TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc v Ofcom

Last updated

TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc v Ofcom
TalkTalk logo.svg
Court Court of Appeal
Citation(s)[2013] EWCA Civ 1318
Keywords
Telecommunications

TalkTalk Telecom Group Plc v Office of Communications [2013] EWCA Civ 1318 is an EU law case relevant for UK enterprise law, concerning telecommunications. [1]

Contents

Facts

TalkTalk claimed that charge controls should be imposed upon BT. In 2010, Ofcom reviewed competition in the wholesale broadband market. BT was the main provider. Before Ofcom published its Market Review Determination, TalkTalk said it would install its own broadband equipment in 700 local exchanges belonging to BT, as yet unspecified. As they were unknown, Ofcom ignored them in defining ‘Market 1’ and said even if TalkTalk deployed its plans, BT would still have a market share of at least 70-80%. This led Ofcom to say BT had significant market power in ‘Market 1’ and imposed a charge control, published in July 2011. By then, TalkTalk had completed unbundling, setting up in 17 exchanges in Market 1. Under CA 2003 s 86, Ofcom concluded there was no material change in Market 1, and BT’s market share would stay above 70%. [2]

Judgment

The Court of Appeal held by a majority that Ofcom’s determination was correct and charge controls under CA 2003 section 86 could remain. McFarlane LJ and Sir Timothy Lloyd held that, though the circumstances had changed, it could not be seen as a material change under CA 2003 s 86. If forecasts of change had not been falsified to a material extent, there was no material change. The actual changes were within the scope of Ofcom’s predictions. Sir Bernard Rix dissented, arguing Ofcom substituted a new ‘Market 1’ definition, relating solely to ‘exchanges where only BT is present’, and should make a fresh Market Review Determination.

Sir Timothy Lloyd said the following.

151. The essential difference that lies between the judgments of each of my Lords is whether, at the time of the Charge Control Determination, Ofcom substituted a new definition of Market 1 for that which had been adopted in the Market Review Determination [per Sir Bernard Rix at paragraphs 34 to 44] or whether the changed factual circumstances that by then existed were no more than the acting out of events that were reasonably within the market forecast made by Ofcom at the time of the Market Review Determination [per Sir Timothy Lloyd at paragraphs 140 to 146].

152. In his analysis, Sir Bernard cites a number of factors arising from the Market Review Determination but he lays particular emphasis upon the fact that the definition of Market 1 at that time related solely to 'exchanges where only BT is present' and in doing so Ofcom made a distinction between exchanges where another PO had 'committed' plans in relation to a specific exchange or merely 'uncommitted plans'. At paragraphs 20 to 23 the relevant passages are set out and the express references to the distinction between committed or uncommitted plans have been italicised. As is plain, by the time of the Charge Control Determination the situation on the ground had changed in that Talk Talk had committed to rolling out LLU-based services in a number of specific Market 1 exchanges. For Sir Bernard, Ofcom's decision to press on with the Charge Control Determination on the basis that its original definition of Market 1 remained valid is untenable [paragraphs 37 and 38] as the list of Market 1 exchanges was no longer confined to exchanges where there was no committed 2nd PO in addition to BT. He holds that Ofcom were in reality now accepting a revised definition of Market 1 as containing exchanges where, whether or not BT is challenged by another operator's committed unbundling in a specified exchange, BT's market share is projected not to fall below 70% by the end of the review period; in consequence Sir Bernard holds that it was necessary for Ofcom to conduct a fresh Market Review Determination.

