The Art of War III: Retribution | |
---|---|
Directed by | Gerry Lively |
Written by | Joe Halpin |
Produced by | Philip B. Goldfine Dan Lyon Ari Newman |
Starring | Treach Warren Derosa Sung-Hi Lee Janet Carroll Leo Lee |
Cinematography | Suki Medencevic |
Edited by | Randy Carter |
Music by | Louis Castle James Bairian |
Distributed by | Sony Pictures |
Release date |
|
Running time | 88 minutes |
Countries | United States South Korea |
Language | English |
The Art of War III: Retribution is a 2009 American direct-to-video action film directed by Gerry Lively and starring Treach, Warren Derosa, Sung-Hi Lee and Leo Lee. It is the third installment in The Art of War film series. It is the sequel to The Art of War II: Betrayal (2008). The film had a negative critical reception.
UN operative Neil Shaw is sent to South Korea to stop a potential nuclear threat amidst reunification talks with North Korea. Shaw's team is attacked, resulting in the death of one agent. During the firefight, Shaw encounters Sun Yi, who is with the arms dealers, and takes her into custody. Shaw's superior, Gaines, arrives in South Korea but is intercepted and killed by men working for the arms dealer. They plant evidence to frame Shaw for the murder, making him a fugitive from the FBI and the Triads. Shaw must evade capture, clear his name, and stop the North Korean separatists from acquiring a nuclear bomb.
The film was produced before The Art of War II: Betrayal , but shelved after Wesley Snipes contacted the producers about returning to the series. Though consideration was initially given to releasing it as a stand-alone film named "Intervention", it was ultimately released as the third The Art of War film. [1]
The film received a strongly negative critical reaction. DVDtalk called the film "complete garbage", singling out the action sequences and Treach's performance. [2] The Movie Scene had similar criticisms, describing the action as "boringly pedestrian", accusing Treach of having no charisma, and finding Warren Derosa's performance to be annoying. [3] Movieman's Guide described the plot as "frankly nonsensical and just plain stupid", and criticised the poorly-staged gunfights, particularly the film's climax. [4]