Professional learning community

Last updated

A professional learning community (PLC) is a method to foster collaborative learning among colleagues within a particular work environment or field. It is often used in schools as a way to organize teachers into working groups of practice-based professional learning.

Contents

History

The phrase professional learning community began to be used in the 1990s after Peter Senge's book The Fifth Discipline (1990) had popularized the idea of learning organizations, [1] [2] : 2  related to the idea of reflective practice espoused by Donald Schön in books such as The Reflective Turn: Case Studies in and on Educational Practice (1991). [3] [4] Charles B. Myers and Lynn K. Myers used the phrase professional learning community in relation to schools in their 1995 book The Professional Educator: A New Introduction to Teaching and Schools, [5] and a year later Charles B. Myers presented a paper at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association titled "Beyond the PDS: Schools as Professional Learning Communities" that proposed a path from professional development school (PDS) efforts to schools as professional learning communities. [6] In 1997, Shirley M. Hord issued a white paper titled "Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement". [7] A year later, Richard DuFour and Robert E. Eaker published the book Professional Learning Communities at Work. [8] Since the late 1990s, a large literature on PLCs has been published. [9]

Definitions

PLCs have many variations. In Shirley M. Hord's 1997 definition, it means "extending classroom practice into the community; bringing community personnel into the school to enhance the curriculum and learning tasks for students; or engaging students, teachers, and administrators simultaneously in learning". [7] : 1  Hord noted that the benefits of professional learning community to educators and students include reduced isolation of teachers, better informed and committed teachers, and academic gains for students. [7] In 1998, Richard DuFour and Robert E. Eaker explained:

If schools are to be significantly more effective, they must break from the industrial model upon which they were created and embrace a new model that enables them to function as learning organizations. We prefer characterizing learning organizations as "professional learning communities" for several vital reasons. While the term "organization" suggests a partnership enhanced by efficiency, expediency, and mutual interests, "community" places greater emphasis on relationships, shared ideals, and a strong culture—all factors that are critical to school improvement. The challenge for educators is to create a community of commitment—a professional learning community. [...] It sounds simple enough, but as the old adage warns, "the devil is in the details." Educators willing to embrace the concept of the school as a professional learning community will be given ambiguous, oftentimes conflicting advice on how they should proceed.

—  Richard DuFour and Robert E. Eaker, Professional Learning Communities at Work [8] : 15–16 

In 2004, DuFour stated that initiating and sustaining a PLC "requires the school staff to focus on learning rather than teaching, work collaboratively on matters related to learning, and hold itself accountable for the kind of results that fuel continual improvement". [10] : 11  In 2005, the Ontario Ministry of Education defined a PLC as "a shared vision for running a school in which everyone can make a contribution, and staff are encouraged to collectively undertake activities and reflection in order to constantly improve their students' performance". [11] : 53 

Michael Fullan has noted that "in the spread of PLCs, we have found that the term travels a lot faster than the concept, a finding common to all innovations. The concept is deep and requires careful and persistent attention in thorough learning by reflective doing and problem solving." [12] Fullan also noted: "Transforming the culture of schools and the systems within which they operate is the main point. It is not an innovation to be implemented, but rather a new culture to be developed." [12]

Attributes

There are many core characteristics of PLCs including collective teamwork in which leadership and responsibility for student learning are extensively shared, a focus on reflective inquiry and dialogue among educators, collective emphasis on improving student learning, shared values and norms, and development of common practices and feedback. [13]

The 2005 report by the Ontario Ministry of Education titled Education for All indicates the characteristics of PLCs are as follows: [11] : 54 

Supporting conditions

Around the time that the term professional learning community was coined, a group of education researchers became interested in the similar idea of "professional community" in schools. [14] [15] Based on data they collected in their research for the Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools, Sharon Kruse, Karen Seashore Louis, and Anthony Bryk developed a three-part framework to describe the critical elements and supportive conditions that are necessary to establish a healthy "professional" culture. [14] The components of this framework are described in the following table. Kruse and colleagues found that "in schools where professional community is strong, teachers work together more effectively, and put more efforts into creating and sustaining opportunities for student learning." [14] They also suggested that the social and human resources are more important than the structural conditions in the development of professional community.

