The Economics of Imperfect Competition

Last updated May 30, 2024

The Economics of Imperfect Competition is a 1933 book written by British economist Joan Robinson.

The book discusses the views of Alfred Marshall and Arthur Cecil Pigou on competition and the theory of the firm. Marshall believed that competition was imprecise, with prices being influenced by the rise and fall of demand. He also used the analogy of trees in a forest to explain how firms grow and establish a monopoly. Pigou, on the other hand, presented a logical system where perfect competition occurs when firms produce at a level where marginal cost equals price. He explained that firms operate at less than full capacity due to falling demand curves and maximization of profits at a certain output level. Robinson highlights the limitations and simplifications made in Pigou's analysis, particularly in terms of assumptions about demand conditions and the concept of price policy in manufacturing industries.^[1]

She highlights the distinction between tool-makers and tool-users in economics. The book is presented as a box of tools for analytical economists, but it acknowledges that the direct contribution to understanding the real world is limited. The gap between the tool-makers and tool-users is recognized, as economists often provide poor or misleading information to practical individuals. However, the solution is not to abandon the tools but to refine and perfect them to better address practical needs. The importance of stating assumptions clearly is emphasized, as economists sometimes struggle to do so due to a sense of shame or a lack of knowledge of their own assumptions. She stresses the need for economists to be frank about their assumptions and to approach problems in a way that has a chance of finding answers.^[1]

Summary

Structure of the book:^[1]

Book I: The Technique - This book establishes the necessary definitions and assumptions for the discussions that follow. It introduces the basic concepts and lays the groundwork for the analysis.

Book II: Monopoly Equilibrium - This book focuses on the determination of prices by a single producer operating in a monopoly setting. It examines the factors that influence the price charged by a monopolist, considering both the conditions of demand and the costs involved.

Book III: Competitive Equilibrium - This book delves into the analysis of the supply curve of a commodity based on the results obtained in the previous book. It introduces a new element by considering the impact of monopoly profit on the number of producers in the industry. It also explores the effect of changes in demand on individual sellers' costs and analyzes the supply curve of a commodity under perfect competition.

Book IV: The Comparison of Monopoly and Competitive Output - This book compares the output of a perfectly competitive industry with that of a monopoly when the number of independent producers is reduced to one. It explores the differences in output levels and examines the control of monopoly price. The book also addresses objections to these comparisons, highlighting their limitations and unrealistic assumptions.

Book V: Price Discrimination - This book explores the practice of price discrimination, where a single firm charges different prices for the same commodity. It discusses the concept of price discrimination and raises reflections on its desirability.

Book VI: Monopsony - This book shifts the focus to the perspective of an individual buyer. It analyzes prices from the point of view of a monopsonist, a single buyer facing multiple sellers. It introduces definitions and considerations related to the buyer's position and examines the relationship between monopoly, monopsony, and perfect competition.

Book VII: The Demand for a Factor of Production - This book deals with the demand curve for a factor of production, specifically labor. It explores the demand for labor from the perspective of an individual employer and analyzes the demand for labor at the industry level. The analysis parallels the earlier discussions on the supply curve of a commodity.

Book VIII: The Comparison of Monopoly and Competitive Demand for Labor - This book compares the demand for labor under monopoly and perfect competition, similar to the comparisons made in Book IV for output levels. It addresses the objections and limitations of these comparisons and completes the analysis of the demand side.

Book IX: Exploitation - This book examines the prices of factors of production, shifting the perspective from the employer to the owners of the factors (such as labor). It explores the concept of exploitation and analyzes the prices of factors of production in relation to perfect competition. Ethical reflections and considerations are also introduced.

Book X: A World of Monopolies - This book moves away from the theory of value and delves into the Economics of Welfare. It connects the analysis of monopoly value with the work of Pigou on welfare economics. The book raises ethical questions and explores the implications of a world dominated by monopolies.

Reception

A contemporary review from The Economic Journal in 1933 noted that the book is interesting and stimulating despite editorial limitations.^[2] The book was also reviewed in The Journal of Political Economy ^[3] and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society.^[4]

Related Research Articles

Microeconomics is a branch of economics that studies the behavior of individuals and firms in making decisions regarding the allocation of scarce resources and the interactions among these individuals and firms. Microeconomics focuses on the study of individual markets, sectors, or industries as opposed to the national economy as a whole, which is studied in macroeconomics.

