![]() | This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject.(November 2014) |
The surplus procedure (SP) is a fair division protocol for cutting cake in a way that achieves proportional equitability between 2 people.
The surplus procedure was devised by Steven J. Brams, Michael A. Jones, and Christian Klamler in 2006. [1]
In a nutshell, the procedure serves as an expansion of the "you cut I choose" method, having both participants serve as cutters. It has both participants privately disclose where they consider a fair halfway cut-point to be for the cake to a neutral arbitrator, who resolves the division of cake as follows:
It can be generalized to more than 2 people, and to dividing many kinds of goods, and is strategyproof. For 3 or more people it is not always possible to achieve a division that is both equitable and envy-free.
A generalization of the surplus procedure called the equitable procedure (EP) achieves a form of equitability. Equitability and envy-freeness can be incompatible for 3 or more players. [2]
There have been a few criticisms of aspects of the paper. [3] In effect the paper should cite a weaker form of Pareto optimality and suppose the measures are always strictly positive.