Talent Agencies Act (California)

Last updated

The Talent Agencies Act. [1] is a law in the U.S. state of California which sets regulations for talent agents. Noncompliance with the statute on the part of the agent allows actors, writers and other artists to disgorge their financial obligations by petitioning the California Department of Industrial Relations, alleging their talent representatives found them work without having a talent agency license. [2] This may expose unlicensed personal managers to significant potential liability. [3]

The Labor Commissioner's enforcement of the law led to personal managers forfeiting an estimated $500,000,000 in otherwise-owed commissions. [4] These forfeitures are based on the authority given by a 1967 case, Buchwald v. Superior Court, 254 Cal. App. 2d 347, a suit initiated by the Jefferson Airplane founder to remove the contractual rights of its personal manager. Buchwald found that, "Since the clear object of the Act is to prevent improper persons from becoming artists' managers and to regulate such activity for the protection of the public, a contract between an unlicensed artists' manager and an artist is void. [5]

However, Wood, Loving, Severance and Smith all hold that the only way an adjudicator has the authority to impair anyone's contractual rights is when there is a codified penalty provision. If the statute does not "declare that a contract made by any one in the conduct of the various businesses for which licenses are provided to be procured ... be invalid; nor is there any provision therein indicating in the slightest that this failure was intended to affect in any degree the right of contract." [6] "The imposition by statute of a penalty implies a prohibition of the act to which the penalty is attached, and a contract founded upon such act is void." [7] “If the statute does not provide expressly that its violation will deprive the parties to sue on the contract and the denial of the relief is wholly out of proportion to the requirements of public policy or appropriate individual punishment, the right to recover will not be denied.” [8] “[I]t has been repeatedly declared in this state that ‘a contract made contrary to the terms of a law designed for the protection of the public and prescribing a penalty for the violation thereof is illegal and void, and no action may be brought to enforce such contract.’” Loving at 608.

As Justice Kathryn Werdegar wrote in Marathon v. Blasi, 42 Cal. 4th 974, 991 (2008): “The Act is silent – completely silent – on the subject of the proper remedy for illegal procurement. As the Act has no codified penalty, following Wood, Loving, Severance and Smith, Buchwald was a judicial error: it should have held that no adjudicator has the authority to affect the contract of an unlicensed representative. Had it been, none of the $500,000,000+ of monies that have been forfeited would have been.

When the National Conference of Personal Managers, a trade association of talent agencies, sued the State and the Labor Commissioner in federal court to enjoin enforcement of the law in 2012, the organization did not know to use the 'no penalty' argument. [9] As presented, the case was dismissed, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed in 2015. [10]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sherman Antitrust Act</span> 1890 U.S. anti-monopoly law

The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is a United States antitrust law which prescribes the rule of free competition among those engaged in commerce. It was passed by Congress and is named for Senator John Sherman, its principal author.

In United States labor law, at-will employment is an employer's ability to dismiss an employee for any reason, and without warning, as long as the reason is not illegal. When an employee is acknowledged as being hired "at will", courts deny the employee any claim for loss resulting from the dismissal. The rule is justified by its proponents on the basis that an employee may be similarly entitled to leave their job without reason or warning. The practice is seen as unjust by those who view the employment relationship as characterized by inequality of bargaining power.

United States federal administrative law encompasses statutes, regulations, rules, common law rulings, and directives issued by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the Executive Office of the President, that together define the extent of powers and responsibilities held by administrative agencies of the United States government. The executive, legislative, and judicial branches of the U.S. federal government cannot always directly perform their constitutional responsibilities. Specialized powers are therefore delegated to an agency, board, or commission. These administrative governmental bodies oversee and monitor activities in complex areas, such as commercial aviation, medical device manufacturing, and securities markets.

A talent agent, or booking agent, is a person who finds jobs for actors, authors, broadcast journalists, film directors, musicians, models, professional athletes, screenwriters, writers, and other professionals in various entertainment or sports businesses. In addition, an agent defends, supports and promotes the interest of their clients. Talent agencies specialize, either by creating departments within the agency or developing entire agencies that primarily or wholly represent one specialty. For example, there are modeling agencies, commercial talent agencies, literary agencies, voice-over agencies, broadcast journalist agencies, sports agencies, music agencies and many more.

A cause of action or right of action, in law, is a set of facts sufficient to justify suing to obtain money or property, or to justify the enforcement of a legal right against another party. The term also refers to the legal theory upon which a plaintiff brings suit. The legal document which carries a claim is often called a 'statement of claim' in English law, or a 'complaint' in U.S. federal practice and in many U.S. states. It can be any communication notifying the party to whom it is addressed of an alleged fault which resulted in damages, often expressed in amount of money the receiving party should pay/reimburse.

In contract law, a non-compete clause, restrictive covenant, or covenant not to compete (CNC), is a clause under which one party agrees not to enter into or start a similar profession or trade in competition against another party. In the labor market, these agreements prevent workers from freely moving across employers, and weaken the bargaining leverage of workers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stop and identify statutes</span> US state laws allowing police to require identification of those suspected of a crime

"Stop and identify" statutes are laws in several U.S. states that authorize police to lawfully order people whom they reasonably suspect of committing a crime to state their name. If there is not reasonable suspicion that a person has committed a crime, is committing a crime, or is about to commit a crime, the person is not required to identify himself or herself, even in these states.