Macroeconomics is a branch of economics that deals with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole. This includes regional, national, and global economies. Macroeconomists study topics such as output/GDP and national income, unemployment, price indices and inflation, consumption, saving, investment, energy, international trade, and international finance.

Monopolistic competition is a type of imperfect competition such that there are many producers competing against each other but selling products that are differentiated from one another and hence not perfect substitutes. In monopolistic competition, a company takes the prices charged by its rivals as given and ignores the impact of its own prices on the prices of other companies. If this happens in the presence of a coercive government, monopolistic competition will fall into government-granted monopoly. Unlike perfect competition, the company maintains spare capacity. Models of monopolistic competition are often used to model industries. Textbook examples of industries with market structures similar to monopolistic competition include restaurants, cereals, clothing, shoes, and service industries in large cities. The "founding father" of the theory of monopolistic competition is Edward Hastings Chamberlin, who wrote a pioneering book on the subject, Theory of Monopolistic Competition (1933). Joan Robinson's book The Economics of Imperfect Competition presents a comparable theme of distinguishing perfect from imperfect competition. Further work on monopolistic competition was undertaken by Dixit and Stiglitz who created the Dixit-Stiglitz model which has proved applicable used in the sub fields of international trade theory, macroeconomics and economic geography.

Neoclassical economics is an approach to economics in which the production, consumption, and valuation (pricing) of goods and services are observed as driven by the supply and demand model. According to this line of thought, the value of a good or service is determined through a hypothetical maximization of utility by income-constrained individuals and of profits by firms facing production costs and employing available information and factors of production. This approach has often been justified by appealing to rational choice theory.

An oligopoly is a market in which control over an industry lies in the hands of a few large sellers who own a dominant share of the market. Oligopolistic markets have homogenous products, few market participants, and inelastic demand for the products in those industries. As a result of their significant market power, firms in oligopolistic markets can influence prices through manipulating the supply function. Firms in an oligopoly are also mutually interdependent, as any action by one firm is expected to affect other firms in the market and evoke a reaction or consequential action. As a result, firms in oligopolistic markets often resort to collusion as means of maximising profits.

In economics, specifically general equilibrium theory, a perfect market, also known as an atomistic market, is defined by several idealizing conditions, collectively called perfect competition, or atomistic competition. In theoretical models where conditions of perfect competition hold, it has been demonstrated that a market will reach an equilibrium in which the quantity supplied for every product or service, including labor, equals the quantity demanded at the current price. This equilibrium would be a Pareto optimum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supply and demand</span> Economic model of price determination in a market

In microeconomics, supply and demand is an economic model of price determination in a market. It postulates that, holding all else equal, in a competitive market, the unit price for a particular good or other traded item such as labor or liquid financial assets, will vary until it settles at a point where the quantity demanded will equal the quantity supplied, resulting in an economic equilibrium for price and quantity transacted. The concept of supply and demand forms the theoretical basis of modern economics.

In economics, imperfect competition refers to a situation where the characteristics of an economic market do not fulfil all the necessary conditions of a perfectly competitive market. Imperfect competition causes market inefficiencies, resulting in market failure. Imperfect competition usually describes behaviour of suppliers in a market, such that the level of competition between sellers is below the level of competition in perfectly competitive market conditions.

This aims to be a complete article list of economics topics:

Steve Keen is an Australian economist and author. He considers himself a post-Keynesian, criticising neoclassical economics as inconsistent, unscientific, and empirically unsupported.

Allocative efficiency is a state of the economy in which production is aligned with the preferences of consumers and producers; in particular, the set of outputs is chosen so as to maximize the social welfare of society. This is achieved if every produced good or service has a marginal benefit equal to the marginal cost of production.

In economics, market power refers to the ability of a firm to influence the price at which it sells a product or service by manipulating either the supply or demand of the product or service to increase economic profit. In other words, market power occurs if a firm does not face a perfectly elastic demand curve and can set its price (P) above marginal cost (MC) without losing revenue. This indicates that the magnitude of market power is associated with the gap between P and MC at a firm's profit maximising level of output. The size of the gap, which encapsulates the firm's level of market dominance, is determined by the residual demand curve's form. A steeper reverse demand indicates higher earnings and more dominance in the market. Such propensities contradict perfectly competitive markets, where market participants have no market power, P = MC and firms earn zero economic profit. Market participants in perfectly competitive markets are consequently referred to as 'price takers', whereas market participants that exhibit market power are referred to as 'price makers' or 'price setters'.

