Strategy implementation

Last updated

Strategy implementation is the activities within a workplace or organisation designed to manage the activities associated with the delivery of a strategic plan.

Contents

Definition

There are several definitions, most of which relate to the process of managing activities associated with the delivery of a strategic plan such as the following:

  • The sum total of the activities and choices required for the execution of a strategic plan [1]
  • Operationalisation of a clearly articulated strategic plan [2]
  • All the processes and outcomes which accrue to a strategic decision once authorisation has been to go ahead and put the decision into practice [3]
  • A series of interventions concerning organisational structures, key personnel actions, and control systems designed to control performance with respect to desired ends. [4]

Other definitions concern the processes by which an organisation identifies and allocates the actions associated with the delivery of a strategic plan such as the following:

  • A process by which large, complex, and potentially unmanageable strategic problems are factored into progressively smaller, less complex, and hence more manageable proportions. [4]
  • The managerial interventions that align organisational action with strategic intention (Floyd and Wooldridge, 1992). [5]

The term first became well known following the publication in 1984 of "Strategy Implementation," [4] a highly regarded book on the topic by Lawrence G. Hrebiniak and William F. Joyce, and it is no surprise that definitions from that work appear in both of the lists given above.

Strategy implementation thinking has strongly influenced writing and work on the related topic of Strategy execution [6] - a term that has been used to associate strategy implementation with the Balanced Scorecard approach to strategic performance management.

Process

Most authors propose specific activities and systems that they think are necessary to effectively implement a strategy (e.g. Hrebiniak and Joyce, 1984; [4] Reed and Buckley, 1988; [7] Wheelen and Hunger, 1992 [1] ).

Strategy implementation requires the following activities to be undertaken:

  • Strategy articulation - Building consensus within the team responsible for delivery of the strategy about the outcomes to be achieved
  • Strategy validation - Engaging with stakeholders and others to confirm strategic outcomes being pursued are acceptable
  • Strategy communication - Convert strategic objectives into clear short-term operating objectives that can be assigned to groups for delivery
  • Strategy monitoring - Monitor the progress of the organisation in delivering the strategic objectives
  • Strategy engagement - Managerial interventions designed to ensure organisation successfully achieves chosen strategic outcomes

Strategy articulation

The purpose of articulating the strategy is to translate the strategy into a form where managers and stakeholders agree consensually on what needs to be achieved [4] [8]

The strategy articulation will describe the strategic outcomes to be achieved, preferably expressed in the form of quantitative or qualitative goals. [9] This strategy articulation can, for example, be expressed in the form of a Destination Statement. [10]

Strategy validation

Validating the strategy is an essential part of the implementation [4] [2] [9] (see also Heide et al., 2002; Kotter, 1995; Hambrick, 1981). This validation can be both internal to the organisation or external. In addition, when implementing a strategy, the human aspect also needs to be considered. And an implementation can be done only if the organisational members are engaged.

Internal validation

Validation of the strategy is needed from within the organisation - in particular from members of the organisation with implementation responsibilities. Organisational members must be aware of and support the strategic goals of the firm (Kotter and Schlesinger, 1979). Without this knowledge of the strategy, organisational members will not be able to place the strategy being implemented within a broader context and assess its importance.

One way the communication can be done, is by cascading down the strategy into the organisation, where the strategic activities and outcomes are broken down into smaller set of change programmes and operational goals specific for each management teams, with the focus to achieve them in the near term - combining critical operational outcomes with the most urgently required change initiatives. This kind of validation overlaps with strategy communication activities (see below).

External validation

Sometimes, especially in non-commercial organisations, it is also necessary to confirm strategic goals with external stakeholders (Hambrick and Cannella, 1989; and Nielsen, 1983): in commercial organisations it is common for the achievement of financial outcomes to be used to guide strategic choices, but this does not diminish the need for validation with other key stakeholders (e.g. regulators, key customers etc.).

Strategy communication

To be usable, a strategy needs to be translated into a set of actionable operational steps. The concrete and clear strategic objectives should be translated into operational implementation sub-objectives (Reid, 1989), be linked to departmental and individual goals (Kaplan, 1995), and be measurable (Reid, 1989). An essential part is to make sure that people understand what is they need to do and why.

In other words, the business strategy must be translated into a set of clear short-term operating objectives (activities and outcomes) in order to execute the strategy. Key issues, elements, and needs of strategy must be translated into objectives, action plans, and “scorecards” and this translation is an integral and vital part of the execution process. Developing this set of clear objectives, that relates logically to the strategy and how the organisation plans to compete, is an important aspect of an effective implementation process (Owen, 1982). Having a concrete, detailed and comprehensive implementation plan can have a positive influence on the level of success of an implementation effort. In addition it helps identify what will be required in terms of resources, capabilities and time.