Professional culture in schools [14]
Critical elements
Reflective dialogueDe-privatization of practiceCollective focus on student learningCollaborationShared norms and values
Supporting conditions
Structural conditions
  • Time to meet and talk
  • Physical proximity
  • Interdependent teaching roles
  • Communication structures
  • Teacher empowerment and school autonomy
Social and human resources
  • Openness to improvement
  • Trust and respect
  • Cognitive and skill base
  • Supportive leadership
  • Socialization

Use of data

In their 2015 examination of middle school mathematics teachers' collaborative conversations regarding student data, Jason Brasel, Brette Garner, Britnie Kane and Ilana Horn found that the teachers used data to answer four questions: [16]

The matrix in the following table shows how Brasel and colleagues found that the teachers combined these four questions to learn about two dimensions of teaching: student thinking and instruction. [16] The authors found that while the most productive collaborative discussions—that allowed the teachers to learn more about mathematics content, students and pedagogy—focused more on why and how, the teachers tended to address only the first two questions, what and to whom. While these conversations were helpful in identifying students in need of remediation, they did little in the way to improve instruction in the long run. [16]

Learning about instruction [16]
WeakStrong
Learning about
student thinking		WeakTargeted reteaching
  • What?
  • To whom?
Tips and tricks
  • What?
  • To whom and how?
StrongBounded improvement
  • What and why?
  • To whom?
Responsive revisioning
  • What and why?
  • To whom and how?

Staff development

Barriers to implementation

Teachers and other educators can feel as if they are pawns in a larger game of chess where school and district leaders are making decisions that cause problems for educators trying to do their jobs. [17] : 16  Barriers that can inhibit the development of PLCs include subject areas, because some educational subjects tend to naturally take precedence over others. [18] : 35  The physical layout of the school can be another obstacle. [18] : 35 

In the book Intentional Interruption: Breaking Down Learning Barriers to Professional Practice, Steven Katz and Lisa Ain Dack identified six mental barriers to learning in PLCs: "we don't think through all possibilities; we focus on confirming our hypotheses and not challenging them; we pay too much attention to things that are vivid; we consider ourselves to be exceptions; we hesitate to take action in a new direction; we don't want others to see our vulnerabilities". [19] : 51–68  Katz and Dack opt for a psychological definition of learning: "Learning is the process through which experience causes permanent change in knowledge or behaviour". [19] : 14  It is the characteristic of permanence which raises the bar for all professional learning, because learning as permanent change is not easy or natural to achieve. [19] : 15–17  Katz and Dack urge designers of professional learning to avoid the "activity trap" of assuming that participation in a protocol or process guarantees real learning has occurred or putting so much emphasis on the activity that learning is lost in the shuffle. [19] : 77–78 

Because of these difficulties many teachers are turning to the web for PLCs. Teachers are finding groups through Twitter, Facebook, and other social media websites that allow them to interact with teachers from across their country to brainstorm and exchange ideas. [20] These groups can be helpful for those with PLCs already at their current school and those without PLCs.

Staff as a community

A PLC can be seen as an effective staff development team approach and a strategy for school improvement. The PLC process aims to be a reflective process where both individual and community growth is achieved, connected with the school's shared vision for learning. In his book The Fifth Discipline, Peter Senge commented on the importance of building shared vision:

The practice of shared vision involves the skills of unearthing shared "pictures of the future" that foster genuine commitment and enrollment rather than compliance. In mastering this discipline, leaders learn the counter-productiveness of trying to dictate a vision, no matter how heartfelt.

—  Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline [1] : 9 

Creation of a shared vision involves sharing diverse ideas and making compromises so that all members are satisfied with the direction in which the organization is moving. Conflicting goals can become a source of positive development: "Top-down mandates and bottom-up energies need each other". [21] : 19 

Through this commitment and creation of a shared vision the team may become empowered to work together and achieve goals. As teachers' capacity increases and they develop a sense of professional growth, they may find they are able to reach goals they could not reach on their own.