Marginal revenue is a central concept in microeconomics that describes the additional total revenue generated by increasing product sales by 1 unit. Marginal revenue is the increase in revenue from the sale of one additional unit of product, i.e., the revenue from the sale of the last unit of product. It can be positive or negative. Marginal revenue is an important concept in vendor analysis. To derive the value of marginal revenue, it is required to examine the difference between the aggregate benefits a firm received from the quantity of a good and service produced last period and the current period with one extra unit increase in the rate of production. Marginal revenue is a fundamental tool for economic decision making within a firm's setting, together with marginal cost to be considered.

The marginal revenue productivity theory of wages is a model of wage levels in which they set to match to the marginal revenue product of labor, $, which is the increment to revenues caused by the increment to output produced by the last laborer employed. In a model, this is justified by an assumption that the firm is profit-maximizing and thus would employ labor only up to the point that marginal labor costs equal the marginal revenue generated for the firm. This is a model of the neoclassical economics type.$

Market structure, in economics, depicts how firms are differentiated and categorised based on the types of goods they sell (homogeneous/heterogeneous) and how their operations are affected by external factors and elements. Market structure makes it easier to understand the characteristics of diverse markets.

In economics, competition is a scenario where different economic firms are in contention to obtain goods that are limited by varying the elements of the marketing mix: price, product, promotion and place. In classical economic thought, competition causes commercial firms to develop new products, services and technologies, which would give consumers greater selection and better products. The greater the selection of a good is in the market, the lower prices for the products typically are, compared to what the price would be if there was no competition (monopoly) or little competition (oligopoly).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward Chamberlin</span> American economist

Edward Hastings Chamberlin was an American economist. He was born in La Conner, Washington, and died in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

A bilateral monopoly is a market structure consisting of both a monopoly and a monopsony.

In economics, a monopsony is a market structure in which a single buyer substantially controls the market as the major purchaser of goods and services offered by many would-be sellers. The microeconomic theory of monopsony assumes a single entity to have market power over all sellers as the only purchaser of a good or service. This is a similar power to that of a monopolist, which can influence the price for its buyers in a monopoly, where multiple buyers have only one seller of a good or service available to purchase from.

In economics, a factor market is a market where factors of production are bought and sold. Factor markets allocate factors of production, including land, labour and capital, and distribute income to the owners of productive resources, such as wages, rents, etc.

References

1 2 3 Robinson, Joan (1979). The economics of imperfect competition (Repr. d. 2. 1969 ed.). London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-10289-3.
↑ Shove, G (1 December 1933). "The Economics of Imperfect Competition. by Joan Robinson". The Economic Journal . Retrieved 2023-07-01.
↑ Schumpeter, Joseph A.; Nichol, A. J. (1934). "Robinson's Economics of Imperfect Competition". Journal of Political Economy. 42 (2): 249–259. doi:10.1086/254595. ISSN 0022-3808. JSTOR 1823265.
↑ H., R. G. (1934). "Review of The Economics of Imperfect Competition". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 97 (4): 671–674. doi:10.2307/2342203. ISSN 0952-8385. JSTOR 2342203.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[Robinsonimperfect-1] 1 2 3 Robinson, Joan (1979). The economics of imperfect competition (Repr. d. 2. 1969 ed.). London: Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-10289-3.

[2] Shove, G (1 December 1933). "The Economics of Imperfect Competition. by Joan Robinson". The Economic Journal . Retrieved 2023-07-01.

[3] Schumpeter, Joseph A.; Nichol, A. J. (1934). "Robinson's Economics of Imperfect Competition". Journal of Political Economy. 42 (2): 249–259. doi:10.1086/254595. ISSN 0022-3808. JSTOR 1823265.

[4] H., R. G. (1934). "Review of The Economics of Imperfect Competition". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 97 (4): 671–674. doi:10.2307/2342203. ISSN 0952-8385. JSTOR 2342203.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]