153. Whilst I understand this essential reasoning within Sir Bernard Rix's judgment, together with the other supporting points that he makes, and despite the true respect that I have for his wide knowledge and extensive experience of these matters, I prefer the analysis given by Sir Timothy Lloyd in his judgment. Although Ofcom did draw a line in the Market Review Determination between exchanges where a 2nd PO was 'committed' and those which were 'uncommitted', and Sir Bernard is right to highlight that clear distinction in identifying exchanges at the start of the review period, Ofcom also made it plain that it was taking a forward view, that it anticipated that Talk Talk would choose to unbundle in some of those exchanges during the review period and that 'even if Talk Talk deploys towards the start of the review period BT's market share would be likely to be at least 70 to 80 percent in the exchanges where Talk Talk deploys at the end of the period' (MRD paragraph 3.182). Sir Timothy Lloyd is right to have highlighted paragraphs 3.178 and 3.182 by repeating them [paragraph 91] as they were expressly in Ofcom's contemplation at the time of the Market Review Determination. The principal purpose of the process on which Ofcom were engaged was to look forward over the three year period of the review and to apply, where necessary, price structure to the market in the interest of promoting competition; they were required to execute this task in relation to a market which was bound to change and develop throughout that period. Given that the definition of Market 1 readily contemplated that during the review period some of the 'BT only' exchanges would change to ones in which Talk Talk was active, I agree with Sir Timothy that the fact that, by the Charge Control Determination, some of those changes were already taking place cannot of itself by regarded as a material change for the purposes of section 86 [paragraph 126] and I agree that Ofcom's forecast of the market was not falsified by the events that had taken place on the ground when the Charge Control Determination was made [paragraph 130].

See also

Notes

  1. "Superfast broadband price control appeals: BT and TalkTalk". GOV.UK. Retrieved 27 January 2021.
  2. "Dispute between Cable & Wireless and BT about BT's charges for Ethernet services". Ofcom. 13 March 2018. Retrieved 27 January 2021.

Related Research Articles

BT Group British multinational telecommunications holding company

BT Group plc is a British multinational telecommunications holding company headquartered in London, England. It has operations in around 180 countries and is the largest provider of fixed-line, broadband and mobile services in the UK, and also provides subscription television and IT services.

Local loop unbundling is the regulatory process of allowing multiple telecommunications operators to use connections from the telephone exchange to the customer's premises. The physical wire connection between the local exchange and the customer is known as a "local loop", and is owned by the incumbent local exchange carrier. To increase competition, other providers are granted unbundled access.

Telephone slamming is an illegal telecommunications practice, in which a subscriber's telephone service is changed without their consent. Slamming became a more visible issue after the deregulation of the telecommunications industry in the mid-1980s, especially after several brutal price wars between the major telecommunications companies. The term slamming was coined by Mick Ahearn, who was a consumer marketing manager at AT&T in September 1987. The inspiration for the term came from the ease at which a competitor could switch a customer's service away from AT&T by falsely notifying a telephone company that an AT&T customer had elected to switch to their service. This process gave AT&T's competitors a "slam dunk" method for the unauthorized switching of a customer's long-distance service. The term slamming became an industry standard term for this practice.

Ofcom British government agency

The Office of Communications, commonly known as Ofcom, is the government-approved regulatory and competition authority for the broadcasting, telecommunications and postal industries of the United Kingdom.

KCOM Group is a UK communications and IT services provider. Its headquarters are in the city of Kingston upon Hull, a unitary authority in the ceremonial county of the East Riding of Yorkshire, and it serves local residents and businesses with Internet and telephony services. It was listed on the London Stock Exchange but is now privately owned by Macquarie Group.

Plusnet British internet service provider

Plusnet plc is a British triple play internet service provider (ISP); providing broadband, landline and mobile services. The company was founded in 1997 in Sheffield, England, and became a public limited company (plc) in July 2004 when it was floated on the Alternative Investment Market. On 30 January 2007, Plusnet was acquired by BT Group, but it continues to operate as a separate business. By December 2013, it had over 750,000 customers across the UK.

Be Un Limited Internet service provider in the UK

Be Unlimited was an Internet service provider in the United Kingdom between 2004 and 2014. Initially founded as an independent company by Boris Ivanovic and Dana Tobak in 2005, it was bought by Spanish group Telefónica Europe in 2006 before being sold on to BSkyB in March 2013 in an agreement which saw BSkyB buy the fixed telephone line and broadband business of Telefónica Europe which at the time traded under the O2 and BE brands. The deal saw BSkyB agree to pay £180 million initially, followed by a further £20 million after all customers had been transferred to Sky's existing business. The sale was subject to regulatory approval in April 2013, and was subsequently approved by the Office of Fair Trading on 16 May 2013.

