| The Tidelands Case | |
|---|---|
| Original jurisdiction Decided June 23, 1947 | |
| Full case name | United States v. California |
| Citations | 332 U.S. 19 ( more ) |
| Outcome | |
| California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and the Federal Government, rather than the State, has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including oil. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Per curiam | |
United States v. California, 332 U.S. 19(1947), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that California is not the owner of the three-mile marginal belt along its coast, and the Federal Government, rather than the State, has paramount rights in and power over that belt, an incident to which is full dominion over the resources of the soil under that water area, including oil. [1] [2] The case was better known in its time as The Tidelands Case, although this was a misnomer because it did not involve tidelands. [2]
| | This section is empty. You can help by adding to it. (October 2025) |
| | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (October 2025) |
The Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 23, 1947. [1]
On October 27, 1947, the Supreme Court entered a final decree addressing the entitlement of the United States and the State of California to lands, minerals, and other natural resources underlying the Pacific Ocean offshore of California. United States v. California, 332 U.S. 804 (1947). On January 31, 1966, the Supreme Court entered a supplemental decree redefining the federal-state boundary pursuant to the Submerged Lands Act. 382 U.S. 448 (1966). Between 1977 and 1981, the Supreme Court issued three additional supplemental decrees further delineating particular portions of the federal-state boundary. 432 U.S. 40 (1977); 439 U.S. 30 (1978); 449 U.S. 408 (1981). The Supreme Court issued another supplemental decree in 2014. [3]
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain .