Teacher leadership

Last updated

Teacher leadership is a term used in K-12 schools for classroom educators who simultaneously take on administrative roles outside of their classrooms to assist in functions of the larger school system. Teacher leadership tasks may include but are not limited to: managing teaching, learning, and resource allocation. Teachers who engage in leadership roles are generally experienced and respected in their field which can both empower them and increase collaboration among peers.

Contents

In these types of school environments, teachers are able to make decisions based on the work they do directly with students. When a school system places the decision-making on the teachers, the action is happening one level closer to the people who are most closely impacted by the decisions (generally the students and the teachers), rather than two or more levels above at the principal, superintendent, or school board level.

The extent to which teacher leaders adopt additional roles varies in degree and description:

Administration leadership (traditional school leadership/educational leadership):
Administrative staff carries out the majority of the leadership duties.

Teacher networks (professional learning community/professional community/networked improvement communities/community of practice/distributed leadership):

All teachers collectively take on decision-making roles about curriculum and school climate. This practice is facilitated by and supported by an administrative leader.

Teacher leaders (instructional leadership/instructional coaches):
Some teachers take on individual leadership roles that directly impact educational practices under the leadership of a school administrator.

Teacher co-ops (teacher-powered schools/teacher-led schools/worker cooperative/professional partnerships/teacherpreneurs):
All teachers collectively take on leadership and administrative tasks that would traditionally be done by a principal or administrative team

Teacher leadership spectrum.png

Research supportive of the philosophy

The National Education Association (NEA) (2011) describes teacher leaders as, "experienced professionals who have earned the respect of their students and colleagues and have gained a set of skills that enable them to work effectively and collaboratively with colleagues. They work closely with principals who have been trained to develop and implement effective mechanisms of support for teachers and teacher leaders." [1]

Teacher leaders are teachers who, "want to remain closely connected to the classroom and students, but are willing to assume new responsibilities that afford them leadership opportunities in or outside the classroom while still teaching full or part-time." [2]

In his book, Kolderie (2014) cites Hubbs in describing the benefits of decentralizing the authority in schools: "You just can’t beat a decentralized system. It gets closest to the level where the action really is. Education should have an advantage in moving into it, because your locations and your people are already physically dispersed." [3]

Another potential benefit of decentralizing authority is as Spillane et al. describe: "The interactions among two or more leaders in carrying out a particular task may amount to more than the sum of those leaders’ practice." [4]

The NEA (2011) reported that, "Research indicates that in order to increase the likelihood that Gen "Y" teachers remain in the profession, they need opportunities to participate in decision making at the school and district level; a positive and supportive school culture which fosters teamwork and effective lines of communication; professional opportunities that include collaboration and technology; in-depth feedback and support from administrators and colleagues; time set aside for regular collaboration; and fair pay and a differentiated pay structure which includes rewarding outstanding performance, acquiring new knowledge and skills, and assuming new roles and responsibilities (Behrstock & Clifford, 2009)." [5]

Kolderie (2014) emphasizes, "If teachers can control what matters for student success teachers will accept accountability for student success." [6]

Teacherpowered.org is a resource for this kind of work, and they note that teachers, "feel increased passion for the job and have greater ability to make the dramatic changes in schools that they determine are needed to truly improve student learning and the teaching profession." [7]

Lieberman (2000) cited Newmann and Wehlage (1995) in their search for, "an understanding of how schools developed the capacity to inspire student learning of high intellectual quality. They found that a self-conscious professional community was a salient characteristic of those schools most successful with students." [8]

Spectrum of authority

To frame the types of work in which Teacher leaders participate, it is important to look at the roles taken on by Educational leadership more broadly. Halverson, Kelley, and Shaw (2013) identify the following domains of school leadership:

  1. "Focus on Learning
  2. Monitoring teaching and learning
  3. Building nested learning communities
  4. Acquiring and allocating resources
  5. Establishing a safe and effective learning environment." [9]

Styles of school leadership can be placed on a spectrum in which on one end the leadership is completely owned by the administration to the opposite end in which leadership in completely owned by the teachers.