Part of this strategy translation is to assign responsibilities (Owen, 1982) across the organisations members, not only as to engage them but also to monitor and control that each of the operating objectives is being taken care of.

Therefore, to achieve strategic objectives, the short-term operating objectives need to be measurable. Performance appraisal and measurement of strategic progress simply cannot function without the existence of these critical metrics or measurable performance criteria. Progress measurement points or ‘milestones’ should be established (Owen, 1982). In addition, goal setting provides a sense of direction and pace setting for the implementation effort (Reid, 1989)

The pace of the strategy implementation can affect its success:

  • Dooley et al. (2000) found that strongly committed decision teams lead to more effective implementation but slows down strategy implementation.
  • Implementation should occur incrementally so that organisations are not overwhelmed by trying to implement too many changes simultaneously (e.g. Leighton, 1996)
  • A radical implementation pace in which large changes are quickly made may not allow organisations the time to carefully plan and execute successful reorganisations or to engage organisational member participation and commitment. moreover operations can be dramatically disrupted and other unintended consequences may occur
  • The pace of the implementation: a slow implementation with small steps usually has a positive influence on implementation performance.

Strategy monitoring

Monitoring or evaluation should begin early on in order to cut an errant strategy before losses or negative impacts become too costly or damaging.

As mentioned in the Strategy translation, each short-term operating objectives needs to be associated with a measure whether it be an action plan with milestones or a metric (Owen, 1982). These small number of high-level measures with associated targets will track the implementation activities being undertaken and their consequences .

Monitoring these measures will help the organisation members in controlling that the strategy is being implemented successfully and if not in making them take decisions that will allow them to achieve the strategy. Strategy control, in turn, provides timely and valid feedback about organisational performance so that change and adaptation become a routine part of the implementation effort. Controls allow for the revision of execution-related factors if desired goals are not being met.

Strategy engagement

To achieve that there needs to be an agreed mechanism of intervention to enable the management to efficiently and effectively engage with their organisation to ensure the required actions are being carried out, and where these actions are not working as expected, to be able to change the actions as required (Amason 1996). For example, a best practice for strategy implementation monitoring and control is to meet regularly in structured and time-limited sessions (Allio, 2005).

As mentioned previously, a slow implementation with small steps usually has a positive influence on engaging the management resulting in a better implementation performance.

Implementation evaluation can have a positive influence on future implementation performance, increasing engagement using past successes or based on lessons learned.

Strategic implementation is often associated with performance management. Tools such as balanced scorecard and its derivatives such as the performance measurement, or the ACME (Articulate, Communicate, Monitor and Engage) framework. [11] can be practical and useful to successfully implement a strategy.

Strategy implementation obstacles

Strategy implementations obstacles have long been studied (e.g.: Kotter and Schlesinger, 1979; Alexander, 1985). [12] [13] Several studies have identified a number of different implementation obstacles. These obstacles can be grouped into several categories, including leadership, time available, communication and perceptions, reluctance to change, behavioural diagnosis, peoples' skills, participation, organisational culture and climate, structure, magnitude of the strategic changes, coordination, resources, performance management and external events (Cândido and Santos, 2019). [14] Some of the most frequently cited obstacles are:

These obstacles can interact [16] and may lead to other obstacles, which can prevent the strategy from being implemented successfully. [14] The rate of implementation failure has been estimated in the range of 70 to 90 percent (e.g., Kiechel, 1982; Dion et al., 2007) [17] [18] but these rates of failure are likely overestimated since there are other much smaller estimates not so frequently cited. [19] [15]

Related Research Articles

Project management is the process of leading the work of a team to achieve all project goals within the given constraints. This information is usually described in project documentation, created at the beginning of the development process. The primary constraints are scope, time, and budget. The secondary challenge is to optimize the allocation of necessary inputs and apply them to meet pre-defined objectives.

The ISO 9000 family is a set of five quality management systems (QMS) standards by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) that help organizations ensure they meet customer and other stakeholder needs within statutory and regulatory requirements related to a product or service. ISO 9000 deals with the fundamentals of QMS, including the seven quality management principles that underlie the family of standards. ISO 9001 deals with the requirements that organizations wishing to meet the standard must fulfill. ISO 9002 is a model for quality assurance in production and installation. ISO 9003 for quality assurance in final inspection and test. ISO 9004 gives guidance on achieving sustained organizational success.

