The Genealogical Adam and Eve

Last updated
The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry
The Genealogical Adam and Eve.jpg
US paperback cover
Author S. Joshua Swamidass
LanguageEnglish
Subjects
Publisher InterVarsity Press [1]
Publication date
December 10, 2019
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (paperback)
Pages264
ISBN 978-1-514-00383-1

The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry is a 2019 book by S. Joshua Swamidass. [2] In this book, Swamidass, a computational biologist and Christian, uses the findings of biology and genealogy to affirm belief in both evolution and a historical Genesis creation narrative. [3]

Contents

Background

Swamidass grew up in a Christian family, with his parents raising him as a Young Earth creationist. [4] Even after learning about evolution, however, he continued to be interested in the Christian faith. In 2019, he founded Peaceful Science, [5] a community where he writes regularly about reconciling science with the religious public. His work in this area motivated him to write The Genealogical Adam and Eve.

Synopsis

Creation-evolution controversy

Swamidass begins the book by describing the existing conflict between evolutionary science and most interpretations of the Genesis creation narrative. The most common interpretations of the Book of Genesis read as Adam and Eve being the first two humans to ever exist, with all of humankind descending from that single, divinely created couple. However, evolutionary biologists have long stated that humans have existed since well before 10,000 years ago, descending from ape-like creatures rather than being specially created. Swamidass explains that many religious groups have rejected evolution on the grounds of biblical inerrancy, while atheists and theistic evolutionists have discarded any belief in a historical Adam and Eve on the grounds that such a belief is incompatible with the findings of science.

"Genealogical hypothesis"

Swamidass then posits what he calls the "genealogical hypothesis" (GH), which bears a striking resemblance to "Adamic exceptionalism" in Islam:

Entirely consistent with the genetic and archeological evidence, it is possible that Adam was created out of dust, and Eve out of his rib, less than ten thousand years ago. Leaving the Garden, their offspring would have blended with those outside it, biologically identical neighbors from the surrounding area. In a few thousand years, they would become genealogical ancestors of everyone. [6]

Following this, he considers various points to show that his hypothesis is plausible within the findings of science as well as theology:

  1. Genealogy has demonstrated that it is possible for a single couple who lived in the Middle East less than 10,000 years ago to be the ancestors of nearly every human on Earth by the year 1 CE. [7]
  2. The definition of the term human is completely different in biology from that of theology; even within each respective field, there is some debate as to how to precisely define it. Scientists often debate whether certain species, such as Australopithecus afarensis , should be described as human. [8] Theologians, on the other hand, are unsure of how to define the image of God, which is meant to be the key characteristic of humans in Scripture. This ambiguity provides flexibility in answering the question of the origins of humankind. [9]
  3. The Book of Genesis may provide some evidence that humans already existed by the time of the special creation of Adam and Eve. Swamidass suggests that Chapter 2 might take place after Chapter 1 chronologically; alternatively, he suggests that Chapter 2 is a "zoomed-in" account of what was happening in a specific area in the Middle East during the events of Chapter 1. Such a hypothesis would provide room for biological humans to evolve from ape-like ancestors outside the Garden of Eden, while Adam and Eve are specially created in the Garden as the first "textual humans." [10]

Synthesis of evolution and Genesis

By defining "textual humans" as the members of the genealogical tree rooted at Adam and Eve, and "people outside the Garden", as humans who emerged through evolution by natural selection, [lower-alpha 1] Swamidass argues that the evidence shows a compatibility between a historical—though not completely literal—reading of Genesis and the evolutionary history of life. Science—asserts Swamidass—tells the story of humankind starting from its evolutionary origins, while the Bible tells the story of the Fall of man, its aftermath, and humankind's redemption.