Administration-led (educational leadership/school administration)

Teacher networks

The structure of teacher networks, or as Kruse defines them, professional communities, includes "collective responsibility, professional control, and flexible boundaries". [10] Kruse continues to describe the day-to-day norms of a professional community, including: "reflective dialogue..., de-privatized, collective focus on student learning, collaboration, [and] shared norms and values." [11]

Lieberman (2000) explains that, "having a professional community differentiated those teachers who worked together to change the culture of their classrooms and their departments from those teachers who either tried new ideas in fragmented ways on their own or who blamed students for their inabilities to learn." [12]

Bryk/Gomez describe a type of teacher network, "a networked improvement community" as, "an intentionally formed social organization" whose "improvement goals impose specific demands on the rules and norms of participation." [13]

Teacher leaders

Danielson (2006) explains, "Many schools have instituted structures in which teachers assume formal leadership roles in the school, such as master teacher, department chair, team leader, helping teacher, or mentor." [14]

"Teachers in leadership roles work in collaboration with principals and other school administrators by facilitating improvements in instruction and promoting practices among their peers that can lead to improved student learning outcomes. By doing so, they support school leaders in encouraging innovation and creating cultures of success in school. Teacher leadership can neither be effective nor successful without principal support, but neither can the principal maximize his or her effectiveness without harnessing the talents and expertise of teachers in leadership roles." [15]

"Teachers who serve in leadership roles may do so formally or informally. Rather than having positional authority, teachers become leaders in their schools by being respected by their peers, being continuous learners, being approachable, and using group skills and influence to improve the educational practice of their peers. They model effective practices, exercise their influence in formal and informal contexts, and support collaborative team structures within their schools." [16]

"The Teacher Leader Model Standards consist of seven domains describing the many dimensions of teacher leadership:

One way in which teachers serve in these leadership or instructional coaching roles is to do instructional rounds in their school. Rounds consist of teachers spending time observing in one another’s classrooms and then meeting to discuss the findings. City et al. describe the goals of rounds to: "1. Build skills of network members by coming to a common understanding of effective practice and how to support it. 2. Support instructional improvement at the host site (school or district) by sharing what the network learns and by building skills at the local level." [18]

Some additional forms of teacher or instructional leadership may include: problem-solving teams, peer mentoring, and coaching, which support of the work of the administration without replacing it.

Teacher co-ops

The Teacher Powered Schools organization explains this teacher co-op or teacher-powered model as: "1. collaboratively designed and implemented by teachers. 2. teachers having collective autonomy to make the decisions influencing the success of a school, project, or professional endeavor." [19]

In these teacher co-ops or professional partnerships, Kolderie explains, "The authority pyramid inverts, and school moves to the dual-leader model typical of partnerships in most areas. (Think of the managing partner and the administrator of a law firm, or the chief of the medical staff and the executive of a hospital.)." [20]

The structure of a teacher co-op could vary from, "...handling the whole school [which] involves the teachers in the administration and management of the school as well as in the learning. Alternatively, teachers in a large secondary school—while continuing to be district employees—could form a partnership to handle the math department, the science department or the English department. They could then focus on learning; the principal would handle the school administration. A partnership of teachers might also organize to take responsibility for a program serving several schools across a district; Montessori, for example." [21]

Factors of implementation

Lieberman (2000) found that, "Networks that last, that hold their members, and continue to attract new teachers understand that they must account for the daily pressures of teaching, even as they seek to advance larger ideals." [22]

In order to be successful, teacher leadership should be implemented strategically. "Among the issues that will need to be considered are:

  1. resources (new or reallocated) necessary to provide professional development to teachers and administrators,
  2. availability of time within schools to create a collaborative work environment,
  3. re-structuring of current teacher compensation systems,
  4. the development of cost-efficient, equitable, and streamlined systems to recognize and reward teachers serving in leadership roles,
  5. assessing the effectiveness of various teacher leadership models, and
  6. replicating and scaling-up effective teacher leadership practices." [23]

Teacher leadership can be initiated from within the staff itself, however, it is important that the teachers have administrative support as well as peer-to-peer support to carry out their tasks. Halverson, Kelley, and Shaw (2013) reference: "Louis, Kruse and Bryk (1995) conclude that the most important task for school leaders is to create meaningful opportunities for teachers across the school to work together on pressing issues of common interest." [24]

Kruse (1993) outlines the conditions that support teacher leadership in the specific case of a professional community:

"Structural conditions

Social and human resources

Schools may implement a teacher leadership model as a strategy to downsize and cut costs for the school. In most cases, distributing administrative among the teachers could reduce overall personnel costs.