Strategic planning is an organization's process of defining its strategy or direction, and making decisions on allocating its resources to attain strategic goals.

In the field of management, strategic management involves the formulation and implementation of the major goals and initiatives taken by an organization's managers on behalf of stakeholders, based on consideration of resources and an assessment of the internal and external environments in which the organization operates. Strategic management provides overall direction to an enterprise and involves specifying the organization's objectives, developing policies and plans to achieve those objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the plans. Academics and practicing managers have developed numerous models and frameworks to assist in strategic decision-making in the context of complex environments and competitive dynamics. Strategic management is not static in nature; the models can include a feedback loop to monitor execution and to inform the next round of planning.

A marketing plan may be part of an overall business plan. Solid marketing strategy is the foundation of a well-written marketing plan so that goals may be achieved. While a marketing plan contains a list of actions, without a sound strategic foundation, it is of little use to a business.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Information management</span> Organisational activity concerning information lifecycle

Information management (IM) is the appropriate and optimized capture, storage, retrieval, and use of information. It may be personal information management or organizational. IM for organizations concerns a cycle of organizational activity: the acquisition of information from one or more sources, the custodianship and the distribution of that information to those who need it, and its ultimate disposal through archiving or deletion and extraction.

A balanced scorecard is a strategy performance management tool – a well-structured report used to keep track of the execution of activities by staff and to monitor the consequences arising from these actions.

Information technology (IT)governance is a subset discipline of corporate governance, focused on information technology (IT) and its performance and risk management. The interest in IT governance is due to the ongoing need within organizations to focus value creation efforts on an organization's strategic objectives and to better manage the performance of those responsible for creating this value in the best interest of all stakeholders. It has evolved from The Principles of Scientific Management, Total Quality Management and ISO 9001 Quality management system.

Business analysis is a professional discipline focused on identifying business needs and determining solutions to business problems. Solutions may include a software-systems development component, process improvements, or organizational changes, and may involve extensive analysis, strategic planning and policy development. A person dedicated to carrying out these tasks within an organization is called a business analyst or BA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strategy map</span>

A strategy map is a diagram that documents the strategic goals being pursued by an organization or management team. It is an element of the documentation associated with the Balanced Scorecard, and in particular is characteristic of the second generation of Balanced Scorecard designs that first appeared during the mid-1990s. The first diagrams of this type appeared in the early 1990s, and the idea of using this type of diagram to help document Balanced Scorecard was discussed in a paper by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton in 1996.

The Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) defines a process area as, "a cluster of related practices in an area that, when implemented collectively, satisfies a set of goals considered important for making improvement in that area." Both CMMI for Development v1.3 and CMMI for Acquisition v1.3 identify 22 process areas, whereas CMMI for Services v1.3 identifies 24 process areas. Many of the process areas are the same in these three models.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internal audit</span> Independent, objective assurance and consulting activity

Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed to add value and improve an organization's operations. It helps an organization accomplish its objectives by bringing a systematic, disciplined approach to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of risk management, control and governance processes. Internal auditing might achieve this goal by providing insight and recommendations based on analyses and assessments of data and business processes. With commitment to integrity and accountability, internal auditing provides value to governing bodies and senior management as an objective source of independent advice. Professionals called internal auditors are employed by organizations to perform the internal auditing activity.

Strategic communication can mean either communicating a concept, a process, or data that satisfies a long-term strategic goal of an organization by allowing facilitation of advanced planning, or communicating over long distances usually using international telecommunications or dedicated global network assets to coordinate actions and activities of operationally significant commercial, non-commercial and military business or combat and logistic subunits. It can also mean the related function within an organization, which handles internal and external communication processes. Strategic communication can also be used for political warfare.

Capability management is a high-level management function, with particular application in the context of defense.

Change management (CM) is a collective term for all approaches to prepare, support, and help individuals, teams, and organizations in making organizational change. It includes methods that redirect or redefine the use of resources, business process, budget allocations, or other modes of operation that significantly change a company or organization.

In business performance management, a third-generation balanced scorecard is a version of the traditional balanced scorecard, a structured report, supported by design methods and automated tools, that can be used by managers to keep track of the execution of activities by the staff within their control, and to monitor the consequences arising from these actions.

Team service management (TSM) is an open-source management framework that uses and integrates existing management methods and techniques to help teams deliver ever improving services. TSM is designed to be used by any and all teams within an enterprise including sales, production, administration, IT, finance and management teams.

