The People's Parliament

Last updated

The People's Parliament is a Channel 4 programme in which 90-100 randomly selected citizens, sitting in a mockup of the House of Commons of the United Kingdom, debated and voted on controversial issues. [1] [2] [3] Each programme started with a motion that was then debated by a proposer and witnesses for each side, setting out the facts behind the issues and the arguments for and against the motion. Its parliamentary procedures were under the control of Lesley Riddoch who acted as its "Speaker". [4] The participants hearing debate and voted on motions were called "Members of the People's Parliament" (MPPs) and selected to be representative of society. They made their own speeches, examined expert witnesses, and set up their own "Select committees".

Contents

It was first broadcast at 7 pm on 30 July 1994 with a programme that deliberated the motion that "Persistent young offenders between the ages of 12 and 14 should be locked up." [5] The programme has been described as "an attempt to 're-empower' the disenfranchised electorate and explore the way in which a representative sample of people would respond to extended deliberation of difficult issues." [2]

Format

Each episode started with a motion and an initial vote was taken (for, against and abstentions). Then speeches for, and against were made. There was also some initial debate by the MPPs. Then the MPPs were next presented with the recorded deliberations of a 'Select Committee' that presented evidence on the complexities of the issue from experts. After this, in the chamber of the People's Parliament, MPPs make responses to what they have heard. Finally, there is another vote that lets the viewer see how the arguments changed the views of the MPPs who also were about to comment about how they influenced them. [2]

The People's Parliament was shot in the House of Commons set at Granada studios in Manchester. The MPPs were selected from around Manchester and the North of England. It copied many of the aspects of Westminster in terms of the names given to the host "Madam Speaker" and participants, "MPPs". There was a set of Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice and a tinsel Ceremonial Mace. The MPPs were not paid for appearing through they received £20 to cover "transport costs". A late-night follow up phone-in programme was also sometimes transmitted. There were a pilot and five series. [2] [3]

Deliberative democracy

The show was initiated by Peter Weil and produced by Barraclough Carey Productions. [6] The idea of the programme came from James S. Fishkin (a consultant also to the programme) and his theories upon deliberative democracy. This is a form of direct democracy adapted for modern nation states. Direct democracy was found in Classical Greece and in some Swiss Cantons but is unsuitable for modern states due to population numbers. [7] According to Fiskin statistical sampling can recreate the advantages of direct democracy in reflecting the views of the entire citizen body by the use of random sampling to create deliberative assemblies that reflect society in miniature. [7] Though opinion polls engage in random sampling they measure only instant opinions, not those that people form after hearing different sides of an argument over an issue. The People's Parliament was an attempt to create such a deliberative parliament that reflected by random sampling the diversity of informed opinion of all citizens. [7]

Programmes

Pilot

A pilot was made in 1993 and broadcast on 14 November: "Benefits should only be paid for the first child born to a single parent and they should not get priority housing". Michael McKay from Liverpool, was chosen, to introduce the motion to the House, for subsequent debate. A young man, who was very articulate and passionate in his delivery of the proposal. This was later supported by comments made by the editor of the show Peter Weil. Michael went on to appear in the first twelve episodes, leaving the programme after the first series had been completed. [6]

First series 1994

30 July 'Persistent young offenders between the ages of 12 and 14 should be locked up.' FOR: Ch Supt John Potts, Police Superintendents' Association, AGAINST Prof Norman Tutt, executive director of Social Information Systems, Cheshire. [5]

6 August 'Britain should prohibit the sale of military equipment to all countries which use arms for internal repression'. FOR: Nathalia Berkowitz, AGAINST John Kershaw, lecturer and member of the pro-defence British Atlantic Committee. Motion Approved. [8]

13 August 'Non-essential vehicles should be banned from city centres' FOR: Rolf Monheim, Professor in Applied Urban Geography, Bayreuth University, AGAINST: Rosemary Graham, public policy and communications manager of the Royal Automobile Club. [9]

20 August "Recess"

27 August 'Britain should legalise all hard and soft drugs' FOR Miles Celic AGAINST: Stella Beardsmore. OPPOSED. (28 Yes, 44 No) [10]