See also

Related Research Articles

Situated learning is a theory that explains an individual's acquisition of professional skills and includes research on apprenticeship into how legitimate peripheral participation leads to membership in a community of practice. Situated learning "takes as its focus the relationship between learning and the social situation in which it occurs".

Blended learning is an approach to education that combines online educational materials and opportunities for interaction online with traditional place-based classroom methods. It requires the physical presence of both teacher and student, with some elements of student control over time, place, path, or pace. While students still attend "brick-and-mortar" schools with a teacher present, face-to-face classroom practices are combined with computer-mediated activities regarding content and delivery. Blended learning is also used in professional development and training settings.

Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (CFAT) is a U.S.-based education policy and research center. It was founded by Andrew Carnegie in 1905 and chartered in 1906 by an act of the United States Congress. Among its most notable accomplishments are the development of the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association (TIAA), the Flexner Report on medical education, the Carnegie Unit, the Educational Testing Service, and the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.

In education, response to intervention is an approach to academic intervention used in the United States to provide early, systematic, and appropriately intensive assistance to children who are at risk for or already underperforming as compared to appropriate grade- or age-level standards. RTI seeks to promote academic success through universal screening, early intervention, frequent progress monitoring, and increasingly intensive research-based instruction or interventions for children who continue to have difficulty. RTI is a multileveled approach for aiding students that is adjusted and modified as needed if they are failing.

The National Writing Project (NWP) is a United States professional development network that serves teachers of writing at all grade levels, primary through university, and in all subjects. The mission of the NWP is to improve student achievement by improving the teaching of writing and improving learning in the nation's schools.

The National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE) is an American not-for-profit, policy analysis and development organization based in Washington, DC that first opened in 1988 in Rochester, New York. Its precursor, the Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, was established by the Carnegie Corporation of New York in 1985. The National Board for Professional Teaching Standards was established in response to a 1986 report by Marc Tucker, "A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century." This Board established the NCEE in 1988 with Tucker as founder, CEO, and president. The NCEE's stated mission is,"To analyze the implications of changes in the international economy for American education, formulate an agenda for American education based on that analysis and seek wherever possible to accomplish that agenda through policy change and development of the resources educators would need to carry it out."

Linda Darling-Hammond is an American academic who is the Charles E. Ducommun Professor of Education Emeritus at the Stanford Graduate School of Education. She was also the President and CEO of the Learning Policy Institute. She is author or editor of more than 25 books and more than 500 articles on education policy and practice. Her work focuses on school restructuring, teacher education, and educational equity. She was education advisor to Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign and was reportedly among candidates for United States Secretary of Education in the Obama administration.

A professional learning community (PLC) is a method to foster collaborative learning among colleagues within a particular work environment or field. It is often used in schools as a way to organize teachers into working groups of practice-based professional learning.

Classroom walkthrough is a model of professional development for teachers. Clinical supervision, or the practice of classroom observation and feedback has been one of the most often used tool in evaluating teacher performance, however the extent to which it helps teachers to improve their instruction is questionable. As a result, the classroom walkthrough, not designed for evaluation, but for the purpose of professional development, has gained increasing popularity.

New Leaders is an American non-profit organization that aims to recruit and train school leaders who focus on improving education results for poor and minority students. It also aims to promote system-level policies and practices that provide support to these leaders. The organization was founded in 2000 as New Leaders for New Schools by Jonathan Schnur and a group of teachers and investors. Research from the Harvard Business School and RAND corporation has found that principals from the New Leaders program have "outperform[ed] their peers". As of 2016, the organization trains education leaders at all levels, in more than 20 cities across the United States.

School Improvement Grants (SIGs) are grants awarded by the U.S. Department of Education to state education agencies (SEAs) under Section 1003(g) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. The SEAs, in turn, award subgrants to local educational agencies for the purpose of supporting focused school improvement efforts. In 2009, the Obama administration, and specifically U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, challenged the education community to make the lowest-achieving schools its highest priority.