"Skeptic of the conflict"

Swamidass concludes his book by stating that he is a "skeptic of the conflict" between science and Genesis. [11] He writes that most atheists, theistic evolutionists, and creationists share the belief that science is incompatible with a literal, historical Adam and Eve; the conflict or "fracture" comes down to which "story" each group dismisses in favor of the other. Swamidass hopes that his GH will help refute that belief, and that it will require "tolerance, humility," and "patience" for people of all three groups to come together to resolve this longstanding religious controversy. [12]

"Evidence and the Resurrection"

The first appendix of the book is the only one available in the print edition; it is a reprint of a 2017 essay by Swamidass. [13] [14] He dedicates this appendix to discussing his belief in the resurrection of Jesus, which he states is the foundation of his faith in God. Swamidass cites several examples of details of Jesus's life that he believes were predicted in the Hebrew Bible. [15] His approach has been interpreted as encouraging readers to rest their faith on the miracles related to Jesus's life in the New Testament rather than only on the apparent intelligent design of life in the natural world. [16] Swamidass also asserts that the scientists Blaise Pascal, Johann Kepler, Robert Boyle, Gregor Mendel, Asa Gray, Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, and Francis Collins were all "reached" by God through the Resurrection. [17]

Reception

The book has generated a range of responses; some are written from a religious view, and others, from a scientific view. Writing for The Gospel Coalition, Hans Madueme says: "As far as I can see, Swamidass’s revisionism lacks a convincing exegetical or theological basis." Madueme criticizes the book, arguing that its assumptions about the biological origins of the people outside the Garden are incompatible with Scripture, but praises the effort to reconcile science and religion. [18] Professor Nathan H. Lents of The City University of New York comments on the potential impact on Christians of Swamidass's approach to Genesis: "This will not tempt someone like me to believe in the creation story laid out in Genesis. But it just might allow those who do believe to be more open to evolution and, god willing, to science more broadly." [19]

Notes

  1. Swamidass clarifies that this distinction is purely theological, and that the people outside the Garden were not sub-human in any way; the GH agrees with the position of evidence-based science against polygenism. [4]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creationism</span> Belief that nature originated through supernatural acts

Creationism is the religious belief that nature, and aspects such as the universe, Earth, life, and humans, originated with supernatural acts of divine creation. In its broadest sense, creationism includes a continuum of religious views, which vary in their acceptance or rejection of scientific explanations such as evolution that describe the origin and development of natural phenomena.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolutionism</span> Derogatory term for the theory of evolution

Evolutionism is a term used to denote the theory of evolution. Its exact meaning has changed over time as the study of evolution has progressed. In the 19th century, it was used to describe the belief that organisms deliberately improved themselves through progressive inherited change (orthogenesis). The teleological belief went on to include cultural evolution and social evolution. In the 1970s, the term "Neo-Evolutionism" was used to describe the idea that "human beings sought to preserve a familiar style of life unless change was forced on them by factors that were beyond their control."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Young Earth creationism</span> Form of creationism

Modern young Earth creationism (YEC) is a conspiracy theory that claims the age of the Earth is younger than its measured age of 4.54 billion years, and is instead around 6,000 to 10,000 years old. Christians, Muslims and Jews who adhere to young Earth creationism (creationists), often believe that the Abrahamic God created Earth and its lifeforms in six literal days through supernatural powers as in the Genesis creation story. The most widespread version is based on the religious belief in the inerrancy of the Bible and the creation story. Since the creation story is said to be perfect and without any errors, some interpretation of the Book of Genesis is taken to be literally true, even to the point of science denial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Old Earth creationism</span> Form of creationism

Old Earth Creationism (OEC) is an umbrella of theological views encompassing certain varieties of creationism which may or can include day-age creationism, gap creationism, progressive creationism, and sometimes theistic evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theistic evolution</span> Views that religion is compatible with science

Theistic evolution, alternatively called evolutionary creationism, is a view that God acts and creates through laws of nature. Here, God is taken as the primary cause while natural causes are secondary, positing that the concept of God and religious beliefs are compatible with the findings of modern science, including evolution. Theistic evolution is not in itself a scientific theory, but includes a range of views about how science relates to religious beliefs and the extent to which God intervenes. It rejects the strict creationist doctrines of special creation, but can include beliefs such as creation of the human soul. Modern theistic evolution accepts the general scientific consensus on the age of the Earth, the age of the universe, the Big Bang, the origin of the Solar System, the origin of life, and evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive creationism</span> Belief that God created life gradually