3 September 'Workers in the essential services should not have the right to strike.' FOR: Ira Chapllin, Institute of Directors, AGAINST : Roger Poole, of the health and local government union, Unison. On eve of the Trades Union Congress. (motion lost by 23 to 53) [11] [12]

10 September 'Fertility treatment should be available on the NHS to everyone over 18'. FOR: Zoe Conway. Opposer: Elizabeth Leech. AGAINST. (For: 48 Against: 21) [13]

17 September 'Councils should have the power to set up their own police forces'. For: Margaret Mervis, Wandsworth Council's housing chairwoman; AGAINST Fred Broughton, chairman-elect of the Police Federation of England and Wales. (rejected by 42 to 31 votes) [14] [15]

24 September 'Able-bodied people who have been out of work for more than 6 months should be made to work for the community.' [16]

1 October 'Corporal punishment should be brought back in state schools' Special edition in which 80 young people debate the motion. Proposer Wesley Soller, Opposer Helena Davies, REJECTED. [17]

8 October 'Northern Ireland should be part of a united Ireland and not the United Kingdom' SUPPORTED. [18] [19]


Comments

Kenneth Wright, in the Glasgow Herald wrote of the first programme that it:

struck hell into my heart from its earliest tidings; set as it was in a slavish mock-up of the House of Commons ... To be sure, there were many present who were deeply in love with the sound of their own voices, a fair scattering of career dingbats, and two or three who looked suspiciously capable of becoming real, hectoring, righteous, boring MPs themselves one day; yet on the whole they were disappointingly non-fanatical and well-meaning. ... Lesley Riddoch, as Madam Speaker, handled the mob with wit and charm ("One singer, one song") only rarely giving the tiniest hint of the impatience that people who are paid to have opinions naturally feel for the amateur competition. [20]

The Economist of 17 September 1994 noted that "many viewers of the "People's Parliament" have judged its debates to be of higher quality than those in the House of Commons. Members of the former, unlike the latter, appear to listen to what their fellows say." [1]

Lesley Riddoch, noted that:

The Mother of Parliaments is also overwhelmingly male, white, able-bodied, middle-class, and university educated. The people are generally not. That awareness of the unrepresentative nature of Parliament, together with recent allegations of sleaze, has switched a lot of the public off parliamentary politics. ... Now whether The People's Parliament manages to be more animated, more passionate and more open-minded than the other place on the Thames remains to be seen. As their Speaker, I'm obviously biased. But as a journalist, I'm also fascinated by the desire of many people to believe this whole escapade can become more than just another TV series. [21]

Simon Hoggart in a Parliamentary sketch in the Guardian upon a debate in the House of Commons observed that:

For a moment the session began to sound like one of the appalling 'People's Parliaments' on Channel Four in which members of the public contemplate the issue of juvenile custodial sentences in terms of how their car radio got nicked, and how we should take a tip from Singapore where you get flogged for leaving chewing gum under a bus seat. The People's Parliament is a quick reminder that the real one might not be so bad after all. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Direct democracy</span> Form of democracy

Direct democracy or pure democracy is a form of democracy in which the electorate decides on policy initiatives without elected representatives as proxies. This differs from the majority of currently established democracies, which are representative democracies. The theory and practice of direct democracy and participation as its common characteristic constituted the core of the work of many theorists, philosophers, politicians, and social critics, among whom the most important are Jean-Jacques Rousseau, John Stuart Mill, and G.D.H. Cole.

Deliberative democracy or discursive democracy is a form of democracy in which deliberation is central to decision-making. Deliberative democracy seeks quality over quantity by limiting decision-makers to a smaller but more representative sample of the population that is given the time and resources to focus on one issue.

Participatory democracy, participant democracy, participative democracy, or semi-direct democracy is a form of government in which citizens participate individually and directly in political decisions and policies that affect their lives, rather than through elected representatives. Elements of direct and representative democracy are combined in this model.

An opinion poll, often simply referred to as a survey or a poll, is a human research survey of public opinion from a particular sample. Opinion polls are usually designed to represent the opinions of a population by conducting a series of questions and then extrapolating generalities in ratio or within confidence intervals. A person who conducts polls is referred to as a pollster.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1979 Scottish devolution referendum</span> Post-legislative referendum

A post-legislative referendum was held in Scotland in 1979 to decide whether there was a sufficient support for a Scottish Assembly proposed in the Scotland Act 1978 among the Scottish electorate. This was an act to create a devolved deliberative assembly for Scotland. A majority (51.6%) of voters supported the proposal, but an amendment to the Act stipulated that it would be repealed if less than 40% of the total electorate voted in favour. As there was a turnout of 64% the "Yes" vote represented only 32.9% of the registered electorate, and the act was subsequently repealed.