Bridge International Academies

Bridge International Academies ('Bridge') is a for-profit private network of community schools and a "social enterprise" which began in Kenya in 2009. It's community school network is part of the NewGlobe education services portfolio; founded in 2007. The organisation aims to ensure all children have access to a quality education. To achieve this they support government schools through a range of large scale partnerships and also run Bridge community and school programme.

Global education is a mental development program that seeks to improve global human development based on the understanding of global dynamics, through the various sectors of human development delivery. In formal education, as a mode of human development delivery, it is integrated into formal educational programs, as an advanced program where global dimensions to local problems are appreciated through interconnectivity. Its first phase began as an undertaking to restructure education and society in the 1960s and 1970s, through the initiatives of educationalists, NGOs and intergovernmental organizations. The program evolves with the internet, and is in its virtual interconnectivity phase, through social media and other global public spheres. This global approach to mental development, seeks to fix the failing curriculum-based global education program that is: stuck in limited subject knowledge, based on theories that have failed the world ;hinged on memorization without visual exposure to knowledge development resources and global culture, limited by access to human development resources. Instead, the program seeks to improve the global mental resources pool through the appreciation of global dynamics and local perspectives on issues. This is through alternative motivations for global human development, and alternative global futures hinged on interconnectivity.

The Teacher Development Trust is a UK charity which works to raise awareness of the importance of professional development for teachers and other education professionals.

Kenneth "Ken" Leithwood is an educational researcher and professor at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education in Toronto, Canada.

In U.S. education, deeper learning is a set of student educational outcomes including acquisition of robust core academic content, higher-order thinking skills, and learning dispositions. Deeper learning is based on the premise that the nature of work, civic, and everyday life is changing and therefore increasingly requires that formal education provides young people with mastery of skills like analytic reasoning, complex problem solving, and teamwork.

Distributed leadership is a conceptual and analytical approach to understanding how the work of leadership takes place among the people and in context of a complex organization. Though developed and primarily used in education research, it has since been applied to other domains, including business and even tourism. Rather than focus on characteristics of the individual leader or features of the situation, distributed leadership foregrounds how actors engage in tasks that are "stretched" or distributed across the organization. With theoretical foundations in activity theory and distributed cognition, understanding leadership from a distributed perspective means seeing leadership activities as a situated and social process at the intersection of leaders, followers, and the situation.

Instructional leadership is generally defined as the management of curriculum and instruction by a school principal. This term appeared as a result of research associated with the effective school movement of the 1980s, which revealed that the key to running successful schools lies in the principals' role. However, the concept of instructional leadership is recently stretched out to include more distributed models which emphasize distributed and shared empowerment among school staff, for example distributed leadership, shared leadership, and transformational leadership.

Educator effectiveness is a K-12 school system education policy initiative that measures the quality of an educator performance in terms of improving student learning. It describes a variety of methods, such as observations, student assessments, student work samples and examples of teacher work, that education leaders use to determine the effectiveness of a K-12 educator.

Data-driven instruction is an educational approach that relies on information to inform teaching and learning. The idea refers to a method teachers use to improve instruction by looking at the information they have about their students. It takes place within the classroom, compared to data-driven decision making. Data-driven instruction works on two levels. One, it provides teachers the ability to be more responsive to students’ needs, and two, it allows students to be in charge of their own learning. Data-driven instruction can be understood through examination of its history, how it is used in the classroom, its attributes, and examples from teachers using this process.

