![]() 1st ed. cover | |
Author | Ian Smith |
---|---|
Cover artist | Ian Berry (front photograph) Associated Press (back photograph) |
Language | English |
Subject | Autobiography |
Publisher | John Blake Publishing |
Publication date | June 1997 (hardback) |
Publication place | United Kingdom |
Pages | 418 |
ISBN | 1-85782-176-9 |
The Great Betrayal: The Memoirs of Ian Douglas Smith is a 1997 autobiographic apologia written by Ian Smith, focusing on his time as Prime Minister of the British self-governing colony of Southern Rhodesia, later Rhodesia. The book was republished in 2001 with the title Bitter Harvest: The Great Betrayal.
It was published by Blake Publishing in London in 1997. [1] [2] The book was controversial even prior to its publication; it was originally going to be published by HarperCollins, but they refused to publish the book unless Smith made his language less intense. They particularly took issue with describing Robert Mugabe as a terrorist, and refusing to use the name "Zimbabwe". [2] [3] He refused and the book was dropped by HarperCollins. [2] [4] The title refers to the "betrayal" by the British commonwealth. [5]
Due to a resurgence of interest in Zimbabwe due to its political and economic struggles under Mugabe, the book was republished in 2001 with the title Bitter Harvest: The Great Betrayal and the Dreadful Aftermath. [6] [7] This edition has some updates from the first. [6]
In the book, Ian Smith sought to explain the reasons why his government made its Unilateral Declaration of Independence, and how Rhodesia coped in the face of sanctions and the Rhodesian Bush War until the pressures forced him and his government to accede to the wishes of his adversaries. Smith points to the chaotic situation in Zimbabwe after 1980 as proof that he was trying to prevent Rhodesia from suffering the same fate as other majority-ruled African states. [1] Extensive portions of the book are dedicated to criticizing Robert Mugabe. [7]
The postscript of the 2001 edition begins: [8] [9]
Two years have passed since I finished writing The Great Betrayal. I think I can correctly comment: I told you so.
The book was popular with white Zimbabweans, but was largely ignored by black Zimbabweans. [10] Journalist Richard Gott said to read the book was to enter the "forgotten world" of Rhodesia, "with all its rancour and pomposity and paranoia", calling it an "excellent read" with "sharp and accurate comments" about various British politicians. Gott said that Smith "remembers everything and forgives no one". [7] Publishers Weekly called it "unrepentant" and "heavily detailed", defensive of Rhodesia and not acknowledging the gap in privilege between the two groups, but said it made some points on political pressure and the struggles faced by Zimbabwe. [5]
South African scholar Cuthbeth Tagwirei described it as "an unapologetic remembrance of Rhodesia that nevertheless concedes the existence of a Zimbabwean present that retains remnants from both Rhodesia and Britain before it." [11] Samuel M. Makinda was critical of the work, saying Smith demonstrated a lack of awareness of the consequences of his actions, though said "It is, perhaps, unreasonable to call this book 'disappointing,' since that would suggest that one had higher expectations." He called the title a misnomer as Smith had actually written of several "great betrayals", with a "list of enemies [that] rivals that of former U.S. president Richard Nixon". Makinda further noted the affair surrounding the book as capturing "the essence of Ian Smith—bitter, stubborn, and unrepentant." [2]
Astrid Rasch compared it to the memoir of black nationalist Zimbabwean politician Joshua Nkomo, Nkomo: The Story of My Life , saying both were written "against the backdrop of accusations against them of subversive or even illegal activities". She argues both employed self-defensive strategies and portrayed themselves as "incapable of treason". [6] The book continues to have popularity with conservatives who view it as evidence of the negative effects of multiculturalism. [6]