A deliberative opinion poll, sometimes called a deliberative poll, is a form of opinion poll taken before and after significant deliberation. Professor James S. Fishkin of Stanford University first described the concept in 1988. The typical deliberative opinion poll takes a random, representative sample of citizens and engages them in deliberation on current issues or proposed policy changes through small-group discussions and conversations with competing experts to create more informed and reflective public opinion. Deliberative polls have been run around the world, including recent experiments to conduct discussions virtually in the United States, Hong Kong, Chile, Canada and Japan.

Psychology Beyond Borders (PBB) is an international non-profit organisation focused on the research and treatment of the mental and community health impacts of terrorism and natural disasters. It was created by Issues Deliberation Australia/America (IDA), an international non-partisan public policy and political psychology think tank, in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James S. Fishkin</span> American political scientist and communications scholar

James S. Fishkin is an American political scientist and communications scholar. He holds the Janet M. Peck Chair in International Communication in the Department of Communication at Stanford University, where he serves as a professor of communication and, by courtesy, political science. He also acts as the director of Stanford’s Deliberative Democracy Lab. Fishkin is widely cited for his work on deliberative democracy, with his proposition of Deliberative Polling in 1988 being particularly influential. Together with Robert Luskin, Fishkin's work has led to over 100 deliberative polls in 28 countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Public consultation</span> Process to get public input

Public consultation, public comment, or simply consultation, is a process by which members of the public are asked for input on public issues. This can occur in public meetings open to all in written form, as well as in deliberative groups. Surveys and deliberative groups can be conducted with self-selected citizens or with statistically representative samples of the population which enables the identification of majority opinion. Its main goals are to improve public involvement and influence, as well as the transparency and efficiency of government projects, laws, or regulations.

Radical democracy is a type of democracy that advocates the radical extension of equality and liberty. Radical democracy is concerned with a radical extension of equality and freedom, following the idea that democracy is an unfinished, inclusive, continuous and reflexive process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open Media</span> British television production company

Open Media is a British television production company, best known for the discussion series After Dark, described in the national press as "the most original programme on television".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sortition</span> Selection of decision-makers by random sample

In governance, sortition is the selection of public officials or jurors at random, i.e. by lottery, in order to obtain a representative sample.

Power 2010 was a campaign to reform the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gombojavyn Zandanshatar</span> Mongolian politician

Gombojav Zandanshatar is a Mongolian politician. He is a member of the Mongolian People's Party, and served as Party General Secretary from 2012 to 2013. Zandanshatar currently serves as Mongolian President's chief of staff.

A citizens' assembly is a group of people selected by lottery from the general population to deliberate on important public questions so as to exert an influence. Other types of deliberative mini-publics include citizens' jury, citizens' panel, people's panel, people's jury, policy jury, consensus conference and citizens' convention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Representative democracy in Singapore</span> Democratic system used in Singapore national elections

Singapore has a multi-party parliamentary system of representative democracy in which the President of Singapore is the head of state and the Prime Minister of Singapore is the head of government. Executive power is vested in the President and the Cabinet. Cabinet has the general direction and control of the government and is collectively responsible to the Parliament. There are three separate branches of government: the legislature, executive and judiciary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Citizens Convention for Climate</span> French citizens assembly looking at reducing emissions

The Citizens Convention for Climate is a citizens' assembly held in 2019 and 2020 which discussed reducing France's carbon emissions by 40% from its 1990 levels in a spirit of social justice. It was initiated in response to the Yellow Vest protests to the fuel tax. The convention was modeled after a number of other deliberative experiments known as deliberative mini-publics. The members of the convention were 150 randomly selected citizens designed to be representative of the French public across six demographic dimensions: gender, age, socio-economic background, education level, location type, and province. The convention was assisted by a number of committees including the governance committee, a team of experts who provided organizational guidance and assistance, a guarantor college, which maintained the convention's independence, and a legal board. The members themselves divided into working groups on five issues within the topic of climate change: food, housing, employment, transportation, and consumption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">America in One Room</span> 2019 deliberative polling event; the largest representative sample in American history

America in One Room was a 2019 event that assembled the largest representative sample of the American voting electorate in history to discuss polarizing political issues. It utilized a method called deliberative polling, led by Stanford Professors James Fishkin and Larry Diamond of the Center for Deliberative Democracy. The event was funded and operated by Helena, an organization that implements projects to address global challenges.