References

  1. ↑ NEA. 2011. Teacher Leader Model Standards Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. <<http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdf>> p27-28.
  2. ↑ NEA. 2011. Teacher Leader Model Standards Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. <<http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdf>> p. 27
  3. ↑ Kolderie, Ted. 2014. The Split Screen Strategy: Improvement + Innovation: How to Get Education Changing the Way Successful Systems Change. Beaver’s Pond Press, Edina, MN. <<http://www.educationevolving.org/pdf/Book-Innovation-Plus-Improvement.pdf>> p. 135
  4. ↑ Spillane, James; Halverson, Rich; Diamond, John (2004). "Towards a Theory of Leadership Practice: a distributed perspective". Journal of Curriculum Studies. 36 (1): 16. doi:10.1080/0022027032000106726.
  5. ↑ NEA. 2011. Teacher Leader Model Standards Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. <<http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdf>> p13.
  6. ↑ Kolderie, Ted. 2014. The Split Screen Strategy: Improvement + Innovation: How to Get Education Changing the Way Successful Systems Change. Beaver’s Pond Press, Edina, MN. <<http://www.educationevolving.org/pdf/Book-Innovation-Plus-Improvement.pdf>> p. 85
  7. ↑ Teacher-Powered Schools. 2014. <<http://www.teacherpowered.org/about>>
  8. ↑ Lieberman, Ann. Networks As Learning Communities Shaping The Future Of Teacher Development. Stanford University.
  9. ↑ Halverson, Rich; Kelley, Carolyn. Shaw, Jim. 2013. Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership for Learning: Formative Assessment for School-Wide Improvement. Submitted as a conference paper for the 2013 Annual Conference of the University Council for Education Administration. p 5
  10. ↑ Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S., An Emerging Framework for Analyzing School-based Professional Community. 1993. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. p. 7.
  11. ↑ Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S., An Emerging Framework for Analyzing School-based Professional Community. 1993. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. p. 10.
  12. ↑ Lieberman, A (2000). "Networks As Learning Communities Shaping The Future Of Teacher Development". Journal of Teacher Education. 51 (3): 221–227. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.496.8651 . doi:10.1177/0022487100051003010.
  13. ↑ Bryk, Anthony S., Gomez, Louis M.. 2010. Getting Ideas into Action: Building Networked Improvement Communities in Education. Frontiers in Sociology of Education. Springer Publishing. p. 10.
  14. ↑ Danielson, Charlotte. 2006. Teacher Leadership That Strengthens Professional Practice. ASCD Member Book. p18.
  15. ↑ NEA. 2011. Teacher Leader Model Standards Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. <<http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdf>> p. 11.
  16. ↑ NEA. 2011. Teacher Leader Model Standards Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. <<http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdf>> p. 11.
  17. ↑ NEA. 2011. Teacher Leader Model Standards Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. <<http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdf>> p. 9.
  18. ↑ City, Elizabeth A., Elmore, Richard F., Fiarman, Sarah E., Teitel. Lee. 2009. Instructional Rounds in Education: A Network Approach To Improving Teaching And Learning. HARVARD EDUCATION PRESS CAMBRIDGE, MASSACHUSETTS. p. 100.
  19. ↑ Teacher-Powered Schools. 2014. << "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-08-24. Retrieved 2015-04-09.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)>>.
  20. ↑ Kolderie, Ted. 2014. The Split Screen Strategy: Improvement + Innovation: How to Get Education Changing the Way Successful Systems Change. Beaver’s Pond Press, Edina, MN. <<http://www.educationevolving.org/pdf/Book-Innovation-Plus-Improvement.pdf>> p. 86.
  21. ↑ Kolderie, Ted. 2014. The Split Screen Strategy: Improvement + Innovation: How to Get Education Changing the Way Successful Systems Change. Beaver’s Pond Press, Edina, MN. <<http://www.educationevolving.org/pdf/Book-Innovation-Plus-Improvement.pdf>> p. 95.
  22. ↑ Lieberman, A (2000). "Networks As Learning Communities Shaping The Future Of Teacher Development". Journal of Teacher Education. 51 (3): 221–227. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.496.8651 . doi:10.1177/0022487100051003010.
  23. ↑ NEA. 2011. Teacher Leader Model Standards Teacher Leadership Exploratory Consortium. <<http://www.nea.org/assets/docs/TeacherLeaderModelStandards2011.pdf>> p. 32.
  24. ↑ Halverson, Rich; Kelley, Carolyn. Shaw, Jim. 2013. Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership for Learning: Formative Assessment for School-Wide Improvement. Submitted as a conference paper for the 2013 Annual Conference of the University Council for Education Administration. p. 7.
  25. ↑ Kruse, S. D., Louis, K. S., & Bryk, A. S., An Emerging Framework for Analyzing School-based Professional Community. 1993. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. p. 16-23.

Sources

Organizations, links, resources for implementation and further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.