In an educational setting, a PLC may include people from multiple levels of the organization who are collaboratively and continually working together for the betterment of the organization. [22] Peter Senge believes "it is no longer sufficient to have one person learning for the organization". [23] : 3  A major principle of PLCs is that people learn more together than if they were on their own, if conditions are right. [19] Teachers may promote the idea of team learning to students in their classrooms, but teachers may not practice team learning in their professional lives; PLCs aim to help teachers practice the team learning that they preach. Senge suggests that when teams learn together there are beneficial results for the organization. [23] Some school improvement evaluators have even claimed that "high-quality collaboration has become no less than an imperative". [24]

Leadership

For a school to be fully committed to implementing PLCs, the school's leadership must help establish and maintain PLCs. [8] Successful PLCs will require a shift in the traditional leadership structure from leader-centered (top-down) to shared leadership. [8] Sue C. Thompson and her colleagues pointed out how many educators often feel that "new ideas that came from someone else without teacher input" are a waste of time and do not qualify as true leadership or support. [2] : 4  In a PLC, the view of the principal as the instructional leader changes to a view that reflects the principal as a member of a community of learners and leaders. [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

A mindset is an established set of attitudes of a person or group concerning culture, values, philosophy, frame of mind, outlook, and disposition. It may also arise from a person's worldview or beliefs about the meaning of life. A person can have multiple mindsets, whilst the two most common ones are often cited as the growth and fixed mindset, a person also has a money mindset which can be more deeply described as a poverty mindset or a wealth mindset. There are also: abundance mindset, positive mindset, negative mindset, victim mindset, protector mindset, poverty mindset, rich mindset, wealth mindset, losing mindset, and winning mindset among others that form the make up of a person's overall mindset based on the various values, beliefs, experiences and opinions that comprise the thinking on a conscious and unconscious level regarding these things.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Action research</span> Methodology for social science research

Action research is a philosophy and methodology of research generally applied in the social sciences. It seeks transformative change through the simultaneous process of taking action and doing research, which are linked together by critical reflection. Kurt Lewin, then a professor at MIT, first coined the term "action research" in 1944. In his 1946 paper "Action Research and Minority Problems" he described action research as "a comparative research on the conditions and effects of various forms of social action and research leading to social action" that uses "a spiral of steps, each of which is composed of a circle of planning, action and fact-finding about the result of the action".

Transformative learning, as a theory, says that the process of "perspective transformation" has three dimensions: psychological, convictional, and behavioral.

Transformative learning is the expansion of consciousness through the transformation of basic worldview and specific capacities of the self; transformative learning is facilitated through consciously directed processes such as appreciatively accessing and receiving the symbolic contents of the unconscious and critically analyzing underlying premises.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Experiential education</span> Philosophy of education

Experiential education is a philosophy of education that describes the process that occurs between a teacher and student that infuses direct experience with the learning environment and content. The term is not interchangeable with experiential learning; however experiential learning is a sub-field and operates under the methodologies of experiential education. The Association for Experiential Education regards experiential education as "a philosophy that informs many methodologies in which educators purposefully engage with learners in direct experience and focused reflection in order to increase knowledge, develop skills, clarify values, and develop people's capacity to contribute to their communities". Experiential education is the term for the philosophy and educational progressivism is the movement which it informed. The Journal of Experiential Education publishes peer-reviewed empirical and theoretical academic research within the field.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Experiential learning</span> Learn by reflect on active involvement

Experiential learning (ExL) is the process of learning through experience, and is more narrowly defined as "learning through reflection on doing". Hands-on learning can be a form of experiential learning, but does not necessarily involve students reflecting on their product. Experiential learning is distinct from rote or didactic learning, in which the learner plays a comparatively passive role. It is related to, but not synonymous with, other forms of active learning such as action learning, adventure learning, free-choice learning, cooperative learning, service-learning, and situated learning.