The Global Assembly is a global citizens' assembly consisting of one hundred persons from around the world chosen by sortition to discuss issues facing the world as a whole, starting with climate change. It is a joint initiative of several bodies including the Iswe FoundationArchived 2024-06-06 at the Wayback Machine, Danish Board of Technology, and the Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance at the University of Canberra and has multiple funders including the Scottish Government and the European Climate Foundation and is supported by the United Nations. On 30 October 2021, the Assembly produced the first statement that has any claim to democratically represent the voice of humanity in the form of an interim statement.

Mongolia's Law on Deliberative Polling is a law that codified the deliberative polling process into Mongolian law. It was ratified on February 9, 2017. It requires deliberative polling on potential amendments to the Mongolian Constitution before they are considered by parliament. It is the first ever instance of a country incorporating deliberative polling into its national law.

References

  1. 1 2 Back to the polis: direct democracy. The Economist, 17 September 1994.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Taylor, I. (1994). Of the people, by the people, for the people. The Independent, Thursday 29 July
  3. 1 2 BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT
  4. ↑ Riddoch, L. (1994). An uplifting experience. The Herald (Glasgow), 30 August 1994.
  5. 1 2 SHOULD YOUNG OFFENDERS BE LOCKED UP? The Observer, page 22, 24 July 1994
  6. 1 2 BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT 14/11/93
  7. 1 2 3 Fishkin, J.S.(1995). The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. Yale University Press. ISBN   978-0-300-07255-6
  8. ↑ THE PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: SHOULD BRITAIN ARM OPPRESSIVE REGIMES? The Observer, 7 August 1994.
  9. ↑ THE PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: SHOULD THE WHEEL TURN FULL CIRCLE?/ SPARE THE CAR, SAVE THE CITY CENTRE. The Observer, 7 August 1994. p. 18.
  10. ↑ PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: BRITAIN SHOULD LEGALISE HARD AND SOFT DRUGS BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT
  11. ↑ DEBATE: THE PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: SHOULD WE BAN STRIKES IN KEY SERVICES? The Observer, 28 August 1994, p. 18.
  12. ↑ PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: WORKERS IN ESSENTIAL INDUSTRIES SHOULD NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO STRIKE BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT
  13. ↑ PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: IT'S EVERY WOMAN'S RIGHT TO HAVE A CHILD BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT
  14. ↑ THE PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: SHOULD COUNCILS HAVE THEIR OWN POLICE? HE OBSERVER NEWS PAGE; p. 20 11 September 1994
  15. ↑ PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: COUNCILS SHOULD HAVE THE POWER TO SET UP THEIR OWN POLICE FORCE BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT
  16. ↑ ABLE-BODIED PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN OUT OF WORK FOR MORE THAN 6 MONTHS SHOULD BE MADE TO WORK FOR THE COMMUNITY BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT
  17. ↑ CORPORAL PUNISHMENT SHOULD BE BROUGHT BACK INTO STATE SCHOOL S BFI | Film & TV Database | The PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT
  18. ↑ THE PEOPLE'S PARLIAMENT: SHOULD THE TWO IRELANDS BE UNITED? The Observer 2 October 1994 LEADER PAGE; p. 24
  19. ↑ NEWS IN BRIEF: ULSTER VOTE The Observer 9 October 1994 p. 5
  20. ↑ Wright, K. Vital Spark still glows. The Herald (Glasgow) 6 August 1994. p. 13
  21. ↑ Sitting a bit too comfortably. The Herald (Glasgow). 2 August 1994. p. 11
  22. ↑ Hoggart S. TORY MPS LAUNCH CRACKDOWN ON LORDS CRUSTIES: Sketch. Guardian (London) 20 October 1994. p. 6
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.