Progressive creationism is the religious belief that God created new forms of life gradually over a period of hundreds of millions of years. As a form of old Earth creationism, it accepts mainstream geological and cosmological estimates for the age of the Earth, some tenets of biology such as microevolution as well as archaeology to make its case. In this view creation occurred in rapid bursts in which all "kinds" of plants and animals appear in stages lasting millions of years. The bursts are followed by periods of stasis or equilibrium to accommodate new arrivals. These bursts represent instances of God creating new types of organisms by divine intervention. As viewed from the archaeological record, progressive creationism holds that "species do not gradually appear by the steady transformation of its ancestors; [but] appear all at once and "fully formed."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rejection of evolution by religious groups</span> Religious rejection of evolution

Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th century, evolution by natural selection has been established by the scientific community as an empirical scientific fact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of creationism</span>

The history of creationism relates to the history of thought based on the premise that the natural universe had a beginning, and came into being supernaturally. The term creationism in its broad sense covers a wide range of views and interpretations, and was not in common use before the late 19th century. Throughout recorded history, many people have viewed the universe as a created entity. Many ancient historical accounts from around the world refer to or imply a creation of the earth and universe. Although specific historical understandings of creationism have used varying degrees of empirical, spiritual and/or philosophical investigations, they are all based on the view that the universe was created. The Genesis creation narrative has provided a basic framework for Jewish and Christian epistemological understandings of how the universe came into being – through the divine intervention of the god, Yahweh. Historically, literal interpretations of this narrative were more dominant than allegorical ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry M. Morris</span> American young Earth creationist, Christian apologist and engineer

Henry Madison Morris was an American young Earth creationist, Christian apologist and engineer. He was one of the founders of the Creation Research Society and the Institute for Creation Research. He is considered by many to be "the father of modern creation science". He coauthored The Genesis Flood with John C. Whitcomb in 1961.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pre-Adamite</span> Belief that humans existed before the biblical character Adam

The pre-Adamite hypothesis or pre-Adamism is the theological belief that humans existed before the biblical character Adam. Pre-Adamism is therefore distinct from the conventional Abrahamic belief that Adam was the first human. "Pre-Adamite" is used as a term, both for those humans believed to exist before Adam, and for believers or proponents of this hypothesis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Evolution and the Catholic Church</span> Attitude of the Catholic Church to evolution theory

The Catholic Church holds no official position on the theory of creation or evolution, leaving the specifics of either theistic evolution or literal creationism to the individual within certain parameters established by the Church. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, any believer may accept either literal or special creation within the period of an actual six-day, twenty-four-hour period, or they may accept the belief that the earth evolved over time under the guidance of God. Catholicism holds that God initiated and continued the process of his creation, that Adam and Eve were real people, and that all humans, whether specially created or evolved, have and have always had specially created souls for each individual.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jewish views on evolution</span> Jewish views on biological evolution

Jewish views on evolution includes a continuum of views about the theory of evolution, experimental evolution, the origin of life, the age of the universe, and theistic evolution. Today, many Jewish people accept the theory of evolution and do not see it as incompatible with traditional Judaism, reflecting the emphasis of prominent rabbis such as the Vilna Gaon and Maimonides on the ethical rather than factual significance of scripture.

Polygenism is a theory of human origins which posits the view that the human races are of different origins (polygenesis). This view is opposite to the idea of monogenism, which posits a single origin of humanity. Modern scientific views find little merit in any polygenic model due to an increased understanding of speciation in a human context, with the monogenic "Out of Africa" hypothesis and its variants being the most widely accepted models for human origins. Polygenism has historically been heavily used in service of white supremacist ideas and practices, denying a common origin between European and non-European peoples. It can be distinguished between Biblical polygenism, describing a Pre-Adamite or Co-Adamite origin of certain races in the context of the Genesis narrative of Adam and Eve, and scientific polygenism, attempting to find a taxonomic basis for ideas of racial science.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adam</span> First man according to the Abrahamic creation and religions such as Judaism, Christianity and Islam

Adam is the name given in Genesis 1–5 to the first human. Adam is the first human-being aware of God, and features as such in various belief systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerry Coyne</span> American biologist

Jerry Allen Coyne is an American biologist and skeptic known for his work on speciation and his commentary on intelligent design. A professor emeritus at the University of Chicago in the Department of Ecology and Evolution, he has published numerous papers on the theory of evolution. His concentration is speciation and ecological and evolutionary genetics, particularly as they involve the fruit fly, Drosophila. In 2023 he became a fellow with the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adam and Eve</span> First man and woman in Abrahamic creation myth

Adam and Eve, according to the creation myth of the Abrahamic religions, were the first man and woman. They are central to the belief that humanity is in essence a single family, with everyone descended from a single pair of original ancestors. They also provide the basis for the doctrines of the fall of man and original sin, which are important beliefs in Christianity, although not held in Judaism or Islam.