The International Baccalaureate Primary Years Programme (PYP) is an educational programme managed by the International Baccalaureate (IB) for students from kindergarten to fifth grade. While the programme prepares students for the IB Middle Years Programme, it is not a prerequisite for it. The subject areas of the PYP are language, social studies, mathematics, science, technology, arts; personal, social and physical education. Students are required to learn a second language during the programme. Assessment is carried out by teachers according to strategies provided by the IB, and with respect to guidelines to what the students should learn specified in the curriculum model.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching</span> American education policy and research center

The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (CFAT) is a U.S.-based education policy and research center. It was founded by Andrew Carnegie in 1905 and chartered in 1906 by an act of the United States Congress. Among its most notable accomplishments are the development of the Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association (TIAA), the Flexner Report on medical education, the Carnegie Unit, the Educational Testing Service, and the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.

Reflective practice is the ability to reflect on one's actions so as to take a critical stance or attitude towards one's own practice and that of one's peers, engaging in a process of continuous adaptation and learning. According to one definition it involves "paying critical attention to the practical values and theories which inform everyday actions, by examining practice reflectively and reflexively. This leads to developmental insight". A key rationale for reflective practice is that experience alone does not necessarily lead to learning; deliberate reflection on experience is essential.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Student voice</span> Perspectives and actions of students

Student voice is the individual and collective perspective and actions of students within the context of learning and education. It is identified in schools as both a metaphorical practice and as a pragmatic concern. Tech educator Dennis Harper noted that student voice gives students "the ability to influence learning to include policies, programs, contexts and principles."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teacher education</span> Training teachers to develop teaching skills

Teacher education or teacher training refers to programs, policies, procedures, and provision designed to equip (prospective) teachers with the knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, approaches, methodologies and skills they require to perform their tasks effectively in the classroom, school, and wider community. The professionals who engage in training the prospective teachers are called teacher educators.

Educational leadership is the process of enlisting and guiding the talents and energies of teachers, students, and parents toward achieving common educational aims. This term is often used synonymously with school leadership in the United States and has supplanted educational management in the United Kingdom. Several universities in the United States offer graduate degrees in educational leadership.

Michigan Virtual University (MVU) is a private, nonprofit corporation that provides online educational tools, resources and courses for middle and high school students, parents and K-12 educators. Established in 1998 by the Michigan governor John Engler and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation, MVU is governed by an independent Board of Directors composed of individuals representing business, industry, higher education, K-12 education and state government. MVU also provides Michigan's K-12 educators access to online courses and resources to meet professional development requirements and earn State Continuing Education Clock Hours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Fullan</span>

Michael Fullan is the Global Leadership Director, New Pedagogies for Deep Learning. Deep Learning, as described by NPDL, is mobilized by four elements that combine to form the new pedagogies. They are: Learning Partnerships, Learning Environments, Pedagogical Practices, and Leveraging Digital.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open educational practices</span>

Open educational practices (OEP) are part of the broader open education landscape, including the openness movement in general. It is a term with multiple layers and dimensions and is often used interchangeably with open pedagogy or open practices. OEP represent teaching and learning techniques that draw upon open and participatory technologies and high-quality open educational resources (OER) in order to facilitate collaborative and flexible learning. Because OEP emerged from the study of OER, there is a strong connection between the two concepts. OEP, for example, often, but not always, involve the application of OER to the teaching and learning process. Open educational practices aim to take the focus beyond building further access to OER and consider how in practice, such resources support education and promote quality and innovation in teaching and learning. The focus in OEP is on reproduction/understanding, connecting information, application, competence, and responsibility rather than the availability of good resources. OEP is a broad concept which can be characterised by a range of collaborative pedagogical practices that include the use, reuse, and creation of OER and that often employ social and participatory technologies for interaction, peer-learning, knowledge creation and sharing, empowerment of learners, and open sharing of teaching practices.