Virgin Media Anglo-Dutch-American cable and telecommunications company

Virgin Media is a British telecommunications company which provides telephone, television and internet services in the United Kingdom. Its headquarters are at Green Park in Reading, England. It is owned by VMED O2 UK Limited, a 50:50 joint venture between Liberty Global and Telefónica.

In the United Kingdom a Migration Authorisation Code (MAC) was a 17 to 19-character unique identifier code used by DSL customers when they wish to switch internet service provider (ISP). A MAC is generated by the actual telecommunication provider, identifies the local loop to be switched, and authorises the provider to switch the customer to the new ISP.

Openreach Limited is a company wholly owned by BT plc, that maintains the telephone cables, ducts, cabinets and exchanges that connect nearly all homes and businesses in the United Kingdom to the national broadband and telephone network. It was established in 2006 following an agreement between BT and the UK's telecoms regulator, Ofcom, to implement certain undertakings, pursuant to the Enterprise Act 2002, to ensure that rival telecom operators have equality of access to BT's local network.

Sky Broadband is a broadband service offered by Sky UK in the United Kingdom. With the introduction of Sky Fibre, Sky Broadband now refers to ADSL broadband products.

Metallic path facility (MPF) are the unshielded twisted pair of copper wires that run from a main distribution frame (MDF) at a local telephone exchange to the customer. In this variant, both broadband and voice (baseband) services, together potentially with a video on demand service, are provided to the end user by a single communications provider. MPF services are typically delivered through use of an MSAN.

Internet in the United Kingdom Overview of the Internet in the United Kingdom

The United Kingdom has been involved with the Internet throughout its origins and development. The telecommunications infrastructure in the United Kingdom provides Internet access to businesses and home users in various forms, including fibre, cable, DSL, wireless and mobile.

TalkTalk Telecom Group plc is a company which provides pay television and Internet access services to businesses and consumers in the United Kingdom. It was founded in 2003 as a subsidiary of Carphone Warehouse and was demerged as a standalone company in March 2010. Its headquarters are in Salford.

YouView is a hybrid television platform in the United Kingdom developed by YouView TV Ltd., a partnership of four broadcasters, the BBC, ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5; and three telecommunications operators, Arqiva, BT Group and TalkTalk Group.

O2 (UK) British telecommunications provider

O2 UK (legally incorporated as Telefónica UK Limited) is a British telecommunications services provider, headquartered in Slough, England which operates under the O2 brand. It is owned by VMED O2 UK Limited, a 50:50 joint venture between Telefónica and Liberty Global. O2 is the largest mobile network operator in the United Kingdom, with 31.3 million subscribers as of September 2021.

The British media company Sky UK has incurred criticism over the years, much of it centred on overcharging, anti-competitive practices, and the business practices and undue political influence of its one-time majority owner News Corporation.

BT Superfast Fibre is a broadband service in the United Kingdom provided by BT Consumer, the consumer sales arm of the BT Group. The underlying network is fibre-to-the-cabinet (FTTC), which uses optical fibre for all except the final few hundred metres (yards) to the consumer, and delivers claimed download speeds of "up to 76 Mbit/s" and upload speeds of "up to 19 Mbit/s" depending on package selected. The fibre terminates in a new roadside cabinet containing a DSLAM, from where the final connection to the customer uses VDSL2 technology.

<i>Telefonica O2 UK Ltd v British Telecommunications plc</i>

Telefonica O2 UK Ltd v British Telecommunications plc [2014] UKSC 42 is a UK enterprise law, concerning telecommunications.

<i>Vodafone Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc</i>

Vodafone Ltd v British Telecommunications Plc is an EU law case relevant for UK enterprise law, concerning telecommunications.

References