Environmental certification is a form of environmental regulation and development where a company can voluntarily choose to comply with predefined processes or objectives set forth by the certification service. Most certification services have a logo which can be applied to products certified under their standards. This is seen as a form of corporate social responsibility allowing companies to address their obligation to minimise the harmful impacts to the environment by voluntarily following a set of externally set and measured objectives.

Results-based management (RBM) is a tool for monitoring and managing the implementation of strategy. It in many respects is similar to the logical framework approach, a strategy implementation tool used extensively by Non-governmental organizations.

Strategic control is the process used by organizations to control the formation and execution of strategic plans; it is a specialised form of management control, and differs from other forms of management control in respects of its need to handle uncertainty and ambiguity at various points in the control process.

References

  1. 1 2 Wheelen, Thomas L.; Hunger, J. David (2004). Concepts in Strategic Management and Business Policy. Prentice Hall. ISBN   9780131424050.
  2. 1 2 Noble, Charles H. (1999). "The eclectic roots of strategy implementation research". Journal of Business Research. 45 (2): 119–134. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(97)00231-2.
  3. ↑ Miller, Susan; Wilson, David; Hickson, David (2004). "Beyond Planning: Strategies for Successfully Implementing Strategic Decisions". Long Range Planning. 37 (3): 201–218. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2004.03.003.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hrebiniak, Lawrence G.; Joyce, William F. (1984). Strategy Implementation. Macmillan. ISBN   9780023575402.
  5. ↑ Floyd, Steven W; Wooldridge, Bill (1992). "Middle Management Involvement in Strategy and Its Association with Strategic Type: A Research Note". Strategic Management Journal. 13: 153–168. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131012.
  6. ↑ Kaplan, Robert S; Norton, D. P. (2001). The Strategy Focused Organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA.: Harvard Business School Press. ISBN   1-57851-250-6.
  7. ↑ Reed, Richard; Buckley, M. Ronald (1988). "Strategy in action-techniques for implementing strategy". Long Range Planning. 213 (109).
  8. ↑ Keegan, Anne E.; Den Hartog, Deanne N. (2004). "Transformational leadership in a project-based environment: a comparative study of the leadership styles of project managers and line managers". International Journal of Project Management. 22 (8): 609–617. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.05.005.
  9. 1 2 Reid, David M. (1989). "Operationalizing Strategic Planning". Strategic Management Journal. 10 (6): 553–567. doi:10.1002/smj.4250100604.
  10. ↑ Lawrie, Gavin J G; Cobbold, I (2004). "3rd Generation Balanced Scorecard: Evolution of an effective strategic control tool" (PDF). International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 53 (7): 611–623. doi:10.1108/17410400410561231. Archived from the original on 1 May 2014. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  11. ↑ "ACME Framework". 2GC Active Management. Retrieved 11 July 2017.
  12. ↑ Kotter and Schlesinger (1979). "Choosing Strategies for Change". Harvard Business Review Home. July–August: 130–138.
  13. ↑ Alexander, Larry D. (1985). "Successfully implementing strategic decisions". Long Range Planning. 18 (3): 91–97. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(85)90161-X.
  14. 1 2 3 Cândido, Carlos J.F.; Santos, Sérgio P. (2019-01-07). "Implementation obstacles and strategy implementation failure". Baltic Journal of Management. 14 (1): 39–57. doi:10.1108/BJM-11-2017-0350. hdl: 10400.1/12307 . ISSN   1746-5265. S2CID   158884562.
  15. 1 2 Cândido, Carlos J.F.; Santos, Sérgio P. (2011). "Is TQM more difficult to implement than other transformational strategies?". Total Quality Management & Business Excellence. 22 (11): 1139–1164. doi:10.1080/14783363.2011.625185. hdl: 10400.1/3664 . ISSN   1478-3363. S2CID   84839873.
  16. ↑ Beer and Eisenstat (2000). "The Silent Killers of Strategy Implementation and Learning". Sloan Management Review. 41: 29–40.
  17. ↑ Kiechel, W. (1982). "Corporate strategists under fire". Fortune. 106: 34–39.
  18. ↑ Dion, C., Allday, D., Lafforet, C., Derain, D., & Lahiri, G. (2007). Dangerous liaisons, mergers and acquisitions: The integration game. Philadelphia, USA: Hay Group. pp. 1–16.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  19. ↑ Cândido, Carlos J F; Santos, Sérgio P (2015). "Strategy implementation: What is the failure rate?". Journal of Management & Organization. 21 (2): 237–262. doi:10.1017/jmo.2014.77. hdl: 10400.1/5752 . ISSN   1833-3672. S2CID   53140486.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.