Richard DuFour was an American educational researcher noted for developing strategies to create collaborative teaching environments in K–12 schools.

The College of Education is one of 15 colleges at The Pennsylvania State University, located in University Park, PA. It houses the departments of Curriculum and Instruction, Education Policy Studies, Learning and Performance Systems, and Educational Psychology, Counseling, and Special Education. Almost 2,300 undergraduate students, and nearly 1,000 graduate students are enrolled in its 7 undergraduate and 16 graduate degree programs. The college is housed in four buildings: Chambers, Rackley, Keller, and CEDAR Buildings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Teacher leadership</span> Teachers that take on additional administrative roles outside of the classroom

Teacher leadership is a term used in K-12 schools for classroom educators who simultaneously take on administrative roles outside of their classrooms to assist in functions of the larger school system. Teacher leadership tasks may include but are not limited to: managing teaching, learning, and resource allocation. Teachers who engage in leadership roles are generally experienced and respected in their field which can both empower them and increase collaboration among peers.

Conducting instructional rounds is a process that school districts and schools use to better understand teaching and learning in schools in order to improve learning at scale. In an instructional rounds session, a group of educators, from perhaps 20 to 40 in size, makes a series of visits to multiple classrooms to observe what is taking place in the instructional core. Low inference observation notes are taken about a learning problem identified by the school being observed. The observation notes are used to create a data picture of what has been seen in teaching and learning practices throughout the school. It is these data and practices that are shared with the school, not information about individual teachers or students. Adapted from the practice of grand rounds in medical school, the aim of instructional rounds is to observe teaching and learning to discern root causes for problems identified by the school and to help the school and district create more productive outcomes. Distinct from supervision and evaluation, instructional rounds are used to describe what is happening in classrooms and to share observations with educators - and are not intended to be evaluative.

Data-driven instruction is an educational approach that relies on information to inform teaching and learning. The idea refers to a method teachers use to improve instruction by looking at the information they have about their students. It takes place within the classroom, compared to data-driven decision making. Data-driven instruction works on two levels. One, it provides teachers the ability to be more responsive to students’ needs, and two, it allows students to be in charge of their own learning. Data-driven instruction can be understood through examination of its history, how it is used in the classroom, its attributes, and examples from teachers using this process.

Solution Tree is a professional development company and publisher of educational material for K–12 educators. Founded in 1998, the company provides services and products that include books, videos, conferences, workshops, consultation, and online courses. Solution Tree authors and consultants provide guidance to schools and districts on topics such as professional learning communities, response to intervention, educational assessment, and Common Core State Standards.

