retrieved 2021-07-15.
  4. "Hong Kong Court Refuses to Grant Springboard Injunction to Protect Employer's Confidential Information". Mayer Brown. Retrieved 2023-01-13.
  5. 1 2 3 Swarbrick, David (2021-01-20). "Terrapin v Builders' Supply Co (Hayes): ChD 1967". swarb.co.uk. Retrieved 2021-03-28.
  6. Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) (1988) UKHL 6, published 13 October 1988, accessed 25 October 2022
  7. 1 2 3 Maynard, P., Briefing Note: Springboard Injunctions, Gaby Hardwicke Solicitors, updated August 2014, accessed 7 August 2021
  8. Roger Bullivant Ltd & Others v Ellis & Others [1987] IRLR 491
  9. "PART 25 - INTERIM REMEDIES AND SECURITY FOR COSTS - Civil Procedure Rules". www.justice.gov.uk. Retrieved 2021-03-28.
  10. "Alston Asquith | Springboard Injunctions".
  11. 1 2 3 "UBS Wealth Management (UK) Ltd v Vestra Wealth Llp [2008] EWHC 1974 (QB) (04 August 2008)". www.bailii.org. Retrieved 2021-03-28.
  12. "Sectrack NV v Satamatics Ltd & Anor [2007] EWHC 3003 (Comm) (19 December 2007)". www.bailii.org. Retrieved 2021-03-28.