<i>Why Darwin Matters</i> 2006 book by Michael Shermer

Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design is a 2006 book by Michael Shermer, an author, publisher, and historian of science. Shermer examines the theory of evolution and the arguments presented against it. He demonstrates that the theory is very robust and is based on a convergence of evidence from a number of different branches of science. The attacks against it are, for the most part, very simplistic and easily demolished. He discusses how evolution and other branches of science can coexist with religious beliefs. He describes how he and Darwin both started out as creationists and how their thinking changed over time. He examines current attitudes towards evolution and science in general. He finds that in many cases the problem people have is not with the facts about evolution but with their ideas of what it implies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Creationist museum</span> Facility that hosts exhibits to present a young Earth creationist view

A creationist museum is a facility that hosts exhibits which use the established natural history museum format to present a young Earth creationist view that the Earth and life on Earth were created some 6,000 to 10,000 years ago in six days. These facilities generally promote pseudoscientific biblical literalist creationism and contest evolutionary science. Their claims are dismissed by the scientific community.

Although biological evolution has been vocally opposed by some religious groups, many other groups accept the scientific position, sometimes with additions to allow for theological considerations. The positions of such groups are described by terms including "theistic evolution", "theistic evolutionism" or "evolutionary creation". Of all the religious groups included on the chart, Buddhists are the most accepting of evolution. Theistic evolutionists believe that there is a God, that God is the creator of the material universe and all life within, and that biological evolution is a natural process within that creation. Evolution, according to this view, is simply a tool that God employed to develop human life. According to the American Scientific Affiliation, a Christian organization of scientists:

A theory of theistic evolution (TE) — also called evolutionary creation — proposes that God's method of creation was to cleverly design a universe in which everything would naturally evolve. Usually the "evolution" in "theistic evolution" means Total Evolution — astronomical evolution and geological evolution plus chemical evolution and biological evolution — but it can refer only to biological evolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">S. Joshua Swamidass</span> American academic

S. Joshua Swamidass is an American computational biologist, physician, academic, and author. He is an associate professor of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine, and a Faculty Lead of Translational Bioinformatics in the Institute for Informatics at Washington University in St. Louis.

References

  1. "The Genealogical Adam and Eve". InterVarsity Press. June 1, 2021.
  2. Swamidass, S. Joshua (2019). The Genealogical Adam and Eve: The Surprising Science of Universal Ancestry. Illinois: InterVarsity Press. ISBN   978-1-514-00383-1.
  3. Randall, Rebecca (January 30, 2020). "What If We Don't Have to Choose Between Evolution and Adam and Eve?". Christianity Today.
  4. 1 2 Randall 2020.
  5. "Peaceful Science".
  6. Swamidass 2019, p. 10.
  7. Swamidass 2019, p. 64.
  8. Swamidass 2019, p. 99.
  9. Swamidass 2019, p. 106.
  10. Swamidass 2019, p. 176.
  11. Swamidass 2019, p. 215.
  12. Swamidass 2019, p. 221.
  13. Swamidass 2019, p. 230.
  14. Swamidass, S. Joshua (April 15, 2017). "Is There Evidence for Easter? A Scientist's List". The Veritas Forum. Archived from the original on September 16, 2017.
  15. Swamidass 2019, p. 228.
  16. Lents, Nathan H. (October 4, 2019). "Upcoming book leaves scientific possibility for existence of 'Adam and Eve'". USA Today.
  17. Swamidass 2019, p. 229.
  18. Madueme, Hans (March 2, 2020). "Evolution and Historical Adam? A Provocative But Unconvincing Attempt". The Gospel Coalition.
  19. Lents 2019.