References

  1. 1 2 Senge, Peter M. (2006) [1990]. The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization (Revised ed.). New York: Currency/Doubleday. ISBN   0385517254. OCLC   65166960.
  2. 1 2 Thompson, Sue C.; Gregg, Larry; Niska, John M. (January 2004). "Professional learning communities, leadership, and student learning" (PDF). RMLE Online. 28 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1080/19404476.2004.11658173 .
  3. ↑ Schön, Donald A., ed. (1991). The reflective turn: case studies in and on educational practice. New York: Teachers College Press. ISBN   0807730467. OCLC   22110784.
  4. ↑ Lieberman, Ann (April 1995). "Practices that support teacher development: transforming conceptions of professional learning". Phi Delta Kappan . 76 (8): 591–596.
  5. ↑ Myers, Charles B.; Myers, Lynn K. (1995). The professional educator: a new introduction to teaching and schools. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing. ISBN   0534205747. OCLC   31009967. See also: Myers, Charles B.; Simpson, Douglas J. (1998). Re-creating schools: places where everyone learns and likes it . Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. ISBN   0803964250. OCLC   37353705.
  6. ↑ Myers, Charles B. (April 1996). "Beyond the PDS: schools as professional learning communities: a proposal based on an analysis of PDS efforts of the 1990s" (PDF). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City, April 8–12, 1996. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
  7. 1 2 3 Hord, Shirley M. (1997). "Professional learning communities: communities of continuous inquiry and improvement" (PDF). White paper issued by Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, Austin, TX and funded by the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, United States Department of Education . Retrieved 27 October 2016. A summary of the white paper was published as: Hord, Shirley M. (1997). "Professional learning communities: what are they and why are they important?". Issues About Change. 6 (1).
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 DuFour, Richard; Eaker, Robert E. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington; Alexandria, VA: National Educational Service; Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. ISBN   1879639602. OCLC   39040733.
  9. ↑ A search for the phrase on Google Scholar on 27 October 2016 returned over 17,000 results.
  10. ↑ DuFour, Richard (May 2004). "What is a 'professional learning community'?". Educational Leadership. 61 (8): 6–11.
  11. 1 2 Education for all: the report of the expert panel on literacy and numeracy instruction for students with special education needs, kindergarten to grade 6 (PDF). Toronto: Ministry of Education (Ontario). 2005. ISBN   0779480600. OCLC   225161136. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 October 2006. Retrieved 16 November 2006.
  12. 1 2 Fullan, Michael (2016) [1982]. "Enter change". The NEW meaning of educational change (5th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press. pp. 107–120. ISBN   9780807756805. OCLC   921102633.
  13. ↑ Stoll, Louise; Bolam, Ray; McMahon, Agnes; Wallace, Mike; Thomas, Sally (December 2006). "Professional learning communities: a review of the literature". Journal of Educational Change. 7 (4): 221–258. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-0001-8. S2CID   50731927.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Kruse, Sharon; Louis, Karen Seashore; Bryk, Anthony (Spring 1994). "Building professional community in schools" (PDF). Issues in Restructuring Schools (6): 3–6.
  15. ↑ Anfara, Vincent A.; Caskey, Micki M.; Carpenter, Jan (August 2015). "Organizational models for teacher learning". Middle School Journal. 43 (5): 52–62. doi:10.1080/00940771.2012.11461830. S2CID   145752331.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Brasel, Jason; Garner, Brette; Kane, Britnie; Horn, Ilana (November 2015). "Getting to the why and how: what kinds of conversations about data bring about the greatest improvements in math teaching and learning?". Education Leadership. 73 (3).
  17. ↑ Buffum, Austin; Hinman, Charles (May 2006). "Professional learning communities: reigniting passion and purpose". Leadership. 35 (5): 16–19.
  18. 1 2 Riley, Kathryn; Stoll, Louise (Winter 2004). "Inside-out and outside-in: why schools need to think about communities in new ways". Education Review. 18 (1): 34–41.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 Katz, Steven; Dack, Lisa A. (2015). Intentional interruption: breaking down learning barriers to transform professional practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. ISBN   9781412998796. OCLC   795172349.
  20. ↑ Holmes, Kathryn; Preston, Greg; Shaw, Kylie; Buchanan, Rachel (December 2013). "'Follow' me: networked professional learning for teachers". Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 38 (12): 55–65. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2013v38n12.4 .
  21. ↑ Fullan, Michael (1999). Change forces: the sequel . London; Philadelphia: Falmer Press. ISBN   0750707569. OCLC   41363236.
  22. ↑ Darling-Hammond, Linda; Wei, Ruth Chung; Andree, Alethea; Richardson, Nikole; Orphanos, Stelios (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the U.S. and abroad: technical report (PDF). Dallas, TX; Stanford, CA: National Staff Development Council; School Redesign Network. OCLC   912261565.
  23. 1 2 Senge, Peter M. (2013) [2000]. "Give me a lever long enough... and single-handed I can move the world". In Grogan, Margaret (ed.). The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 3–16. ISBN   9781118456217. OCLC   829055889.
  24. ↑ Gajda, Rebecca; Koliba, Christopher (March 2007). "Evaluating the imperative of intraorganizational collaboration: a school improvement perspective". American Journal of Evaluation . 28 (1): 26–44. doi:10.1177/1098214006296198. S2CID   38333256.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.