Perez v. Sharp, also known as Perez v. Lippold or Perez v. Moroney, is a 1948 case decided by the Supreme Court of California in which the court held by a 4–3 majority that the state's ban on interracial marriage violated the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Coast Guard Legal Division</span>

The Coast Guard Judge Advocate General oversees the delivery of legal services to the United States Coast Guard, through the Office of the Judge Advocate General in Washington, the Legal Service Command, offices in the Atlantic and Pacific Areas, nine Coast Guard Districts, the Coast Guard Academy, three training centers, and a number of other activities and commands. Legal services are delivered by Coast Guard judge advocates and civilian counsel in ten legal practice areas: criminal law/military justice, operations, international activities, civil advocacy, environmental law, procurement law, internal organizational law, regulations and administrative law, legislative support and legal assistance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States contract law</span>

Contract law regulates the obligations established by agreement, whether express or implied, between private parties in the United States. The law of contracts varies from state to state; there is nationwide federal contract law in certain areas, such as contracts entered into pursuant to Federal Reclamation Law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Labor Code</span> Collection of Californian civil law statutes

The California Labor Code, more formally known as "the Labor Code", is a collection of civil law statutes for the State of California. The code is made up of statutes which govern the general obligations and rights of persons within the jurisdiction of the State of California. The stated goal of the Department of Industrial Relations is to promote and develop the welfare of the wage earners of California, to improve their working conditions and to advance their opportunities for profitable employment."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">California Public Records Act</span> Freedom-of-information law in California, US

The California Public Records Act was a law passed by the California State Legislature and signed by governor Ronald Reagan in 1968 requiring inspection or disclosure of governmental records to the public upon request, unless exempted by law.

The De Havilland Law, formally De Havilland v. Warner Bros. Pictures, is a published judicial opinion interpreting California Labor Code Section 2855, a California law which prevents a court from enforcing specific performance of an exclusive personal services contract beyond the term of seven calendar years from the commencement of service.

Commercial bribery is a form of bribery which involves corrupt dealing with the agents or employees of potential buyers to secure an advantage over business competitors. It is a form of corruption which does not necessarily involve government personnel or facilities.

Tunkl. v. Regents of the University of California was a leading case in California that established a persuasive six-factor test that helps guide courts to decide when a contract relates to the "public interest."

In law, wrongful dismissal, also called wrongful termination or wrongful discharge, is a situation in which an employee's contract of employment has been terminated by the employer, where the termination breaches one or more terms of the contract of employment, or a statute provision or rule in employment law. Laws governing wrongful dismissal vary according to the terms of the employment contract, as well as under the laws and public policies of the jurisdiction.

Rick Siegel is a former stand-up comedian who is best known for his legal efforts that made the California Labor Commission change their interpretation of how the California Talent Agencies Act ("TAA") is enforced. Siegel created LaughTrack, a national magazine about stand-up comedy, and later became a personal manager for comic performers, actors and writers. Most recently, he has created several environmentally-friendly products focused on the dry cleaning industry.

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy is a case pending before the Supreme Court of the United States. In May 2022, Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held, under certain statutory provisions, the Securities and Exchanges Commission's administrative adjudication of fraud claims without jury trials in their administrative proceedings with their own administrative law judges (ALJs) rather than Article III judges violated three provisions of the Constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Private Attorneys General Act</span>

The Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) is a California statute that authorizes aggrieved employees to bring actions for civil penalties on behalf of themselves, other employees, and the State of California against their employers for California Labor Code violations. PAGA's purpose is not to recover damages or receive restitution, but rather to allow citizens to act as private attorneys general and enforce the Labor Code. Because PAGA suits are fundamentally law enforcement actions, aggrieved employees must notify the Labor and Workforce Development Agency (LWDA)—the state agency that enforces California labor laws—of any alleged Labor Code violations. An aggrieved employee can only file a PAGA lawsuit after the LWDA elects not to pursue its own action against the employer.

References

  1. ↑ Cal. Labor Code § 1700 et. seq.
  2. ↑ Los Angeles Daily Journal, May 10, 2013: Talent Agency the TAA Survives Suit, Clarity Remains Elusive.
  3. ↑ Taking Away an Artist's 'Get Out of Jail Free' Card, Pierce L. Rev., Vol. 8, No. 3 (2010)
  4. ↑ Variety, October 9, 2013: Showbiz Mangers Seek Appeals Court Ruling on Talent Agencies Act
  5. ↑ (See Wood v. Krepps, 168 Cal. 382, 386; Loving & Evans v. Blick, 33 Cal. 2d 603, 608-609; Albaugh v. Moss Constr. Co., 125 Cal. App. 2d 126, 131-132. Contracts otherwise violative of the Act are void (see Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co., 29 Cal. 2d 561, 568; Smith v. Bach, 183 Cal. 259, 262.
  6. ↑ Wood at 386.
  7. ↑ Smith at 262.
  8. ↑ Severance at 572.
  9. ↑ "National Conference of Personal Managers Inc v. Edmund G Brown Jr, 2:12-cv-09620 - CourtListener.com". CourtListener. Retrieved 2023-08-12.
  10. ↑ Nat'l Conference of Pers. Managers, Inc. v. Brown(2015), Text .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.